Electroconductive and electroresponsive membranes for water treatment

References

Abelow AE, Persson KM, Jager EWH, Berggren M, Zharov I. Electroresponsive nanoporous membranes by coating anodized alumina with poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) and polypyrrole. Macromol Mater Eng 2014; 299: 190–197.10.1002/mame.201200456Search in Google Scholar

Al-Amoudi A, Lovitt RW. Fouling strategies and the cleaning system of NF membranes and factors affecting cleaning efficiency. J Membr Sci 2007; 303: 4–28.10.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Anderson MA, Cudero AL, Palma J. Capacitive deionization as an electrochemical means of saving energy and delivering clean water. Comparison to present desalination practices: will it compete? Electrochim Acta 2010; 55: 3845–3856.10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.012Search in Google Scholar

Ang WS, Lee S, Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of cleaning of organic-fouled reverse osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 2006; 272: 198–210.10.1016/j.memsci.2005.07.035Search in Google Scholar

Asatekin A, Mennitib A, Kangd S, Elimelechd M, Morgenrothb E, Mayes AM. Antifouling nanofiltration membranes for membrane bioreactors from self-assembling graft copolymers. J Membr Sci 2006; 285: 81–89.10.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.042Search in Google Scholar

Ates M. A review study of (bio)sensor systems based on conducting polymers. Mater Sci Eng C 2013; 33: 1853–1859.10.1016/j.msec.2013.01.035Search in Google Scholar

Ayadi S, Jedidi I, Rivallin M, Gillot F, Lacour S, Cerneaux S, Cretin M, Amar RB. Elaboration and characterization of new conductive porous graphite membranes for electrochemical advanced oxidation processes. J Membr Sci 2013; 446: 42–49.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.005Search in Google Scholar

Baatout S, Boever P, Mergeay M. Physiological changes induced in four bacterial strains following oxidative stress. Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol 2006; 42: 369–377.10.1134/S0003683806040053Search in Google Scholar

Babuponnusami A, Muthukumar K. Advanced oxidation of phenol: a comparison between fenton, electro-fenton, sono-electro-fenton and photo-electro-fenton processes. Chem Eng J 2012; 183: 1–9.10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.010Search in Google Scholar

Baker JS, Dudley LY. Biofouling in membrane systems – a review. Desalination 1998; 118: 81–89.10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00091-5Search in Google Scholar

Barraud N, Hassett DJ, Hwang SH, Rice SA, Kjelleberg S, Webb JS. Involvement of nitric oxide in biofilm dispersal of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 2006; 188: 7344–7353.10.1128/JB.00779-06Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Bhattacharyya D, Schäfer T, Wickramasinghe SR, Daunert S. Responsive membranes and materials. New York: Wiley, 2012.10.1002/9781118389553Search in Google Scholar

Boles BR, Singh PK. Endogenous oxidative stress produces diversity and adaptability in biofilm communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 12503–12508.10.1073/pnas.0801499105Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Brant J, Childress AE. Membrane-colloid interactions: comparison of extended dlvo predictions with AFM force measurements. Environ Eng Sci 2002; 19: 413–427.10.1089/109287502320963409Search in Google Scholar

van der Bruggen B, Vandecasteele C, van Gestel T, Doyen W, Leysen R. A review of pressure-driven membrane processes in wastewater treatment and drinking water production. Environ Prog 2003; 22: 46–56.10.1002/ep.670220116Search in Google Scholar

Buonomenna MG. Membrane processes for a sustainable industrial growth. RSC Adv 2013; 3: 5694.10.1039/c2ra22580hSearch in Google Scholar

Callow ME, Callow JA. Marine biofouling: a sticky problem. Biologist 2002; 49: 10–14.Search in Google Scholar

Čáp M, Váchová L, Palková Z. Reactive oxygen species in the signaling and adaptation of multicellular microbial communities. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2012; 2012: 1–13.10.1155/2012/976753Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Chan EP, Mulhearn WD, Huang YR, Lee JH, Lee D, Stafford CM. Tailoring the permselectivity of water desalination membranes via nanoparticle assembly. Langmuir 2014; 30: 611–616.10.1021/la403718xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Chen PR, Chuang YJ. The development of conductive nanoporous chitosan polymer membrane for selective transport of charged molecules. J Nanomater 2013; 2013: 6.10.1155/2013/980857Search in Google Scholar

