Monolithic substrate support catalyst design considerations for steam methane reforming operation

References

Askeland DR, Fulay PP, Wright WJ. Mechanical properties: part two. In: The science and engineering of materials, 6th ed., Stamford, USA: Global Engineering, 2010: 260–265.Search in Google Scholar

Auerkari P. Mechanical and physical properties of engineering alumina ceramics. Finland: Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1996: 5–26.Search in Google Scholar

Baharudin L, Watson MJ. Monolithic substrate support catalyst design considerations for steam methane reforming operation. Rev Chem Eng 2018; 34: 481–501.10.1515/revce-2016-0048Search in Google Scholar

Bartholomew CH, Farrauto RJ. Chapter 2: catalyst materials, properties and preparation. In: Fundamentals of industrial catalytic processes. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Basile F, Benito P, Del Gallo P, Fornasari G, Gary D, Rosetti V, Vaccari A. Highly conductive Ni steam reforming catalysts prepared by electrodeposition. Chem Commun 2008; 25: 2917–2919.10.1039/b801645cSearch in Google Scholar

Boger T, Heibel AK. Heat transfer in conductive monolith structures. Chem Eng Sci 2005; 60: 1823–1835.10.1016/j.ces.2004.11.031Search in Google Scholar

Chinthaginjala JK, Seshan K, Lefferts L. Preparation and application of carbon-nanofiber based microstructured materials as catalyst supports. Ind Eng Chem Res 2007; 46: 3968–3978.10.1021/ie061394rSearch in Google Scholar

Chinthaginjala J, Thakur D, Seshan K, Lefferts L. How carbon-nano-fibers attach to Ni foam. Carbon 2008; 46: 1638–1647.10.1016/j.carbon.2008.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Czuppon TA, Knez SA, Newsome DS. In: A. Bisio, S. Boots, editors. Encyclopedia of energy technology and the environment. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1995: 1752–1782.Search in Google Scholar

Echave F, Sanz O, Velasco I, Odriozola J, Montes M. Effect of the alloy on micro-structured reactors for methanol steam reforming. Catal Today 2013; 213: 145–154.10.1016/j.cattod.2013.02.027Search in Google Scholar

Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M, Voecks GE, Charng T. Modelling of heat transfer in non-adiabatic monolith reactors and experimental comparisons of metal monoliths with packed beds. Chem Eng Sci 1986; 41: 1203–1212.10.1016/0009-2509(86)87093-2Search in Google Scholar

Giroux T, Hwang S, Liu Y, Ruettinger W, Shore L. Monolithic structures as alternatives to particulate catalysts for the reforming of hydrocarbons for hydrogen generation. Appl Catal B-Environ 2005; 56: 95–110.10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.07.013Search in Google Scholar

Groppi G, Tronconi E. Continuous vs. discrete models of nonadiabatic monolith catalysts. AIChE J 1996; 42: 2382–2387.10.1002/aic.690420829Search in Google Scholar

Groppi G, Tronconi E. Design of novel monolith catalyst supports for gas/solid reactions with heat exchange. Chem Eng Sci 2000; 55: 2161–2171.10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00440-6Search in Google Scholar

Groppi G, Tronconi E. Honeycomb supports with high thermal conductivity for gas/solid chemical processes. Catal Today 2005; 105: 297–304.10.1016/j.cattod.2005.06.041Search in Google Scholar

Guo N, Leu MC. Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Front Mech Eng 2013; 8: 215–243.10.1007/s11465-013-0248-8Search in Google Scholar

Hayes R, Liu B, Moxom R, Votsmeier M. The effect of washcoat geometry on mass transfer in monolith reactors. Chem Eng Sci 2004; 59: 3169–3181.10.1016/j.ces.2004.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Haynes International. Retrieved from https://www.haynesintl.com/alloys/alloy-portfolio_(accessed30.01.17).Search in Google Scholar

Heck RM, Gulati S, Farrauto RJ. The application of monoliths for gas phase catalytic reactions. Chem Eng J 2001; 82: 149–156.10.1016/S1385-8947(00)00365-XSearch in Google Scholar

Heck RM, Farrauto RJ, Gulati ST. Catalytic air pollution control: commercial technology. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2009: 63–77.10.1002/9781118397749Search in Google Scholar

