Home General Interest The application of screen-printed electrodes and bath – injection cells for real-time and in-site voltammetric analysis of heavy metals
Article Open Access

The application of screen-printed electrodes and bath – injection cells for real-time and in-site voltammetric analysis of heavy metals

  • ORCID logo EMAIL logo , ORCID logo , ORCID logo , ORCID logo , ORCID logo and ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: January 19, 2026
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study aims to develop and experimentally implement a novel portable electrochemical sensor based on screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCEs) and an original bath-injection electrochemical cell for real-time environmental monitoring of pollutants. The scientific novelty of this work lies in the design of a simplified yet highly effective electrochemical cell that eliminates the need for a liquid carrier through an innovative self-washing mechanism using excess sample volume. This feature significantly reduces system complexity and enhances sensor reliability in field applications. The advantages of microfluidic technologies in the development of SPCE-based sensors are highlighted, and detailed protocols for modifying SPCEs with mercury, bismuth, and gold films are presented. Surface characterization is supported by micrographs, ensuring reproducibility of the electrode surface and analytical results. Voltammograms for various individual ions and their mixtures are provided, along with the corresponding electrode modifications and analytical conditions. The developed system demonstrates a broad linear concentration range and a detection limit as low as 5–10 μg/L. Field trials of the sensor were conducted using water samples from the Zeravshan river, a major source of drinking water in the region. Elevated concentrations of several toxic ions were detected, with the results confirmed by atomic absorption and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. The proposed sensor system proves to be a promising solution for on-site pollutant detection under limited infrastructure conditions, supporting rapid response to both anthropogenic and natural environmental emergencies.

1 Introduction

One of the key priorities in modern analytical chemistry is the creation of reliable, real-time methods for on-site chemical analysis [1], [2], [3]. The demand for such approaches has grown significantly due to their critical role in rapid decision-making during man-made and natural emergencies, where analytical delays can lead to severe consequences [4], [5], [6], [7]. In addition to emergency response, on-site analysis ensures the integrity of samples by minimizing alterations caused by environmental influences such as temperature shifts, UV exposure, redox activity, and time-dependent degradation processes like hydrolysis and aging.

The emergence of portable, compact, and automated analytical systems – especially those based on microfluidic technologies – has opened new avenues for decentralizing laboratory diagnostics [8], [9], [10]. Among these, “lab-on-a-chip” platforms incorporating screen-printed electrodes (SPEs) stand out for their high potential in miniaturized voltammetric analysis [11], 12]. These systems not only require minimal reagent and sample volumes but also offer high analytical performance, reproducibility, and ease of automation at low cost, making them especially attractive for field use and routine analysis in resource-limited settings [13], [14], [15], [16].

Screen-printing technology enables the mass production of disposable electrochemical sensors with customizable design and functionality [17], [18], [19]. By tailoring the composition and rheology of carbon-based inks, it is possible to fabricate SPEs with diverse structural and electrochemical characteristics [20], [21], [22], [23]. This includes the ability to modify electrode surfaces with various nanocomposite materials – such as metal or organic films – thus significantly expanding their selectivity and sensitivity [24], 25]. For example, carbon microparticles incorporated into the ink can enhance the sensor’s performance, enabling it to detect a broad range of analytes [26], [27], [28], [29].

The use of SPСEs has been further advanced by the development of three-electrode sensor designs with standard dimensions of 10 × 28 × 0.35 mm, where carbon-based inks form the working and auxiliary electrodes, and silver chloride paste serves as the reference electrode [30], 31]. Additionally, dielectric substrates such as polyethylene terephthalate (PETF) or thick Whatman-type paper are commonly employed to support these sensors [32], 33]. These innovations have paved the way for more efficient and scalable production of high-performance electrochemical sensors.

Despite significant advances in planar voltammetric systems, most analytical measurements employing screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCEs) are still conducted under static conditions [34], [35], [36]. For practical on-site applications and integration into continuous monitoring systems, however, the transition to a flow-through configuration is essential.