Chen X, Zhao B, Zhao L, Bi S, Han P, Feng X, Chen L. Temperature- and pH-responsive membranes based on poly (vinylidene fluoride) functionalized with microgels. J Membr Sci 2014; 469: 447–457.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.005Search in Google Scholar

Chuo T-W, Wei T-C, Chang Y, Liu Y-L. Electrically driven biofouling release of a poly(tetra fl uoroethylene) membrane modi fied with an electrically induced reversibly cross-linked polymer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2013; 5: 9918–9925.10.1021/am4033982Search in Google Scholar

Coster HGL, Farahani TD, Chilcott TC. Production and characterization of piezo-electric membranes. Desalination 2011; 283: 52–57.10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.071Search in Google Scholar

Darestani MT, Coster HGL, Chilcott TC. Piezoelectric membranes for separation processes: fabrication and piezoelectric properties. J Membr Sci 2013a; 434: 184–192.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.01.035Search in Google Scholar

Darestani MT, Coster HGL, Chilcott TC. Piezoelectric membranes for separation processes: operating conditions and filtration performance. J Membr Sci 2013b; 435: 226–232.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.02.024Search in Google Scholar

Duan W, Dudchenko A, Mende E, Flyer C, Zhu X, Jassby D. Electrochemical mineral scale prevention and removal on electrically conducting carbon nanotube – polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. Environ Sci Processes Impacts 2014; 16: 1300–1308.10.1039/C3EM00635BSearch in Google Scholar

Dudchenko AV, Rolf J, Russell K, Duan W, Jassby D. Organic fouling inhibition on electrically conducting carbon nanotube–polyvinyl alcohol composite ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 2014; 468: 1–10.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.041Search in Google Scholar

Elimelech M, Phillip WA. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science (New York) 2011; 333: 712–717.10.1126/science.1200488Search in Google Scholar

Eshed L, Yaron S, Dosoretz CG. Effect of permeate drag force on the development of a biofouling layer in a pressure-driven membrane separation system. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008; 74: 7338–7347.10.1128/AEM.00631-08Search in Google Scholar

Fan L, Harris JL, Roddick FA, Booker NA. Influence of the characteristics of natural organic matter on the fouling of microfiltration membranes. Water Res 2001; 35: 4455–4463.10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00183-XSearch in Google Scholar

Feng R, Wang C, Xu X, Yang F, Xu G, Jiang T. Highly effective antifouling performance of N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone modified polypropylene non-woven fabric membranes by ATRP method. J Membr Sci 2011; 369: 233–242.10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.072Search in Google Scholar

Field R. Fundamentals of fouling in membrane technology. In: Klaus-Viktor P, Suzana PN, editors. Membranes for water treatment, vol. 4. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, 2010: 1–23.10.1002/9783527631407.ch1Search in Google Scholar

Flemming HC. Biofouling in water systems-cases, causes and countermeasures. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2002; 59: 629–640.10.1007/s00253-002-1066-9Search in Google Scholar

Flemming HC, Schaule G, Griebe T, Schmitt J, Tamachkiarowa A. Biofouling – the Achilles heel of membrane processes. Desalination 1997; 113: 215–225.10.1016/S0011-9164(97)00132-XSearch in Google Scholar

Frost S, Ulbricht M. Thermoresponsive ultrafiltration membranes for the switchable permeation and fractionation of nanoparticles. J Membr Sci 2013; 448: 1–11.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.036Search in Google Scholar

Gao G, Zhang Q, Hao Z, Vecitis CD. Carbon nanotube membrane stack for flow-through sequential regenerative electro-fenton. Environ Sci Technol 2015; 49: 2375–2383.10.1021/es505679eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Geise GM, Cassady HJ, Paul DR, Logan BE, Hickner MA. Specific ion effects on membrane potential and the permselectivity of ion exchange membranes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2014; 16: 21673–21681.10.1039/C4CP03076ASearch in Google Scholar

