Language, Definition and Being in Antisthenes

References

Allen, R. E. (1983): Plato’s Parmenides, Translation and Analyses. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Aubenque, Pierre (1962): Le problème de l’être chez Aristote. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Aubenque, Pierre (1987): “Syntaxe et sémantique de l’être dans le Poème de Parménide”. In: Pierre Aubenque (ed.): Etudes sur Parmenide, Vol. II: Problèmes d’interprétations. Paris: Vrin, pp. 102–34.Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan ed. (1995): The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Belardi, Walter (1975): Il linguaggio nella filosofia di Aristotele. Rome: K Libreria Editrice.Search in Google Scholar

Benson, Hugh H. (2002): “Problems with Socratic Method”. In: Gary Alan Scott (ed.): Does Socrates have a Method? Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato’s Dialogues and Beyond. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 101–13.10.5325/j.ctv14gpdz4.11Search in Google Scholar

Benson, Hugh H. (2013), “The Priority of Definition”. In: John Bussanich and Nicholas D. Smith (eds.): The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 136–55.Search in Google Scholar

Bluck, R. S. (1961): Plato’s Meno edited with Introduction and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brancacci, Aldo (1990): La filosofia del linguaggio di Antistene. Naples: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar

Brancacci, Aldo (2005): “Antisthène et les Stoïciens: la logique”. In: Gilbert Romeyer Dherbey and Jean-Baptiste Gourinat (eds.): La Stoïciens. Paris: Vrin, pp. 55–73.Search in Google Scholar

Brancacci, Aldo (2018): “Socratism and Eleaticism in Euclides of Megara’. In: Alessandro Stavru and Christopher Moore (eds.): Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue. Leiden-Boston: Brill, pp. 161–178.10.1163/9789004341227_009Search in Google Scholar

Brunschwig, Jacques (1988): “La théorie stoïcienne du genre suprème”. In: Jonathan Barnes and Mario Mignucci (eds.): Matter and Metaphysique. Fourth Symposium Hellenisticum. Naples: Bibliopolis, pp. 19–127.Search in Google Scholar

Caizzi, Fernanda (1964): “Antistene”, Studi Urbinati 38, pp. 48–99.Search in Google Scholar

Calogero, Guido (1932): Studi sull’eleatismo. Roma: Tipografia del Senato; (1977): Studi sull’eleatismo. Nuova edizione arricchita di due Appendici. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Search in Google Scholar

Calogero Guido (1967): Storia della logica antica. Volume primo: L’età arcaica. Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Calogero, Guido (2019): Le ragioni di Socrate. Introduzione e cura di Aldo Brancacci. Milan-Udine: Mimesis.Search in Google Scholar

Canto, Monique (1993²): Platon. Ménon. Traduction inédite, introduction et notes. Paris: GF-Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar

Cassin, Barbara (1980): Si Parménide, Le traité anonyme De Melisso Xenophane Gorgia. Édition critique et commentaire. Lille: Presses Universitaires.Search in Google Scholar

Charles, David (1994): “Aristotle on Names and Their Signification”. In: Stephen Everson (ed.): Language. Companions to Ancient Thought 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–73.Search in Google Scholar

Charles, David (2010): “Definition and Explanation in the Posterior Analytics and Metaphysics”. In: Charles (2010a), pp. 286–385.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199564453.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Charles, David, ed. (2010a): Definition in Greek Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chiba, Kei (2010): “Aristotle on Essence and Defining-Phrase in his Dialectic”. In: Charles (2010a), pp. 203–51.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199564453.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Consigny, Scott (2001): Gorgias. Sophist and Artist. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cornford, Francis M. (1935): Plato’s Theory of Knowledge. The ‘Theaetetus’ and the ‘Sophist’ of Plato translated with a Running Commentary. London: Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Crivelli, Paolo (2007): “The Stoics on Definitions and Universals”, Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 18, pp. 89–122.Search in Google Scholar

Crivelli, Paolo (2010): “The Stoics on Definitions”. In: Charles (2010a), pp. 359–423.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199564453.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Deslauriers, Marguerite (2007): Aristotle on Definition. Leiden-Boston: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004156692.i-230Search in Google Scholar

Dixsaut, Monique (2002): “Platon et la leçon de Gorgias: pouvoir tout dire de l’être, ne rien pouvoir dire de ce qui est”. In: Monique Dixsaut and Aldo Brancacci (eds.): Platon, Source des Présocratiques. Exploration. Paris: Vrin, pp. 191–217.Search in Google Scholar

Döring, Klaus (1972): Die Megariker: kommentierte Sammlung der Testimonien. Amsterdam: Grüner.Search in Google Scholar

Dümmler, Ferdinand (1882): Antisthenica. Dissertatio inauguralis Bonnensis. Berlin: Typis Hendeliis.Search in Google Scholar

Dümmler, Ferdinand (1889): Akademica: Beiträge zur Literaturgeschichte der Sokratischen Schulen. Giessen: J. Rickersche Buchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar

Fronterotta, Francesco (2001): Methexis. La teoria platonica delle idee e la partecipazione delle cose empiriche. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Search in Google Scholar

Giannantoni, Gabriele (1990): Socratis et Socraticorum reliquiae. Collegit, disposuit, apparatibus notisque instruxit. 4 Vols. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar

Giannantoni, Gabriele (2005): Dialogo socratico e nascita della dialettica nella filosofia di Platone. Edizione postuma a cura di Bruno Centrone. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar

Heitsch, Ernst (2004): Platon. Apologie des Sokrates. Übersetzung und Kommentar. 2., durchgesehene Auflage. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar

Höistad, Ragnar (1948): Cynic Hero and Cynic King. Studies in the Cynic Conception of Man. Uppsala: Bloms.Search in Google Scholar

Jöel, Karl (1893): Der echte und der Xenophontische Sokrates. Erster Band. Berlin: R. Gaertners Verlagsbuchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles (1966): “The Greek Verb ‘To Be’ and the Concept of Being”, Foundations of Language 2, pp. 245–55.Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles (2005): Plato and the Socratic Dialogue. The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kneale, William Calvert and Kneale, Martha (1972). The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1962. Italian Translation: Storia della logica. 1972. Torino: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar

Kraus, Manfred (1987). Name und Sache. Ein Problem im frürgriechischen Denken. Amsterdam: Grüner.Search in Google Scholar

Le Blond, Jean-Marie (1975): “Aristotle on Definition”, in Jonathan Barnes, Malcolm Schofield, and Richard R.K. Sorabji (eds.), Articles on Aristotle (Volume 1: Science), London: Duckworth, pp. 63–79.Search in Google Scholar

Levi, Adolfo (1932): “Le dottrine filosofiche della scuola di Megara”, Rendiconti della r. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche (6a Serie) 8, pp. 463–99.Search in Google Scholar

Lévystone, David (2005): “La figure d’Ulysse chez les Socratiques: Socrate polutropos”, Phronesis 50, pp. 181–214.10.1163/1568528054740168Search in Google Scholar

Long, Anthony and Sedley, David (1987–1988): The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165907Search in Google Scholar

Lo Piparo, Franco (2003): Aristotele e il linguaggio. Cosa fa di una lingua una lingua. Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Meijer, P. A (2017): A New Perspective on Antisthenes. Logos, Predicate and Ethics in his Philosophy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.10.1017/9789048532957Search in Google Scholar

Modrak, Deborah (2003): Aristotle’s Theory of Language and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Modrak, Deborah (2019): “Nominal Definition in Aristotle”. In: Charles (2010a), pp. 252–279.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199564453.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Montiglio, Silvia (2011): From Vilain to Hero: Odysseus in Ancient Thought. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.2802465Search in Google Scholar

Montoneri, Luciano (1984): I Megarici. Studio storico-critico e traduzione delle testimonianze antiche. Catania: Tipografia Grafica del Libro.Search in Google Scholar

Morpurgo-Tagliabue, Guido (1967): Linguistica e stilistica di Aristotele. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Search in Google Scholar

Mourelatos, Alexander D.P. (1973), “Heraclitus, Parmenides, and the Naïve Metaphysics of Things”. In: Gregory Vlastos, Edward N. Lee, Alexander D.P. Mourelatos & Richard Rorty (eds.): Exegesis and Argument. Studies in Greek Philosophy presented to Gregory Vlastos (Phronesis Suppl. Vol.). Assen: Van Gorcum, pp. 16–48.Search in Google Scholar

Mourelatos, Alexander D.P. (1987): “Gorgias on the Function of Language”, Philosophical Topics 15, pp. 135–70.10.5840/philtopics19871527Search in Google Scholar

Muller, Robert (1985): Les Mégariques. Fragments et témoignages. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Natorp, Paul (1903): Platos Ideenlehre. Eine Einführung in den Idealismus. Leipzig: Dürr.Search in Google Scholar

Patzer, Andreas (1970): Antisthenes der Sokratiker: Das literarische Werk und die Philosophie, dargestellt am Katalog der Schriften. Inaugural-Dissertation der Ruprecht-Karl-Universität zu Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Susan (2015): Antisthenes of Athens. Text, Translations and Commentary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.5730060Search in Google Scholar

Ramnoux, Clémence (1959) : Héraclite ou l’homme entre les choses et les mots. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Romeyer-Dherbey, Gilbert (1996): “Entre Ajax et Ulysse, Antisthène”. Elenchos 17, pp. 251–74.Search in Google Scholar

Sainati, Vittorio (1968): Storia dell’Organon aristotelico. Florence: Le Monnier.Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, David (1982): “The Stoic criterion of identity”, Phronesis 27, pp. 255–75.10.1163/156852882X00177Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, David (1985): “The Stoic theory of universals”, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 23, Supplement, pp. 87–92.10.1111/j.2041-6962.1985.tb00428.xSearch in Google Scholar

Suvák, Vladislav (2017): “On the Dialectical Character of Antisthenes’ Speeches Ajax and Odysseus”. In: Alessandro Stavru and Christopher Moore (eds.): Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue, pp. 141–60.10.1163/9789004341227_008Search in Google Scholar

Tarrant, Harold (2002): “Elenchos and Exetasis: Capturing the Purpose of Socratic Interrogation”. In: Gary Alan Scott (ed.): Does Socrates have a Method? Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato’s Dialogues and Beyond. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 61–77.10.5325/j.ctv14gpdz4.8Search in Google Scholar

Vogt, Katja Maria (forthcoming): Stoic Definitions Without Forms. In: Peter Anstey, David Bronstein (eds.): Definitions and Essences from Aristotle to Kant (forthcoming).Search in Google Scholar

Whitaker, C. W. A. (1996): Aristotle’s De interpretatione. Contradiction and Dialectic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfsdorf, David (2013: “Socratic Philosophizing”. In: John Bussanich and Nicholas D. Smith (eds.): The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 34–67.Search in Google Scholar

Zeller, Eduard (1886): “Über die zeitgeschichtlichen Beziehungen des platonischen Theätet”, Sitzungsberichte der kgl. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 2, 1886, pp. 631–647.Search in Google Scholar

Zeller, Eduard (1887): “Über die Unterscheidung einer doppelten Gestalt der Ideenlehre in den platonischen Schriften”, Sitzungsberichte der kgl. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 3, 1887, pp. 369–97.Search in Google Scholar

Zeller, Eduard (1892): “Plato’s Mittheilungen über frühere und gleichzeitige Philosophen”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 5, 1892, pp. 165–84.10.1515/agph.1892.5.2.165Search in Google Scholar

Zeller, Eduard (1920): Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung. II 1: Sokrates und die Sokratiker. Plato und die alte Akademie. Obraldruck der 6. Auflage, mit einem Anhang von E. Hoffmann. Leipzig: O. R. Reisland.Search in Google Scholar