Home Mathematics A nonlinear Bayesian filtering approach to estimating adaptive market effciency
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A nonlinear Bayesian filtering approach to estimating adaptive market effciency

  • Gennady Yu. Kulikov EMAIL logo , David R. Taylor and Maria V. Kulikova
Published/Copyright: February 4, 2019

Abstract

The adaptive market hypothesis (AMH) supplies a convincing motivation for why market efficiency should not be regarded as a stable property in time. This paper explores a Bayesian methodology for estimating weak-form market efficiency under the AMH using a test of evolving efficiency (TEE). More precisely, a generalized TEE (GTEE) approach is proposed in which the conditional first moment of a time series is assumed to be a nonlinear function of its conditional second moment, i.e., a nonlinear feedback term is present in the conditional mean equation. We then discuss a maximum likelihood estimation procedure for the resulting nonlinear model using the state-space approach and extended Kalman filtering. This methodology is used to estimate time-varying, weak-form market efficiency in four, specifically chosen, markets over a time-period that includes the global financial crisis of 2007/2008.

MSC 2010: 62C10; 62P20; 91B24
  1. Funding The first and third authors acknowledge the support from Portuguese National Funds through the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) within project UID/Multi/04621/2013 and the Investigador FCT 2013 programme.

References

[1] W. Abdmoulah, Testing the evolving effciency of Arab stock markets. Int. Review Financ. Analysis 19 (2010), 25–34.10.1016/j.irfa.2009.11.004Search in Google Scholar

[2] F. Black and M. Scholes, The valuation of option contracts and a test of market effciency. J. Finance 27 (1972), 399–417.10.1111/j.1540-6261.1972.tb00969.xSearch in Google Scholar

[3] F. Black and M. Scholes, The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, J. Political Economy 81 (1973), 637–654.10.1086/260062Search in Google Scholar

[4] J. Y. Campbell, A. W. Lo, and A. C. Mackinlay, The Econometrics of Financial Markets Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997.10.1515/9781400830213Search in Google Scholar

[5] R. Emerson, S. G. Hall, and A. Zalewska-Mitura, Evolving market effciency with an application to some Bulgarian shares. Econom. Planning 30 (1997), 75–90.10.1023/A:1003053807165Search in Google Scholar

[6] R. F. Engle, D. M. Lilien, and R. P. Robins, Estimating time varying risk premia in the term structure: The ARCH-M model, Econometrica (1987), 391–407.10.2307/1913242Search in Google Scholar

[7] E. F. Fama, The behavior of stock-market prices. J. Business 38 (1965), 34–105.10.1086/294743Search in Google Scholar

[8] E. F. Fama, Effcient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work, J. Finance 25 (1970), 383–417.10.2307/2325486Search in Google Scholar

[9] S. Hall and G. Urga, Testing for ongoing effciency in the Russian stock market. Emerging Markets Group, Discussion Paper 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[10] S. G. Hall, A note on the estimation of GARCH-M models using the Kalman filter. Bank of England Discussion Paper (1990).Search in Google Scholar

[11] S. G. Hall, An application of the stochastic GARCH-in-Mean model to risk premia in the London Metal Exchange, The Manchester School 59 (1991), 57–71.10.1111/j.1467-9957.1991.tb01368.xSearch in Google Scholar

[12] S. G. Hall and M. P. Taylor, Modelling risk premia in commodity forward prices: Some evidence from the London Metal Exchange. Review Futur. Markets 8 (1989), 200–217.Search in Google Scholar

[13] A. C. Harvey, Applications of the Kalman filter in econometrics. In: Advances in Econometrics, Proc. Fifth World Congress of the Econometric Society Part 1, 1987, pp. 285–313.10.1017/CCOL0521344301.008Search in Google Scholar

[14] A.C. Harvey, Forecasting Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.10.1017/CBO9781107049994Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. Ito, A. Noda, and T. Wada, International stock market effciency: a non-Bayesian time-varying model approach. Applied Economics 46 (2014), 2744–2754.10.1080/00036846.2014.909579Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. Ito, A. Noda, and T. Wada, The evolution of stock market effciency in the US: a non-Bayesian time-varying model approach. Applied Economics 48 (2016), 621–635.10.1080/00036846.2015.1083532Search in Google Scholar

