Home Analytic Philosophy, the Ancient Philosopher Poets and the Poetics of Analytic Philosophy
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Analytic Philosophy, the Ancient Philosopher Poets and the Poetics of Analytic Philosophy

  • Catherine Rowett EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 8, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The paper starts with reflections on Plato’s critique of the poets and the preference many express for Aristotle’s view of poetry. The second part of the paper takes a case study of analytic treatments of ancient philosophy, including the ancient philosopher poets, to examine the poetics of analytic philosophy, diagnosing a preference in Analytic philosophy for a clean non-poetic style of presentation, and then develops this in considering how well historians of philosophy in the Analytic tradition can accommodate the contributions of philosophers who wrote in verse. The final part of the paper reviews the current enthusiasm for decoding Empedocles’ vague and poetic descriptions of the cosmic cycle into a precise scientific periodicity on the basis of the recently discovered Byzantine scholia on Aristotle. I argue that this enthusiasm speaks to a desire for definite and clear numerical values in place of poetic motifs of give and take, and that this mathematical and scientific poetic is comparable to the preferred poetic of analytic philosophy.

Bibliography

Barfield, Raymond (2011): The Ancient Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511976438Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan (1979): The Presocratic Philosophers.Volume 1, London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203007372Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan (1982): The Presocratic Philosophers. 2nd ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.10.4324/9780203007372Search in Google Scholar

Bignone, Ettore (1916): Empedocle: Studio critico, traduzione e commento delle testimonianze e dei frammenti. Il pensiero greco. Turin: Fratelli BoccaSearch in Google Scholar

Bollack, Jean (1965–1969): Empédocle. 3 vols. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Search in Google Scholar

Bryan, Jenny (2011): Likeness and Likelihood in the Presocratics and Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M (1999): “Of Love and Strife: Startling new light on the pre-Socratic universe”. Review of Alain Martin and Oliver Primavesi L’Empédocle de Strasbourg. Times Literary Supplement, May 28, pp. 7–8.Search in Google Scholar

Charles, David (2000): Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/019925673X.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Garani, Myrto (2007): Empedocles Redivivus: Poetry and analogy in Lucretius. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203929285Search in Google Scholar

Gemelli Marciano, M. Laura (2008): “Images and Experience: at the roots of Parmenides’ Aletheia”. Ancient Philosophy 28: pp. 21–48.10.5840/ancientphil20082812Search in Google Scholar

Graham, Daniel (2010): The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Graham, Gordon (2005): Philosophy of the Arts. Third ed. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203696224Search in Google Scholar

Halliwell, Stephen (1986): Aristotle’s Poetics. London: Duckworth.10.1017/CHOL9780521300063.005Search in Google Scholar

Halliwell, Stephen (1988): Plato Republic X. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.10.3828/liverpool/9780856684067.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Halliwell, Stephen (2002): The Aesthetics of Mimesis: ancient texts and modern problems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400825301Search in Google Scholar

Hanna, Robert (2004): Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272044.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hanna, Robert (2009): “Back to Kant: Teaching the First Critique as Contemporary Philosophy”, APA Newsletter on Teaching Philosophy 8, no. 2: pp. 2–6.Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Malcolm (2001): “Aristotle and the pleasure of tragedy”. In: Anderson, Ø. and J. Haarberg (eds.): Making sense of Aristotle: Essays in Poetics. London: Duckworth pp. 7–23.Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Malcolm (2013): Ancient Philosophical Poetics. Key Themes in Ancient Philosophy, edited by Ferrari, G.R.F. and Catherine Osborne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139018258Search in Google Scholar

Hölscher, Uvo (1965): “Weltzeiten und Lebenszyklus. Eine Nachprüfung der Empedokles-Doxographie”, Hermes 93: pp. 7–33.Search in Google Scholar

Kirk, Geoffrey S., Raven, John E. and Schofield, Malcolm (1983): The Presocratic Philosophers, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813375Search in Google Scholar

Kristeller, Paul Oskar (2008): “Introduction”. In: Steven M. Cahn and Aaron Meskin (eds.): Aesthetics: a comprehensive anthology. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 3–15.Search in Google Scholar

