Home Sunesis as Ethical Discernment in Aristotle
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Sunesis as Ethical Discernment in Aristotle

  • Attila Simon EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 18, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract:

In this paper, I examine the concept of sunesis (comprehension) in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. In Section I, I clarify the differences between phronēsis and sunesis, focusing on the roles they play in bouleusis (deliberation). I argue that sunesis is not directly involved in practical deliberation in the canonical sense of the notion. In Section II, I suggest an interpretation of sunesis as ethical discernment. We employ sunesis in cases without any immediate objects of practical deliberation, such as when we criticize an action in the past or give advice to others. In this function, discernment has a crucial role in the ethical life of individuals embedded in a community.

Bibliography

Aubenque, Pierre (2007): Der Begriff der Klugheit bei Aristoteles. Aus dem Französischen übersetzt von Nicolai Sinai und Ulrich Johannes Schneider. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.10.28937/978-3-7873-2006-6Search in Google Scholar

Bodéüs, Richard (1993): The Political Dimensions of Aristotle’s Ethics. Translated by Jan Edward Garrett. Albany: SUNY Press.Search in Google Scholar

Broadie, Sarah (1991): Ethics with Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195085604.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Broadie, Sarah (2002): Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics. Translation (with Historical Introduction) by Christopher Rowe. Philosophical Introduction and Commentary by Sarah Broadie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ebert, Theodor (1995): “Phronēsis. Anmerkungen zu einem Begriff der aristotelischen Ethik (VI 5, 8–13)”. In: Ottfried Höffe (ed.): Aristoteles: Die Nikomachische Ethik. Berlin: Akademie, pp. 165–185.10.1524/9783050050232.165Search in Google Scholar

Eikeland, Olav (2006): “Phrónēsis, Aristotle, and action research”, International Journal of Action Research 2, pp. 5–53.Search in Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1998): Aristoteles, Nikomachische Ethik VI. Translation and commentary by Hans-Georg Gadamer. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Search in Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg (2004): Truth and Method. (2nd, revised edition) Translation revised by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. London, New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Garsten, Bryan (2013): “Deliberating and acting together”. In: Marguerite Deslauriers and Pierre Destrée (eds.): The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Politics. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 324–349.10.1017/CCO9780511791581.014Search in Google Scholar

Grant, Alexander (1885): The Ethics of Aristotle. Illustrated with Essays and Notes. (4th, revised edition) London: Longmans, Green and Co.Search in Google Scholar

Halliwell, Stephen (2001): “Aristotelian Mimesis and Human Understanding”. In: Øivind Andersen and Jon Haarberg (eds.): Making Sense of Aristotle. Essays in Poetics. London: Duckworth, pp. 87–107.Search in Google Scholar

Hardie, William Francis Ross (1968): Aristotle’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198246329.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hursthouse, Rosalind (2006): “Practical Wisdom: a Mundane Account”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106, pp. 283–307.10.1093/oso/9780192895844.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Long, Christopher P. (2002): “The ontological reappropriation of phronēsis”, Continental Philosophy Review 35, 35–60.10.1023/A:1015180421385Search in Google Scholar

Louden, Robert B. (1997): “What is Moral Authority?”, Ancient Philosophy 17, pp. 103–118.10.5840/ancientphil19971717Search in Google Scholar

Natali, Carlo (2014): “The Book on Wisdom”. In: Ronald Polansky (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 180–202.10.1017/CCO9781139022484.009Search in Google Scholar

Reeve, C. D. C. (2013): Aristotle on Practical Wisdom. Nicomachean Ethics VI. Translated with Introduction, Analysis, and Commentary by C. D. C. Reeve. Cambridge (Massachusetts), London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reeve, C. D. C. (2014): Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics. Translated with Introduction and Notes by C. D. C. Reeve, Indianapolis-Cambridge: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar

Segvic, Heda (2011): “Deliberation and Choice in Aristotle”. In: Michael Pakaluk and Giles Pearson (eds.): Moral Psychology and Human Action in Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 159–185.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546541.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Simon, Attila (2006): “Freundschaft und Selbstverständnis bei Aristoteles“, Rhizai 3, pp. 275–298.Search in Google Scholar

Snell, Bruno (1924): Die Ausdrücke für den Begriff des Wissens in der vorplatonischen Philosophie. Berlin: Weidmann.Search in Google Scholar

Stewart, J. A. (1892): Notes on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle I-II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wiggins, David (1980): “Deliberation and Practical Reason”. In: Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.): Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 221–240.10.1525/9780520340985-016Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-7-18
Published in Print: 2017-7-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 9.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/rhiz-2017-0004/html
Scroll to top button