Goosen MFA, Sablanib SS, Al-Hinaia H, Al-Obeidania S, Al-Belushib R, Jackson D. Fouling of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration membranes: a critical review. Sep Sci Technol 2005; 39: 2261–2297.10.1081/SS-120039343Search in Google Scholar

Gugliuzza A. Intelligent membranes: dream or reality? Membranes 2013; 3: 151–154.10.3390/membranes3030151Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Guo B, Glavas L, Albertsson A-C. Biodegradable and electrically conducting polymers for biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 2013; 38: 1263–1286.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Guo L, Jung Y, Chaplin BP. Development and characterization of ultrafiltration TiO₂ Magnéli phase reactive electrochemical membranes. Environ Sci Technol 2016; 50: 1428–1436.10.1021/acs.est.5b04366Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Guo W, Ngo HH, Li J. A mini-review on membrane fouling. Bioresour Technol 2012; 122: 27–34.10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.089Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Hashaikeh R, Lalia BS, Kochkodan V, Hilal N. A novel in situ membrane cleaning method using periodic electrolysis. J Membr Sci 2014; 471: 149–154.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.08.017Search in Google Scholar

He Y, Chen X, Bi S, Fu W, Shi C, Chen L. Conferring pH-sensitivity on poly (vinylidene fluoride) membrane by poly (acrylic acid-co-butyl acrylate) microgels. React Funct Polym 2014; 74: 58–66.10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2013.10.012Search in Google Scholar

Hegab HM, Zou L. Graphene oxide-assisted membranes: fabrication and potential applications in desalination and water purification. J Membr Sci 2015; 484: 95–106.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.011Search in Google Scholar

Hermansson M. The DLVO theory in microbial adhesion. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 1999; 14: 105–119.10.1016/S0927-7765(99)00029-6Search in Google Scholar

Hijnen WAM, Castillo C, Brouwer-Hanzens AH, Harmsen DJ, Cornelissen ER, van der Kooij D. Quantitative assessment of the efficacy of spiral-wound membrane cleaning procedures to remove biofilms. Water Res 2012; 46: 6369–6381.10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.013Search in Google Scholar

Holder A, Weik J, Hinrichs J. A study of fouling during long-term fractionation of functional peptides by means of cross-flow ultrafiltration and cross-flow electro membrane filtration. J Membr Sci 2013; 446: 440–448.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.017Search in Google Scholar

Hong S, Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 1997; 132: 159–181.10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00060-4Search in Google Scholar

Huang J, Wang Z, Zhang J, Zhang X, Wu Z. A novel composite conductive microfiltration membrane and its anti-fouling performance with an external electric field in membrane bioreactors. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 1–8.10.1038/srep09268Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Jeon G, Yang SY, Byun J, Kim JK. Electrically actuatable smart nanoporous membrane for pulsatile drug release. Nano Lett 2011; 11: 1284–1288.10.1021/nl104329ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Ji Y-L, An Q-F, Guo Y-S, Hung W-S, Lee K-R, Gao C-J. Bio-inspired fabrication of high perm-selectivity and anti-fouling membranes based on zwitterionic polyelectrolyte nanoparticles. J Mater Chem A 2016; 4: 4224–4231.10.1039/C6TA00005CSearch in Google Scholar

Jin Y-L, Lee WN, Lee CH, Chang IS, Huang X, Swaminathan T. Effect of DO concentration on biofilm structure and membrane filterability in submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res 2006; 40: 2829–2836.10.1016/j.watres.2006.05.040Search in Google Scholar

Katsuno C, Konda A, Urayama K, Takigawa T, Kidowaki M, Ito K. Pressure-responsive polymer membranes of slide-ring gels with movable cross-links. Adv Mater 2013; 25: 4636–4640.10.1002/adma.201301252Search in Google Scholar