Flow injection analysis (FIA) offers several advantages: it eliminates the need for sample mixing or pretreatment, reduces reagent consumption, and enables automation [6], 37]. Nevertheless, the implementation of FIA requires the incorporation of additional mechanical components into the analytical platform – such as a peristaltic or plunger pump, a carrier flow-rate controller, and a sample injection device [38]. Furthermore, commercially available FIA systems are not always compatible with standardized SPCE sensors, which limits their widespread adoption, particularly for field applications.

In recent years, batch-injection analysis (BIA) has emerged as a practical alternative to FIA [39], 40]. BIA systems retain the main advantages of FIA – high sampling frequency, low sample and reagent consumption, good accuracy, sensitivity, and reproducibility – while avoiding the need for auxiliary components typically required in FIA setups (pumps, injectors, and carrier flow control systems) [41], 42].

Traditionally, all reported BIA cells have utilized three separate electrodes (working, auxiliary, and reference) [43], [44], [45], [46], which can be cumbersome, especially when a conventional reference electrode is employed, as it requires special maintenance. The introduction of SPCE technology has largely resolved this issue since SPCEs inherently integrate all three electrodes on a single planar substrate.

Nevertheless, researchers continue to propose improved electrochemical cell configurations and simplified sample introduction systems [47], [48], [49], aiming to enhance portability, reduce manufacturing costs, and maintain analytical performance.

In this work, we propose a simple and cost-effective batch-injection analysis system based on both native and modified SPCEs. The primary objective is to assess its analytical characteristics and evaluate the feasibility of using such a system for real-time, on-site voltammetric determination of target analytes. The study underscores both the scientific and practical significance of integrating SPCEs into compact, portable BIA configurations, thereby advancing the development of rapid environmental and industrial electrochemical diagnostics.

2 Materials and methods

In this study, unmodified screen-printed electrodes (SPCEs) from RUSENS Ltd (Russia) were used as the base electrodes [31]. The modification of the working surface of these electrodes was performed using mercury, bismuth, and gold, employing both in situ and ex situ methods. These modifications were adapted from techniques traditionally applied to macroelectrodes, but with optimizations tailored to the SPCEs, making them more suitable for sensitive and selective measurements.

All reagents used in the work were qualified as “suitable for analysis” and “chemically pure” and were purchased from the main suppliers of reagents from Russia (CJSC Reagent) Kazakhstan (Sigma-Aldrich), China (ALFA GROUP). Control solutions were prepared in bidistilled water with a specific electrical conductivity of no more than 0.5 μs/cm. The appropriate certified reference solution was used to prepare buffer solutions. The pH was monitored using a portable pH meter DPH1 (Fortek, Uzbekistan).

2.1 Surface modification methods

2.1.1 Mercury film modification

The modification of the SPCE surface with a mercury film was carried out using an in situ deposition process. A solution containing 5 × 10−4 mol‧L−1 Hg(NO3)2 in 1 M sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.6) was employed. To ensure the removal of dissolved oxygen, the solution was purged with nitrogen for 10–15 min prior to the deposition. After deaeration, a potential of −1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl was applied for 600 s to facilitate mercury film formation. Following this step, the electrode was thoroughly rinsed with distilled water to remove any residual solution.

2.1.2 Bismuth film modification

For the bismuth film deposition, the electrode was exposed to a solution containing 1 mg‧L−1 Bi(III) in 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 4.5) at −1.4 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) for 300 s. Prior to deposition, a conditioning step at +0.3 V for 5 min was performed to re-oxidize any heavy metals that might have been adsorbed on the electrode surface. During the deposition process, the solution was continuously stirred to ensure uniformity of the film. After modification, the electrode was rinsed with distilled water followed by ethanol to eliminate any residual chemicals.

2.1.3 Gold film modification

The gold film was deposited using a novel method outlined in RF patent RU2753352C1 [50], which involves the reduction of gold from its acidic form with sodium nitrite in a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) solution.

2 H Au Cl 4 + 3 Na NO 2 + 8 NaOH 2 Au + 3 Na NO 3 + 8 NaCl + 5 H 2 O

A 100 mg‧L−1 H[AuCl4] solution, prepared from certified reference materials provided in the TL-4 voltammetric analyzer kit (Tom-Analyte, Tomsk), was reacted with 10−3 M sodium nitrite in 1 % PVA solution. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 2М caustic soda, and the mixture was then sonicated at 40 °C for 20 min. The appearance of pink coloration in the solution indicated the formation of gold nanoparticles.

