Empedocles’ Sphairos
-
Vojtěch Hladký
Abstract:
The aim of this article is to reopen the rather neglected issue of the nature and internal structure of the Sphairos as it appears in Empedocles’ account of the cycle of the cosmos. The Sphairos is generally understood as a result of the mixing of the four elements, or ‘roots’ at the moment of the greatest dominance of Love. Based on an analysis of preserved fragments and testimonies, the article argues that the Sphairos is not an amorphous mixture. On a contrary, it has a complex and structured form with clearly differentiated parts. Moreover, Empedocles’ description of the process of mixing of the basic elements and a gradual emergence of ever more complex things and organisms seems to support this interpretation. The process of unification of the elements should culminate at the moment of the strongest influence of Love with in the emergence of a huge, internally differentiated, complex, and thinking ‘superorganism’. This superorganism is then identical with the whole of the cosmos and all lower, simpler organisms which had emerged in the prior phases of the zoogony are contained in it.
To Tomáš Vítek for Empedoclean initiation[1]
Bibliography
Editions and English translations of primary texts:
Coxon, A.H. (2009): The Fragments of Parmenides, ed. and new transl. R. McKirahan, Las Vegas – Zurich – Athens: Parmenides Publishing (2nd edn.; 1st edn.: 1986).10.1163/156852888X00090Search in Google Scholar
Diels, H. – Kranz W., eds. (1951): Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 3 vols., Berlin: Weidmann (6th edn.).Search in Google Scholar
Gallop, D., ed. and transl. (1984): Parmenides of Elea: Fragments, Toronto: University of Toronto, 1984.Search in Google Scholar
Graham, D.W., ed. and transl. (2010): The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of The Major Presocratics, 2 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Inwood, B., ed. and transl. (2001): The Poem of Empedocles, Toronto: University of Toronto Press (2nd edn.).Search in Google Scholar
Laks, A. – Most, G.W., ed. and transl. (2016): Early Greek Philosophy, vol. V.2, Cambridge, MA – London: Harvard University Press, pp. 317–733 (Loeb Classical Library, vol. 528).Search in Google Scholar
Lesher, J.H., transl. (2001): Xenophanes of Colophon: Fragments, Toronto: University of Toronto.10.3138/9781442627826Search in Google Scholar
Wright, M.R., ed., transl. and comm. (1995): Empedocles: The Extant Fragments, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing (2nd edn.).Search in Google Scholar
Secondary litarature
Bollack, J. (1965, 1969): Empédocle, 3. vols., Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, vol. I: 1965, vols. II and III: 1969.Search in Google Scholar
Bollack, J. (2003): Empédocle: Les Purification: Un projet de paix universelle, Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Search in Google Scholar
Curd, P. (2005): “On the Question of Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles”. In: Pierris, ed. (2005): pp. 137–162.Search in Google Scholar
Curd, P. (2016): “Power, Structure, and Thought in Empedocles”, Rhizomata, 4, pp. 55–79.Search in Google Scholar
Ferella, C. (forthcoming): “Empedocles’ Ultimate Symmetry Revisited”.Search in Google Scholar
Finkelberg, A. (1998): “On the History of the Greek κόσμος”, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 98, pp. 103–136.Search in Google Scholar
Graham, D.W. (1988): “Symmetry in the Empedoclean Cycle”, Classical Quaterly, 38, pp. 297–312.Search in Google Scholar
Graham, D.W. (2005): “The Topology and Dynamics of Empedocles’ Cycle”. In: Pierris, ed. (2005), pp. 225–244.Search in Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1965): A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. II: The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hladký, V. (2002): “Vítkův Empedoklés [Vítek’s Empedocles]”, Souvislosti 53–54. 3–4, pp. 194–202.Search in Google Scholar
Hladký, V. (2006): “Empedokleův Sfairos [Empedocles’ Sphairos]”, Filosofický časopis 54.3, pp. 393–410.Search in Google Scholar
Hladký, V. (2014): “Empedocles’ Sphairos and Its Interpretations in Antiquity, I: Aristotle and the Neoplatonists”, Eirene 50, pp. 149–164.Search in Google Scholar
Hladký, V. (2015): “Empedocles’ Sphairos and Its Interpretations in Antiquity II: Plato’s Timaeus and Statesman”, Eirene 51 pp. 71–98.Search in Google Scholar
Hladký, V. (2016): “Empedocles’ Sphairos and Its Interpretations in Antiquity III: Zoogony and Plato’s Symposium”, Eirene 52 pp. 149–64.Search in Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2005): “Empedocles on Colour and Colour Vision”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29, pp. 1–37.Search in Google Scholar
Janko, R. (2004): “Empedocles, On Nature I 233–364: A New Reconstructrion of P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665–6”, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 150, pp. 1–26 = “Empedocles’ Physica Book I: a New Reconstruction”. In: Pierris, ed. (2005), pp. 94–135.Search in Google Scholar
