Home An effective approach to synthesize carbon nanotube-reinforced Al matrix composite precursor
Article Open Access

An effective approach to synthesize carbon nanotube-reinforced Al matrix composite precursor

  • Sandeep Alanka , Chanamala Ratnam and Balla Srinivasa Prasad
Published/Copyright: October 17, 2017

Abstract

Aluminum-based nanocomposites reinforced with carbon nanotubes have increased scientific attention in today’s life. The dispersion quality was the critical aspect, which decides the homogeneous distribution of CNTs within the Al matrix as starting precursors. In this study, a new attempt has been made to obtain a uniformly dispersed Al-0.75% CNT precursor via combining ultra-sonication, cubic tumbler rod milling, and spray drying. This process was integrated with organic deflocculant (formulator) in specific proportion to transform as a semi-wet-based route. The effect of milling media on the morphology and interface structure of the as-produced composite precursor after all the processing steps was investigated through scanning electron microscope (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, Raman spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The results reveal that the approach is effective in CNT dispersion in Al precursor, which shields the nanotube structure from damage for longer periods of milling time due to the organic formulator mixture, and also, the CNT retention in the Al precursor with minimum clustering is identified compared to the ball milling process. Carbon traces were confirmed in the as-produced composite precursor by this approach.

1 Introduction

Composite material contains a matrix with one or more distributed phases. To obtain the desired properties compared with performance limitation of monolithic materials, it created a remarkable expansion from sports racket to space rocket and became an essential part of today’s industries. In fact, most of the industries widely uses aluminum (Al)-based composite with their tailored properties, i.e. high specific strength, specific modulus, etc., to reach the advance developments [1], [2]. The proposed carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as ideal reinforcements for Al-based composites due to the ultra-high strength, ultra-high Young’s modulus, high thermal conductivity, weight reduction, and large aspect ratio for structural and functional applications [3], [4] have created an amount of scientific attention toward Al matrix nanocomposites. It was discussed that incorporation of the CNTs with metal or alloys exhibits the ~1-Tpa elastic modulus, ~150-Gpa tensile strength, and excellent electrical and thermal conductivities (~6000 W/m-K) with low CTE (CTE≈0) [5], [6], [7], [8].

However, a few major challenges in the field of the Al-CNT composite are clustering and agglomeration of the CNTs due to their attractive van der Waals interaction and H-bonds. As a result, it is difficult to obtain the homogeneous dispersion of the CNTs in the Al matrix. The CNT-Al contact interface is also crucial, resulting in the deterioration of composites properties and lack of suitable fabrication technique [9]. To overcome these challenges, various techniques have been suggested such as powder metallurgy [10], [11], [12], [13], thermal spraying [14], [15], [16], and nanoscale dispersion [17]. Among these, powder metallurgy appears to be promising techniques owing to its simplicity, flexibility, and controllability [14], [18]. One of the common bottleneck in powder metallurgy is the CNTs’ dispersion in starting Al powders, which is usually done by mechanical alloying/ball milling [10], [19] that affects the tubular damage, CNTs’ distribution in the final Al-CNT composite product, and incorporating sufficient amount of CNTs in the Al matrix [3]. Until now, studies have reported on dispersing CNTs throughout the Al matrix powders either by dry powder blending or wet slurry blending leading to heterogeneous behavior due to size, shape, and morphology of used CNTs and Al powders [9]. Liu et al. [4] employed a high-energy mechanical alloying in a planetary ball mill as dry powder blending to disperse Al-0.5 wt. % CNT with 1.8 wt. % process control agent at a speed of 300 rpm using a ball to powder ratio of 8:1 for a milling time of 2–12 h; however, better interfacial bonding is achieved after 6 h of milling, but the milling time extended from 8 to 12 h resulting in damage to the CNTs and destruction of their tubular structure. A similar case by Perez-Bustamante et al. [20] has been observed after 30 h of milling with transmission electron microscopy (TEM). At the same time, Esawi and EI Borady [21] confirmed that numerous CNT clusters were seen on the surface of the Al particles blended with X wt. % CNT (X=0.5, 1, and 2) prepared by low-energy mechanical alloying in a Turbula mixer at a rotary speed of 46 rpm, which leads to the ruin of the overall properties of the composites. Recently, the CNTs blended in solution are quite difficult to be absorbed on the Al powder surface due to the weak attractive force between the CNTs and Al, resulting in their ζ potential incompatibility, and weak Al-CNT bonding might result in agglomerates during dispersion in the slurry-based processes according to Chen et al. [22]. Simoes et al. [3] investigated the influence of the dispersion technique of the CNTs in producing Al matrix nanocomposites by three different routes. Among the three routes, the author has observed that the third route (R3) achieves better dispersion by ultra-sonication and mixing at 15–60 min. As a result, nanocomposites of 0.75 wt. % of CNT exhibits well-dispersed and embedded nanotubes with higher hardness and tensile strength. Therefore, it appears to be a problem to produce Al-CNT’s starting powder by ball milling/wet slurry-based process, which was not satisfactory as an effect of prolonged milling time, tubular damage, Al-CNT’s poor wettability, strong agglomeration of CNTs, and homogeneous dispersion of CNTs. In fact, the effective way to disperse the CNTs within the Al powder can be deeply affected by milling media and chemical modification of the surface of the Al powder. The organic agent on the wall of the CNTs is also discussed in this article.

