Abstract
In this paper, I argue that Plato conceives self-motion as non-spatial in Laws X. I demonstrate this by focusing on the textual evidence and by refuting interpretations according to which self-motion either is a specific type of spatial motion (e. g. circular motion) or is said to require space as a necessary condition for its occurrence. Moreover, I show that this non-spatial understanding differs from the identification of the soul’s motion with locomotion in the Timaeus. Consequently, I provide an explanation for this difference between the Timaeus and Laws X by considering developmentalist and contextualist viewpoints.
Article note
My research was made possible by the generous funding of the Cusanuswerk and the Faculty of Classics, Cambridge. I am grateful to Myrto Hatzimichali for most helpful discussions and suggestions. I thank David Sedley, Gábor Betegh, Frisbee Sheffield, Kasra Abdavi Azar, Christopher Poetsch, and the anonymous referee of Rhizomata for their insightful and learned comments from which this paper has greatly benefited. I am solely responsible for all remaining flaws.
Bibliography
Betegh, Gábor (2018): ‘“Cosmic and Human Cognition in the Timaeus”. In: J. Sisko (ed.): Philosophy of Mind in Antiquity. London: Routledge, pp. 120–140.10.4324/9780429508219-7Search in Google Scholar
– (2021): “The Ingredients of the Soul in Plato’s Timaeus”. In: F. Leigh (ed.): Themes in Plato, Aristotle, and Hellenistic Philosophy. Keeling Lectures 2011–18. London: Institute of Classical Studies, pp. 83–103.Search in Google Scholar
Bobonich, Christopher (2002): Plato’s Utopia Recast. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199251436.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bos, Abraham P. (1989): Cosmic and Meta-Cosmic Theology in Aristotle’s Lost Dialogues. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004246652Search in Google Scholar
Brisson, Luc (1994): Le même et I’autre dans la structure ontologique du Timée de Platon: un commentaire systematique du Timée de Platon. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Broadie, Sarah (2012): Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511997815Search in Google Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles (2000): “Plato on Why Mathematics is Good for You”. In: T. Smiley (ed.): Mathematics and Necessity. Essays in the History of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–81.Search in Google Scholar
Carone, Gabriela R. (1994): “Teleology and Evil in Laws 10”, The Review of Metaphysics 48, pp. 275–298.Search in Google Scholar
– (2005a): Plato’s Cosmology and its Ethical Dimension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
– (2005b): “Mind and Body in Late Plato”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87:3, pp. 227–69.10.1515/agph.2005.87.3.227Search in Google Scholar
Carter, Jason W. (2019): Aristotle and Earlier Greek Psychology. The Science of Soul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108646321Search in Google Scholar
Cherniss, Harold F. (1944): Aristotle’s criticism of Plato and the Academy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chroust, Anton H. (1966): “The Probable Date of Aristotle’s Lost Dialogue On Philosophy”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 4:4, pp. 283–91.10.1353/hph.2008.1228Search in Google Scholar
Corcilius, Klaus (2018): “Ideal Intellectual Cognition in Timaeus 37 A 2 – C 5”, OSAP 54, pp. 51–105.10.1093/oso/9780198825128.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Cornford, Francis M. (1937): Plato’s Cosmology. The Timaeus of Plato. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar
Dillon, John (2009): “How does the Soul Direct the Body, After All? Traces of a Dispute on the Mind–Body Relations in the Old Academy”. In: D. Frede and B. Reis (eds.): Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 349–56.10.1515/9783110216523.4.349Search in Google Scholar
England, Edwin B. (1921): The Laws of Plato. Volume II: Books VII–XII. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Falcon, Andrea (2020): “The Lost On Philosophy and Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy”. In: A. P. Mesquita et al. (eds.): Revisiting Aristotle’s Fragments. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 93–108.10.1515/9783110679847-006Search in Google Scholar