Katz I, Dosoretz CG. Desalination of domestic wastewater effluents: phosphate removal as pretreatment. Desalination 2008; 222: 230–242.10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.160Search in Google Scholar

Kennedy MD, Kamanyi J, Salinas Rodríguez SG, Lee NH, Schippers JC, Amy C. Water treatment by microfiltration and ultrafiltration. In: Matsuura T, Li NN, Fane AG, Winston Ho WS, editors. Advance membrane technology and application. New Jersey: John Wiley, 2008: 131–150.10.1002/9780470276280.ch6Search in Google Scholar

Krinks JK, Qiu MH, Mergos IA, Weavers LK, Mouser PJ, Verweij H. Piezoceramic membrane with built-in ultrasonic defouling. J Membr Sci 2015; 494: 130–135.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.07.058Search in Google Scholar

Kuo TC, Sloan LA, Sweedler JV, Bohn PW. Manipulating molecular transport through nanoporous membranes by control of electrokinetic flow: effect of surface charge density and debye length. Langmuir 2001; 17: 6298–6303.10.1021/la010429jSearch in Google Scholar

Lachheb H, Puzenata E, Houasb A, Ksibib M, Elalouib E, Guillarda C, Herrmann J-M. Photocatalytic degradation of various types of dyes (alizarin S, crocein orange G, methyl red, congo red, methylene blue) in water by UV-irradiated titania. Appl Catal B Environ 2002; 39: 75–90.10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00078-4Search in Google Scholar

de Lannoy CF, Jassby D, Davis DD, Wiesner MR. A highly electrically conductive polymer–multiwalled carbon nanotube nanocomposite membrane. J Membr Sci 2012; 415–416: 718–724.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.061Search in Google Scholar

de Lannoy CF, Jassby D, Gloe K, Gordon AD, Wiesner MR. Aquatic biofouling prevention by electrically charged nanocomposite polymer thin film membranes. Environ Sci Technol 2013; 47: 2760–2768.10.1021/es3045168Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Lee W-N, Changb I-S, Hwanga B-K, Parka P-K, Leea C-H, Huangc X. Changes in biofilm architecture with addition of membrane fouling reducer in a membrane bioreactor. Proc Biochem 2007; 42: 655–661.10.1016/j.procbio.2006.12.003Search in Google Scholar

Lee KP, Arnot TC, Mattia D. A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination-development to date and future potential. J Membr Sci 2011; 370: 1–22.10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.036Search in Google Scholar

Legrini O, Oliveros E, Braun AM. Photochemical processes for water treatment. Chem Rev 1993; 93: 671–698.10.1021/cr00018a003Search in Google Scholar

Lenntech. Product Information: Dow Filmtec BW30FR-365 Fouling Resistant RO Element, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Li H, Liao J, Xiang T, Wang R, Wang D, Sun S, Zhao C. Preparation and characterization of pH- and thermo-sensitive polyethersulfone hollow fiber membranes modified with P(NIPAAm-MAA-MMA) terpolymer. Desalination 2013; 309: 1–10.10.1016/j.desal.2012.09.008Search in Google Scholar

Li N, Liu L, Yang F. Highly conductive graphene/PANi-Phytic acid modi Fi Ed cathodic Fi Lter membrane and its antifouling property in EMBR in neutral conditions. Desalination 2014; 338: 10–16.10.1016/j.desal.2014.01.019Search in Google Scholar

Liébana R, Arregui L, Belda I, Gamella L, Santos A, Marquina D, Serrano S. Membrane bioreactor wastewater treatment plants reveal diverse yeast and protist communities of potential significance in biofouling. Biofouling 2015; 31: 71–82.10.1080/08927014.2014.998206Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Liu M, Cote P, Siverns S. Water reclamation and desalination by membranes. In: Matsuura T, Li NN, Fane AG, Winston Ho WS, editors. Advanced membrane technology and applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2008: 171–87.10.1002/9780470276280.ch7Search in Google Scholar

Liu CX, Zhang DR, He Y, Zhao XS, Bai R. Modification of membrane surface for anti-biofouling performance: effect of anti-adhesion and anti-bacteria approaches. J Membr Sci 2010; 346: 121–130.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.028Search in Google Scholar

