Home Platonic Hylomorphism
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Platonic Hylomorphism

  • Lloyd P. Gerson EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 9, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Hylomorphism is almost universally claimed to be a staple doctrine of Aristotle. In this paper, I discuss a wide range of texts from the dialogues of Plato that straightforwardly display hylomorphism. Both Plato and Aristotle rest their cognitive realism on their hylomorphism. The crucial difference between Aristotle’s hylomorphism and Plato’s is that Aristotle believes that hylomorphism supports and is supported by essentialism whereas Plato does not. Plotinus presents arguments against Aristotle’s essentialism at the same time as he defends Platonic hylomorphism and his cognitive realism.

Bibliography

Gerson, Lloyd P., ed. (2009): Ancient Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801730Search in Google Scholar

Gerson, Lloyd P., ed. (2018): Plotinus. The Enneads. Translated by George Boys-Stones, John M. Dillon, Lloyd P. Gerson, R.A.H. King, Andrew Smith, and James Wilberding, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press10.1017/9780511736490Search in Google Scholar

Groff, R. and Greco, J., eds. (2013): Powers and Capacities in Philosophy, The New Aristotelianism, New York/London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Novotný, D. and Novák, L, eds. (2014): Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives in Metaphysics, New York/London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315885551Search in Google Scholar

Tahko, T., ed. (2012): Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511732256Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, A. E. (1928): A Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-08-09
Published in Print: 2022-08-04

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/rhiz-2022-0002/html
Scroll to top button