Frede, Dorothea (1996): “The Philosophical Economy of Plato’s Psychology”. In: G. Striker and M. Frede (eds.): Rationality in Greek Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 29–58.Search in Google Scholar
Gaiser, Konrad (1968): Platons ungeschriebene Lehre. Stuttgart: E. Klett.Search in Google Scholar
Gaudin, Claude (1990): “Automotricité et auto affection: un commentaire de Platon Lois, X 894d–895c”, Elenchos 11, pp. 169–85.Search in Google Scholar
Greene, William C. (1938): Scholia Platonica. Haverford, PA: The American Philological Association.Search in Google Scholar
Griswold, Charles L. (1986): Self-Knowledge in Plato’s Phaedrus. New Haven, Conn./London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gueroult, Martial (1924): “Le Xe livre des Lois et la dernière forme de la physique platonicienne”, Revue des Études Grecques 37, pp. 27–78.10.3406/reg.1924.5126Search in Google Scholar
Hackforth, Reginald (1965): “Plato’s Theism”. In: R. E. Allen (ed.): Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 439–47.10.1017/S0009838800013008Search in Google Scholar
Johansen, Thomas K. (2000): “Body, Soul, and Tripartition in Plato’s Timaeus”, OSAP 19, pp. 87 –111.Search in Google Scholar
– (2004): Plato’s Natural Philosphy. A Study of the Timaeus-Critias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511518478Search in Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles H. (2004): “From Republic to Laws. A Discussion of Christopher Bobonich, Plato’s Utopia Recast”, OSAP 26, pp. 337–62.10.1093/oso/9780199272495.003.0013Search in Google Scholar
Kamtekar, Rachana (2010): “Psychology and the inculcation of virtue in Plato’s Laws”. In: C. Bobonich (ed.): Plato’s Laws. A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 127–48.10.1017/CBO9780511781483.008Search in Google Scholar
Karfík, Filip (2004): Die Beseelung des Kosmos. Untersuchungen zur Kosmologie, Seelenlehre und Theologie in Platons Phaidon und Timaios. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110930801Search in Google Scholar
Lee, Edward N. (1976): “Reason and Rotation: Circular Movement as the Model of Mind (Nous) in the Later Plato”. In: W. H. Werkmeister (ed.): Facets of Plato’s Philosophy. Assen: Van Gorcum, pp. 70–102.Search in Google Scholar
Mayhew, Robert (2008): Plato. Laws 10. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.5840/ancientphil201030242Search in Google Scholar
Menn, Stephen (1994): Plato on God as Nous. Carbondale and Edwardsville, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press.Search in Google Scholar
– (2002): “Aristotle’s Definition of Soul and the Programme of the De Anima”, OSAP 22, pp. 83–139.Search in Google Scholar
Michalewski, Alexandra (2020): “The Causality of the Self-Moving Soul: Platonic Responses to the Objections of De Anima I 3”. In: S. Delcomminette et al. (eds.): The Reception of Plato’s ›Phaedrus‹ from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 41–60.10.1515/9783110683936-004Search in Google Scholar
Mohr, Richard D. (2006): God and Forms in Plato. Las Vegas: Parmenides.Search in Google Scholar
Opsomer, Jan (2020): “The Platonic Soul, from the Early Academy to the First Century CE”. In: B. Inwood and J. Warren (eds.): Body and Soul in Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 171–198.10.1017/9781108641487.008Search in Google Scholar
Ostenfeld, Erik (1982): Forms, Matter and Mind: Three Strands in Plato’s Metaphysics. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-009-7681-8Search in Google Scholar
Parry, Richard D. (2002): “The Soul in Laws X and Disorderly Motion in Timaeus”, Ancient Philosophy 22, pp. 289–301.10.5840/ancientphil200222225Search in Google Scholar
Pietsch, Christian (2003): “Die Dihairesis der Bewegung in Platon, Nomoi X 893b1–894c9”, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 146:3, pp. 303–27.Search in Google Scholar
Poetsch, Christoph (2019): Platons Philosophie des Bildes. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann.10.5771/9783465144106Search in Google Scholar
Post, L. A. (1944): Review of “The Theory of Motion in Plato’s Later Dialogues” by J. B. Skemp, American Journal of Philology 65:3, pp. 298–301.10.2307/291512Search in Google Scholar
