Abstract
The paper addresses a numerical approach for calculating three-fluid hydrodynamics on Eulerian grids with taking into account surface tension and viscous effects. The medium considered consists of three different compressible fluids separated with interfaces. The fluids are assumed to be immiscible. The three-fluid flow is described by the reduced equilibrium model derived from the non-equilibrium three-phase model by performing an asymptotic analysis in the limit of zero relaxation time. To simulate surface tension effects, we extend the continuum surface force (CSF) model of two-fluid incompressible flow to the case of compressible three-fluid flow. A thermodynamically consistent surface energy of the compressible three-fluid flow is obtained by means of splitting the surface tension between distinct fluids into pairs of specific phase related surface tensions. Some aspects of the numerical method for solving the system of governing equations of the considered three-fluid model are discussed. Numerical results presented demonstrate the accuracy and robustness of the proposed model in simulating dynamics of interfaces and surface tension effects.
References
[1] R. Abgrall, How to prevent pressure oscillations in multicomponent flow calculations: a quasi conservative approach. J. Comp. Phys. 125 (1996), No. 1, 150–160.10.1006/jcph.1996.0085Suche in Google Scholar
[2] G. Allaire, S. Clerc, and S. Kokh, A five-equation model for the simulation of interfaces between compressible fluids. J. Comp. Phys. 181 (2002), No. 2, 577–616.10.1006/jcph.2002.7143Suche in Google Scholar
[3] M. Baer and J. Nunziato, A two-phase mixture theory for the deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) in reactive granular materials. Int. J. Multiphase Flow12 (1986), No. 6, 861–889.10.1016/0301-9322(86)90033-9Suche in Google Scholar
[4] P. Batten, N. Clarke, C. Lambert, and D. M. Causon, On the choice of wavespeeds for the HLLC Riemann solver. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 18 (1997), No. 6, 1553–1570.10.1137/S1064827593260140Suche in Google Scholar
[5] J. Brackbill, D. Kothe, and C. Zemach, A continuum method for modeling surface tension. J. Comp. Phys. 100 (1992), No. 2, 335–354.10.1016/0021-9991(92)90240-YSuche in Google Scholar
[6] B. Einfeldt, C. D. Munz, and P. L. Roe, On Godunov-type methods near low densities. J. Comp. Phys. 92 (1991), No. 2, 273–295.10.1016/0021-9991(91)90211-3Suche in Google Scholar
[7] M. B. Friess and S. Kokh, Simulation of sharp interface multi-material flows involving an arbitrary number of components through an extended five-equation model. J. Comp. Phys. 273 (2014), No. 273, 488–519.10.1016/j.jcp.2014.05.012Suche in Google Scholar
[8] J. Glimm, X. Li, Y. Liu, Z. Xu, and N. Zhao, Conservative front tracking with improved accuracy. SIAM J. Numer. Analysis41 (2003), No. 5, 1926–1947.10.1137/S0036142901388627Suche in Google Scholar
[9] S. K. Godunov, A difference method for numerical calculation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of hydrodynamics. Mat. Sb. (N.S.)47(89) (1959), No. 3, 271–306.Suche in Google Scholar
[10] D. Gueyffier, J. Li, A. Nadim, R. Scardovelli, and S. Zaleski, Volume-of-fluid interface tracking with smoothed surface stress methods for three-dimensional flows. J. Comp. Phys. 152 (1999), No. 2, 423–456.10.1006/jcph.1998.6168Suche in Google Scholar
[11] J.-M. Hérard, A three-phase flow model. Math. Comp. Modelling45 (2007), No. 5, 732–755.10.1016/j.mcm.2006.07.018Suche in Google Scholar
[12] C. Hirt, A. Amsden, and J. Cook, An arbitrary lagrangian-eulerian computing method for all flow speeds. J. Comp. Phys. 14 (1974), No. 3, 227–253.10.1016/0021-9991(74)90051-5Suche in Google Scholar
