Surface modification in inorganic filler of mixed matrix membrane for enhancing the gas separation performance

References

Ahmad J, Hägg MB. Preparation and characterization of polyvinyl acetate/zeolite 4A mixed matrix membrane for gas separation. J Membr Sci 2013; 427: 73–84.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.036Search in Google Scholar

Ahn J, Chung WJ, Pinnau I, Guiver MD. Polysulfone/silica nanoparticle mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. J Membr Sci 2008; 314: 123–133.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.01.031Search in Google Scholar

Ahn J, Chung WJ, Pinnau I, Song J, Du N, Robertson GP, Guiver MD. Gas transport behavior of mixed-matrix membranes composed of silica nanoparticles in a polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1). J Membr Sci 2010; 346: 280–287.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.047Search in Google Scholar

Amooghin AE, Omidkhah M, Kargari A. The effects of aminosilane grafting on NaY zeolite-Matrimid^® 5218 mixed matrix membranes for CO₂/CH₄ separation. J Membr Sci 2015; 490: 364–379.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.070Search in Google Scholar

Ansaloni L, Zhao Y, Jung BT, Ramasubramanian K, Baschetti MG, Ho WW. Facilitated transport membranes containing amino-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes for high-pressure CO₂ separations. J Membr Sci 2015; 490: 18–28.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.097Search in Google Scholar

Arkles B. Tailoring surfaces with silanes. Chemtech 1977; 7: 766–778.Search in Google Scholar

Arkles B. Silane coupling agents: connecting across boundaries. Gelest, Morrisville, 2004: 1–5.10.1201/b12184-2Search in Google Scholar

Aroon MA, Ismail AF, Matsuura T, Montazer-Rahmati MM. Performance studies of mixed matrix membranes for gas separation: a review. Sep Purif Technol 2010; 75: 229–242.10.1016/j.seppur.2010.08.023Search in Google Scholar

Askari M, Chung TS. Natural gas purification and olefin/paraffin separation using thermal cross-linkable co-polyimide/ZIF-8 mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 2013; 444: 173–183.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.016Search in Google Scholar

Barquist K, Larsen SC. Chromate adsorption on amine-functionalized nanocrystalline silicalite-1. Micropor Mesopor Mater 2008; 116: 365–369.10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.04.025Search in Google Scholar

Barquist KN. Synthesis and environmental adsorption applications of functionalized zeolites and iron oxide/zeolite composites. Ph.D. Thesis. Iowa: The University of Iowa, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Bastani D, Esmaeili N, Asadollahi M. Polymeric mixed matrix membranes containing zeolites as a filler for gas separation applications: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 2013; 19: 375–393.10.1016/j.jiec.2012.09.019Search in Google Scholar

Beltran AB, Nisola GM, Cho E, Lee EED, Chung WJ. Organosilane modified silica/polydimethylsiloxane mixed matrix membranes for enhanced propylene/nitrogen separation. Appl Surf Sci 2011; 258: 337–345.10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.08.061Search in Google Scholar

Berg J, Jones F. The role of sizing resins, coupling agents and their blends on the formation of the interphase in glass fibre composites. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufact 1998; 29: 1261–1272.10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00091-8Search in Google Scholar

Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L. Biochemistry, 5th ed., New York: W H Freeman, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Bernardo P, Drioli E, Golemme G. Membrane gas separation: a review/state of the art. Ind Eng Chem Res 2009; 48: 4638–4663.10.1021/ie8019032Search in Google Scholar

Broyles NS, Verghese KNE, Davis SV, Li H, Davis RM, Lesko JJ, Riffle JS. Fatigue performance of carbon fibre/vinyl ester composites: the effect of two dissimilar polymeric sizing agents. Polymer 1998; 39: 3417–3424.10.1016/S0032-3861(97)10078-7Search in Google Scholar

Bushell AF, Attfield MP, Mason CR, Budd PM, Yampolskii Y, Starannikova L, Rebrov A, Bazzarelli F, Bernardo P, Carolus Jansen, J, Lanc M, Friess K, Shantarovich V, Gustov V, Isaeva V. Gas permeation parameters of mixed matrix membranes based on the polymer of intrinsic microporosity PIM-1 and the zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-8. J Membr Sci 2013; 427: 48–62.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.035Search in Google Scholar

