The Limits of Behavioral Economics in Tort Law

References

Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risqué: critique des postulats et axioms de l’école Américaine. Econometrica 21: 503–546. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907921.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, G.S. (1962). Irrational behavior and economic theory. J. Polit. Econ. 70: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1086/258584.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, J. (1973). Toward an economic theory of liability. J. Leg. Stud. 2: 323–349. https://doi.org/10.1086/467501.Search in Google Scholar

Camerer, C.F. and Loewenstein, G. (2004). Behavioral economics: past, present, future. In: Camerer, C.F., Loewenstein, G., and Rabin, M. (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.10.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.6Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, L.R. (2001). The lure of the lottery. Wake For. Law Rev. 36: 705–745.Search in Google Scholar

Cooter, R. (1985). Unity in tort, contract, and property: the model of precaution. Calif. Law Rev. 73: 1–51.10.2307/3480463Search in Google Scholar

Cooter, R. and Ulen, T.S. (2012). Law and economics, 6th ed. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar

Dari-Mattiacci, G. and Mangan, B.M. (2008). Disappearing defendants versus judgment-proof injurers. Econometrica 75: 749–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00663.x.Search in Google Scholar

Dari-Mattiacci, G. and Parisi, F. (2013). Liability rules: an economic taxonomy. In: Bussani, M. and Sebok, A.J. (Eds.), Comparative tort law: global perspectives. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk ambiguity and the savage axioms. Q. J. Econ. 75: 643–669. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884324.Search in Google Scholar

Glazier, A. and Mone, T. (2019). Success of opt-in organ donation policy in the United States. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 322: 719–720. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.9187.Search in Google Scholar

Hicks, J.R. (1956). A Revision of demand theory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, C.A. (2011). A positive agenda for behavioral law and economics. Cognitive Critique 3: 85–92.Search in Google Scholar

Jolls, C. (2007). Behavioral law and economics. In: Diamond, P. and Vartiainen, H. (Eds.), Behavioral economics and its applications. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.3386/w12879Search in Google Scholar

Jolls, C., Sunstein, C.R., and Thaler, R. (1998). A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Rev. 50: 1471–1550. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229304.Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Korobkin, R. (2011). What comes after victory for behavioral law and economics? Univ. Ill. Law Rev. 2011: 1653–1674.Search in Google Scholar

Korobkin, R. and Ulen, T. (2000). Law and behavioral science: removing the rationality assumption from law and economics. Calif. Law Rev. 88: 1051–1144. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481255.Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, T.S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions, 4th ed. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Little, I.M.D. (1949). A reformulation of the theory of consumer’s behaviour. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 1: 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041063.Search in Google Scholar

Luppi, B. and Parisi, F. (2016). Optimal liability for optimistic tortfeasors. Eur. J. Law Econ. 41: 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-016-9523-6.Search in Google Scholar

Luppi, B. and Parisi, F. (2018). Behavioral models in tort law. In: Teitelbaum, J.C. and Zeiler, K. (Eds.), Research handbook on behavioral law and economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781849805681.00017Search in Google Scholar

Markham, F. and Young, M. (2015). ‘Big gambling’: the rise of the global industry-state gambling complex. Addiction Res. Theor. 23: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2014.929118.Search in Google Scholar

Pi, D. (2019). Meta-rational choice. In: Essays in law and economics, Doctoral dissertation, Available at: http://amsdottorato.unibo.it/8753/1/Pi_Daniel_tesi.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Polinsky, M.A. (1980). Strict liability vs. negligence in a market setting. Am. Econ. Rev. 70: 363–367.10.4324/9781315188133-6Search in Google Scholar

Posner, R.A. (1997). Rational choice, behavioral economics, and the law. Stanford Law Rev. 50: 1551–1575.10.2307/1229305Search in Google Scholar

Samuelson, P.A. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behavior. Econometrica 5: 61–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2548836.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitz, D. (2009). Reasons for altruism. Soc. Philos. Pol. 10: 52–68.10.1017/S0265052500004015Search in Google Scholar

Shavell, S. (1980). Strict liability versus negligence. J. Leg. Stud. 9: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/467626.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, V.L. (2007). Rationality in economics: constructivist and ecological forms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sugden, R. (1991). Rational choice: a survey of contributions from economics and philosophy. Econ. J. 101: 751–785. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233854.Search in Google Scholar

Thaler, R.H. (2015). Misbehaving: the making of behavioral economics. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Thaler, R.H. (2016). Behavioral economics: past, present, and future. Am. Econ. Rev. 106: 1577–1600. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.106.7.1577.Search in Google Scholar

Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ulen, T.S. (1998). The growing pains of behavioral law and economics. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 51: 1747–1763.Search in Google Scholar

Ulen, T.S. (2014). The importance of behavioral law. In: Zamir, E. and Teichman, D. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of behavioral economics and the law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199945474.013.0004Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, T. (2019). The promise of behavioral economics for understanding decision-making in court. Criminol. Publ. Pol. 18: 785–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12461.Search in Google Scholar

Zamir, E. (2020). Refounding law and economics: behavioral support for the predictions of standard economic analysis. Rev. Law Econ. 16: 1–35.10.1515/rle-2019-0023Search in Google Scholar