Liu L, Liu J, Gao B, Yang F, Chellam S. Fouling reductions in a membrane bioreactor using an intermittent electric field and cathodic membrane modified by vapor phase polymerized pyrrole. J Membr Sci 2012; 394–395: 202–208.10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.042Search in Google Scholar

Liu C, Xie X, Zhao W, Liu N, Maraccini PA, Sassoubre LM, Boehm AB, Cui Y. Conducting nanosponge electroporation for affordable and high efficiency disinfection of bacteria and viruses in water. Nano Lett 2013a; 13: 4288–4293.10.1021/nl402053zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Liu H, Vajpayee A, Vecitis CD. Bismuth-doped tin oxide-coated carbon nanotube network: improved anode stability and efficiency for flow-through organic electrooxidation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2013b; 5: 10054–10066.10.1021/am402621vSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Liu J, Liu L, Gao B, Yang F. Integration of bio-electrochemical cell in membrane bioreactor for membrane cathode fouling reduction through electricity generation. J Membr Sci 2013c; 430: 196–202.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.046Search in Google Scholar

Liu L, Liu J, Bo G, Yang F, Crittenden, Chen Y. Conductive and hydrophilic polypyrrole modified membrane cathodes and fouling reduction in MBR. J Membr Sci 2013d; 429: 252–258.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.066Search in Google Scholar

Liu L, Zhao F, Liu J, Yang F. Preparation of highly conductive cathodic membrane with graphene (oxide)/PPy and the membrane antifouling property in filtrating yeast suspensions in EMBR. J Membr Sci 2013e; 437: 99–107.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.02.045Search in Google Scholar

Liu Y, Rosenfield E, Hu M, Mi B. Direct observation of bacterial deposition on and detachment from nanocomposite membranes embedded with silver nanoparticles. Water Res 2013f; 47: 2949–2958.10.1016/j.watres.2013.03.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Liu Y, Lee JHD, Xia Q, Ma Y, Yu Y, Yung LYL, Xie J, Ong CN, Vecitis CD, Zhou Z. A graphene-based electrochemical filter for water purification. J Mater Chem A 2014; 2: 16554–16562.10.1039/C4TA04006FSearch in Google Scholar

Lu X, Zhao C. Highly efficient and robust oxygen evolution catalysts achieved by anchoring nanocrystalline cobalt oxides onto mildly oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J Mater Chem A 2013; 1: 12053.10.1039/c3ta12912hSearch in Google Scholar

Ma S, Meng J, Li J, Zhang Y, Ni L. Synthesis of catalytic polypropylene membranes enabling visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of dyes in water. J Membr Sci 2014; 453: 221–229.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.021Search in Google Scholar

Malaisamy R, Berry D, Holder D, Raskin L, Lepak L, Jones KL. Development of reactive thin film polymer brush membranes to prevent biofouling. J Membr Sci 2010; 350: 361–370.10.1016/j.memsci.2010.01.011Search in Google Scholar

Marchal V, Dellink R, van Vuuren D, Clapp C, Château J, Lanzi E, Magné B, van Vliet J. OECD environmental outlook to 2050: the consequences of inaction. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Martins P, Lopes AC, Lanceros-Mendez S. Electroactive phases of poly(vinylidene fluoride): determination, processing and applications. Prog Polym Sci 2014; 39: 683–706.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.006Search in Google Scholar

Meng H, Hu J. A brief review of stimulus – active polymers responsive to thermal, light, magnetic, electric, and water/solvent stimuli. J Intell Mater Sys Struct 2010; 21: 859–885.10.1177/1045389X10369718Search in Google Scholar

Munna MS, Nur I, Rahman T, Noor R. Influence of exogenous oxidative stress on Escherichia coli cell growth, viability and morphology. Am J Biosci 2013; 1: 59.10.11648/j.ajbio.20130104.12Search in Google Scholar