To modify the SPCE surface, a drop-casting method was employed, wherein the colloidal gold nanoparticle solution was applied to the working electrode surface and allowed to dry. To further stabilize the gold film, the electrode was subjected to cyclic voltammetry in 0.2 M hydrochloric acid, with a potential scan range of −0.2 V to −1.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl, repeated 15–20 times at a scan rate of 25–30 mV/s. This unique approach to gold nanoparticle deposition enhances the surface conductivity and electrochemical properties, enabling superior sensor performance.

2.2 Instrumentation

Electrochemical measurements were performed using a computerized PU-1 polarograph (Belarus), which digitized the analytical signal from the working electrode. This data was transmitted to a personal computer for analysis, where peaks corresponding to metal ions were identified and quantified. Cyclic voltammetry was conducted with an ELINS P-40X potentiostat/galvanostat, equipped with an FRA 24 module (Russia), for detailed electrochemical characterization. Additionally, atomic absorption spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) were employed using an ISP5000 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), providing complementary methods for metal ion quantification. The morphology of the modified electrode surfaces was examined using a Shimadzu SSX-550 scanning electron microscope (Japan), which provided high-resolution imaging of the films deposited on the SPCEs.

2.3 Research object

The study was carried out using model solutions containing various heavy metal ions, as well as real-world water samples collected from the city of Samarkand and the Zeravshan river. The heavy metal ion concentrations in these samples were quantified to evaluate the performance of the modified electrodes in environmental sensing applications.

Measurement accuracy was rigorously evaluated using standard statistical methods, including the F-test, to ensure reliable and reproducible results.

3 Results and discussion

The use of screen-printed electrodes (SPCEs) in electrochemical experiments enables rapid and convenient detection, enhances experimental efficiency, and contributes to the practicality and innovativeness of electrochemical sensing systems, thereby meeting market demands. Figure 1 shows the general configuration of a standard screen-printed electrode.

Figure 1: 
Scheme of screen printed electrodes.
Figure 1:

Scheme of screen printed electrodes.

Early SPCEs used for the voltammetric determination of heavy metal ions – such as zinc, cadmium, lead, and copper – were modified in a manner similar to solid macroelectrodes, using mercury films formed both in situ and ex situ [51], 52]. Although mercury-modified SPCEs demonstrated low detection limits for heavy metals at micromolar and sometimes nanomolar concentrations, the use of mercury did not address the need for environmentally friendly electrodes.

As a result, researchers have focused on developing mercury-free and environmentally benign SPCEs, typically by modifying the surface with noble metal nanoparticles, metal oxides, various carbon nanostructures, and hexacyanoferrates [53], [54], [55]. Of particular interest is the bismuth-based electrode [56]. While its operational potential window is narrower than that of mercury, bismuth is nearly 5,000 times less toxic [57]. Additionally, bismuth and its salts are more readily available and environmentally safer. Like mercury, bismuth is capable of forming intermetallic compounds with many metals [58], and its film can be deposited onto electrode surfaces using techniques similar to those used for mercury, both in situ and ex situ, from solutions of bismuth salts [59].

These advantages have led to the growing use of bismuth as a surface modifier [60], [61], [62], [63]. Since then, bismuth-modified electrodes have found applications in environmental monitoring [35], 64], 65], food analysis [66], pharmaceutical testing [67], [68], [69], and the analysis of biological fluids and plant materials [70]. Naturally, bismuth film modification has also been extended to screen-printed electrodes. However, information on Bi-SPCEs and their practical applications remains relatively scarce in the scientific literature. Therefore, a comprehensive study of the fabrication technology and practical use of bismuth-modified SPCEs remains a relevant and pressing issue.

In our study, we drew on prior experience in modifying macroelectrodes with bismuth films [71]. The bismuth-containing modifying solution was prepared by dissolving bismuth nitrate to a concentration of 1 mmol of Bi(III) ions in a 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer solution at pH 4.5. The Bi-SPCE was prepared as described in Section 2 (Materials and Methods). The success of the bismuth modification was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Figure 2 shows SEM micrographs of unmodified (A) and bismuth film-modified (B) screen-printed electrodes. Comparative analysis of the micrographs revealed the appearance of contrasting regions and the formation of fibrillar structures in the Bi-SPCE image [72].