The aim of the present research is to develop a new approach in processing an Al-0.75 wt. % multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) composite with proper initiated steps of organic deflocculant (semi-wet state) to bind the starting powders via cubic tumbler rod mill (CTRM) (Orchid Scientifics, India) that can retain the CNTs in the Al matrix in their position, whereas it minimizes the structural damage and achieve a better dispersion of the CNTs in the nanocomposite.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

The procedure for the suggested approach of processing the Al-CNT starting precursor is shown in Figure 1. First, a precursor was prepared by combining ultra-sonication, CTRM, and spray dry with the objective of dispersing Al-0.75 wt. % MWCNT composite in which MWCNTs are better distributed in the Al matrix. This precursor consists of gas-atomized Al powder with a size ~40 μm, purity 99.7%, produced by Otto Chemie Pvt Ltd, India, selected as the matrix constituent; CVD-grown MWCNTs of 20–30 nm OD, 10–30 μm length, purity >95%, supplied by Cheaptubes Inc, USA, as the reinforcement; and other organic deflocculants such as polyvinyl butyral (PVB), poly ethylene glycol (PEG; M.W. 300), and N,N-ethylene bis-stearamide (NN-EBS) supplied by Otto Chemie Pvt Ltd, India. Surface functionalization of the nanotubes was not done due to changes in the CNT structure [23].

Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the processing procedure for Al- MWCNT composites.
Figure 1:

Schematic illustration of the processing procedure for Al- MWCNT composites.

2.2 Methodology

Initially, 150 ml of isopropanol with the addition of 0.75 g of MWCNT was poured into a 500-ml glass beaker, which was then kept within ultrasonic bath (Cintex Industrial Corporation, India) and sonicated for 4 h to split entangled CNTs into individual tubes by frequency stir (power: 500 W, frequency: 20 kHz). Meanwhile, 10 ml of isopropanol was added to 99.25 g of Al powder in a cubic rod tumbler (Orchid Scientifics, India), milled for 20 min at a speed of 100 rpm to make a flowable or fairly fluid system, which can easily be shaped and breaks down the agglomerates. The organic formulator was prepared separately with the grouping of 1 g of PVB as a binder, 0.5 g of PEG as a plasticizer, and 0.5 g of NN-EBS as a lubricant (organic mixture) added into the as-produced Al slurry, again milled for another 40 min at a speed of 80–100 rpm to produce Al-2 wt. % organic formulator, which chemically modifies the surface of the Al powder and have the tendency to anchor and align MWCNT on the boundaries of Al particles.

Later, the as-prepared MWCNT suspension slurry was poured into the Al-2 wt. % organic formulator (semi-wet state) for further milling using CTRM for 6 h at a speed of 100 rpm to disperse the MWCNT in the Al matrix powder. The CTRM consists of an agitator between the cubical chambers, which prevents the CNT to agglomerate by imparting Al-CNTs onto the walls of the blender as well as the agitator while going through the milling process, helping in the better dispersion of the composite mixture and retaining the MWCNT and Al particles in the actual state. Finally, the as-blended Al-CNT composite powder was spray dried at ≤200°C inlet air temperature for 30 min to evaporate the solvent and burn out the organic formulator from the Al-0.75 wt. % MWCNT composite precursor. Then, the final Al-CNT composite precursor was further investigated for the study.

