Does Patent Quality Drive Damages in Patent Lawsuits? Lessons from the French Judicial System

References

Allison, J.R. , M.A.Lemley, and J.H.Walker. 2009. “Extreme Value or Trolls on Top? The Characteristics of the Most Litigated Patents,” 158University of Pennsylvania Law Review1.Search in Google Scholar

Bartholomew, D.J. , and M.Knott. 1999. Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chien, C.V. 2011. “Predicting Patent Litigation,” 90Texas Law Review283–329, reprinted at 44 Intellectual Property Law Review, 77–123 (2012).Search in Google Scholar

Crampes, C. , and C.Langinier. 2002. “Litigation and Settlement in Patent Infringement Cases,” 33RAND Journal of Economics258–274.10.2307/3087433Search in Google Scholar

Cremers, K. 2004. “Determinants of Patent Litigation in Germany”, Working Paper 04–72, ZEW.10.2139/ssrn.604467Search in Google Scholar

Cremers, K. , M.Ernicke, F.Gaessler, D.Harhoff, L.Helmers, L.McDonagh, P.Paula Schliessler, and N.Van Zeebroeck. 2013. “Patent Litigation in Europe”, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 13–072, Mannheim.10.2139/ssrn.2333617Search in Google Scholar

European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy. 2012. “Report on Damages in Intellectual Property Rights”, https://oami.europa.eu/ohimportal/fr/web/observatory/home.Search in Google Scholar

Gambardella, A. , D.Harhoff, and B.Verspagen. 2008. “The Value of European Patents,” 5European Management Review69–84.10.1057/emr.2008.10Search in Google Scholar

Harhoff, D. , F.Narin, F.M.Scherer, and K.Vopel. 1999. “Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Innovation,” 81Review of Economics and Statistics511–515.10.1162/003465399558265Search in Google Scholar

Heckman, J.J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error,” 47Econometrica153–161.10.2307/1912352Search in Google Scholar

Lanjouw, J.O. , A.Pakes, and J.Putnam. 1998. “How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data,” XLVIThe Journal of Industrial Economics405–433.10.1111/1467-6451.00081Search in Google Scholar

Lanjouw, J.O. , and M.Schankerman. 2001. “Characteristics of Patent Litigation: A Window on Competition,” 32RAND Journal of Economics129–151.10.2307/2696401Search in Google Scholar

Lanjouw, J.O. , and M.Schankerman. 2004. “Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators,” 114Economic Journal441–465.10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lemley, M. , and C.Shapiro. 2005. “Probabilistic Patents,” 19Journal of Economic Perspectives75–98.10.1257/0895330054048650Search in Google Scholar

Mazzeo, M.J. , J.Hillel, and S.Zyontz. 2013. “Predicting the ‘Unpredictable’: An Empirical Analysis of U.S. Patent Infringement Awards,” 35International Review of Law and Economics58–72.10.1016/j.irle.2013.03.001Search in Google Scholar

Opderbeck, D.W. 2009. “Patent Damages Reform and the Shape of the Patent Law,” 89Boston University Law Review127.Search in Google Scholar

Priest, G.L. , and B.Klein. 1984. “The Selection of Disputes for Litigation,” 13Journal of Legal Studies1–55.10.1086/467732Search in Google Scholar

Scherer, F.M. 2001. “The Innovation Lottery,” in R.Dreyfuss et al., eds. Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property, 3–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198298571.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Squicciarini, M. , H.Dernis, and C.Criscuolo. 2013. “Measuring Patent Quality: Indicators of Technological and Economic Value”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2013/03, OECD Publishing [En ligne], https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4522wkw1r8-en.Search in Google Scholar

Tiet, G. 2000. “Propriété intellectuelle, le coût des litiges: Etude comparée entre la France, l’Allemagne, l’Angleterre, les Etats-Unis, l’Espagne et les Pays-Bas”, Rapport pour la Direction générale de l’industrie, des technologies de l’information et des postes, 156p.Search in Google Scholar

Van Zeebroeck, N. , and S.Graham. 2014. “Comparing Patent Litigation Across Europe: A First Look,” 17Stanford Technology Law Review655–708.Search in Google Scholar