Home Plato’s Theaetetus and the Hunting of the Proposition
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Plato’s Theaetetus and the Hunting of the Proposition

  • Lesley Brown EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 8, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Section 1 contrasts the approaches to Plato of F.M.Cornford and Gilbert Ryle, two of the early twentieth century’s leading Plato interpreters. Then I trace and evaluate attempts to discern in Plato’s Theaetetus a recognition of the role of the proposition. Section 2 focuses on the hunting of the proposition in Socrates’ Dream in the Theaetetus. Ryle, inspired by Logical Atomism, argued that Plato there anticipated an insight about the difference between names and propositions that Russell credited to Wittgenstein. I rehearse difficulties for understanding the logos of the Dream as a proposition, preferring a reading of logos there as something like definition: a reading Wittgenstein also adumbrated. Section 3 examines attempts by writers such as Burnyeat and Kahn to find Plato allocating a starring role to the proposition in the argument at Theaetetus 185–6: perception, since it cannot grasp being, cannot grasp truth and hence cannot be knowledge. On their reading a grasp of being is understood as a grasp of something propositional. Problems for the propositional reading include Socrates’ talk of grasping ‘the truth of something’ (alētheia tinos), and the way the dialogue develops after 186.

References

Bostock, David (1988): Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198239307.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Lesley (1993): “Understanding the Theaetetus”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 11, pp. 199–224.Search in Google Scholar

Burnyeat, Myles F. (1990): The Theaetetus of Plato, M. J. Levett (trans.) with Introduction. by M. F. Burnyeat. Indianapolis: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar

Burnyeat, Myles F. (1976): “Plato on the Grammar of Perceiving”, Classical Quarterly 26, pp. 29–51.10.1017/CBO9780511974069.006Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Lewis (1883): The Theaetetus of Plato. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, John M. (1970): “Plato on Sense perception and Knowledge: Theaetetus 184–186”, Phronesis 15, pp. 123–46.10.1515/9781400826445.43Search in Google Scholar

Cornford, Francis M. (1935): Plato’s Theory of Knowledge. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315822884Search in Google Scholar

Cornford, Francis M. (1939): Plato and Parmenides. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315822945Search in Google Scholar

Cornford, Francis M. (1908): Microcosomographia Academica. Cambridge: Bowes & Bowes Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Fine, Gail (1979): “Knowledge and Logos in the Theaetetus”, Philosophical Review 88, pp. 366–97. page numbers cited from reprint in Fine (2003).10.2307/2184956Search in Google Scholar

Fine, Gail (2003): Plato on Knowledge and Forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199245581.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Frede, Dorothea (1989): “The Soul’s Silent Dialogue: A Non-Aporetic Reading of the Theaetetus”, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 215, pp. 20–49.10.1017/S0068673500005137Search in Google Scholar

Frede, Michael (1987): “Observations on perception in Plato’s Later Dialogues”. In: Michael Frede: Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–8.Search in Google Scholar

Gaskin, Richard M. (2013): “When Logical Atomism met the Theaetetus: Ryle on Naming and Saying”. In: Michael Beaney (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 852–67.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238842.013.0037Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles H. (1981): “Some Philosophical Uses of ‘To be’ in Plato”, Phronesis 26, pp. 105–34.10.1163/156852881X00204Search in Google Scholar

McDowell, John (1973): Plato: Theaetetus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Modrak, Deborah (1981): “Perception and Judgement in the Theaetetus”, Phronesis 26, pp. 35–54.10.1163/156852881X00123Search in Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand (1956): Logic and Knowledge, Essays 1901–1950, edited by Robert C. Marsh. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand (1918/1919): “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism”, The Monist 28, pp. 495–527, and 29, pp. 33–63, 190–222, 345–80.10.4324/9780203864777Search in Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert (1939): “Plato’s Parmenides”, Mind 48, pp. 129–51 and 302–25. Reprint in Reginald E. Allen, ed. (1965): Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics. London: Routledge.10.1093/mind/XLVIII.190.129Search in Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert (1960): “Letters and Syllables in Plato”, Philosophical Review 69, pp. 431–51.10.2307/2183479Search in Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert (1966): Plato’s Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert (1971): Collected Papers vol. 1. London: Hutchinson.10.1111/j.1468-0149.1972.tb03781.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert (1990): “Logical Atomism in Plato’s Theaetetus”, Phronesis 35, pp. 21–46. The paper was written in 1952.10.1163/156852890X00024Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, David (2004): The Midwife of Platonism. Oxford: University Press.10.1093/0199267030.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Szaif, Jan (1996): Platons Begriff der Wahrheit. Freiburg-Munich: Verlag Karl Alber.Search in Google Scholar

Waddell, W. W. (1894): The Parmenides of Plato. Glasgow: James Maclehose and Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1922): Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, with introduction by Bertrand Russell. London: Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953): Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1969): Philosophische Grammatik, ed. Rush Rhees. Frankfurt:a/M Suhrkamp. Translation Anthony Kenny (1974): Philosophical Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-05-08
Published in Print: 2021-04-06

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/rhiz-2020-0012/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button