Beyond the Principle of Non-Contradiction: Damascius on the Ineffable

References

Ahbel-Rappe, S. (1998): “Scepticism in the sixth century? Damascius’ Doubts and Solutions Concerning First Principles”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 36(3), pp. 337–363.10.1353/hph.2008.0925Search in Google Scholar

Ahbel-Rappe, S. (2010): Damascius’ Problems and solutions concerning first principles. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Search in Google Scholar

Allen, R. E. (1997): Plato’s Parmenides. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bloom, L. (2017): The Principle of Non-Contradiction in Plato’s Republic: An Argument for Form. Lanham (Md.): Lexington Books.Search in Google Scholar

Caluori, D. (2018): “Aporia and the limits of reason and of language in Damascius”. In: The aporetic tradition in ancient philosophy. V. Politis and G. Karamanolis, G. (ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 269–284.10.1017/9781316274293.015Search in Google Scholar

Castagnoli, L. (2010): Ancient Self-Refutation: the Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, S. R. L. (2008): “Deconstructing the Laws of Logic”, Philosophy 83 (323), pp. 25–53.10.1017/S0031819108000296Search in Google Scholar

Cousin, V., ed. (1864) : Procli philosophi platonici, opera inedita: quae primus olim e codd. mss. parisinis italicisque vulgaverat nunc secundus curis emendavit et auxit. Parisiis [Paris]: Prostant apud Aug. Durand.Search in Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1996): “Damascius on the Ineffable”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 78 (2), pp. 120–129.10.1515/agph.1996.78.2.120Search in Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. and G.R. Morrow, trans. (1987): Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Duncombe, M. (2015): “The Role of Relatives in Plato’s Partition Argument, Republic 4, 436b9–439c9”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 48 (1), pp. 37–60.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735540.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Duncombe, M. (2020): Ancient Relativity: Plato, Aristotle, Stoics, and Sceptics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198846185.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Galpérine, M.-C. (1987): Damascius: Des premiers principes: apories et résolutions. Lagrasse: Verdier.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, P. (1997) : “L’expression de l’indicible dans le néoplatonisme grec, de Plotin à Damascius”. In: Dire l’évidence (philosophie et rhétorique antiques). C. Lévy and L. Pernot, (ed). Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 335–390.Search in Google Scholar

Kirwan, Christopher, trans. (1993): Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Books G, D, and E. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (1902): Syriani in Metaphysica commentaria. Berolini: Typis et Impensis G. Reimeri.10.1515/9783112360828Search in Google Scholar

Lachance, G. (2016): “Platonic Contrariety: Ancestor of the Aristotelian Notion of Contradiction?”, Logica Universalis 10 (2–3), pp. 143–156.10.1007/s11787-016-0141-4Search in Google Scholar

Linguiti, A. (1991): L’ultimo platonismo greco: principi e conoscenza. Firenze: L.S. Olschki.Search in Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J. (1993): Plotinus: an Introduction to the Enneads. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198751478.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J. (2004): “Notes on the Aporetics of the One in Greek Neoplatonism”. In: Pensées de l’Un dans l’histoire de la philosophie (Mélanges W. Beierwaltes). J.-M. Narbonne and A. Reckermann (ed.). Paris/Laval: Presses de l’Université Laval, pp. 98–107.10.1515/9782763714646-006Search in Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. (2008) : “Le fondement du principe de non-contradiction chez Syrianus”. In: Syrianus et la métaphysique de l’Antiquité tardive. A. Longo (ed.). Naples: Bibliopolis, pp. 299–309.Search in Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J. (2013): Sur les traces de l’absolu: études de philosophie antique. Fribourg: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J. and Dillon, J., eds (2014): Syrianus: On Aristotle Metaphysics 3–4. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2013): “Syrianus, Proclus, and Damascius”. In: The Routledge Companion to Ancient Philosophy. J. Warren and F. Sheffield (eds.). London: Routledge, pp. 624–642.10.4324/9781315871363.ch44Search in Google Scholar

Pelin, A. (2021): Modalités et structures causales dans la philosophie des principes de Damascius: Présentation de Gerd Van Riel. 1st edn. Baden-Baden: Academia-Verlag (Symbolon).10.5771/9783896659064Search in Google Scholar

Pitteloud, L. (2020) : “Plotin et l’argument du troisième homme”, Voluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofia 11(1), pp. 118–133.10.5902/2179378643334Search in Google Scholar

Segonds, A., and L. Concetta (2007): Proclus, Commentaire sur le ‘Parménide’ de Platon. Edited by Concetta Luna and Alain Philippe Segonds. Paris: Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Steel, C. (2008): “Beyond the Principle of Contradiction? Proclus’ Parmenides and the Origin of Negative Theology”. In: Die Logik des Transzendentalen: Festschrift für Jan A. Aertsen zum 65. Geburtstag. M. Pickavé M (ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 581–599.Search in Google Scholar

Steel, C., C. Macé and P. d’Hoine, eds. (2007): Procli in Platonis Parmenidem Commentaria. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tresson-Metry, C. (2012): L’aporie ou l’expérience des limites de la pensée dans le Péri Archôn de Damaskios. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004216129Search in Google Scholar

Vlad, M. (2017): “Stepping into the Void: Proclus and Damascius on Approaching the First Principle 1”, International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 11(1), pp. 46–70.10.1163/18725473-12341364Search in Google Scholar

Vlad, M. (2019): Damascius et l’ineffable: récit de l’impossible discours. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Westerink, L. G., ed. (1986): Damascius: Traité des premiers principes. Translated by J. Combès. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar