Planetary boundary layer scheme in the INMCM Earth system model

References

[1] N. P. Arnold, Representing effects of surface heterogeneity in a multi-plume eddy diffusivity mass flux boundary layer parameterization. Geosci. Model Dev. 17 (2024), No. 12, 5041–5056.10.5194/gmd-17-5041-2024Search in Google Scholar

[2] P. Bechtold, I. Sandu, D. Klocke, et al., The role of shallow convection in ECMWF’s Integrated Forecasting System. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[3] A. K. Betts, A new convective adjustment scheme. Part I: Observational and theoretical basis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 112 (1986), No. 473, 677–691.10.1002/qj.49711247307Search in Google Scholar

[4] P. Bogenschutz, A. Gettelman, H. Morrison, et al., Unified parameterization of the planetary boundary layer and shallow convection with a higher-order turbulence closure in the Community Atmosphere Model: Single-column experiments. Geosci. Model Dev. 5 (2012), No. 6, 1407–1423.10.5194/gmd-5-1407-2012Search in Google Scholar

[5] E. Bou-Zeid, W. Anderson, G. G. Katul, et al., The persistent challenge of surface heterogeneity in boundary-layer meteorology: a review. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 177 (2020), 227–245.10.1007/s10546-020-00551-8Search in Google Scholar

[6] D. Chechin, On the u_*-U relationship in the stable atmospheric boundary layer over arctic sea ice. Atmosphere 12 (2021), No. 5, 591.10.3390/atmos12050591Search in Google Scholar

[7] P. de Vrese, J.-P. Schulz, and S. Hagemann, On the representation of heterogeneity in land–surface–atmosphere coupling. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 160 (2016), 157–183.10.1007/s10546-016-0133-1Search in Google Scholar

[8] A. V. Debolskiy, E. V. Mortikov, A. V. Glazunov, et al., Evaluation of surface layer stability functions and their extension to first order turbulent closures for weakly and strongly stratified stable boundary layer. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 187 (2023), No. 1, 73–93.10.1007/s10546-023-00784-3Search in Google Scholar

[9] S. Derbyshire, Boundary-layer decoupling over cold surfaces as a physical boundary-instability. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 90 (1999), 297–325.10.1023/A:1001710014316Search in Google Scholar

[10] J. M. Edwards, A. C. Beljaars, A. A. Holtslag, et al., Representation of boundary-layer processes in numerical weather prediction and climate models. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 177 (2020), No. 2-3, 511–539.10.1007/s10546-020-00530-zSearch in Google Scholar

[11] I. N. Esau and Ø. Byrkjedal, Application of a large-eddy simulation database to optimisation of first-order closures for neutral and stably stratified boundary layers. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 125 (2007), 207–225.10.1007/s10546-007-9213-6Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. D. Fowler, R. B. Neale, T. Waterman, et al., Assessing the atmospheric response to subgrid surface heterogeneity in the single-column community earth system model, version 2 (CESM). J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 16 (2024), No. 3, e2022MS003517.10.1029/2022MS003517Search in Google Scholar

[13] J. Garratt, J. Wilczak, A. Holtslag, et al., Commentaries on top-cited boundary-layer meteorology articles. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 177 (2020), No. 2, 169–188.10.1007/s10546-020-00563-4Search in Google Scholar

[14] A. Glazunov, E. Mortikov, and A. Debolskiy, Studies of stable stratification effect on dynamic and thermal roughness lengths of urban-type canopy using large-eddy simulation. J. Atmos. Sci. 80 (2023), No. 1, 31–48.10.1175/JAS-D-22-0044.1Search in Google Scholar

[15] V. M. Gryanik, C. Lüpkes, D. Sidorenko, et al., A universal approach for the non-iterative parametrization of near-surface turbulent fluxes in climate and weather prediction models. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 13 (2021), No. 8, e2021MS002590.10.1029/2021MS002590Search in Google Scholar

[16] J. Han, M. L. Witek, J. Teixeira, et al., Implementation in the NCEP GFS of a hybrid eddy-diffusivity mass-flux (EDMF) boundary layer parameterization with dissipative heating and modified stable boundary layer mixing. Weather Forecast. 31 (2016), No. 1, 341–352.10.1175/WAF-D-15-0053.1Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. Holtslag, G. Svensson, P. Baas, et al., Stable atmospheric boundary layers and diurnal cycles: Challenges for weather and climate models. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 94 (2013), No. 11, 1691–1706.10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00187.1Search in Google Scholar