2.3 Characterization

The morphology of the final Al-CNT composite precursors was characterized using a JEOL (Japan), JSM-6610LV scanning electron microscope (SEM) operated at voltage of 10–20 kV to analyze the various samples under different magnifications. The microstructure of the raw CNT was investigated using a JEOL (Japan), JEM-2100 high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) at an acceleration voltage of 200 keV. The TEM samples were prepared by focused ion beam (FIB) in a JEOL (Japan) JEM 9320-FIB microscope operated at 30 kV and 25 mA. On the other hand, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the powders were carried out in a PanAlytical X-Pert PRO diffractometer, Netherlands, with Cu Kα radiation (λ=1.5406 Å) operated at a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 35 mA in the 2θ range of 5–90°. XRD was used to find new phases produced during the different stages of synthesizing bulk specimens. The structural integrity of CNTs in the composites in various processes was characterized by Raman spectroscopy (Laser Micro Raman System) Horiba Jobin Vyon (Japan), LabRam HR. Finally, IR Prestige-21, Shimadzu (Japan), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was used for analyzing the surface functional groups on the MWCNT.

3 Results and discussion

The morphology of the as-received Al powders is shown in Figure 2A, B. In Figure 2A, it is clear that the shapes of the as-received Al particles are asymmetrical, which is helpful in the anchoring of MWCNTs onto the surface of the Al particles. Also, under high magnification, the Al particles that are observed in Figure 2B have surfaces that are smooth having the advantage of better compaction and simplification of the particle friction as well as the die wall friction. Figure 3A, B shows the morphology of the as-received MWCNTs, with long tubular structure and diameter, which has the tendency to produce clusters and agglomerate and then curved and entangled CNTs as proclaimed by Simoes et al. [3]. The image of the high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) shows the multi-walls, which represent the MWCNTs as shown in Figure 3B. It is likely to view the presence of 26 walls, and the average inner diameter of the CNT is measured as 3.4±1 nm. From the TEM observations, the average outer diameter of the raw CNTs was measured as 24.11±4 nm, respectively.

Figure 2: SEM images of (A) as-received Al powder at 20 μm; (B) under the magnification of 10 μm.
Figure 2:

SEM images of (A) as-received Al powder at 20 μm; (B) under the magnification of 10 μm.

Figure 3: (A) TEM images of as-received MWCNTs at 50 nm; (B) high-resolution TEM image of MWCNT screening multi-walls.
Figure 3:

(A) TEM images of as-received MWCNTs at 50 nm; (B) high-resolution TEM image of MWCNT screening multi-walls.

The dispersion of the CNT using high-energy ball milling was confirmed to be unsuccessful because longer periods of time, excessive cold weld, and decrease in length, damage the CNT structure [20]. Simoes et al. [23] prefer isopropanol as a solvent to CNT to avoid the structural changes, which may be effected by ethanol. Instead, an ultra-sonicator was used as an effective way to disperse the CNT agglomerate for 4 h and to untangle the CNT. Figure 4A shows the SEM image of Al-0.75 wt. % of MWCNT composite powder produced by CTRM via adding 2 wt. % of organic formulator mixture. It is seen that micro-sized Al powder was agglomerated due to the binding phenomenon of the organic formulator and fine powders. The as-blended mixture still overlapped and entangled together with the remaining surfactant as shown in Figure 4A and formed irregular particles that are harmful to die-filling, compaction, and pore-filling processes during sintering. To overcome this difficulty, Figure 4B shows that the composite powder was spray dried for 30 min to remove the organic deflocculant from the micro-sized Al powder and retains the MWCNT on the surface of the Al walls. Minimal agglomerations of the MWCNTs are found in the Al matrix; as a result, distribution of the MWCNTs in the Al matrix was achieved. It is obvious that the long tubular structured MWCNTs were individually dispersed on the Al particle, and the smooth Al particle surface was retained without any change in the particle size. This was processed by CTRM as shown in Figure 4C, D. This confirmed that the MWCNTs and Al maintain their original nature, i.e. size, shape, and morphology in the as- produced Al-0.75 wt. % MWCNT composite powder by selecting the suitable milling media [24], [25]. Cintas et al. [26] investigated the effect of milling media on the properties of mechanically milled Al powder by employing two different types of milling balls, i.e. tungsten carbide and steel, which results in the contaminated powder by WC and Co, coming from the milling balls and no remarkable change in the properties.