Ritter, Conrad (1896): Platos Gesetze. Kommentar zum griechischen Text. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Robinson, Thomas M. (1995): Plato’s Psychology. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ross, William D., ed. (1961): Aristotle. De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198141556.book.1Search in Google Scholar
Saunders, Trevor J. (1970): Plato. The Laws. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar
Sassi, Maria M. (2008): “The Self, the Soul, and the Individual in the City of the Laws”, OSAP 35, pp. 125–48.Search in Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm (ed.) and Griffith, Tom (tr.) (2016): Plato. Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Schöpsdau, Klaus (2011): Platon. Nomoi (Gesetze). Buch VIII–XII. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar
Sedley, David (1997): “‘Becoming like god’ in the Timaeus and Aristotle”. In: T. Calvo and L. Brisson (eds.): Interpreting the Timaeus – Critias. Proceedings of the IV Symposium Platonicum. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, pp. 327–39.Search in Google Scholar
– (1999): “The Ideal of Godlikeness”. In: G. Fine (ed.): Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion, and the Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 309–28.Search in Google Scholar
– (2013): “The atheist underground”. In: V. Harte and M. Lane (eds.): Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 329–48.10.1017/CBO9781139096843.022Search in Google Scholar
– (2019): “The Timaeus as Vehicle for Platonic Doctrine”, OSAP 56, pp. 45–71.10.1093/oso/9780198851059.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Skemp, Joseph B. (1967): The Theory of Motion in Plato’s Later Dialogues. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Search in Google Scholar
Solmsen, Friedrich (1960): Aristotle’s System of the Physical World: A Comparison with His Predecessors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stalley, Richard F. (1983): An Introduction to Plato’s Laws. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Steiner, Peter M. (1992a): Platon. Nomoi X. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
– (1992b) Psyche bei Platon. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar
Stenzel, Julius (1933): Zahl und Gestalt bei Platon und Aristoteles. Leipzig/Berlin: B. G. Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
von Perger, Mischa (1997): Die Allseele in Platons Timaios. Stuttgart/Leipzig: Teubner.10.1515/9783110968422Search in Google Scholar
Vuillemin, Jules (1991): “The Systems of Plato and Aristotle Compared as to their Contributions to Physics”. In: W. Spohn, B. C. van Frassen and B. Skyms (eds.): Existence and Explanation. Boston: Springer, pp. 197–206.10.1007/978-94-011-3244-2_13Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Articles
- The Zoogonies of Empedocles Reconsidered
- The Playful Role of the Girl in Empedocles’ B100
- The First City and First Soul in Plato’s Republic
- Getting Younger
- Plato on Self-Motion in Laws X
- Aristotle on Flight: Air as an External Resting Point
- Reviews
- Devin Henry, Aristotle on Matter, Form, and Moving Causes. The Hylomorphic Theory of Substantial Generation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2019. ix + 246 pp, ISBN 978-1108475570, GBP 75. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108646680
- Marilena Vlad, Damascius et l’ineffable: récit de l’impossible discours, Vrin, Paris, 2019; ISBN: 978-2-7116-2873-5, EUR 28.
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Articles
- The Zoogonies of Empedocles Reconsidered
- The Playful Role of the Girl in Empedocles’ B100
- The First City and First Soul in Plato’s Republic
- Getting Younger
- Plato on Self-Motion in Laws X
- Aristotle on Flight: Air as an External Resting Point
- Reviews
- Devin Henry, Aristotle on Matter, Form, and Moving Causes. The Hylomorphic Theory of Substantial Generation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2019. ix + 246 pp, ISBN 978-1108475570, GBP 75. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108646680
- Marilena Vlad, Damascius et l’ineffable: récit de l’impossible discours, Vrin, Paris, 2019; ISBN: 978-2-7116-2873-5, EUR 28.