Lambridis, Helle (1976): Empedocles: a philosophical investigation. Studies in the Humanities. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lesher, James H. (1992): Xenophanes of Colophon: Fragments: A Text and Translation with Commentary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442627826Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Susan (2001): The Ancient Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry Revisited. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195136067.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mansfeld, Jaap, and Primavesi, Oliver, eds. (2012): Die Vorsokratiker Griechisch/Deutsch. Stuttgart: Reclam.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Alain – Primavesi, Oliver (1999): L’Empédocle de Strasbourg: Introduction, édition et commentaire. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

McKirahan, Richard (2010): Philosophy before Socrates. Second ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar

Millerd, Clara E. (1908): On the Interpretation of Empedocles. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mogyoródi, Emese (2006): “Xenophanes’ epistemology and Parmenides’ quest for knowledge”. In: Maria M Sassi (ed.) La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici. Pisa: Ed. della Scuola Normale, pp. 123–60.Search in Google Scholar

Monro, David Binning (1901): Homeri Opera, vol. IV (The Odyssey, Books 13–24). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Most, Glenn W. (2011): “What ancient quarrel between philosophy and poetry?”. In: Pierre Destrée and Fritz-Gregor Herrmann (eds.): Plato and the Poets. Leiden: Brill, pp. 1–2010.1163/ej.9789004201293.i-434.8Search in Google Scholar

Mothersill, Mary (2003): “Make-believe morality and fictional worlds”. In: Bermúdez, J and J Gardner, eds. Art and Morality. London and New York: Routledge 4 4, pp. 74–94.10.4324/9781003060222-5Search in Google Scholar

Murdoch, Iris (1970): The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.10.4324/9781315887524Search in Google Scholar

Murdoch, Iris (1977): The fire and the sun: why Plato banished the artists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nelis, Damien (2004): “Georgics 2. 458–542: Virgil, Aratus and Empedocles”, Dictynna [En ligne] 1. Published electronically 25 novembre 2010. http://dictynna.revues.org/161.10.4000/dictynna.161Search in Google Scholar

Nightingale, Andrea Wilson (1993): “The Folly of Praise: Plato’s Critique of Encomiastic Discourse in the Lysis and Symposium”, The Classical Quarterly 43, no. 1, pp. 112–30.10.1017/S0009838800044219Search in Google Scholar

Nightingale, Andrea Wilson (1995): Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511582677Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. (1986): The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817915Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. (1990): “Form and Content: Philosophy and Literature”. In: Martha C. Nussbaum: Love’s Knowledge. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–53.Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C (2001): Upheavals of thought: the intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840715Search in Google Scholar

O’Brien, Denis (1969): Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle: A reconstruction from the fragments and secondary sources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

O’Brien, Denis (1981): Pour interpreter Empédocle. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004320598Search in Google Scholar

O’Brien, Denis (2005): “Apologia pro vita sua”. In: John Dillon and Monique Dixsaut (eds.): Agoniste: Essays in Honour of Denis O’Brien. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. ix–xli.Search in Google Scholar

Osborne, Catherine (1987a): “Empedocles Recycled”, Classical Quarterly 37, pp. 23–50.10.1017/S0009838800031633Search in Google Scholar

Osborne, Catherine (1987b): Rethinking Early Greek Philosophy. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

Osborne, Catherine (1997): “Was Verse the Default Form for Presocratic Philosophy?”. In Catherine Atherton (ed.): Form and Content in Didactic Poetry. Bari: Levente Editori, pp. 23–35.Search in Google Scholar

Osborne, Catherine (1999a): “Letter to the editor”, Times Literary Supplement, June 4.Search in Google Scholar

Osborne, Catherine (1999b): ““No” means “Yes”: the seduction of the word in Plato’s Phaedrus”, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 15: pp. 263–81.10.1163/2213441799X00161Search in Google Scholar

Osborne, Catherine (2005): “Sin and Moral Responsibility in Empedocles’s Cosmic Cycle”. In: Apostolos L. Pierris (ed.) The Empedoclean Κόσμος: Structure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research Patras, pp. 283–308.Search in Google Scholar