Cakal U, Yilmaz L, Kalipcilar H. Effect of feed gas composition on the separation of CO₂/CH₄ mixtures by PES-SAPO 34-HMA mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 2012; 417–418: 45–51.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.06.011Search in Google Scholar

Calleja G, Sanz R, Arencibia A, Sanz-Pérez E. Influence of drying conditions on amine-functionalized SBA-15 as adsorbent of CO₂. Top Catal 2011; 54: 135–145.10.1007/s11244-011-9652-7Search in Google Scholar

Chen XY, Nik OG, Rodrigue D, Kaliaguine S. Mixed matrix membranes of aminosilanes grafted FAU/EMT zeolite and cross-linked polyimide for CO₂/CH₄ separation. Polymer 2012; 53: 3269–3280.10.1016/j.polymer.2012.03.017Search in Google Scholar

Chung TS, Jiang LY, Li Y, Kulprathipanja S. Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising organic polymers with dispersed inorganic fillers for gas separation. Prog Polym Sci 2007; 32: 483–507.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.01.008Search in Google Scholar

Cserjési P, Nemestóthy N, Vass A, Csanádi Z, Bélafi-Bakó K. Study on gas separation by supported liquid membranes applying novel ionic liquids. Desalination 2009; 245: 743–747.10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.046Search in Google Scholar

Dong G, Li H, Chen V. Challenges and opportunities for mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. J Mater Chem A 2013; 1: 4610–4630.10.1039/c3ta00927kSearch in Google Scholar

Duan C, Jie X, Liu D, Cao Y, Yuan Q. Post-treatment effect on gas separation property of mixed matrix membranes containing metal organic frameworks. J Membr Sci 2014; 466: 92–102.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.024Search in Google Scholar

Duval JM, Kemperman A, Folkers B, Mulder M, Desgrandchamps G, Smolders C. Preparation of zeolite filled glassy polymer membranes. J Appl Polym Sci 1994; 54: 409–418.10.1002/app.1994.070540401Search in Google Scholar

Goh PS, Ismail AF, Sanip SM, Ng BC, Aziz M. Recent advances of inorganic fillers in mixed matrix membrane for gas separation. Sep Purif Technol 2011; 81: 243–264.10.1016/j.seppur.2011.07.042Search in Google Scholar

Gorgojo P, Uriel S, Téllez C, Coronas J. Development of mixed matrix membranes based on zeolite Nu-6 (2) for gas separation. Micropor Mesopor Mater 2008; 115: 85–92.10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.11.046Search in Google Scholar

Gui MM, Yap YX, Chai SP, Mohamed AR. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified with (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane for effective carbon dioxide adsorption. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2013; 14: 65–73.10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.004Search in Google Scholar

Gun’Ko V, Voronin E, Pakhlov E, Zarko V, Turov V, Guzenko N, Leboda R, Chibowski E. Features of fumed silica coverage with silanes having three or two groups reacting with the surface. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2000; 166: 187–201.10.1016/S0927-7757(99)00519-1Search in Google Scholar

Guo X, Huang H, Ban Y, Yang Q, Xiao Y, Li Y, Yang W, Zhong C. Mixed matrix membranes incorporated with amine-functionalized titanium-based metal-organic framework for CO₂/CH₄ separation. J Membr Sci 2015; 478: 130–139.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.01.007Search in Google Scholar

Gür TM. Permselectivity of zeolite filled polysulfone gas separation membranes. J Membr Sci 1994; 93: 283–289.10.1016/0376-7388(94)00102-2Search in Google Scholar

Hao L, Li P, Yang T, Chung TS. Room temperature ionic liquid/ZIF-8 mixed-matrix membranes for natural gas sweetening and post-combustion CO₂ capture. J Membr Sci 2013; 436: 221–231.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.02.034Search in Google Scholar

He Z, Pinnau I, Morisato A. Nanostructured poly (4-methyl-2-pentyne)/silica hybrid membranes for gas separation. Desalination 2002; 146: 11–15.10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00463-0Search in Google Scholar

Hillock AM, Miller SJ, Koros WJ. Crosslinked mixed matrix membranes for the purification of natural gas: effects of sieve surface modification. J Membr Sci 2008; 314: 193–199.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.01.046Search in Google Scholar

Hsu SC, Lu C, Su F, Zeng W, Chen W. Thermodynamics and regeneration studies of CO₂ adsorption on multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Chem Eng Sci 2010; 65: 1354–1361.10.1016/j.ces.2009.10.005Search in Google Scholar

Huang HY, Yang RT, Chinn D, Munson CL. Amine-grafted MCM-48 and silica xerogel as superior sorbents for acidic gas removal from natural gas. Ind Eng Chem Res 2003; 42: 2427–2433.10.1021/ie020440uSearch in Google Scholar

Hudiono YC, Carlisle TK, Bara JE, Zhang Y, Gin DL, Noble RD. A three-component mixed-matrix membrane with enhanced CO₂ separation properties based on zeolites and ionic liquid materials. J Membr Sci 2010; 350: 117–123.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.12.018Search in Google Scholar

Hudiono YC, Carlisle TK, LaFrate AL, Gin DL, Noble RD. Novel mixed matrix membranes based on polymerizable room-temperature ionic liquids and SAPO-34 particles to improve CO₂ separation. J Membr Sci 2011; 370: 141–148.10.1016/j.memsci.2011.01.012Search in Google Scholar

Husain S, Koros WJ. Mixed matrix hollow fiber membranes made with modified HSSZ-13 zeolite in polyetherimide polymer matrix for gas separation. J Membr Sci 2007; 288: 195–207.10.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.016Search in Google Scholar

Ismail AF, Rahim R, Rahman W. Characterization of polyethersulfone/Matrimid^® 5218 miscible blend mixed matrix membranes for O₂/N₂ gas separation. Sep Purif Technol 2008a; 63: 200–206.10.1016/j.seppur.2008.05.007Search in Google Scholar

Ismail AF, Kusworo TD, Mustafa A. Enhanced gas permeation performance of polyethersulfone mixed matrix hollow fiber membranes using novel Dynasylan Ameo silane agent. J Membr Sci 2008b; 319: 306–312.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.03.067Search in Google Scholar

Japip S, Wang H, Xiao Y, Chung TS. Highly permeable zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF)-71 nano-particles enhanced polyimide membranes for gas separation. J Membr Sci 2014; 467: 162–174.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.025Search in Google Scholar

Jia M, Peinemann KV, Behling RD. Molecular sieving effect of the zeolite-filled silicone rubber membranes in gas permeation. J Membr Sci 1991; 57: 289–292.10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80684-5Search in Google Scholar

Junaidi MUM, Leo CP, Kamal S, Ahmad A, Chew, T. Carbon dioxide removal from methane by using polysulfone/SAPO-44 mixed matrix membranes. Fuel Process Technol 2013; 112: 1–6.10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.02.014Search in Google Scholar

Junaidi MUM, Khoo CP, Leo CP, Ahmad AL. The effects of solvents on the modification of SAPO-34 zeolite using 3-aminopropyl trimethoxy silane for the preparation of asymmetric polysulfone mixed matrix membrane in the application of CO₂ separation. Micropor Mesopor Mater 2014; 192: 52–59.10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.10.006Search in Google Scholar

Kango S, Kalia S, Celli A, Njuguna J, Habibi Y, Kumar R. Surface modification of inorganic nanoparticles for development of organic-inorganic nanocomposites A review. Prog Polym Sci 2013; 38: 1232–1261.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.02.003Search in Google Scholar

Karatay E, Kalıpçlar H, Yılmaz L. Preparation and performance assessment of binary and ternary PES-SAPO 34-HMA based gas separation membranes. J Membr Sci 2010; 364: 75–81.10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.004Search in Google Scholar

Keskin S, Kayrak-Talay D, Akman U, Hortaçsu Ö. A review of ionic liquids towards supercritical fluid applications. J Supercrit Fluid 2007; 43: 150–180.10.1016/j.supflu.2007.05.013Search in Google Scholar

Khan AL, Klaysom C, Gahlaut A, Khan AU, Vankelecom IF. Mixed matrix membranes comprising of Matrimid and -SO₃H functionalized mesoporous MCM-41 for gas separation. J Membr Sci 2013; 447: 73–79.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.011Search in Google Scholar

Kim S, Pechar TW, Marand E. Poly(imide siloxane) and carbon nanotube mixed matrix membranes for gas separation. Desalination 2006; 192: 330–339.10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.098Search in Google Scholar

Kim JY, Kim J, Yang ST, Ahn WS. Mesoporous SAPO-34 with amine-grafting for CO₂ capture. Fuel 2013; 108: 515–520.10.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.020Search in Google Scholar

Kim S, Lee YM. Rigid and microporous polymers for gas separation membranes. Prog Polym Sci 2015; 43: 1–32.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.10.005Search in Google Scholar

Kulprathipanja S, Li NN, Neuzil RW. (1988). Separation of fluids by means of mixed matrix membranes. Google Patents.Search in Google Scholar

Kuppler RJ, Timmons DJ, Fang QR, Li JR, Makal TA, Young MD, Yuan D, Zhao D, Zhuang W, Zhou HC. Potential applications of metal-organic frameworks. Coord Chem Rev 2009; 253: 3042–3066.10.1016/j.ccr.2009.05.019Search in Google Scholar

Li S, Falconer JL, Noble RD. Improved SAPO34 membranes for CO₂/CH₄ separations. Adv Mater 2006a; 18: 2601–2603.10.1002/adma.200601147Search in Google Scholar

Li Y, Guan HM, Chung TS, Kulprathipanja S. Effects of novel silane modification of zeolite surface on polymer chain rigidification and partial pore blockage in polyethersulfone (PES)–zeolite A mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 2006b; 275: 17–28.10.1016/j.memsci.2005.08.015Search in Google Scholar

Li JR, Ma Y, McCarthy MC, Sculley J, Yu J, Jeong HK, Balbuena PB, Zhou HC. Carbon dioxide capture-related gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks. Coord Chem Rev 2011; 255: 1791–1823.10.1016/j.ccr.2011.02.012Search in Google Scholar

Lu C, Bai H, Wu B, Su F, Hwang JF. Comparative study of CO₂ capture by carbon nanotubes, activated carbons, and zeolites. Energ Fuel 2008; 22: 3050–3056.10.1021/ef8000086Search in Google Scholar

Mahajan R, Burns R, Schaeffer M, Koros WJ. Challenges in forming successful mixed matrix membranes with rigid polymeric materials. J Appl Polym Sci 2002; 86: 881–890.10.1002/app.10998Search in Google Scholar

Mahajan R, Koros W. Mixed matrix membrane materials with glassy polymers. Part 2. Polym Eng Sci 2002; 42: 1432–1441.10.1002/pen.11042Search in Google Scholar

Marieta C, Schulz E, Mondragon I. Characterization of interfacial behaviour in carbon-fibre/cyanate composites. Compos Sci Technol 2002; 62: 299–309.10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00215-9Search in Google Scholar

Matsumoto A, Tsutsumi K, Schumacher K, Unger KK. Surface functionalization and stabilization of mesoporous silica spheres by silanization and their adsorption characteristics. Langmuir 2002; 18: 4014–4019.10.1021/la020004cSearch in Google Scholar

Mohshim DF, Mukhtar H, Man Z, Nasir R. Latest development on membrane fabrication for natural gas purification: a review. J Eng 2012; 2013: 1–7.10.1155/2013/101746Search in Google Scholar

Mustafa A, Busairi A, Ismail A. Increasing the performance of PES-CNTs mixed matrix membrane using carbon nanotubes (CNTs) functionalization. Int J Waste Resour 2012; 2: 22–24.10.12777/ijwr.2.1.2012.22-24Search in Google Scholar

Naseri M, Mousavi SF, Mohammadi T, Bakhtiari O. Synthesis and gas transport performance of MIL-101/Matrimid mixed matrix membranes. J Ind Eng Chem 2015; 29: 249–256.10.1016/j.jiec.2015.04.007Search in Google Scholar

Nasir R, Mukhtar H, Man Z, Mohshim DF. Material advancements in fabrication of mixed-matrix membranes. Chem Eng Technol 2013; 36: 717–727.10.1002/ceat.201200734Search in Google Scholar

Nasir R, Mukhtar H, Man Z, Shaharun MS, Bakar MZA. Effect of fixed carbon molecular sieve (CMS) loading and various di-ethanolamine (DEA) concentrations on the performance of a mixed matrix membrane for CO₂/CH₄ separation. RSC Adv 2015; 5: 60814–60822.10.1039/C5RA09015FSearch in Google Scholar

Nik OG, Nohair B, Kaliaguine S. Aminosilanes grafting on FAU/EMT zeolite: effect on CO₂ adsorptive properties. Micropor Mesopor Mater 2011; 143: 221–229.10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.03.002Search in Google Scholar

Nik OG, Chen XY, Kaliaguine S. Functionalized metal organic framework-polyimide mixed matrix membranes for CO₂/CH₄ separation. J Membr Sci 2012; 413: 48–61.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.04.003Search in Google Scholar

Noble RD. Perspectives on mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 2011; 378: 393–397.10.1016/j.memsci.2011.05.031Search in Google Scholar

Pandey P, Chauhan R. Membranes for gas separation. Prog Polym Sci 2001; 26: 853–893.10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00009-0Search in Google Scholar

Paul D, Kemp D. The diffusion time lag in polymer membranes containing adsorptive fillers. J Polym Sci; Polym Symp 1973; 41: 79–93.10.1002/polc.5070410109Search in Google Scholar

Pechar TW, Tsapatsis M, Marand E, Davis R. Preparation and characterization of a glassy fluorinated polyimide zeolite-mixed matrix membrane. Desalination 2002; 146: 3–9.10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00462-9Search in Google Scholar

Pechar TW, Kim S, Vaughan B, Marand E, Tsapatsis M, Jeong HK, Cornelius CJ. Fabrication and characterization of polyimide-zeolite L mixed matrix membranes for gas separations. J Membr Sci 2006; 277: 195–202.10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.029Search in Google Scholar

Pera-Titus M. Porous inorganic membranes for CO₂ capture: present and prospects. Chem Rev 2013; 114: 1413–1492.10.1021/cr400237kSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Perez EV, Balkus KJ, Ferraris JP, Musselman IH. Mixed-matrix membranes containing MOF-5 for gas separations. J Membr Sci 2009; 328: 165–173.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.12.006Search in Google Scholar

Peydayesh M, Asarehpour S, Mohammadi T, Bakhtiari O. Preparation and characterization of SAPO-34-Matrimid^® 5218 mixed matrix membranes for CO₂/CH₄ separation. Chem Eng Res Design 2013; 91: 1335–1342.10.1016/j.cherd.2013.01.022Search in Google Scholar

Rafizah W, Ismail A. Effect of carbon molecular sieve sizing with poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) K-15 on carbon molecular sieve-polysulfone mixed matrix membrane. J Membr Sci 2008; 307: 53–61.10.1016/j.memsci.2007.09.007Search in Google Scholar

Rezakazemi M, Ebadi Amooghin A, Montazer-Rahmati MM, Ismail AF, Matsuura T. State-of-the-art membrane based CO₂ separation using mixed matrix membranes (MMMs): an overview on current status and future directions. Prog Polym Sci 2014; 39: 817–861.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Robeson LM. The upper bound revisited. J Membr Sci 2008; 320: 390–400.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030Search in Google Scholar

Salmio H, Brühwiler D. Distribution of amino groups on a mesoporous silica surface after submonolayer deposition of aminopropylsilanes from an anhydrous liquid phase. J Phys Chem C 2007; 111: 923–929.10.1021/jp0651440Search in Google Scholar

Sanz R, Calleja G, Arencibia A, Sanz-Pérez ES. Amino functionalized mesostructured SBA-15 silica for CO₂ capture: exploring the relation between the adsorption capacity and the distribution of amino groups by TEM. Micropor Mesopor Mater 2012; 158: 309–317.10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.03.053Search in Google Scholar

Şen D, Kalıpçılar H, Yilmaz L. Development of polycarbonate based zeolite 4A filled mixed matrix gas separation membranes. J Membr Sci 2007; 303: 194–203.10.1016/j.memsci.2007.07.010Search in Google Scholar

Shahid S, Nijmeijer K. High pressure gas separation performance of mixed-matrix polymer membranes containing mesoporous Fe (BTC). J Membrane Sci 2014a; 459: 33–44.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.009Search in Google Scholar

Shahid S, Nijmeijer K. Performance and plasticization behavior of polymer-MOF membranes for gas separation at elevated pressures. J Membr Sci 2014b; 470: 166–177.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.034Search in Google Scholar

Shimekit B, Mukhtar H. Natural gas purification technologies-major advances for CO₂ separation and future directions. In: Hamid AM, editor. Advances in natural gas technology. China: InTech, 2012: 235–270.10.5772/38656Search in Google Scholar

