Home Dariusz Leszczynski responds to comments of Maël Dieudonné on Leszczynski’s review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS)
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Dariusz Leszczynski responds to comments of Maël Dieudonné on Leszczynski’s review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS)

  • Dariusz Leszczynski EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 9, 2022

Abstract

While Dieudonné has praised thoroughness of Leszczynski’s review of EHS studies, he was critical of the final conclusions. Leszczynski strongly disagrees with argumentation of Dieudonné that EHS issue is settled and that biomarker research is unnecessary because it is expensive and might produce false positives. Leszczynski’s opinion is that his review has demonstrated how very poor scientifically and inadequate statistically is the to-date executed research on EHS. Dieudonné’s approach of using such poor science to justify claim that EHS issue is settled and there is no causality link between EHS and EMF exposures, is completely unjustified and simply false.


Corresponding author: Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD, DSc, Adjunct Professor of Biochemistry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: Single author (Dariusz Leszczynski).

  3. Competing interests: Author states no conflict of interest.

References

1. Dieudonné, M. Comments on the review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS) by Dariusz Leszczynski. Rev Environ Health 2023;38:395–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2022-0002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Leszczynski, D. Review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS). Rev Environ Health 2022;37:423–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2021-0038.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Schuermann, D, Mevissen, M. Manmade electromagnetic fields and oxidative stress-biological effects and consequences for health. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073772.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2022-02-18
Accepted: 2022-02-22
Published Online: 2022-03-09
Published in Print: 2023-09-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Determination of safe levels of persistent organic pollutants in toxicology and epidemiology
  4. A critical analysis of the MOBI-Kids study of wireless phone use in childhood and adolescence and brain tumor risk
  5. Occupational and environmental noise exposure during pregnancy and rare health outcomes of offspring: a scoping review focusing on congenital anomalies and perinatal mortality
  6. Exposure to air pollution and risk of ovarian cancer: a review
  7. Evaluation of the impact of different disinfectants on new coronavirus and human health
  8. A review on chromium health hazards and molecular mechanism of chromium bioremediation
  9. A review of the characteristic properties of selected tobacco chemicals and their associated etiological risks
  10. Using biomonitoring as a complementary approach in BTEX exposure assessment in the general population and occupational settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  11. Review, meta-analysis and carcinogenic risk assessment of aflatoxin M1 in different types of milks in Iran
  12. The effect of long-term exposure to toxic air pollutants on the increased risk of malignant brain tumors
  13. Self-referencing authorships behind the ICNIRP 2020 radiation protection guidelines
  14. Nano-engineered vitamins as a potential epigenetic modifier against environmental air pollutants
  15. The effect of toxic air pollutants on fertility men and women, fetus and birth rate
  16. A systematic review of photocatalytic degradation of humic acid in aqueous solution using nanoparticles
  17. Letter to the Editor
  18. Dariusz Leszczynski responds to comments of Maël Dieudonné on Leszczynski’s review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS)
Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2022-0034/html
Scroll to top button