[18] F. Jansson, G. van den Oord, I. Pelupessy, et al., Regional superparameterization in a global circulation model using large eddy simulations. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11 (2019), No. 9, 2958–2979.10.1029/2018MS001600Search in Google Scholar

[19] E. Kadantsev, E. Mortikov, A. Glazunov, et al., On dissipation time scales of the basic second-order moments: the effect on the energy and flux-budget (EFB) turbulence closure for stably stratified turbulence. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 31 (2024), No. 3, 395–408.10.5194/npg-31-395-2024Search in Google Scholar

[20] M. Kulmala, T. Kokkonen, E. Ezhova, et al., Aerosols, clusters, greenhouse gases, trace gases and boundary-layer dynamics: On feedbacks and interactions. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 186 (2023), No. 3, 475–503.10.1007/s10546-022-00769-8Search in Google Scholar

[21] J.-F. Louis, A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 17 (1979), No. 2, 187–202.10.1007/BF00117978Search in Google Scholar

[22] D. V. Mironov and P. P. Sullivan, Turbulence structure and mixing in strongly stable boundary-layer flows over thermally heterogeneous surfaces. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 187 (2023), No. 1, 371–393.10.1007/s10546-022-00766-xSearch in Google Scholar

[23] E. Mortikov, A. Glazunov, A. Debolskiy, et al., Modeling of the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy. Doklady Earth Sciences 489 (2019), 1440–1443.10.1134/S1028334X19120067Search in Google Scholar

[24] I. Sandu, A. Beljaars, P. Bechtold, et al., Why is it so difficult to represent stably stratified conditions in numerical weather prediction (NWP) models? J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 5 (2013), No. 2, 117–133.10.1002/jame.20013Search in Google Scholar

[25] Z. M. Subin, W. J. Riley, and D. Mironov, An improved lake model for climate simulations: Model structure, evaluation, and sensitivity analyses in CESM1. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 4 (2012), No. 1.10.1029/2011MS000072Search in Google Scholar

[26] V. Suiazova, A. Debolskiy, and E. Mortikov, Study of surface layer characteristics in the presence of suspended snow particles using observational data and large eddy simulation. Izv., Atmos. Oceanic. Phys. 60 (2024), No. 2, 158–167.10.1134/S000143382470021XSearch in Google Scholar

[27] H. Sundqvist, E. Berge, and J. E. Kristjánsson, Condensation and cloud parameterization studies with a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model. Mon. Weather Rev. 117 (1989), 1641–1657.10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1641:CACPSW>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[28] M. Tiedtke, Representation of clouds in large-scale models. Mon. Weather Rev. 121 (1993), No. 11, 3040–3061.10.1175/1520-0493(1993)121<3040:ROCILS>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[29] I. Troen and L. Mahrt, A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 37 (1986), No. 1, 129–148.10.1007/BF00122760Search in Google Scholar

[30] E. Volodin, Simulation of present-day climate with the INMCM60 model. Izv., Atmos. Oceanic. Phys. 59 (2023), No. 1, 16–22.10.1134/S0001433823010139Search in Google Scholar

[31] E. Volodin, E. Mortikov, S. Kostrykin, et al., Simulation of the present-day climate with the climate model INMCM5. Clim. Dyn. 49 (2017), No. 11, 3715–3734.10.1007/s00382-017-3539-7Search in Google Scholar

[32] G. V. Zasko, A. V. Glazunov, E. V. Mortikov, et al., Optimal energy growth in stably stratified turbulent couette flow. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 187 (2023), No. 1, 395–421.10.1007/s10546-022-00744-3Search in Google Scholar

[33] S. Zilitinkevich, T. Elperin, N. Kleeorin, et al., A hierarchy of energy-and flux-budget (EFB) turbulence closure models for stably-stratified geophysical flows. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 146 (2013), No. 3, 341–373.10.1007/s10546-012-9768-8Search in Google Scholar

[34] S. Zilitinkevich, E. Kadantsev, I. Repina, et al., Order out of chaos: Shifting paradigm of convective turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci. 78 (2021), No. 12, 3925–3932.10.1175/JAS-D-21-0013.1Search in Google Scholar