On the accuracy of shock-capturing schemes when calculating Cauchy problems with periodic discontinuous initial data

References

[1] F. Arandiga, A. Baeza, and R. Donat, Vector cell-average multiresolution based on Hermite interpolation. Adv. Comput. Math. 28 (2008) 1–22.10.1007/s10444-005-9007-7Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. D. Bragin, O. A. Kovyrkina, M. E. Ladonkina, V. V. Ostapenko, V. F. Tishkin, and N. A. Khandeeva, Combined numerical schemes. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 62 (2022), No. 11, 1743–1781.10.1134/S0965542522100025Search in Google Scholar

[3] S. Z. Burstein and A. A. Mirin, Third order difference methods for hyperbolic equations. J. Comput. Phys. 5 (1970), No. 3, 547–571.10.1016/0021-9991(70)90080-XSearch in Google Scholar

[4] J. Casper and M. H. Carpenter, Computational considerations for the simulation of shock-induced sound. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19 (1998), No. 3, 813–828.10.1137/S1064827595294101Search in Google Scholar

[5] B. Cockburn, An introduction to the discontinuous Galerkin method for convection-dominated problems. Lect. Notes Math. 1697 (1998) 150–268.10.1007/BFb0096353Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Dewar, A. Kurganov, and M. Leopold, Pressure-based adaption indicator for compressible Euler equations. Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equ. 31 (2015), 1844–1874.10.1002/num.21970Search in Google Scholar

[7] B. Engquist and B. Sjogreen, The convergence rate of finite difference schemes in the presence of shocks. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35 (1998), No. 6, 2464–2485.10.1137/S0036142997317584Search in Google Scholar

[8] A. Gelb and E. Tadmor, Adaptive edge detectors for piecewise smooth data based on the minmod limiter. J. Sci. Comput. 28 (2006), 279–306.10.1007/s10915-006-9088-6Search in Google Scholar

[9] S. K. Godunov, A difference scheme for numerical computation of discontinuous solution of hyperbolic equations. Mat. Sb. 47 (1959), No. 3, 271–306.Search in Google Scholar

[10] V. M. Goloviznin and A. A. Samarskii, Finite difference approximation of convective transport equation with space splitting time derivative. Matem. Mod. 10 (1998), No. 1, 86–100.Search in Google Scholar

[11] V. M. Goloviznin and A. A. Samarskii, Some characteristics of finite difference scheme ‘cabaret’. Matem. Mod. 10 (1998), No. 1, 101–116.Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. L. Guermond, R. Pasquetti, and B. Popov, Entropy viscosity method for nonlinear conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 230 (2011), 4248–4267.10.1016/j.jcp.2010.11.043Search in Google Scholar

[13] A. Harten, High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 49 (1983), 357–393.10.1016/0021-9991(83)90136-5Search in Google Scholar

[14] A. Harten, B. Engquist, S. Osher, and S. Chakravarthy, Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III. J. Comput. Phys. 71 (1987), No. 2, 231–303.10.1016/0021-9991(87)90031-3Search in Google Scholar

[15] A. Harten, S. Osher, Uniformly high-order accurate nonoscillatory schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Analys. 24 (1987), No. 2, 279–309.10.1137/0724022Search in Google Scholar

[16] J. S. Hesthaven, In: Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Computational Science & Engineering, Vol. 18. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2018.10.1137/1.9781611975109Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. Iserles, Generalized leapfrog methods. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 6 (1986), No. 4, 381–392.10.1093/imanum/6.4.381Search in Google Scholar

[18] G. S. Jiang and C.-W. Shu, Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126 (1996), 202–228.10.1006/jcph.1996.0130Search in Google Scholar

[19] S. A. Karabasov and V. M. Goloviznin, Compact accurately boundary-adjusting high-resolution technique for fluid dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 228 (2009), 7426–7451.10.1016/j.jcp.2009.06.037Search in Google Scholar

[20] O. A. Kovyrkina and V. V. Ostapenko, On monotonicity of two-layer in time cabaret scheme. Math. Models Comput. Simul. 5 (2013), No. 2, 180–189.10.1134/S2070048213020051Search in Google Scholar

[21] O. A. Kovyrkina and V. V. Ostapenko, On the practical accuracy of shock-capturing schemes. Math. Models Comput. Simul. 6 (2014), No. 2, 183–191.10.1134/S2070048214020069Search in Google Scholar

[22] O. A. Kovyrkina and V. V. Ostapenko, On the construction of combined finite-difference schemes of high accuracy. Dokl. Math. 97 (2018), No. 1, 77–81.10.1134/S1064562418010246Search in Google Scholar

[23] O. A. Kovyrkina and V. V. Ostapenko, Monotonicity of the CABARET scheme approximating a hyperbolic system of conservation laws. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 58 (2018), No. 9, 1435–1450.10.1134/S0965542518090129Search in Google Scholar