Figure 2: 
SEM images of unmodified (A) and bismuth-modified (B) screen printed electrodes.
Figure 2:

SEM images of unmodified (A) and bismuth-modified (B) screen printed electrodes.

In a study [73], it was found that bismuth nanoparticles deposited on a graphitized substrate from the gas phase had an average radius of 56 ± 6 nm, whereas the particles formed during electrochemical deposition in our case had a radius of 150 ± 9 nm. Typically, the sizes of nanoparticles in the ash are smaller than those on the electrode surface. This phenomenon was explained by the possibility of bismuth nanoparticle aggregation during the drying of the gel deposited on the graphitized electrode base.

For voltammetry, a key factor confirming the successful modification of the indicator electrode is the acquisition of a reproducible voltammogram with clearly separated peaks corresponding to the metal ions present in the electrolyte.

Figure 3 presents the voltammogram of Cd2+ and Pb2+ in their combined presence, recorded on a Bi-modified SPCE electrode.

Figure 3: 
Voltammograms showing the dependence of the analytical signal on the increasing concentrations of Cd2+ and Pb2+ in model solutions, and the calibration graph Conditions: E
appl = –1.4 V; accumulation time: 90 s; scan rate: 50 mV/s.
Figure 3:

Voltammograms showing the dependence of the analytical signal on the increasing concentrations of Cd2+ and Pb2+ in model solutions, and the calibration graph Conditions: E appl = –1.4 V; accumulation time: 90 s; scan rate: 50 mV/s.

It was experimentally determined that the calibration plots for Cd2+ and Pb2+ exhibit linearity in the ranges of 10–120 μg/dm3 and 10–160 μg/dm3, respectively. These concentration dependences are shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4: 
Calibration curves for the determination of Cd(II)(a) and Pb(II)(b) ions using Bi-SPCE.
Figure 4:

Calibration curves for the determination of Cd(II)(a) and Pb(II)(b) ions using Bi-SPCE.

The accuracy of the voltammetric determination of cadmium and lead ions in their joint presence was verified under laboratory conditions using the standard addition method, with recovery percentage calculations. The results are presented in Table 1.

Table 1:

Results of the evaluation of the accuracy in determining Cd(II) and Pb(II) ion concentrations in model solutions by stripping voltammetry using Bi-SPCE.

Ion Introduced,μg‧L−1 Found,μg‧L−1 R%
Cd(II) 5 4.60 ± 0.42 92.0
10 9.76 ± 0.80 97.6
20 18.8 ± 1.01 94.0
50 47.3 ± 1.03 94.6
100 101.6 ± 2.04 101.6
Pb(II) 10.0 10.2 ± 0.7 102.0
20.0 18.2 ± 1.4 91.0
40.0 38.1 ± 1.6 95.3
80.0 84.8 ± 5.4 106.0

The data in Table 1 confirm the potential of bismuth-modified electrodes for voltammetric analysis of real samples – specifically, for determining Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions in wastewater, surface water, and drinking water.

Table 2 shows selected results of Cd2+ and Pb2+ determination in these samples.

Table 2:

The results of the stripping voltammetry determination of Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions in aqueous media using the Bi-SPCE additive method (n = 5; P = 0.95; Ftabl. = 6.4; ttabl. = 2.31).

Determined ion Concentration of theintroduced standardadditionsµg·L−1 Defined by stripping voltammetry with Bi- SPCE Determined by AAS method Fexp. texp.
Found, µg·L−1 Sr Found, µg·L−1 Sr
Industrial wastewater

Cd2+ 6.80 ± 0.44 0.05 7.00 ± 0.25 0.04 1.6 0.4
10 16.30 ± 0.68 0.04 17.10 ± 0.36 0.04
20 27.10 ± 0.82 0.04 27.50 ± 0.70 0.03
Pb2+ 0.72 ± 0.06 0.04 2.2 0.56
10 10.60 ± 0.07 0.01 11.23 ± 0.07 0.01
20 19.40 ± 0.06 0.01 20.20 ± 0.06 0.01