Karfík, F. (1998): “‘Vieles wie eines ist das Sein.’: Identität und Differenz bei Heraklit, Parmenides und Platon”, Graecolatina Pragensia, 15, pp. 35–45 (Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Philologica 1, 1997).Search in Google Scholar
Karfík, F. (2014): “L’Âme du monde: Platon, Anaxagore, Empédocle”, Études Platoniciennes 11.10.4000/etudesplatoniciennes.572Search in Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. (1995): Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. (2003): Reality, Inverness, CA: Golden Sufi Center.Search in Google Scholar
Kraus, M. (2013): “Parmenides”. In: H. Flashar – D. Bremer – G. Rechenauer, (eds.): Frühgriechische Philosophie, II, Basel: Schwabe, pp. 441–530 (F. Ueberweg, Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie: Die Philosophie der Antike, I/2).Search in Google Scholar
LSJ = Liddell, H.G. – Scott, R. – Jones, H.S. – McKenzie, R. (1996): Greek-English Lexicon, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996 (9th edn., with a supplement).Search in Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (1974): “Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle in the Sixties”. In: A.P.D. Mourelatos (ed.): The Pre-Socratics, Norwell, MA: Anchor Press, pp. 397–425.10.1515/9781400863204.397Search in Google Scholar
Martin, A. – Primavesi, O. (1999): L’Empédocle de Strasbourg: P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665–1666: Introduction, édition et commentaire, Strasbourg: Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg – Berlin-New York: de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (1969): Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/S0009838800010260Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (2007): “Aristophanes’ Speech in Plato’s Symposium: the Empedoclean Background and Its Philosophical Significance”. In: A. Havlíček – M. Cajthaml (eds.): Plato’s Symposium: Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Platonicum Pragense, Praha: Oikoumene, pp. 59–85.Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, J. (2009): Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567904.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Patočka, J. (1968): Předsokratovská filosofie [Presocratic Philosophy], Praha: SPN, 1968.Search in Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. (2012): “Apollon et la φρὴν ἱερὴ καὶ ἀθέσφατος (Empédocle, fr. 134 DK)”, Anais de la filosofia clássica 6. 11, pp. 1–31.Search in Google Scholar
Pierris, A.L., ed. (2005): The Empedoclean Κόσμος: Structure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research.Search in Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2008): Empedokles, Physika I: Eine Rekonstruktion des zentralen Gedankengangs, Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110210514Search in Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2013): “Empedokles”. In: H. Flashar – D. Bremer – G. Rechenauer (eds.): Frühgriechische Philosophie, II, Basel: Schwabe, pp. 667–739 (F. Ueberweg, Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie: Die Philosophie der Antike, I/2).Search in Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (2011): “La Zoogonie de la Haine selon Empédocle: retour sur l’ensemble ‘d’ du papyrus d’Akhmim”, Phronesis 56, pp. 33–57.10.1163/156852811X540419Search in Google Scholar
Rowett, C. (2016): “Love, Sex and the Gods: Why Things Have Divine Names in Empedocles’ Poem, and Why They Come in Pairs”, Rhizomata 4, pp. 80–110.10.1515/rhiz-2016-0005Search in Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1999): “Parmenides and Melissus”. In: A. A. Long, (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 113–133.10.1017/CCOL0521441226.006Search in Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2005): “Empedocles’ Life Cycles”. In: Pierris, ed. (2005), pp. 331–371.Search in Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2016): “Empedoclean Superorganisms”, Rhizomata 4, pp. 111–125.Search in Google Scholar
Stokes, M.C. (1971): One and Many in Presocratic Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. (2003a): “Empedocles on the Ultimate Symmetry of the World”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25, pp. 1–57.Search in Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. (2003b): “‘We’ and Empedocles’ Cosmic Lottery: P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665–1666, Ensemble A”, Mnemosyne 56, pp. 385–419.10.1163/156852503769173039Search in Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. (2004): Empedocles: An Interpretation, New York – London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203483923Search in Google Scholar
Vítek, T. (2001, 2006): Empedoklés [Empedocles], vol. I: Studie [Study], vol. II: Zlomky [Fragments], vol. III: Komentář [Commentary], Praha: Herrmann & Synové, vol. I: 2001, vols. II and III: 2006.Search in Google Scholar
Vítek, T. (2010): “Le Sphairos d’Empédocle et son substrat mythologique”, Elenchos 31, pp. 21–49.Search in Google Scholar
Wilcox, J. (2001): “‘Whole-Natured Forms’ in Empedocles’s Cosmic Cycle”. In: A.J. Preus (ed.): Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, vol. VI: Before Plato, Albany, NY, pp. 109–122.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
