Home Codes and coding: Sebeok's zoosemiotics and the dismantling of the fixed-code fallacy
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Codes and coding: Sebeok's zoosemiotics and the dismantling of the fixed-code fallacy

  • Paul Cobley

    Paul Cobley (b. 1963) is a professor at Middlesex University 〈p.cobley@mdx.ac.uk〉. His research interests include semiotics, communication theory, the work of Thomas A. Sebeok, and narrative. His publications include Narrative (2nd edn., 2013); Communication theories (4 vols., 2006); The Routledge companion to semiotics (2009); and Realism for the twenty-first century: A John Deely reader (2009).

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 15, 2014

Abstract

The concept of code has a long and varied history across the sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities. In the interdisciplinary field of biosemiotics it has been foundational through the idea of code duality (Hoffmeyer and Emmeche 1991); yet it has not been free from controversy and questions of definition (see, for example, Barbieri 2010). One reason why code has been so central to modern semiotics is not simply a matter of the linguistic heritage of semiology and the work of Jakobson who straddled both semiology and semiotics. Rather, it has been the programmatic reconceptualization of code that is woven through the work of modern semiotics' founder, the father of both biosemiotics and zoosemiotics, Thomas A. Sebeok. A biologist manqué, a communication theorist influenced by cybernetics, and a semiotician deriving from the “major tradition” of Peirce, arguably Sebeok's most systematic considerations of code were offered in his essays on zoosemiotics, largely from his 1963 coining of the term onwards. The present article principally revisits the 1972 collection of Sebeok's zoosemiotic essays and suggests that his particular observations in respect of analogue and digital codes and their relation to evolution in the world of animals harbors an opportunity to rethink and potentially resolve, through an ethological lens, current controversies regarding the status of code.

About the author

Paul Cobley

Paul Cobley (b. 1963) is a professor at Middlesex University 〈p.cobley@mdx.ac.uk〉. His research interests include semiotics, communication theory, the work of Thomas A. Sebeok, and narrative. His publications include Narrative (2nd edn., 2013); Communication theories (4 vols., 2006); The Routledge companion to semiotics (2009); and Realism for the twenty-first century: A John Deely reader (2009).

Published Online: 2014-2-15
Published in Print: 2014-2-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2013-0100/html
Scroll to top button