2D turbulence closures for the barotropic jet instability simulation

References

[1] K. Alvelius, Random forcing of three-dimensional homogeneous turbulence. Physics of Fluids11 (1999), No. 7, 1880–1889.10.1063/1.870050Search in Google Scholar

[2] L. Arnold, Stochastic Differential Equations. New York, 1974.Search in Google Scholar

[3] N. Bakas and P. Ioannou, A theory for the emergence of coherent structures in beta-plane turbulence. J. Fluid Mechanics740 (2014), 312–341.10.1017/jfm.2013.663Search in Google Scholar

[4] J. Bardina, J. Ferziger, and W. Reynolds, Improved subgrid-scale models for large-eddy simulation. In: 13th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference. 1980, p. 1357.10.2514/6.1980-1357Search in Google Scholar

[5] G. Batchelor, Computation of the energy spectrum in homogeneous two-dimensional turbulence. Physics of Fluids12 (1969), No. 12, II-233-II-239.10.1063/1.1692443Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Berner, G. Shutts, M. Leutbecher, and T. Palmer, A spectral stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme and its impact on flow-dependent predictability in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. J. Atmos. Sci. 66 (2009), No. 3, 603–626.10.1175/2008JAS2677.1Search in Google Scholar

[7] F. Bouchet, Parameterization of two-dimensional turbulence using an anisotropic maximum entropy production principle (2003). arXiv:cond-mat/0305205Search in Google Scholar

[8] D. Brown, R. Cortez, and M. Minion, Accurate projection methods for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. J. Comp. Phys. 168 (2001), No. 2, 464–499.10.1006/jcph.2001.6715Search in Google Scholar

[9] J. Chasnov, Simulation of the Kolmogorov inertial subrange using an improved subgrid model. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics3 (1991), No. 1, 188–200.10.1063/1.857878Search in Google Scholar

[10] J. Deardorff, A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mechanics41 (1970), No. 2, 453–480.10.1017/S0022112070000691Search in Google Scholar

[11] V. Dymnikov and P. Perezhogin, Systems of hydrodynamic type that approximate two-dimensional ideal fluid equations. Izv. Atmos. Oceanic Phys. 54, No. 3, 232–241.10.1134/S0001433818030040Search in Google Scholar

[12] G. Flato, J. Marotzke, B. Abiodun, P. Braconnot, S. Chou, W. Collins, P. Cox, F. Driouech, S. Emori, V. Eyring, and C. Forest, Evaluation of climate models. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change5 (2013), 741–866.10.1017/CBO9781107415324.020Search in Google Scholar

[13] J. Flor, Fronts, Waves, and Vortices in Geophysical Flows. Springer 805, 2010.10.1007/978-3-642-11587-5Search in Google Scholar

[14] J. Frederiksen and A. Davies, Eddy viscosity and stochastic backscatter parameterizations on the sphere for atmospheric circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci. 54 (1997), No. 20, 2475–2492.10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<2475:EVASBP>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[15] J. Frederiksen and S. Kepert, Dynamical subgrid-scale parameterizations from direct numerical simulations. J. Atmos. Sci. 63 (2006), No. 11, 3006–3019.10.1175/JAS3795.1Search in Google Scholar

[16] J. Galewsky, R. Scott, and L. Polvani, An initial-value problem for testing numerical models of the global shallow-water equations. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography56 (2004), No. 5, 429–440.10.1111/j.1600-0870.2004.00071.xSearch in Google Scholar

[17] M. Germano, U. Piomelli, P. Moin, and W. Cabot, A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics3 (1991), No. 7, 1760–1765.10.1063/1.857955Search in Google Scholar

[18] A. Glazunov, Large-eddy simulation of turbulence with the use of a mixed dynamic localized closure: Part 1. Formulation of the problem, model description, and diagnostic numerical tests. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics45 (2009), No. 1, 5–24.10.1134/S0001433809010022Search in Google Scholar

[19] S. Griffies and R. Hallberg, Biharmonic friction with a Smagorinsky-like viscosity for use in large-scale eddy-permitting ocean models. Monthly Weather Review128 (2000), No. 8, 2935–2946.10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<2935:BFWASL>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[20] I. Grooms, Y. Lee, and A. Majda, Numerical schemes for stochastic backscatter in the inverse cascade of quasigeostrophic turbulence. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation13 (2015), No. 3, 1001–1021.10.1137/140990048Search in Google Scholar