Figure 4: SEM image of (A) Al-0.75 wt. % MWCNT-2 wt. % organic formulator mixture produced by CTRM; (B) spray dried for 30 min, (C, D) as-produced Al-0.75 wt. % MWCNT composite powder.
Figure 4:

SEM image of (A) Al-0.75 wt. % MWCNT-2 wt. % organic formulator mixture produced by CTRM; (B) spray dried for 30 min, (C, D) as-produced Al-0.75 wt. % MWCNT composite powder.

Figure 5A–C shows the SEM micrographs of the 0.75 wt. % of CNT/Al with organic formulator mixture after various tumbling time from 2 h to 6 h, and Figure 5D–F shows the magnified SEM micrographs of the white line region in (A–C), respectively. As noticed, the minimal CNT agglomerations were found in the SEM images in Figure 5, which are bound by white dotted regions due to the used 2 wt. % of organic formulator, and the CNTs that seemed to be embedded in the Al matrix were also found in the image by the continuous cubic rod tumbling process at an average speed. The morphology of the 0.75 wt. % of CNTs/Al precursors shows that the CNT bundles float on the Al powder surface with an absorbing surfactant (organic formulator) when the cubic rod tumbler milling time increases to 6 h. These bundles are observed for a longer duration of milling due to the precursor’s continuous impact on the wall surface of the cubic tumbler and rods. The CNTs dispersed on the surface of the flattened Al powder are shown in Figure 5D–F. With further increases in the cubic rod tumbler time to 6 h, it is found that no cold weld is formed on the surfaces. The author noticed that the non-welding of the particles was identified while milling in the CTRM. From these results, it is evident that the effective dispersion approach for the starting precursors to obtain the CNTs implanted in the Al grains is essential to transfer the load and enhances the mechanical properties. The starting precursors are further warm compacted and sintered to achieve the imaginable properties of the Al/MWCNT composite.

Figure 5: SEM micrographs of 0.75 wt. % of CNT/Al with organic formulator for (A) 2 h, (B) 4 h, (C) 6 h from (D), (E), (F) with the magnified image of the white line region in (A–C) respectively.
Figure 5:

SEM micrographs of 0.75 wt. % of CNT/Al with organic formulator for (A) 2 h, (B) 4 h, (C) 6 h from (D), (E), (F) with the magnified image of the white line region in (A–C) respectively.

Figure 6 shows the XRD scan of the raw MWCNT, pure Al powder, and as-produced Al-0.75% MWCNT composite powder at 6 h of milling. It is evident that the MWCNTs show a carbon peak at an angle 2θ=25.75° corresponding to the (002) plane spacing=0.345 nm. Similar XRD peaks were observed in both the pure Al powder and as-produced Al-0.75% MWCNT composite powder with the Al peak at an angle 2θ=38.457°, 38.494° corresponding to the (111) planes, and carbon traces are found in the Al-CNT composite powder having no peaks due to the low detection range of the XRD and small quantity (0.75%) of the MWCNT in the composite. The crystal size of the Al powder and CTRM composite powder was analyzed using the Scherrer equation [27]:

Figure 6: XRD scan of raw MWCNT, pure Al powder, and as-produced Al-0.75% MWCNT composite precursor at 6 h of milling.
Figure 6:

XRD scan of raw MWCNT, pure Al powder, and as-produced Al-0.75% MWCNT composite precursor at 6 h of milling.

(1)D=0.94λβg(2θ)cos(θ)

where βg (2θ) is the breadth at half maximum intensity of the peak (excluded instrumental broadening), λ is the wavelength of the X-ray radiation, θ is the corresponding Bragg’s angle, and D is the average crystal size. The calculated crystal sizes for the Al powder and Al-0.75% MWCNT composite powder are 19.970 μm and 7.988 μm, respectively. This conveys that the change in the crystal size after 6 h of milling in the CTRM can result in good bonding between the Al-CNT particles, enhancing the powder compaction and density in the composite material.

To characterize the change in crystal structure of the CNTs, the Raman spectra was used in the studies [2], [22]. The peaks at 1348 cm−1 and 1578 cm−1 correspond to the D-band (defect) and G-band (graphite), respectively. The relative intensity between the two peaks (ID/IG) is identified to obtain data about the internal quality of the CNTs. The maximum value of ID/IG proposed a higher defect density in the CNTs. Figure 6 shows the Raman analysis of the as-received MWCNT processed with the CTRM at 2 h, 4 h and 6 h with CNT content of 0.75 wt. %. The ID/IG value of the as-received MWCNT was 1.170. Blending for 2 h showed the same nearer value, and it revealed a minor CNT change of the dispersion process by agitators. Still, the ID/IG value was increased, respectively, to 1.173–1.181 of the 0.75 wt. % CNTs for 2-h blending, 4-h blending and 6-h blending, which gives the evidence of minimal CNT change in structure by this process. In Figure 7, it is identified that the G-band peak shifts occur due to impacting stress in the CNTs by blending in the CTRM continuously for 6 h at moderate speed, where the CNTs impacted over the walls of the cubic surface as well as the agitators present in between the tumbler. It was also noted that the 4-h blending of the CNTs showed no peak shift in the G-band because the organic formulator (1 g of PVB as a binder, 0.5 g of PEG as a plasticizer, and 0.5 g of NN-EBS as a lubricant) acted like a buffer to reduce the impact of the agitators on the CNTs. Consequently, from the evidence on the morphology surface (Figure 4A) and the CNT structure, it suggested that a uniform dispersion of the CNTs with a large aspect ratio and a minimal structure change in the CNTs were obtained in the Al through this technique.

Figure 7: Raman analysis of as-received MWCNT (0.75 wt. %) processed with CTRM at 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h.
Figure 7:

Raman analysis of as-received MWCNT (0.75 wt. %) processed with CTRM at 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h.

The functionalization of the Al powder with a mixture of the organic formulator demonstrated by the FTIR spectrum in this study, the enhancement in mixing with Al@2 wt. % organic formulator by grouping of 1 g of PVB as a binder, 0.5 g of PEG as a plasticizer, and 0.5 g of NN-EBS as a lubricant (organic mixture) added into the as- produced Al slurry powder over the untreated Al may be explained in terms of the surface structural changes reinforced by the organic formulator treatment [28]. As shown in Figure 8, the FTIR spectrum of the Al@2 wt. % organic formulator shows many additional bands compared to that of the untreated Al. The absorption band at 2847.8 cm−1 and 2916.2 cm−1 indicates a sp3 hybridized C–H stretching vibration. The band at 1558.7 cm−1 corresponds to the C–H stretch and bend vibrations, originating from the organic formulator-modified Al surface. The band at 1635.4 cm−1 indicates the presence of a carbonyl group (C=O). The bands at 3300.6 cm−1 and 3419.3 cm−1 are assigned to the O–H stretch and bend vibrations of the organic formulator, respectively; the band at 1063.9 cm−1 is related to the C–O stretch vibration, a characteristic of the organic formulator. Thus, the FTIR analysis confirms that the Al surface was coated with the organic formulator membrane, and also, the organic formulator membrane contains a high density of carbonyl groups (C=O).

Figure 8: FTIR spectrum of the Al powder with a mixture of organic formulator.
Figure 8:

FTIR spectrum of the Al powder with a mixture of organic formulator.

Compared with the high-energy ball milling and low-energy ball milling processes [4], [21], the present cubic tumbler rod milling process was simple and easy to use as making a starting precursor of the Al/CNT composites, as it combined the two surface functionalizations on the Al and CNTs into one gathering. The 2 wt. % of organic formulator in the cubic tumbler rod milling, more of a function in decreasing the attractive force between the CNTs, decreased the impacting force of the CNTs on the rod and wall of the cube, and it also acted as a surfactant to help produce the Al powder. Therefore, the CNT dispersion can be formed on the Al flattened surface with a larger length and a minimal tubular damage than the balling milling process. Although the CRTM stuck the CNTs onto the Al surface, the process is also helpful to leave surfactants to the solution from the CNTs by the spray drying technique. As a result, a small amount of surfactant (organic formulator) in the CNT-Al powder mixture was found (Figure 4A, B). However, to eliminate the remaining surfactants (organic formulator), hot air spray drying was needed for 30 min in this process. Therefore, these features made the cubic tumbler rod milling process simple and effective to obtain a CNT dispersion with a large aspect ratio and minimum CNT damages, which was interesting among the present dispersion methods.