Nagarale RK, Gohil GS, Shahi VK. Recent developments on ion-exchange membranes and electro-membrane processes. Adv Colloid and Interface Sci 2006; 119: 97–130.10.1016/j.cis.2005.09.005Search in Google Scholar

Narendra G, Ramesh V. Effect of hydrogen peroxide induced oxidative stress on increasing the susceptibility of gram negative bacteria against ciprofloxacin. Int J Future Biotechnol 2012; 1: 1–6.Search in Google Scholar

Nicoletta FP, Cupelli D, Formoso P, Filpo GD, Colella V, Gugliuzza A. Light responsive polymer membranes: a review. Membranes 2012; 2: 134–197.10.3390/membranes2010134Search in Google Scholar

Ohmori S, Saito T. Electrochemical durability of single-wall carbon nanotube electrode against anodic oxidation in water. Carbon 2012; 50: 4932–4938.10.1016/j.carbon.2012.06.023Search in Google Scholar

Otero TF, Martinez JG, Arias-Pardilla J. Biomimetic electrochemistry from conducting polymers. a review: artificial muscles, smart membranes, smart drug delivery and computer/neuron interfaces. Electrochim. Acta 2012; 84: 112–128.10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.097Search in Google Scholar

Park N, Kwon B, Kim IS, Cho J. Biofouling potential of various nf membranes with respect to bacteria and their soluble microbial products (SMP): characterizations, flux decline, and transport parameters. J Membr Sci 2005; 258: 43–54.10.1016/j.memsci.2005.02.025Search in Google Scholar

Prihasto N, Liu Q-F, Kim S-H. Pre-treatment strategies for seawater desalination by reverse osmosis system. Desalination 2009; 249: 308–316.10.1016/j.desal.2008.09.010Search in Google Scholar

Pyo M, Reynolds JR, Warren LF, Marcy HO. Long-term redox switching stability of polypyrrole. Synthetic Metals 1994; 68: 71–77.10.1016/0379-6779(94)90149-XSearch in Google Scholar

Qiu J-H, Zhang Y-W, Zhang Y-T, Zhang H-Q, Liu J-D. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of copper-immobilized membrane comprising grafted poly(4-vinylpyridine) chains. J Colloid Interface Sci 2011; 354: 152–159.10.1016/j.jcis.2010.09.090Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Qiu X, Yu H, Karunakaran M, Pradeep N, Nunes SP, Peinemann K-V. Selective separation of similarly sized proteins with tunable nanoporous block copolymer membranes. ACS Nano 2013; 7: 768–776.10.1021/nn305073eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Ronen A, Duan W, Wheeldon I, Walker SL, Jassby D. Microbial attachment inhibition through low voltage electrochemical reactions on electrically conducting membranes. Environ Sci Technol 2015; 49: 12741–12750.10.1021/acs.est.5b01281Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Saeki D, Nagao S, Sawada I, Ohmukai Y, Maruyama T, Matsuyama H. Development of antibacterial polyamide reverse osmosis membrane modified with a covalently immobilized enzyme. J Membr Sci 2013; 428: 403–409.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.038Search in Google Scholar

Santos MC, Elabd YA, Jing Y, Chaplin BP, Fang L. Highly porous Ti₄O₇ reactive electrochemical water filtration membranes fabricated via electrospinning/electrospraying. AIChE J 2016; 62: 508–524.10.1002/aic.15093Search in Google Scholar

Shannon MA, Bohn PW, Elimelech M, Georgiadis JG, Mariñas BJ, Mayes AM. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 2008; 452: 301–310.10.1142/9789814287005_0035Search in Google Scholar

Shirazi S, Lin CJ, Chen D. Inorganic fouling of pressure-driven membrane processes—a critical review. Desalination 2010; 250: 236–248.10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.056Search in Google Scholar

Singh BL, Ejaz F, Shah T, Hilal N, Hashaikeh R. Electrically conductive membranes based on carbon nanostructures for self-cleaning of biofouling. Desalination 2015; 360: 8–12.10.1016/j.desal.2015.01.006Search in Google Scholar