Panzerbieter, Friedrich (1844): Beiträge zur Kritik und Erklärung des Empedokles (diss.). Einladungs-Programm des Gymnasium Bernhardinum in Meiningen. Meiningen.Search in Google Scholar

Peramatzis, Michail (2011): Priority in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588350.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pierris, Apostolos L., ed. (2005): The Empedoclean Κόσμος Structure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research Patras.Search in Google Scholar

Primavesi, Oliver (2002): “Lecteurs antiques et byzantins d’Empédocle de Zenon à Tzértzès”. In: André Laks and Claire Louguet (eds.): Qu’est-ce que la Philosophie Présocratique, Cahiers de Philologie, vol. 20. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.10.4000/books.septentrion.55650Search in Google Scholar

Primavesi, Oliver (2005): “The Structure of Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle”. In: Apostolos L. Pierris (ed.): The Empedoclean Κόσμος: Structure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research Patras, pp. 245–64.Search in Google Scholar

Primavesi, Oliver (2006): “Empedokles in Florentiner Aristoteles-Scholien”, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 157, pp. 27–40.Search in Google Scholar

Primavesi, Oliver (2008): Empedokles Physika I: eine Rekonstruktion des zentralen Gedankengangs. Archiv für Papyrusforschung. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110210514Search in Google Scholar

Primavesi, Oliver (2016): “Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle and the Pythagorean Tetractys”, Rhizomata 4, pp. 5–29.10.1515/rhiz-2016-0002Search in Google Scholar

Primavesi, Oliver (2017): “Tetraktys und Göttereid bei Empedokles: Der pythagoreische Zeitplan des kosmischen Zyklus”. In: Friedrich Kittler et al. (eds.): Götter und Schriften rund ums Mittelmeer. Paderborn: Verlag Wilhelm Fink, pp. 229–316.10.30965/9783846758199_009Search in Google Scholar

Rashed, Marwan (2001a): Die Überlieferungsgeschchte der aristotelischen Schrift De Generatione et Corruptione. Wiesbaden: Dr Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Rashed, Marwan (2001b): “La Chronographie du Systeme d’Empédocle: documents Byzantins inédits”, Aevum Antiquum 1, pp. 237–59.Search in Google Scholar

Rashed, Marwan (2014): “La Chronographie du Système d’Empédocle: addenda et corrigenda”, Les Études Philosophiques 3/2014, no. 110, pp. 315–42.10.3917/leph.143.0315Search in Google Scholar

Rashed, Marwan (2018): La Jeune Fille et la Sphère: études sur Empédocle. Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne.Search in Google Scholar

Ribeiro, Anna Christina, ed. (2012): The Continuum Companion to Aesthetics. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Rowett, Catherine (2013a): “Literary genres and judgements of taste: some remarks on Aristotle’s remarks about the poetry of Empedocles”. In: Michael Erler (ed.) Literarische Form und Argument in antiker Philosophie. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 305–14.10.1515/9783110338942.305Search in Google Scholar

Rowett, Catherine (2013b): “A Portable Presocratics Primer?”, Review of Daniel Graham The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21, no. 4, pp. 791–97.10.1080/09608788.2013.792773Search in Google Scholar

Rowett, Catherine (2016): “Love, Sex and the Gods: Which things have divine names in Empedocles and why?”, Rhizomata 4, pp. 80–110.10.1515/rhiz-2016-0005Search in Google Scholar

Rutherford, Richard (1995): The art of Plato. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, David (1989): “The proems of Empedocles and Lucretius”, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 30, pp. 269–96.Search in Google Scholar

Warren, James (2007): Presocratics. Stocksfield: Acumen.10.1017/UPO9781844653911Search in Google Scholar

Wright, M. R. (1997): “Philosopher poets: Parmenides and Empedocles”. In: Catherine Atherton (ed.): Form and Content in Didactic Poetry. Bari: Levente Editori, pp. 1–22.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-05-08
Published in Print: 2021-04-06

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/rhiz-2020-0008/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button