4 Conclusion

In summary, the Al-0.75 wt. % CNT starting precursor was successfully synthesized by the cubic tumbler rod milling and spray drying approach by combining the organic formulator mixture, i.e. 1% PVB as a binder, 0.5% PEG as a plasticizer, and 0.5% NN-EBS as a lubricant. The successful functionalization of the Al powder and the MWCNTs with a mixture of organic formulator was proven by the Raman and FTIR spectrum. The interface of the Al-CNT precursor was clearly identified by the SEM results, and a few of the CNT clusters are observed on the walls of the Al matrix using this approach. Moreover, individual CNTs were incorporated in the Al matrix after 6 h of milling time, which appear to give minimal structural damage by maintaining the proper steps in using the organic deflocculant to bind the starting powders followed by an effective approach to obtain the untangled CNTs with a large aspect ratio. The SEM images and XRD analysis confirm that the CNTs were retained and dispersed uniformly in the as-produced composite precursor. Nevertheless, the Al-CNT starting precursor, using this approach, is subject to continuing various investigations by the authors for developing a high load transfer strengthening in the CNT/Al composites and good improvements in the metal matrix composites reinforced with CNTs.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge the technical support provided by the Centre for Advanced Materials and Processing (CAM & P) in the Central Research Laboratory at the GITAM University and Advanced Analytical Laboratory at the Andhra University. The authors also express their sincere gratitude to Prof. V. Srinivas, Department of Mechanical Engineering, GITAM Institute of Technology, GITAM University, for his support and encouragement.

References

[1] Agarwal A, Bakshi SR, Lahiri D. Carbon Nanotubes Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, Florida, 2010.10.1179/095066009X12572530170543Search in Google Scholar

[2] Peng T, Chang I. J. Powtec. 2015, 284, 32–39.10.1016/j.powtec.2015.06.039Search in Google Scholar

[3] Simoes S, Viana F, Reis MAL, Vieira MF. J Compstruct. 2014, 108, 992–1000.10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.043Search in Google Scholar

[4] Liu ZY, Xu SJ, Xiao BL, Xue P, Wang WG, Ma ZY. J. Composite A 2012, 43, 2161–2168.10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.07.026Search in Google Scholar

[5] Esawi AMK, Mohmoud M. Farag. J. Matdes. 2007, 28, 2394–2401.10.1016/j.matdes.2006.09.022Search in Google Scholar

[6] Liu YM, Sung Y, Chen YC, Lin CT, Chou YH, Ger MD. Sol. Stat. Lett. 2007, 10, 101–104.10.1149/1.2749416Search in Google Scholar

[7] Che J, Cagin T, Goddard WA. Nanotechnology 2000, 11, 65–69.10.1088/0957-4484/11/2/305Search in Google Scholar

[8] Berber S, Kwon YK, Tomanek D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 4613–4616.10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4613Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ostovan F, Matori KA, Toozandehjani M, Oskoueian A, Yousoff HM, Yunus R, Ariff AHM, Quah HJ, Lim WF. J. Matchemphys. 2015, 166, 160–166.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.09.041Search in Google Scholar

[10] He C, Zhao N, Shi C, Du X, Li J, Li H, Cui Q. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 1128–1132.10.1002/adma.200601381Search in Google Scholar

[11] Zhong R, Cong H, Hou P. Carbon 2003, 41, 848–851.10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00427-XSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Kwon H, Estili M, Takagi K, Miyazaki T, Kawasaki A. Carbon 2009, 47, 570–577.10.1016/j.carbon.2008.10.041Search in Google Scholar

[13] Choi HJ, Kwon GB, Lee GY, Bae DH. Scr. Mater. 2008, 59, 360–363.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.006Search in Google Scholar

[14] Bakshi SR, Singh V, Seal S, Agarwal A. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2009, 203, 1544–1554.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.12.004Search in Google Scholar

[15] Laha T, Liu Y, Agarwal A. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2007, 7, 515–524.10.1166/jnn.2007.114Search in Google Scholar

[16] Bakshi SR, Singh V, Balani K, McCartney DG, Seal S, Agarwal A. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2008, 202, 5162–5169.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.05.042Search in Google Scholar

[17] Noguchi T, Magario A, Fukuzawa S, Shimizu S, Beppu J, Seki M. Mater. Trans. 2004, 45, 602–604.10.2320/matertrans.45.602Search in Google Scholar