Shu S, Husain S, Koros WJ. A general strategy for adhesion enhancement in polymeric composites by formation of nanostructured particle surfaces. J Phys Chem C 2007; 111: 652–657.10.1021/jp065711jSearch in Google Scholar

Su F, Lu C, Cnen W, Bai H, Hwang JF. Capture of CO₂ from flue gas via multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Sci Total Environ 2009; 407: 3017–3023.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.01.007Search in Google Scholar

Süer MG, Baç N, Yilmaz L. Gas permeation characteristics of polymer-zeolite mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 1994; 91: 77–86.10.1016/0376-7388(94)00018-2Search in Google Scholar

Takahashi S, Paul D. Gas permeation in poly (ether imide) nanocomposite membranes based on surface-treated silica. Part 1: without chemical coupling to matrix. Polymer 2006a; 47: 7519–7534.10.1016/j.polymer.2006.08.029Search in Google Scholar

Takahashi S, Paul D. Gas permeation in poly (ether imide) nanocomposite membranes based on surface-treated silica. Part 2: with chemical coupling to matrix. Polymer 2006b; 47: 7535–7547.10.1016/j.polymer.2006.08.036Search in Google Scholar

Tantekin-Ersolmaz ŞB, Atalay-Oral Ç, Tatlıer M, Erdem-Şenatalar A, Schoeman B, Sterte J. Effect of zeolite particle size on the performance of polymer-zeolite mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 2000; 175: 285–288.10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00423-3Search in Google Scholar

Tao T, Maciel GE. Reactivities of silicas with organometallic methylating agents. J Am Chem Soc 2000; 122: 3118–3126.10.1021/ja991950rSearch in Google Scholar

Venna SR, Carreon MA. Amino-functionalized SAPO-34 membranes for CO₂/CH₄ and CO₂/N₂ separation. Langmuir 2011; 27: 2888–2894.10.1021/la105037nSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Vu DQ, Koros WJ, Miller SJ. Mixed matrix membranes using carbon molecular sieves: I. Preparation and experimental results. J Membr Sci 2003; 211: 311–334.10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00429-5Search in Google Scholar

Wang M, Wang Z, Li N, Liao J, Zhao S, Wang J, Wang S. Relationship between polymer-filler interfaces in separation layers and gas transport properties of mixed matrix composite membranes. J Membr Sci 2015; 495: 252–268.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.08.019Search in Google Scholar

Xie Y, Hill CA, Xiao Z, Militz H, Mai C. Silane coupling agents used for natural fiber/polymer composites: a review. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufact 2010; 41: 806–819.10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.005Search in Google Scholar

Yang ST, Kim JY, Kim J, Ahn WS. CO₂ capture over amine-functionalized MCM-22, MCM-36 and ITQ-2. Fuel 2012; 97: 435–442.10.1016/j.fuel.2012.03.034Search in Google Scholar

Yeo ZY, Chew TL, Zhu PW, Mohamed AR, Chai SP. Conventional processes and membrane technology for carbon dioxide removal from natural gas: a review. J Nat Gas Chem 2012; 21: 282–298.10.1016/S1003-9953(11)60366-6Search in Google Scholar

Yong HH, Park HC, Kang YS, Won J, Kim WN. Zeolite-filled polyimide membrane containing 2,4,6-triaminopyrimidine. J Membr Sci 2001; 188: 151–163.10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00659-1Search in Google Scholar

Zhang Y, Sunarso J, Liu S, Wang R. Current status and development of membranes for CO₂/CH₄ separation: a review. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2013; 12: 84–107.10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.10.009Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman CM, Singh A, Koros WJ. Tailoring mixed matrix composite membranes for gas separations. J Membr Sci 1997; 137: 145–154.10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00194-4Search in Google Scholar

Zornoza B, Tellez C, Coronas J, Gascon J, Kapteijn F. Metal organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: an increasingly important field of research with a large application potential. Micropor Mesopor Mater 2013; 166: 67–78.10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.03.012Search in Google Scholar

Zulhairun A, Ismail AF, Matsuura T, Abdullah M, Mustafa A. Asymmetric mixed matrix membrane incorporating organically modified clay particle for gas separation. Chem Eng J 2014; 241: 495–503.10.1016/j.cej.2013.10.042Search in Google Scholar