Hochmuth JK. Catalytic partial oxidation of methane over a monolith supported catalyst. Appl Catal B-Environ 1992; 1: 89–100.10.1016/0926-3373(92)80035-XSearch in Google Scholar

HyperPhysics. Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30302-5060. Retrieved from http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hph.html (accessed 30.01.17).Search in Google Scholar

INCO Europe Limited (1976). INCO Databooks. IN-519 Cast Chromium-Nickel-Niobium Heat-Resisting Steel <https://www.nickelinstitute.org/∼/media/Files/TechnicalLiterature/IN_519CastChromium_Nickel_NiobiumHeat_ResistingSteel_EngineeringProperties_4383_.ashx> (accessed 30.01.17).Search in Google Scholar

Jungreuthmayer C, Steppert P, Sekot G, Zankel A, Reingruber H, Zanghellini J, Jungbauer A. The 3D pore structure and fluid dynamics simulation of macroporous monoliths: High permeability due to alternating channel width. J Chromatogr A 2015; 1425: 141–149.10.1016/j.chroma.2015.11.026Search in Google Scholar

Kruth J-P, Leu M-C, Nakagawa T. Progress in additive manufacturing and rapid prototyping. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 1998; 47: 525–540.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63240-5Search in Google Scholar

Martinez AT, Camerucci M, Cavalieri A. Thermal stress analysis of cordierite materials subjected to thermal shock. J Mater Sci 2008; 43: 2731–2738.10.1007/s10853-008-2492-6Search in Google Scholar

Material Properties Charts. (2013). Ceramic Industry Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.ceramicindustry.com/ceramic-materials-properties-charts (accessed 30.01.17).Search in Google Scholar

Materials Data Book. (2003). Cambridge University Engineering Department. <http://www-mdp.eng.cam.ac.uk/web/library/enginfo/cueddatabooks/materials.pdf> (accessed 30.01.17).Search in Google Scholar

Mei H, Li C, Ji S, Liu H. Modeling of a metal monolith catalytic reactor for methane steam reforming–combustion coupling. Chem Eng Sci 2007; 62: 4294–4303.10.1016/j.ces.2007.05.011Search in Google Scholar

Mladenov N, Koop J, Tischer S, Deutschmann O. Modeling of transport and chemistry in channel flows of automotive catalytic converters. Chem Eng Sci 2010; 65: 812–826.10.1016/j.ces.2009.09.034Search in Google Scholar

Mohammadzadeh JS, Zamaniyan A. Catalyst shape as a design parameter – optimum shape for methane-steam reforming catalyst. Chem Eng Res Des 2002; 80: 383–391.10.1205/026387602317446425Search in Google Scholar

Mohino F, Martin AB, Salerno P, Bahamonde A, Mendioroz S. High surface area monoliths based on pillared clay materials as carriers for catalytic processes. Appl Clay Sci 2005; 29: 125–136.10.1016/j.clay.2004.12.003Search in Google Scholar

Nijhuis TA, Beers AE, Vergunst T, Hoek I, Kapteijn F, Moulijn JA. Preparation of monolithic catalysts. Catal Rev 2001; 43: 345–380.10.1081/CR-120001807Search in Google Scholar

Peng Y, Richardson JT. Properties of ceramic foam catalyst supports: one-dimensional and two-dimensional heat transfer correlations. Appl Catal A-Gen 2004; 266: 235–244.10.1016/j.apcata.2004.02.012Search in Google Scholar

Rallan C, Garforth A. Growth of hierarchically structured high-surface area alumina on FeCralloy^® rods. Chin J Chem Eng 2014; 22: 861–868.10.1016/j.cjche.2014.06.007Search in Google Scholar

Richardson JT, Peng Y, Remue D. Properties of ceramic foam catalyst supports: pressure drop. Appl Catal A-Gen 2000; 204: 19–32.10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00508-1Search in Google Scholar

Roh H-S, Lee DK, Koo KY, Jung UH, Yoon WL. Natural gas steam reforming for hydrogen production over metal monolith catalyst with efficient heat-transfer. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2010; 35: 1613–1619.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.051Search in Google Scholar

Roy S, Bauer T, Al-Dahhan M, Lehner P, Turek T. Monoliths as multiphase reactors: a review. AIChE J 2004; 50: 2918–2938.10.1002/aic.10268Search in Google Scholar