The water from an artificial reservoir

Cd2+ 1.60 ± 0.05 0.02 2.1 0.62
10 11.02 ± 0.08 0.02 11.90 ± 0.07 0.03
20 21.22 ± 0.09 0.02 21.80 ± 0.07 0.03
Pb2+ 18.47 ± 0.48 0.01 18.80 ± 0.32 0.01 2.6 0.32
10 28.18 ± 0.41 0.03 29.10 ± 0.33 0.01
20 49.15 ± 0.70 0.01 51.20 ± 0.60 0.01

Drinking water

Cd2+ 0.52 ± 0.05 0.04 2.0 0.90
10 10.72 ± 0.06 0.04 9.78 ± 0.07 0.05
20 20.56 ± 0.07 0.05 19.32 ± 0.05 0.05
Pb2+ 0 9.19 ± 0.46 0.04 8.98 ± 0.28 0.03 2.4 0.69
10 18.62 ± 0.28 0.01 19.12 ± 0.44 0.01
20 29.68 ± 0.60 0.02 28.92 ± 0.24 0.06

In this experiment, the results obtained by two independent methods – stripping voltammetry using a Bi-SPCE and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) – were compared. Statistical evaluation of both datasets using Fisher’s F-test and Student’s t-test demonstrated that, for the given sample size (n = 5) and significance level (P = 0.95), the calculated values were significantly lower than the corresponding tabulated ones (Fex < Ftabl ​ and t ex  < t tabl ​). This indicates that there are no statistically significant differences between the results obtained by the two methods, and therefore, the analytical data can be combined.

Practical voltammetric analysis demonstrates that gold-based indicator electrodes, owing to their chemical inertness and high oxidation potential, offer a broader operational potential window and are thus more suitable for determining various heavy metals. The modification of carbon-containing electrodes with gold typically involves electrolytic deposition from an H[AuCl4] solution, using either constant current (0.2–0.3 mA/cm2) or constant potential (from −0.1 to +0.2 V). By varying the gold deposition time, one can form an irregular ensemble of gold microelectrodes with dimensions ranging from 100 to 1,000 nm on the surface.

Gold is readily reduced due to its high standard electrode potential (+1.498 V for the Au3+/Au couple), making Au3+ cations strong oxidizing agents. This allows gold recovery from HAuCl4 solutions using wet-chemical methods similar to those described in Section 2.

A micrograph of the SPCE surface modified with gold nanoparticles using the proposed method is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5: 
SEM image of the modified screen-printed electrode surface reveals the localization of gold micro- and nanoparticles, indicating successful electrode modification.
Figure 5:

SEM image of the modified screen-printed electrode surface reveals the localization of gold micro- and nanoparticles, indicating successful electrode modification.

Modified SPCEs were employed to determine individual metal ions in aqueous solutions under laboratory conditions using conventional stationary electrochemical cells with a total volume of up to 10 mL (Figure 6a). This approach enables the quantification of trace metal ions by the standard addition method; however, it requires continuous mixing of the solution, which limits its applicability in field conditions. Consequently, flow-injection techniques are often preferred. In these systems, the sample is introduced into a segmented liquid stream that is delivered to the electrochemical cell by means of a peristaltic pump or an alternative device (e.g., a pressurized vial). Examples of commercial electrochemical cells designed for SPCEs and operating in flow-injection mode are presented in Figure 6b and c. Nevertheless, the use of carrier-fluid delivery systems such as peristaltic pumps complicates the experimental setup and reduces its suitability for on-site applications.

Figure 6: 
Images of factory-made electrochemical cells for voltammetric analysis using screen-printed electrodes. a) is a stationary mode cell, b) is a DropSens flow-injection cell, c) is a RuSens flow-injection cell, d) batch-injection cell of Ω metrohm, e) batch-injection cell (this work).
Figure 6:

Images of factory-made electrochemical cells for voltammetric analysis using screen-printed electrodes. a) is a stationary mode cell, b) is a DropSens flow-injection cell, c) is a RuSens flow-injection cell, d) batch-injection cell of Ω metrohm, e) batch-injection cell (this work).