[21] M. Jansen and I. Held, Parameterizing subgrid-scale eddy effects using energetically consistent backscatter. Ocean Modelling80 (2014), 36–48.10.1016/j.ocemod.2014.06.002Search in Google Scholar

[22] M. Jansen, I. Held, A. Adcroft, and R. Hallberg, Energy budget-based backscatter in an eddy permitting primitive equation model. Ocean Modelling, 94 (2015), 15–26.10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.015Search in Google Scholar

[23] R. Kraichnan, Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence. Physics of Fluids10 (1967), No. 7, 1417–1423.10.1063/1.1762301Search in Google Scholar

[24] C. Leith, Diffusion approximation for two-dimensional turbulence. Physics of Fluids11 (1968), No. 3, 671–672.10.1063/1.1691968Search in Google Scholar

[25] T. Lund, On the use of discrete filters for large eddy simulation. In: Annual Research Briefs. Center for Turbulence Research, NASA Ames-Stanford University. 1997, pp. 83–95.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Y. Morinishi, T. Lund, O. Vasilyev, and P. Moin, Fully conservative higher order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow. J. Comp. Phys. 143 (1998), No. 1, 90–124.10.1006/jcph.1998.5962Search in Google Scholar

[27] E. Mortikov, Application of the immersed boundary method for solving the system of Navier–Stokes equations in domains with complex geometry. Vychislitel’nye Metody i Programmirovanie11 (2010), No. 1, 32–42 (In Russian).Search in Google Scholar

[28] B. Nadiga, Orientation of eddy fluxes in geostrophic turbulence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 366 (2008), No. 1875, 2489–2508.10.1098/rsta.2008.0058Search in Google Scholar

[29] G. Nastrom and K. Gage, A climatology of atmospheric wavenumber spectra of wind and temperature observed by commercial aircraft. J. Atmos. Sci. 42 (1985), No. 9, 950–960.10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042<0950:ACOAWS>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[30] P. Perezhogin, A. Glazunov, E. Mortikov, and V. Dymnikov, Comparison of numerical advection schemes in two-dimensional turbulence simulation. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling. 32 (2017), No. 1, 47–60.10.1515/rnam-2017-0005Search in Google Scholar

[31] P. Perezhogin and V. Dymnikov, Equilibrium states of finite-dimensional approximations of a two-dimensional incompressible inviscid fluid. Nonlinear Dynamics13 (2017), No. 1, 55–79 (In Russian).10.20537/nd1701005Search in Google Scholar

[32] P. Perezhogin and V. Dymnikov, Modeling of quasi-equilibrium states of a two-dimensional ideal fluid. Doklady Physics62 (2017), No. 5, 248–252.10.1134/S1028335817050032Search in Google Scholar

[33] P. Perezhogin, A. Glazunov, and A. Gritsun, Stochastic and deterministic kinetic energy backscatter parameterizations for simulation of the two-dimensional turbulence. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling34 (2019), No. 4, 197–213.10.1515/rnam-2019-0017Search in Google Scholar

[34] P. Rhines, Waves and turbulence on a beta-plane. J. Fluid Mechanics69 (1975), No. 3, 417–443.10.1017/S0022112075001504Search in Google Scholar

[35] R. Salmon, Lectures on geophysical fluid dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.10.1093/oso/9780195108088.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[36] G. Shutts and T. Palmer, Convective forcing fluctuations in a cloud-resolving model: Relevance to the stochastic parameterization problem. J. Climate20 (2007), No. 2, 187–202.10.1175/JCLI3954.1Search in Google Scholar

[37] G. Shutts, A stochastic convective backscatter scheme for use in ensemble prediction systems. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 141 (2015), No. 692, 2602–2616.10.1002/qj.2547Search in Google Scholar

[38] J. Smagorinsky, General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic equations. Monthly Weather Review91 (1963), No. 3, 99–164.10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[39] G. Vallis, Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017.10.1017/9781107588417Search in Google Scholar

[40] P. Zurita-Gotor, I. Held, and M. Jansen, Kinetic energy-conserving hyperdiffusion can improve low resolution atmospheric models. J. Advances Modeling Earth Systems7 (2015), No. 3, 1117–1135.10.1002/2015MS000480Search in Google Scholar