Startseite Maximum cross section method in the filtering problem for continuous systems with Markovian switching
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Maximum cross section method in the filtering problem for continuous systems with Markovian switching

  • Tatyana A. Averina EMAIL logo und Konstantin A. Rybakov
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 22. Juni 2021

Abstract

New solution algorithms of optimal filtering problem are proposed for systems with random structure and continuous time. This problem consists in estimating the current state of system based on the results of measurements. The mathematical model of the system includes nonlinear stochastic differential equations whose right-hand side determines the structure of the dynamic system or mode of operation. The right-hand side may vary at random time moments. The number of structures of the system is assumed to be finite and the process of changing the structure to be Markov or conditionally Markov. The state vector of such system consists of two components, namely, a vector with real coordinates and an integer structure number. The law of change of the structure number is determined by the distribution of the random time interval between switchings with a given intensity dependent on the state of system.

MSC 2010: 65C30

Funding statement: The work was carried out within the framework of the state task of the ICM&MG SB RAS (project 0315–2019–0002).

References

[1] T. A. Averina, A randomized maximum cross-section method to simulate random structure systems with distributed transitions. Numer. Anal. Appl. 9 (2016), No. 3, 179–190.10.1134/S1995423916030010Suche in Google Scholar

[2] T. A. Averina, Statistical Modelling of Solutions to Stochastic Differential Equations and Systems with Random Structure. Siberian Branch of RAS, Novosibirsk, 2019 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

[3] T. A. Averina and K. A. Rybakov, Maximum cross section method in optimal filtering of jump-diffusion random processes. In: Proc. 15th Int. Asian School-Seminar on Optimization Problems of Complex Systems. IEEE, 2019, pp. 8–11.10.1109/OPCS.2019.8880234Suche in Google Scholar

[4] T. A. Averina and K. A. Rybakov, Using maximum cross section method for filtering jump-diffusion random processes. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling 35 (2020), No. 2, 55–67.10.1515/rnam-2020-0005Suche in Google Scholar

[5] A. Bain and D. Crisan, Fundamentals of Stochastic Filtering. Springer, 2009.10.1007/978-0-387-76896-0Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Y. Bao, C. Chiarella, and B. Kang, Particle filters for Markov-switching stochastic volatility models. In: The Oxford Handbook of Computational Economics and Finance (Eds. S.-H. Chen, M. Kaboudan, and Y.-R. Du). Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 249–266.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199844371.013.9Suche in Google Scholar

[7] V. A. Boldinov, V. A. Bukhalev, S. P. Pryadkin, and A. A. Skrynnikov, Control of the probability distribution of a system state based on its structure indicator. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 55 (2016), No. 3, 333–340.10.1134/S1064230716020039Suche in Google Scholar

[8] N. V. Chernykh and P. V. Pakshin, Numerical solution algorithms for stochastic differential systems with switching diffusion. Autom. Remote Control 74 (2013), No. 12, 2037–2063.10.1134/S0005117913120072Suche in Google Scholar

[9] J. Chevallier and S. Goutte, On the estimation of regime-switching Lévy models. Stud. Nonlinear Dyn. E. 21 (2017), No. 1, 3–29.10.1515/snde-2016-0048Suche in Google Scholar

[10] K. Chugai, I. Kosachev, and K. Rybakov, Approximate MMSE and MAP estimation using continuous-time particle filter. AIP Conf. Proc. 2181 (2019), 020001.10.1063/1.5135661Suche in Google Scholar

[11] K. N. Chugai, I. M. Kosachev, and K. A. Rybakov, Approximate filtering methods in continuous-time stochastic systems. In: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Vol. 173. Springer, 2020, pp. 351–371.10.1007/978-981-15-2600-8_24Suche in Google Scholar

[12] M. Ghosh, A. Arapostathis, and S. Marcus, Optimal control of switching diffusions with application to flexible manufacturing systems. SIAM J. Control Optim. 31 (1993), No. 5, 1183–1204.10.21236/ADA454850Suche in Google Scholar

[13] F. Karamé, A new particle filtering approach to estimate stochastic volatility models with Markov-switching. Econ. Stat. 8 (2018), No. C, 204–230.10.1016/j.ecosta.2018.05.004Suche in Google Scholar

[14] I. E. Kazakov and V. M. Artem’ev, Optimization of Dynamic Systems of Random Structure. Nauka, Moscow, 1980 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

[15] C. Kumar and T. Kumar, On explicit tamed Milstein-type scheme for stochastic differential equation with Markovian switching. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 377 (2020), 112917.10.1016/j.cam.2020.112917Suche in Google Scholar

[16] X. R. Li and V. P. Jilkov, Survey of maneuvering target tracking. Part V: Multiple-model methods. IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electronic Syst. 41 (2005), No. 4, 1255–1321.10.1109/TAES.2005.1561886Suche in Google Scholar

[17] T. Lux, Inference for nonlinear state space models: A comparison of different methods applied to Markov-switching multi-fractal models. Econ. Stat. 10 (2020).10.1016/j.ecosta.2020.03.001Suche in Google Scholar

[18] G. A. Mikhailov and T. A. Averina, The maximal section algorithm in the Monte Carlo method. Doklady Math. 80 (2009), No. 2, 671–673.10.1134/S1064562409050111Suche in Google Scholar

[19] G. A. Mikhailov and A. V. Voitishek, Numerical Statistical Modelling. Monte Carlo Methods. Publ. House Akademia, Moscow, 2006 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

[20] S. L. Nguyen, T. A. Hoang, D. T. Nguyen, and G. Yin, Milstein-type procedures for numerical solutions of stochastic differential equations with Markovian switching. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 55 (2017), No. 2, 953–979.10.1137/16M1084730Suche in Google Scholar

[21] E. A. Rudenko, Finite-dimensional recurrent algorithms for optimal nonlinear logical-dynamical filtering. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 55 (2016), No. 1, 36–58.10.1134/S1064230715060131Suche in Google Scholar

[22] O. A. Stepanov and A. S. Nosov, A map-aided navigation algorithm without preprocessing of field measurements. Gyroscopy Navig. 11 (2020), No. 2, 162–175.10.1134/S207510872002008XSuche in Google Scholar

[23] O. A. Stepanov, V. A. Vasiliev, A. B. Toropov, A. V. Loparev, and M. V. Basin, Efficiency analysis of a filtering algorithm for discrete-time linear stochastic systems with polynomial measurements. J. Franklin Inst. 356 (2019), No. 10, 5573–5591.10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.02.036Suche in Google Scholar

[24] A. P. Trifonov and Yu. S. Shinakov, Joint Discrimination of Signals and Estimation of Their Parameters against the Background of Interferences. Radio i Svyaz, Moscow, 1986 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

[25] V. A. Tupysev and Yu. A. Litvinenko, Application of polynomial-type filters to integrated navigation systems with modular architecture. In: Proc. 26th Int. Conf. on Integrated Navigation Systems. IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–4.10.23919/ICINS.2019.8769422Suche in Google Scholar

[26] M. S. Yarlykov and S. M. Yarlykova, Optimal algorithms of complex nonlinear processing of vector discrete-continuous signals. Radiotekhnika (2004), No. 7, 18–29 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-02-26
Accepted: 2021-03-23
Published Online: 2021-06-22
Published in Print: 2021-06-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 8.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/rnam-2021-0011/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen