Home Heraclitus on the Question of a Common Measure
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Heraclitus on the Question of a Common Measure

  • Sarah Feldman ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 17, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper offers a new reading of Heraclitus fragment B90 (Diels-Kranz). It argues that we can enrich our understanding of the fragment by reading it, not as a primitive analogy, but as a skillful simile grounded both in the poetic tradition and in the cultural context that would have conditioned its significance for Heraclitus and his audience. Read in this way, B90’s evocation of a cosmos whose common measure parallels the common measure of the polis’ marketplace is not simply a source of cosmological doctrine. It is also an epistemic challenge that threatens to undermine the very possibility of cosmology.

Works Cited

Atack, Carol (2019): “Traditional and Innovation in the Kosmos-Polis Analogy”. In: Philip Sidney Horky (ed.): Cosmos in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–187.10.1017/9781108529082.009Search in Google Scholar

Bakewell, Geoffrey (2007): “Agamemnon 437: Chrysamoibos Ares, Athens and Empire”, The Journal of Hellenic Studies 127, pp. 123–132.10.1017/S0075426900001646Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan (1979): The Presocratic Philosophers, Volume I. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, Oskar (1992): “The Theory of Odd and Even in the Ninth Book of Euclid’s Elements”, translated by Charles Oliver, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 16. No. 1, pp. 87–110 (original German article published in 1934).10.5840/gfpj19931613Search in Google Scholar

Betegh, Gábor (2013): “Pythagoreans and the Derveni Papyrus”. In: James Warren and Frisbee Sheffield (eds.): The Routledge Companion to Ancient Philosophy. London: Routledge, pp. 79–93.10.4324/9781315871363.ch6Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, Thomas D., and Michael H. Jameson (1981): “Urban and Rural Land Division in Ancient Greece”, Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens 50. No. 4, pp. 327–342.10.2307/147876Search in Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, George (2003a): “Introduction”. In: George Boys-Stones (ed.): Metaphor, Allegory and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–5.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199240050.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, George (2003b): “The Stoics’ Two Types of Allegory”. In: George Boys-Stones (ed.): Metaphor, Allegory and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 189–216.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199240050.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Brann, Eva (2011): The Logos of Heraclitus. Philadelphia: Paul Dry Books, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Bryant, Joseph M (1996): Moral Codes and Social Structure in Ancient Greece: A Sociology of Greek Ethics from Homer to the Epicureans and Stoics. Albany: SUNY Press.Search in Google Scholar

Burnet, John (1930): Early Greek Philosophy. London: Adam & Charles Black Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Buxton, Richard (2004): “Similes and Other Likenesses”. In: Robert Fowler (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–155.10.1017/CCOL0521813026.009Search in Google Scholar

Cornford, Francis Macdonald (1957): From Religion to Philosophy: A Study in the Origins of Western Speculation (1st ed. 1912). New York: Harper.Search in Google Scholar

Conche, Marcel (1998): Héraclite: Fragments (1st ed. 1986). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Cuomo, Serafina (2001): Ancient Mathematics. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Diano, Carlo and Giuseppe Serra (1989): Eraclito: I frammenti e le testimonianze (1st ed. 1980). Milano: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla.Search in Google Scholar

Emlyn-Jones, C. J. (1976): “Heraclitus and the Identity of Opposites”. Phronesis 21. No. 2, pp. 89–114.10.1163/156852876X00057Search in Google Scholar

Finkelberg, Aryeh (2017): Heraclitus and Thales’ Conceptual Scheme: A Historical Study. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004338210Search in Google Scholar

Fränkel, Hermann (1973): Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy, translated by Moses Hadas and James Willis. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, Kathleen (1966): Companion to the Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fronterotta, Francesco (2013): Eraclito: Frammenti. Milan: BUR.Search in Google Scholar

Gernet, Louis (1981): “‘Value’ in Greek Myth”. In: R.L. Gordon (ed.): Myth, Religion and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–146.Search in Google Scholar

Graham, Daniel (2006): Explaining the Cosmos: The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Graham, Daniel W (2009): “Representation and Knowledge in a World of Change”. In: Enrique Hülsz Piccone (ed.): Nuevos Ensayos sobre Heráclito: Actas del Segundo Symposium Heracliteum. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, pp. 75–91Search in Google Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. (1978): A History of Early Greek Philosophy. Volume I: The Earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hahn, Robert (2001): Anaximander and the Architects: The Contributions of Egyptian and Greek Architectural Technologies to the Origins of Greek Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hahn, Robert (2003): “Proportions and Numbers in Early Greek Thought”. In: Dirk Couprie, Robert Hahn, and Gerard Naddaf (eds.): Anaximander in Context: New Studies in the Origins of Greek Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 73–163.Search in Google Scholar

Halliwell, Steven (2019): “Perspectivism and the Homeric Simile”. 2nd Martin West Memorial Lecture. Oxford, March 1st, 2019. http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/classics/general/2019-04-03-classics-halliwell.pdf Accessed February 20, 2022.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, Mogens Herman (2006): Polis: An Introduction to the Ancient Greek City-State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199208494.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Thomas (1921): A History of Greek Mathematics Vol. 1: From Thales to Euclid. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Huffman, Carl (2013): “Philolaus’ Critique of Heraclitus”. In: David Sider and Dirk Obbink (eds.): Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 121–144.10.1515/9783110331370.121Search in Google Scholar

Hülsz, Enrique (2013). “Heraclitus on Logos: Language, Rationality, and the Real”. In: David Sider and Dirk Obbink (eds.): Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 281–302.10.1515/9783110331370.281Search in Google Scholar

Hussey, Edward (1982): “Epistemology and Meaning in Heraclitus”. In: Malcolm Schofield and Martha Nussbaum (eds.): Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–59.10.1017/CBO9780511550874.004Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles (1979): The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles (1970): “On Early Greek Astronomy”, The Journal of Hellenic Studies 90, pp. 99–116.10.2307/629756Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles (2001): Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans: A Brief History. Indianapolis: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar

Kirk, G. S. (1962): Heraclitus: The Cosmic Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kroll, John (2008): “The Monetary Use of Weighed Bullion in Archaic Greece”. In: W.V. Harris (ed.): The Monetary Systems of the Greeks and Romans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233359.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Kroll, John H (2013): “Weights and measures, Greek”. In: R.S. Bagnall, K. Brodersen, C.B. Champion, A. Erskine and S.R. Huebner (eds.): The Encyclopedia of Ancient History. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 7084–7087.Search in Google Scholar

Kurke, Leslie (1999): Coins, Bodies, Games, and Gold: The Politics of Meaning in Archaic Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691223322Search in Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1966): Polarity and Analogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha (1984). “Plato on Commensurability and Desire”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58, pp. 55–96.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/58.1.55Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha (1986): The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Marcovich, M. (1967): Heraclitus: Greek Text with a Short Commentary. Merida: Los Andes University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McKirahan, Richard (1994): Philosophy before Socrates. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, Katherine (2020): “Paying the Price: Contextualizing Exchange in Phaedo 69A-C”. Rhizomata 8. No. 2, pp. 239–267.10.1515/rhiz-2020-0011Search in Google Scholar

Mouraviev, Serge (2006): Heraclitea III.3.B/ii. Recensio: Fragmenta. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Mouraviev, Serge (2006b): Heraclitea III.3.B/iii. Recensio: Fragmenta. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Mourelatos, Alexander (1973): “Heraclitus, Parmenides and the Naïve Metaphysics of Things”. In: A. P. N. Lee et al. (eds.): Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregrory Vlastos. Assen: Van Gorcum and Co., pp. 16–48.Search in Google Scholar

Netz, Reviel (2014): “The Problem of Pythagorean Mathematics”. In: Carl Huffman (ed.): A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–84.10.1017/CBO9781139028172.009Search in Google Scholar