In recent years, periodic injection systems have been proposed as a simplified alternative, allowing operation without continuous media flow. In such systems, a certain volume of the sample is injected directly onto the surface of the sensor using a syringe or an automatic pipette. The ΩMetrohm sensor shown in Figure 6d uses an electronic micropipette as a metering device, which increases both the complexity of the design and the cost of installation, since it additionally requires mechanical fixation and sealing of the pipette.

Detailed information about the design and manufacturing technology of the ΩMetrohm sensor has not been publicly disclosed. However, a comparative analysis of the cell we developed for periodic administration and the cell described in the literature [74] shows that the latter has a significant “dead volume” and does not have both a mechanism for removing the analyte after measurement and a built-in cell flushing system (Figure 7a).

Figure 7: 
Comparative diagrams of a) the bath-injection cell [74] and b) this work (explanations in the text).
Figure 7:

Comparative diagrams of a) the bath-injection cell [74] and b) this work (explanations in the text).

For clarity, Figure 7 presents schematic diagrams of the compared electrochemical batch-injection cells. The cross-sectional view of our device (Figure 7b) clearly illustrates the principle of its construction and enables its independent fabrication.

The electrochemical sensor housing is made of transparent plexiglass and consists of an upper (1) and lower (2) part, fastened together with screws (3). A shaped slot (4) for a standard screen-printed electrode (5) is located between the housing parts, into which the electrode is inserted. The electrode is held in place by a threaded sleeve (6) screwed into the lower part. The upper part contains a sleeve (7) with a capillary (8) for introducing the analyte directly above the electrode surface. The SPCE sensor is connected to the measurement device.

Considering that only 15–20 µL of the analyzed solution is sufficient to completely cover the SPCE surface, the introduction of 500–1,000 µL of analyte into the cell ensures multiple rinsing of the electrode area (approximately 30–50 times). The cell is filled directly with the sample, while any excess solution is removed through a drainage tube. Such a design of the electrochemical cell eliminates the need for a carrier solution supplied by a peristaltic pump. Moreover, the analyzed sample is not diluted during its introduction into the cell.

Thus, the proposed electrochemical cell design is significantly simpler, includes fewer components, lacks moving parts, and is therefore more reliable in operation.

Operation:

A sample prepared for measurement with a volume of 1,000 µl is inserted into the capillary opening of the upper part of the body using a micropipette. The excess solution is drained through the outlet (9). The cuvette is rinsed by injecting distilled water or excess sample volume.

The developed sensor, with modified SPCE, is suitable for analyzing both model and real solutions containing individual metal ions or their mixtures.

Figures 8 and 9 display voltammograms for various ions and electrode types, demonstrating the analytical capabilities of the sensors.

Figure 8: 
Typical anode voltammograms for Cu(II) and Cd(II), Pb(II) ions obtained on a)Hg-SPCE and b) Bi-SPCE, respectively a) anodic differential pulse voltammogram of Cu(II) ions on the Hg-SPCE in a medium of 0.2 M HCl. Conditions: τ = 30 s, Eaccum. = −0.5 V; ν = 50 mV/s. Ep. = + 0.25 V. LOD = 0.5 μg L−1. b) Anodic differential pulse voltammogram of Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions on the Bi-SPCE in a medium of 0.1 M Na acetate buffer solution pH 4.5. Conditions: τ = 30 s, Eaccum. = −1.1 V; ν = 25 mV/s. Ep. = - 0.72 V and – 0.52 V for Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions, respectively. LOD = 10 μg L−1.
Figure 8:

Typical anode voltammograms for Cu(II) and Cd(II), Pb(II) ions obtained on a)Hg-SPCE and b) Bi-SPCE, respectively a) anodic differential pulse voltammogram of Cu(II) ions on the Hg-SPCE in a medium of 0.2 M HCl. Conditions: τ = 30 s, Eaccum. = −0.5 V; ν = 50 mV/s. Ep. = + 0.25 V. LOD = 0.5 μg L−1. b) Anodic differential pulse voltammogram of Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions on the Bi-SPCE in a medium of 0.1 M Na acetate buffer solution pH 4.5. Conditions: τ = 30 s, Eaccum. = −1.1 V; ν = 25 mV/s. Ep. = - 0.72 V and – 0.52 V for Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions, respectively. LOD = 10 μg L−1.