[17] M. Ito and S. Sugiyama, Measuring the degree of time varying market ineffciency. Economics Letters 103 (2009), 62–64.10.1016/j.econlet.2009.01.028Search in Google Scholar

[18] K. Jefferis and G. Smith, Capitalisation and weak-form effciency in the JSE securities exchange. South African J. Econom 72 (2004), 684–707.10.1111/j.1813-6982.2004.tb00130.xSearch in Google Scholar

[19] K. Jefferis and G. Smith, The changing effciency of African stock markets. South African J. Econom 73 (2005), 54–67.10.1111/j.1813-6982.2005.00004.xSearch in Google Scholar

[20] J. H. Kim, A. Shamsuddin, and K.-P. Lim, Stock return predictability and the adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence from century-long U.S. data. J. Empirical Finance 18 (2011), 868–879.10.1016/j.jempfin.2011.08.002Search in Google Scholar

[21] X. Li, China’s evolving stock market effciency reconsidered: The Kalman filter analysis, (2001), No. 961108. URL: https://protect-za.mimecast.com/s/JhM6CBgX56fMWPV4iNrkHG10.2139/ssrn.961108Search in Google Scholar

[22] K. Lim and R. Brooks, The evolution of stock market effciency over time: A survey of the empirical literature. J. Economic Surveys 25 (2011), 69–108.10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00611.xSearch in Google Scholar

[23] A. Lo, Reconciling effcient markets with behavioral finance: The adaptive markets hypothesis. J. Investment Consulting 7 (2005), 21–44.Search in Google Scholar

[24] A. W. Lo, The adaptive markets hypothesis. J. Portfolio Management 30 (2004), 15–29.10.3905/jpm.2004.442611Search in Google Scholar

[25] B. G. Malkiel, The effcient-market hypothesis and the financial crisis. In: Rethinking Finance: Perspectives on the Crisis New York, Russel Sage Foundation, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[26] R. Merton, Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci 4 (1973), 141–183.10.2307/3003143Search in Google Scholar

[27] J. K. Self and I. Mathur, Asymmetric stationarity in national stock market indices: An MTAR analysis. J. Business 79 (2006), 3153–3174.10.1086/505252Search in Google Scholar

[28] G. Smith, The changing and relative effciency of European emerging stock markets. European J. Finance 18 (2012), 689–708.10.1080/1351847X.2011.628682Search in Google Scholar

[29] G. Smith and A. Dyakova, African stock markets: Effciency and relative predictability. South African J. Econom 82 (2014), 258–275.10.1111/saje.12009Search in Google Scholar

[30] A. Urquhart and R. Hudson, Effcient or adaptive markets? Evidence from major stock markets using very long run historic data. Int. Review Financial Analysis 28 (2013), 130–142.10.1016/j.irfa.2013.03.005Search in Google Scholar

[31] E. A. Wan and R. Van der Merwe, The unscented Kalman filter. In: Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks (Ed. S. Haykin). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2001, pp. 221–280.10.1002/0471221546.ch7Search in Google Scholar

[32] B. A. Wilcox and F. Hamano, Kalman’s expanding influence in the econometrics discipline, in: Proceedings of the 20th IFAC World Congress, Toulouse, France pp. 644–651, 2017.10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.106Search in Google Scholar

[33] D. Wójcik, N. Kreston, and S. McGill, Freshwater, saltwater and deepwater: Effcient market hypothesis versus behavioural finance, J. Economic Geography 13 (2013), 257–277.10.1093/jeg/lbs048Search in Google Scholar

[34] A. Zalewska-Mitura and S. G. Hall, Examining the first stages of market performance: A test for evolving market effciency, Economics Letters 64 (1999), 1–12.10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00074-9Search in Google Scholar

[35] J. Zhou and J. M. Lee, Adaptive market hypothesis: Evidence from the REIT market. Applied Financial Economics 23 (2013), 1649–1662.10.1080/09603107.2013.844326Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-08-19
Accepted: 2018-11-22
Published Online: 2019-02-04
Published in Print: 2019-02-25

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 15.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/rnam-2019-0003/pdf
Scroll to top button