Ryu J-H, Lee K-Y, La H, Kim H-J, Yang J-I, Jung H. Ni catalyst wash-coated on metal monolith with enhanced heat-transfer capability for steam reforming. J Power Sources 2007; 171: 499–505.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.05.107Search in Google Scholar

Saito M, Kojima J, Iwai H, Yoshida H. The limiting process in steam methane reforming with gas diffusion into a porous catalytic wall in a flow reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2015; 40: 8844–8855.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.073Search in Google Scholar

Sheng M, Yang H, Cahela DR, Tatarchuk BJ. Novel catalyst structures with enhanced heat transfer characteristics. J Catal 2011; 281: 254–262.10.1016/j.jcat.2011.05.006Search in Google Scholar

Sheng M, Yang H, Cahela DR, Yantz Jr WR, Gonzalez CF, Tatarchuk BJ. High conductivity catalyst structures for applications in exothermic reactions. Appl Catal A-Gen 2012; 445–446: 143–152.10.1016/j.apcata.2012.08.012Search in Google Scholar

Sheng M, Cahela DR, Yang H, Gonzalez CF, Yantz Jr WR, Harris DK, Tatarchuk BJ. Effective thermal conductivity and junction factor for sintered microfibrous materials. Int J Heat Mass Tran 2013; 56: 10–19.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.08.015Search in Google Scholar

Special Metals Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.specialmetals.com/products (accessed 30.01.17).Search in Google Scholar

Subramanian RS. (2015) Heat transfer in flow through conduits. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Clarkson University Project <http://people.clarkson.edu/projects/subramanian/ch330/notes/Heat%20Transfer%20in%20Flow%20Through%20Conduits.pdf> (accessed 30.01.17).Search in Google Scholar

Tonkovich AY, Perry S, Wang Y, Qiu D, LaPlante T, Rogers WA. Microchannel process technology for compact methane steam reforming. Chem Eng Sci 2004; 59: 4819–4824.10.1016/j.ces.2004.07.098Search in Google Scholar

Tronconi E, Groppi G, Boger T, Heibel A. Monolithic catalysts with ‘high conductivity’ honeycomb supports for gas/solid exothermic reactions: characterization of the heat-transfer properties. Chem Eng Sci 2004; 59: 4941–4949.10.1016/j.ces.2004.07.018Search in Google Scholar

Tronconi E, Groppi G, Visconti CG. Structured catalysts for non-adiabatic applications. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2014; 5: 55–67.10.1016/j.coche.2014.04.003Search in Google Scholar

Twigg M, Richardson J Theory and applications of ceramic foam catalysts. Chem Eng Res Des 2002; 80: 183–189.10.1205/026387602753501906Search in Google Scholar

Visconti CG, Groppi G, Tronconi E. Highly conductive “packed foams”: A new concept for the intensification of strongly endo-and exo-thermic catalytic processes in compact tubular reactors. Catal Today 2016; 273: 178–186.10.1016/j.cattod.2016.02.060Search in Google Scholar

Whittenberger WA. (2010) Permanent, high performance, drop-in replacement catalyst for steam reforming hydrogen plants. In: C. Corporation (Ed.), Stackable structural reactor (SSR^®) Technology White Paper (Vol. 102).Search in Google Scholar

Zamaniyan A, Mortazavi Y, Khodadadi AA, Manafi H. Tube fitted bulk monolithic catalyst as novel structured reactor for gas–solid reactions. Appl Catal A-Gen 2010; 385: 214–223.10.1016/j.apcata.2010.07.014Search in Google Scholar

Zamaniyan A, Khodadadi AA, Mortazavi Y, Manafi H. Comparative model analysis of the performance of tube fitted bulk monolithic catalyst with conventional pellet shapes for natural gas reforming. J Ind Eng Chem 2011; 17: 767–776.10.1016/j.jiec.2011.05.028Search in Google Scholar

Zhu J, Wu F, Li M, Zhu J, van Ommen JG, Lefferts L. Influence of internal diffusion on selective hydrogenation of 4-carboxybenzaldehyde over palladium catalysts supported on carbon nanofiber coated monolith. Appl Cataly A-Gen 2015; 498: 222–229.10.1016/j.apcata.2015.03.036Search in Google Scholar