Osborne, Catherine (1997): “Heraclitus”. In C.C.W. Taylor (ed.): Routledge History of Philosophy, Volume I: From the Beginning to Plato. London: Routledge, pp. 80–116.Search in Google Scholar

Porter, David H. (1972): “Violent Juxtaposition in the Similes of the Iliad”, The Classical Journal 68, pp. 11–21.Search in Google Scholar

Pradeau, Jean-François (2002): Héraclite: Fragments (Citations et Témoignages). Paris: GF Flammarion, Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Rankin, David (1994): “Ψυχή and Λόγος in Heraclitus B45 and B115 (Diels-Kranz)”, Emerita 62. No. 2, pp. 289–294.10.3989/emerita.1994.v62.i2.392Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, T. M. (1987): Heraclitus: Fragments. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rowett, Catherine (2013): “Philosophy’s Numerical Turn”. In: David Sider and Dirk Obbink (eds.): Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras. Berlin, De Gruyter, pp. 201–223.10.1515/9783110331370.3Search in Google Scholar

Sattler, Barbara (2020): The Concept of Motion in Ancient Greek Thought: Foundations in Logic, Method, and Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108775199Search in Google Scholar

Seaford, Richard (2014): Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Snell, Bruno (1953): The Discovery of the Mind, translated by T.G. Rosenmeyer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stamatellos, Giannis (2022): “Heraclitus on Analogy: A Critical Note”, Journal of Ancient Philosophy 16. No. 1, pp. 208–12.10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v16i1p208-212Search in Google Scholar

Stanford, W. Bedell (1936): Greek Metaphor. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, C. C. W. (1999): “The Atomists”. In: A.A. Long (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181–204.10.1017/CCOL0521441226.009Search in Google Scholar

Tejera, Victorino (1991): “Listening to Herakleitos”, The Monist 74, No. 4, pp. 491–516.10.5840/monist199174433Search in Google Scholar

Vickers, Michael (1990): “Golden Greece: Relative Values, Minae, and Temple Inventories”, American Journal of Archaeology 94. No. 4, pp. 613–625.10.2307/505122Search in Google Scholar

Vieira, Celso (2013): “Heraclitus’ Bow Composition”, The Classical Quarterly 63. No. 2, pp. 473–490.10.1017/S0009838813000037Search in Google Scholar

Vlastos, Gregory (1947): “Equality and Justice in Early Greek Cosmologies”, Classical Philology 42, pp. 156–178.10.1086/363029Search in Google Scholar

Vlastos, Gregory (1955): “On Heraclitus”, The American Journal of Philology 76. No. 4, pp. 337–368.10.2307/292270Search in Google Scholar

Von Fritz, Kurt (1945): “The Discovery of Incommensurability by Hippasus of Metapontum”, Annals of Mathematics 46, No. 2, pp. 242–264.10.2307/1969021Search in Google Scholar

Von Reden, Sitta (1995): Exchange in Ancient Greece. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

White, Stephen (2008): “Milesian Measures: Time, Space, and Matter”. In: Patricia Curd and Daniel Graham (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195146875.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

White, Stephen (2016): “Thales and the Stars”. In: Daniel W. Graham and Victor Caston (eds.): Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos. London: Routledge, pp. 3–18.Search in Google Scholar

Wiggins, David (1982): “Heraclitus’ conceptions of flux, fire and material persistence”. In: Malcolm Schofield and Martha Nussbaum (eds.): Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G.E.L. Owen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–32.10.1017/CBO9780511550874.003Search in Google Scholar

Woodruff, Paul (1999): “Rhetoric and Relativism: Protagoras and Gorgias”. In: A. A. Long (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 290–310.10.1017/CCOL0521441226.014Search in Google Scholar

Zhmud, Leonid (2014): “Sixth-, Fifth- and Fourth-century Pythagoreans”. In: Carl Huffman (ed.): A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88–111.10.1017/CBO9781139028172.005Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-08-17
Published in Print: 2023-08-14

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/rhiz-2023-0001/html
Scroll to top button