[24] O. A. Kovyrkina and V. V. Ostapenko, On accuracy of a MUSCL type scheme when calculating discontinuous solutions. Math. Models Comput. Simul. 13 (2021), No. 5, 810–819.10.1134/S2070048221050136Search in Google Scholar

[25] O. A. Kovyrkina, V. V. Ostapenko, and V. F. Tishkin, On convergence of finite-difference shock-capturing schemes in regions of shock waves influence. Dokl. Math. 105 (2022), No. 3, 171–174.10.1134/S1064562422030048Search in Google Scholar

[26] O. A. Kovyrkina, A. A. Kurganov, and V. V. Ostapenko, Comparative analysis of the accuracy of three different schemes in the calculation of shock waves. Math. Models Comput. Simul. 15 (2023), No. 3, 401–414.10.1134/S2070048223030092Search in Google Scholar

[27] A. Kurganov and E. Tadmor, New high-resolution central schemes for nonlinear conservation laws and convection–diffusion equations. J. Comput. Phys. 160 (2000), No. 1, 241–282.10.1006/jcph.2000.6459Search in Google Scholar

[28] A. Kurganov, S. Noelle, and G. Petrova, Semidiscrete central-upwind schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws and Hamilton–Jacobi equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 23 (2001), No. 3, 707–740.10.1137/S1064827500373413Search in Google Scholar

[29] M. E. Ladonkina, O. A. Neklyudova, V. V. Ostapenko, and V. F. Tishkin, On the accuracy of the discontinuous Galerkin method in calculation of shock waves. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 58 (2018), No. 8, 1344–1353.10.1134/S0965542518080122Search in Google Scholar

[30] M. E. Ladonkina, O. A. Neklyudova, V. V. Ostapenko, and V. F. Tishkin, Combined DG scheme that maintains increased accuracy in shock wave areas. Dokl. Math. 100 (2019), No. 3, 519–523.10.1134/S106456241906005XSearch in Google Scholar

[31] P. D. Lax and B. Wendroff, Systems of conservation laws. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 13 (1960), 217–237.10.1002/cpa.3160130205Search in Google Scholar

[32] B. van Leer, Toward the ultimate conservative difference scheme, V. A second-order sequel to Godunov’s method. J. Comput. Phys. 32 (1979), No. 1, 101–136.10.1016/0021-9991(79)90145-1Search in Google Scholar

[33] R. J. LeVeque, In: Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press, 2002.10.1017/CBO9780511791253Search in Google Scholar

[34] X.-D. Liu, S. Osher, and T. Chan, Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 115 (1994), No. 1, 200–212.10.1006/jcph.1994.1187Search in Google Scholar

[35] N. A. Mikhailov, The convergence order of WENO schemes behind a shock front. Math. Models. Comput. Simul. 7 (2015), No. 5, 467–474.10.1134/S2070048215050075Search in Google Scholar

[36] H. Nessyahu and E. Tadmor, Non-oscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 87 (1990), No. 2, 408–463.10.1016/0021-9991(90)90260-8Search in Google Scholar

[37] V. V. Ostapenko, Convergence of difference schemes behind a shock front. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 37 (1997), No. 10, 1161–1172.Search in Google Scholar

[38] V. V. Ostapenko and A. A. Cherevko, Application of the CABARET scheme for calculation of discontinuous solutions of the scalar conservation law with nonconvex flux. Dokl. Phys. 62 (2017), No. 10, 470–474.10.1134/S1028335817100056Search in Google Scholar

[39] V. V. Ostapenko and N. A. Khandeeva, The accuracy of finite-difference schemes calculating the interaction of shock waves. Dokl. Phys. 64 (2019), No. 4, 197–201.10.1134/S1028335819040128Search in Google Scholar

[40] V. V. Ostapenko, Construction of high order accurate shock capturing finite difference schemes for unsteady shock waves. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 40 (2000), No. 12, 1784–1800.Search in Google Scholar

[41] V. V. Rusanov, Third-order accurate shock-capturing schemes for computing discontinuous solutions. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 180 (1968), No. 6, 1303–1305.Search in Google Scholar

[42] C. W. Shu, Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. Acta Numer. 29 (2020), 701–762.10.1017/S0962492920000057Search in Google Scholar

[43] J. J. Stoker, In: Water Waves: The Mathematical Theory with Applications. Wiley-Interscience, 1957.Search in Google Scholar

[44] E. F. Toro, In: Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics: Practical Introduction. Springer-Verlag, 2009.10.1007/b79761Search in Google Scholar

[45] N. A. Zyuzina and V. V. Ostapenko, On the monotonicity of the CABARET scheme approximating a scalar conservation law with a convex flux. Dokl. Math. 93 (2016), No. 1, 69–73.10.1134/S1064562416010282Search in Google Scholar

[46] N. A. Zyuzina, O. A. Kovyrkina, and V. V. Ostapenko, Monotone finite-difference scheme preserving high accuracy in regions of shock influence. Dokl. Math. 98 (2018), No. 2, 506–510.10.1134/S1064562418060315Search in Google Scholar