Teng Y, Zhang Y, Heng L, Meng X, Yang Q, Jiang L. Conductive polymer porous film with tunable wettability and adhesion. Materials 2015; 8: 1817–1830.10.3390/ma8041817Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Tominaga M, Yatsugi Y, Watanabe N. Oxidative corrosion potential vs. pH diagram for single-walled carbon nanotubes. RSC Adv 2014; 4: 27224.10.1039/c4ra02875aSearch in Google Scholar

Tsai YT, Choi CH, Gao N, Yang EH. Tunable wetting mechanism of polypyrrole surfaces and low-voltage droplet manipulation via redox. Langmuir 2011; 27: 4249–4256.10.1021/la104403wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Vecitis CD, Gao G, Liu H. Electrochemical carbon nanotube filter for adsorption, desorption, and oxidation of aqueous dyes and anions. J Phys Chem C 2011a; 115: 3621–3629.10.1021/jp111844jSearch in Google Scholar

Vecitis CD, Schnoor MH, Rahaman S, Schi JD, Elimelech M. Electrochemical multiwalled carbon nanotube filter for viral and bacterial removal and inactivation. Environ Sci Technol 2011b; 45: 3672–3679.10.1021/es2000062Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Wandera DS, Wickramasinghe R, Husson SM. Stimuli-responsive membranes. J Membr Sci 2010; 357: 6–35.10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.046Search in Google Scholar

Wang S, Guillen G, Hoek EMV. Direct observation of microbial adhesion to membranes. Environ Sci Technol 2005; 39: 6461–6469.10.1021/es050188sSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Wang R, Xiang T, Yue W, Li H, Liang S, Sun S, Zhao C. Preparation and characterization of pH-sensitive polyethersulfone hollow fiber membranes modified by poly(methyl methylacrylate-Co-4-vinyl pyridine) copolymer. J Membr Sci 2012a; 423–424: 275–283.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.08.022Search in Google Scholar

Wang Z, Yao X, Wang Y. Swelling-induced mesoporous block copolymer membranes with intrinsically active surfaces for size-selective separation. J Mater Chem 2012b; 22: 20542.10.1039/c2jm34292hSearch in Google Scholar

Wang C, Song H, Zhang Q, Wang B, Li A. Parameter optimization based on capacitive deionization for highly efficient desalination of domestic wastewater biotreated efficient and the fouled electrode regeneration. Desalination 2015a; 365: 407–415.10.1016/j.desal.2015.03.025Search in Google Scholar

Wang S, Liang S, Liang P, Zhang X, Sun J, Wu S, Huang X. In-situ combined dual-layer CNT/PVDF membrane for electrically-enhanced fouling resistance. J Membr Sci 2015b; 491: 37–44.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.014Search in Google Scholar

Wei X, Wang Z, Chen J, Wang J, Wang S. A novel method of surface modification on thin-film-composite reverse osmosis membrane by grafting hydantoin derivative. J Membr Sci 2010; 346: 152–162.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.032Search in Google Scholar

Weidlich C, Mangold KM. Electrochemically switchable polypyrrole coated membranes. Electrochim Acta 2011; 56: 3481–3484.10.1016/j.electacta.2010.11.065Search in Google Scholar

Welgemoed TJ, Schutte CF. Capacitive deionization Technology^TM: an alternative desalination solution. Desalination 2005; 183: 327–340.10.1016/j.desal.2005.02.054Search in Google Scholar

Xiao L, Isner A, Waldrop K, Saad A, Takigawa D, Bhattacharyya D. Development of bench and full-scale temperature and pH responsive functionalized PVDF membranes with tunable properties. J Membr Sci 2014; 457: 39–49.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.033Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Xu T. Ion exchange membranes: state of their development and perspective. J Membr Sci 2005; 263: 1–29.10.1016/j.memsci.2005.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Xu L, Zhang G-Q, Yuan G-E, Liu H-Y, Liu J-D, Yang F-L. Anti-fouling performance and mechanism of anthraquinone/polypyrrole composite modified membrane cathode in a novel MFC–aerobic MBR coupled system. RSC Adv 2015; 5: 22533–22543.10.1039/C5RA00735FSearch in Google Scholar