[13] A. K. Kapila, R. Menikoff, J. B. Bdzil, S. F. Son, and D. S. Stewart, Two-phase modeling of deflagration-to-detonation transition in granular materials:reduced equations. Physics of Fluids13 (2001), No. 10, 3002–3024.10.1063/1.1398042Suche in Google Scholar
[14] R. LeVeque and Z. Li, Immersed interface methods for stokes flow with elastic boundaries or surface tension. SIAM J. Sci. Comp. 18 (1997), No. 3, 709–735.10.1137/S1064827595282532Suche in Google Scholar
[15] I. Menshov and P. Zakharov, On the composite riemann problem for multi-material fluid flows, Int. J. Numer. Methods in Fluids76 (2015), No. 2, 109–127.10.1002/fld.3927Suche in Google Scholar
[16] W. Mulder, S. Osher, and J. A. Sethian, Computing interface motion in compressible gas dynamics. J. Comp. Phys. 100 (1992), No. 2, 209–228.10.1016/0021-9991(92)90229-RSuche in Google Scholar
[17] G. Perigaud and R. Saurel, A compressible flow model with capillary effects. J. Comp. Phys. 209 (2005), No. 1, 139–178.10.1016/j.jcp.2005.03.018Suche in Google Scholar
[18] K.-M. Shyue, A fluid-mixture type algorithm for compressible multicomponent flow with van der waals equation of state. J. Comp. Phys. 156 (1999), No. 1, 43–88.10.1006/jcph.1999.6349Suche in Google Scholar
[19] K. M. Shyue and F. Xiao, An eulerian interface sharpening algorithm for compressible two-phase flow: The algebraic THINC approach. J. Comp. Phys. 268 (2014), No. 2, 326–354.10.1016/j.jcp.2014.03.010Suche in Google Scholar
[20] K. Smith, F. Sons, and D. Chopp, A projection method for motion of triple junctions by level sets. Interfaces and Free Boundaries4 (2002), No. 1, 263–276.10.4171/IFB/61Suche in Google Scholar
[21] K. K. So, X. Y. Hu, and N. A. Adams, Anti-diffusion interface sharpening technique for two-phase compressible flow simulations. J. Comp. Phys. 231 (2012), No. 11, 4304–4323.10.1016/j.jcp.2012.02.013Suche in Google Scholar
[22] M. Sussman, P. Smereka, and S. Osher, A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. J. Comp. Phys. 114 (1994), No. 1, 146–159.10.1006/jcph.1994.1155Suche in Google Scholar
[23] H. Terashima and G. Tryggvason, A front-tracking/ghost-fluid method for fluid interfaces in compressible flows. J. Comp. Phys. 228 (2009), No. 11, 4012–4037.10.1016/j.jcp.2009.02.023Suche in Google Scholar
[24] A. Tiwari, J. B. Freund, and C. Pantano, A diffuse interface model with immiscibility preservation. J. Comp. Phys. 252 (2013), No. C, 290–309.10.1016/j.jcp.2013.06.021Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[25] E. F. Toro, Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg, 2009.10.1007/b79761Suche in Google Scholar
[26] F. Xiao, Y. Honma, and T. Kono, A simple algebraic interface capturing scheme using hyperbolic tangent function. Int. J. Numer. Methods in Fluids48 (2005), No. 9, 1023–1040.10.1002/fld.975Suche in Google Scholar
[27] C. Zhang and I. S. Menshov, Continuous method for calculating the transport equations for a multicomponent heterogeneous system on fixed euler grids. Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie31 (2019) No. 4, 111–130 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Determinism versus randomness in plankton dynamics: The analysis of noisy time series based on the recurrence plots
- Stochastic and deterministic kinetic energy backscatter parameterizations for simulation of the two-dimensional turbulence
- Neural networks for topology optimization
- Eulerian modelling of compressible three-fluid flows with surface tension
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Determinism versus randomness in plankton dynamics: The analysis of noisy time series based on the recurrence plots
- Stochastic and deterministic kinetic energy backscatter parameterizations for simulation of the two-dimensional turbulence
- Neural networks for topology optimization
- Eulerian modelling of compressible three-fluid flows with surface tension