Home A Panoramic View of Trust in the Time of Digital Automated Decision Making – Failings of Trust in the Post Office and the Tax Authorities
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A Panoramic View of Trust in the Time of Digital Automated Decision Making – Failings of Trust in the Post Office and the Tax Authorities

  • Esther Oluffa Pedersen EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 31, 2024

Abstract

The ongoing Post Office scandal in the UK and the 2021 Child Daycare Benefit Scandal in the Netherlands make up exemplary cases of how digital automation has changed and in fact severely harmed trust relations ranging from trust in oneself over trust in social roles, trust in institutions, trust in technology and general trust. By looking closer at how digital automation in these cases generated ruptures in the lives of ordinary citizens and also affected the involved institutions and society at large I discuss how we may begin to discuss the impact of digitalization on trust in societies. I start with an introduction to the panoramic view of trust, followed by a short description of the two scandals. Based on the exploration of the two cases I take an ex post facto perspective on the dynamic social events as they unfolded in the scandals in order to analyze how the introduction of digital automation tools affected trust relations. I draw attention to some of the most noticeable changes in the four relations of trust, which is trust in institutions, interpersonal trust, trust in oneself and trust in technology.


Corresponding author: Esther Oluffa Pedersen, Department of Communication and Arts, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark, E-mail:

References

Baier, Annette. 1986. “Trust and Anti-Trust.” Ethics 96 (2): 231–60. https://doi.org/10.1086/292745.Search in Google Scholar

Barrett, Richard, Claire Bazy Malaurie, Eirik Holmøyvik, and Jasna Omejec. 2021. On the Legal Protection of Citizens, European Commission for Democracy Through Law, Strasbourg, 18.10.2021 CDL-AD(2021)031, 1–28. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Search in Google Scholar

Bekkum, Marvin, Borgesius, and Z. Frederik. 2021. “Digital Welfare Fraud Detection and the Dutch SyRI Judgment.” European Journal of Social Security 23 (4): 323–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627211031257.Search in Google Scholar

CBS. 2018a. Centraal Bereau voor de Statestiek (trust in European Countries 2018). https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/figures/detail/80518ENG?q=keyword:institutional%20confidence#shortTableDescription (Retrieved March 2024).Search in Google Scholar

CBS. 2018b. Centraal Bereau voor de Statestiek (Internet; toegang, gebruik en faciliteiten; 2012–2019. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/cijfers/detail/83429NED (Retrieved March 2024).Search in Google Scholar

FengerMenno, and Robin Simonse. 2023. “The Implosion of the Dutch Surveillance Welfare State.” Social Policy and Administration 2024: 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12998.Search in Google Scholar

Flinders, Karl. 2024. “Post Office Horizon Scandal Explained: Everything You Need to Know.” Computer Weekly 2024: 1–22.Search in Google Scholar

Foley, Richard. 2001. Intellectual Trust in Oneself and Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498923Search in Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold. 1963. “A Conception of, and Experiments with, ’Trust’ as a Condition of Stable Concerted Actions.” In Motivation and Social Interaction: Cognitive Determinants, edited by O. J. Harvey, 187–238. New York.Search in Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Indentity, Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grimen, Harald. 2009. “Power, Trust, and Risk.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 23 (1): 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1387.2009.01035.x.Search in Google Scholar

Growns, Bethany, Jeff Kukucka, Richard Moorhead, and Rebecca Helm. 2023. “The Post Office Scandal in the United Kingdom: Mental Health and Social Experience of Wrongly Convicted and Wrongly Accused Individuals.” Legal Criminal Psychology 29: 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/icrp.12247.Search in Google Scholar

Henley, Jon. 2021. “Dutch Government Resigns over Child Benefits Scandal.” In: The Guardian. London: Guardian Media Group.Search in Google Scholar