[18] Bakshi SR, Lahiri D, Agarwal A. Int. Mater. Rev. 2010, 55, 41–64.10.1179/095066009X12572530170543Search in Google Scholar

[19] Perez-Bustamante R, Gomez-Esparza CD, Estrada-Guel I, Miki-Yoshida M, Licea-Jimenez L, Perez-Garcia SA, Martinez-Sanchez R. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009, 502, 159–163.10.1016/j.msea.2008.10.047Search in Google Scholar

[20] Perez-Bustamante R, Perez-Bustamante F, Estrada-Guel I, Santillan-Rodriguez CR, Matutes-Aquino JA, Herrera-Ramirez JM, Miki-Yoshida M, Martinez-Sanchez R. J. Powtec. 2011, 212, 390–396.10.1016/j.powtec.2011.06.007Search in Google Scholar

[21] Esawi AMK, EI Borady MA. Comput. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68, 486–492.10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.030Search in Google Scholar

[22] Chen B, Li S, Imai H, Jia L, Umeda J, Takahashi M, Kondoh K. J. Matdes. 2015, 72, 1–8.10.1016/j.matdes.2015.02.003Search in Google Scholar

[23] Simoes S, Viana F, Reis MAL, Vieira MF. J. Compstruct. 2015, 126, 114–122.10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.062Search in Google Scholar

[24] Suryanarayana C. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2001, 46(1–2), 1–184.10.1016/S0079-6425(99)00010-9Search in Google Scholar

[25] El-Eskandarany MS, Aoki K, Suzuki K. J. Less Common Metals 1990, 167, 113–118.10.1016/0022-5088(90)90295-USearch in Google Scholar

[26] Cintas J, Montes JM, Cuevas FG, Herrera EJ. J. Mater. Sci. 2005, 40, 3911–3915.10.1007/s10853-005-0756-ySearch in Google Scholar

[27] Choi HJ, Shin JH, Bae DH. Compos. Part A 2012, 43, 1061–1072.10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.008Search in Google Scholar

[28] Shanefield DJ, Organic Additives and Ceramic Processing: With Applications in Powder Metallurgy, Ink, and Paint, Springer Science+Business Media: New York, 1995.10.1007/978-1-4757-6103-0Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-07-03
Accepted: 2017-09-02
Published Online: 2017-10-17
Published in Print: 2018-09-25

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Progress in the research and applications of natural fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites
  4. Original articles
  5. Damage assessment of random multiwalled carbon nanotube-reinforced polymer nanocomposites
  6. A variational approach for predicting initiation of matrix cracking and induced delamination in symmetric composite laminates under in-plane loading
  7. Processing-structure-property correlations of in situ Al/TiB2 composites processed by aluminothermic reduction process
  8. Interface transition layer interaction mechanism for ZTAP/HCCI composites
  9. Mechanical and electrical properties of polylactic acid/carbon nanotube composites by rolling process
  10. Development of hydroxyapatite-polylactic acid composite bone fixation plate
  11. Dielectric and thermal properties of magnesium oxide/poly(aryl ether ketone) nanocomposites
  12. A sustainable approach to optimum utilization of used foundry sand in concrete
  13. Improving flame-retardant, thermal, and mechanical properties of an epoxy using halogen-free fillers
  14. Optimization of the PDMS/biochar nanocomposite membranes using the response surface methodology
  15. Preparation and characterization of low-cost high-performance mullite-quartz ceramic proppants for coal bed methane wells
  16. Experimental investigation and analysis on the wear properties of glass fiber and CNT reinforced hybrid polymer composites
  17. Preparation of polyaniline-polyvinyl alcohol-silver nanocomposite and characterization of its mechanical and antibacterial properties
  18. An effective approach to synthesize carbon nanotube-reinforced Al matrix composite precursor
  19. Effect of oxygen plasma treatment on tensile strength of date palm fibers and their interfacial adhesion with epoxy matrix
  20. A novel characterization method of fiber reinforced polymers with clustered microstructures for time dependent mass transfer
  21. Stress relaxation behavior of annealed aluminum-carbon nanotube composite
  22. Restrained shrinkage cracking of self-consolidating concrete roads
  23. The effective ellipsoid: a method for calculating the permittivity of composites with multilayer ellipsoids
Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/secm-2017-0229/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button