Yang HL, Lin JC, Huang C. Application of nanosilver surface modification to RO membrane and spacer for mitigating biofouling in seawater desalination. Water Res 2009; 43: 3777–3786.10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Yang Q, Himstedt HM, Ulbricht M, Qian X, Wickramasinghe SR. Designing magnetic field responsive nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 2013; 430: 70–78.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.068Search in Google Scholar

Yao C, Xinsong L, Neoh KG, Shi Z, Kang ET. Surface modification and antibacterial activity of electrospun polyurethane fibrous membranes with quaternary ammonium moieties. J Membr Sci 2008; 320: 259–267.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.012Search in Google Scholar

Yaroshchuk A, Boiko Y, Makovetskiy A. Electrochemical perm-selectivity of active layers and diffusion permeability of supports of an asymmetric and a composite NF membrane studied by concentration-step method. Desalination 2009; 245: 374–387.10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Ying W, Kumar R, Herzberg M, Kasher R. Diminished swelling of cross-linked aromatic oligoamide surfaces revealing a new fouling mechanism of reverse-osmosis membranes. Environ Sci Technol 2015; 49: 6815–6822.10.1021/es504325dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Ying W, Siebdrath N, Uhl W, Gitis V, Herzebrg M. New insights on early stages of RO membranes fouling during tertiary wastewater desalination. J Membr Sci 2014; 466: 26–35.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.027Search in Google Scholar

Yong L, Pan L, Xu X, Lu T, Sun Z, Chu DHC. Enhanced desalination efficiency in modified membrane capacitivedeionization by introducing ion-exchange polymers in carbonnanotubes electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 2014; 130: 619–624.10.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.086Search in Google Scholar

Yu S, Liu X, Liu J, Wu D, Liu M, Gao C. Surface modification of thin-film composite polyamide reverse osmosis membranes with thermo-responsive polymer (TRP) for improved fouling resistance and cleaning efficiency. Sep Purif Technol 2011; 76: 283–291.10.1016/j.seppur.2010.10.017Search in Google Scholar

Zaky AM, Chaplin BP. Porous substoichiometric TiO₂ anodes as reactive electrochemical membranes for water treatment. Environ Sci Technol 2013; 47: 6554–6563.10.1021/es401287eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Zaky AM, Chaplin BP. Mechanism of P-substituted phenol oxidation at a Ti₄O₇ reactive electrochemical membrane. Environ Sci Technol 2014; 48: 5857–5867.10.1021/es5010472Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Zhang M, Nguyen QT, Ping Z. Hydrophilic modification of poly (vinylidene fluoride) microporous membrane. J Membr Sci 2009; 327: 78–86.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.11.020Search in Google Scholar

Zhang Q, Vecitis CD. Conductive CNT-PVDF membrane for capacitive organic fouling reduction. J Membr Sci 2014; 459: 143–156.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.017Search in Google Scholar

Zhao R, Biesheuvel PM, van der Wal A. Energy consumption and constant current operation in membrane capacitive deionization. Energy Environ Sci 2012; 5: 9520.10.1039/c2ee21737fSearch in Google Scholar

Zhao F, Liu L, Yang F, Ren N. E-Fenton degradation of MB during filtration with Gr/PPy modified membrane cathode. Chem Eng J 2013a; 230: 491–498.10.1016/j.cej.2013.06.117Search in Google Scholar

Zhao R, Porada S, Biesheuvel PM, van Der Wal A. Energy consumption in membrane capacitive deionization for different water recoveries and flow rates, and comparison with reverse osmosis. Desalination 2013b; 330: 35–41.10.1016/j.desal.2013.08.017Search in Google Scholar

Zhao R, Satpradit O, Rijnaarts HHM, Biesheuvel PM, van der Wal A. Optimization of salt adsorption rate in membrane capacitive deionization. Water Res 2013c; 47: 1941–1952.10.1016/j.watres.2013.01.025Search in Google Scholar PubMed