Human Impact Hearings. 2022. https://www.postofficehorizoninquiry.org.uk/hearings/listing?hearing_type=81&witness=All (Retrieved March 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Hummel, Brun, Mara Yerkes, and Michèlle Bal. 2023. “‘Unprecedented Injustice’: Digitalisation and the Perceived Accessibility of Childcare Benefits.” Journal of Social Policy: 1–2. (Retrieved March 2024). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279423000521.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Karen. 1996. “Trust as an Affective Attitude.” Ethics 107 (1): 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/233694.Search in Google Scholar

Konaté, Salama, and Brunilda Pali. 2023. “‘You Have to Talk with Us, Not About Us’: Exploring the Harms and Wrongful Accusation on Those Affected in the Case of the Dutch ‘Childcare-Benefit Scandal.” Artículo, Journal of Victimology 16: 139–64.Search in Google Scholar

Kruif, Irene, 2023, “Compensatie Ouders Toeslagenaffaire Kan Zomaar Tot 20230 Duren”, NOS. https://nos.nl/nieuwsuur/artikel/2460354-compensatie-ouders-toeslagenaffaire-kan-zomaar-tot-2030-duren (Retrieved March 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Ladkin, Peter Bernard. 2020. “Robustness of Software.” Digital Evidence and Electronic Law Review 17: 17–24.10.14296/deeslr.v17i0.5171Search in Google Scholar

Ladkin, Peter Bernard, Bev Littlewood, Harold Thimbleby, and Martyn Thomas. 2020. “The Law Commission Presumption Concerning the Dependability of Computer Evidence.” Digital Evidence and Electronic Law Review 17: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14296/deeslr.v17i0.5143.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Larry, and Adela McMurray. 2022. Corporate Fraud Across the Globe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-981-19-3667-8Search in Google Scholar

Moore, James H. 1985. “What Is Computer Ethics?” Metaphilosophy 16 (4): 266–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00173.x.Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, C. Thi, 2022, “Trust as an Unquestioning Attitude”. In Oxford Studies in Epistemology Volume 7, Oxford Studies in Epistemology, online edn, edited by S. G. Tamar, J. Hawthorne, and J. Chung, Oxford: Oxford Academic, (Retrieved March 2024).10.1093/oso/9780192868978.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

NTA. 2024. The Netherlands Tax Administration, Privacy and your personal Data. (Retrieved March 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Pedersen, Esther Oluffa. 2010. “A Two-Level Theory of Trust.” Balkan Journal of Philosophy 1: 47–59.10.5840/bjp20102115Search in Google Scholar

Pedersen, Esther Oluffa. 2015. “An Outline of Interpersonal Trust and Distrust.” In Anthropology & Philosophy: Dialogues on Trust and Hope, edited by Pedersen Liisberg, 104–17. Dalsgaard, London: Berghahn Books.10.1515/9781782385578-013Search in Google Scholar

Peeters, Rik & Widlak, Arjan C., 2023 “Administrative Exclusion in the Infrastructure-Level Bureaucracy: The Case of the Dutch Daycare Benefit Scandal.” Public Administration Review, 83: 863-77, https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13615.Search in Google Scholar

Pettit, Peter. 2008. “Trust, Reliance, and the Internet.” In Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Public Policy, edited by J. van den Hoven, and J. Weckert, 161–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498725.010Search in Google Scholar

Simmel, Georg. 2013 [1908]. Soziologie: Unterschungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.10.3790/978-3-428-53725-9Search in Google Scholar

Thomson, Rebecca. 2009. “Postmasters under Stress.” Computer Weekly 2009: 10–5.Search in Google Scholar

Unprecedented Injustice. 2020. Report of the Childcare Allowance Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, Strasbourg, 14.9.2021 (CDL-REF(2021)073, 1–99. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Search in Google Scholar

Wallis, Nick. 2022. “The Great Post Office Scandal.” In The Fight to Expose a Multimillion Pound IT Disaster Which Put Innocent People in Jail. Bath: Bath Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-05-16
Accepted: 2024-05-16
Published Online: 2024-05-31
Published in Print: 2024-07-26

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sats-2024-0008/html
Scroll to top button