Figure 9: 
Voltammograms of heavy metal ions obtained at Au-SPCE a) cathodic differential pulse voltammogram of Fe(III) ions on the Au-SPCE in a phosphate buffer solution medium. Conditions: τ = 30 s, Eaccum. = 0 V;ν = 25 mV/s. in the scanning range −0.3 ÷ −0.95 V; Ep. = − 0.68 V. LOD = 10 μg L−1. b) Cathodic differential pulse voltammogram of Cr(VI) ions on the Au-SPCE in a phosphate buffer solution medium. Conditions: τ = 30 s, Eaccum. = −1.2 V; ν = 25 mV/s. Ep. = −1.40 V. LOD = 5 μg·L− c) anodic differential pulse voltammogram of Bi(III) ions on the Au-SPCE in a phosphate buffer solution medium. Conditions: τ = 30 s, Eaccum. = −0.2 V;ν = 25 mV/s in the scanning range −0.2 ÷ + 0.3 V. Ep. = +0.08. LOD = 10 μg L−1. d) Anodic square wave voltammogram of Tl(I) ions on Au-SPCE in a phosphate buffer solution medium. Conditions: τ = 30 s, Eaccum. = −1.0 V; ν = 25 mV/s in the scanning range −1.0 ÷ − 0.25 V. Ep. = −0.62 V. LOD = 10 μg L−1.
Figure 9:

Voltammograms of heavy metal ions obtained at Au-SPCE a) cathodic differential pulse voltammogram of Fe(III) ions on the Au-SPCE in a phosphate buffer solution medium. Conditions: τ = 30 s, Eaccum. = 0 V;ν = 25 mV/s. in the scanning range −0.3 ÷ −0.95 V; Ep. = − 0.68 V. LOD = 10 μg L−1. b) Cathodic differential pulse voltammogram of Cr(VI) ions on the Au-SPCE in a phosphate buffer solution medium. Conditions: τ = 30 s, Eaccum. = −1.2 V; ν = 25 mV/s. Ep. = −1.40 V. LOD = 5 μg·L c) anodic differential pulse voltammogram of Bi(III) ions on the Au-SPCE in a phosphate buffer solution medium. Conditions: τ = 30 s, Eaccum. = −0.2 V;ν = 25 mV/s in the scanning range −0.2 ÷ + 0.3 V. Ep. = +0.08. LOD = 10 μg L−1. d) Anodic square wave voltammogram of Tl(I) ions on Au-SPCE in a phosphate buffer solution medium. Conditions: τ = 30 s, Eaccum. = −1.0 V; ν = 25 mV/s in the scanning range −1.0 ÷ − 0.25 V. Ep. = −0.62 V. LOD = 10 μg L−1.

Laboratory studies have shown an adequate response of screen-printed electrodes modified with a thin film of mercury, bismuth and gold to the presence of the corresponding Cu(II), Cd(II), Pb(II), Fe(III), Bi(III) and Cr(VI) ions in solutions and the possibility of using such voltammetry for the analysis of these ions in real samples by the method of standard additions.

The object of the study was water samples from the Zeravshan river, the main source of fresh drinking water for the city of Samarkand and the Samarkand region. Currently, due to the deterioration of the environment and the reduction of water resources suitable for consumption, this river requires constant monitoring for the presence of heavy metal ions and other ecotoxicants in it [75], [76], [77], [78].

Water sampling from the Zeravshan river and analytical measurements were carried out jointly with representatives of the analytical laboratory of the Samarkand Regional Department of Ecology, Environmental Protection and Climate Change.

Figure 10 shows a map of the region with the section of the Zeravshan river where the samples were taken, indicating the location of 39°41′43” north latitude and 67°03′15” east longitude.

Figure 10: 
Map of the Zeravshan river valley showing the location of water sampling.
Figure 10:

Map of the Zeravshan river valley showing the location of water sampling.

The control method of analysis was emission spectroscopy performed on an ICP5000 inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).

The measurement results are shown in Table 3.

Table 3:

The results of measuring the content of heavy metal ions in the Zeravshan river, conducted in the field.

Determined ion Type of electrode Maximum permissible concentrations (MPC)µg·L−1 [67] Found, µg·L−1 AES -ICPµg·L−1 n = 3; P = 0.95
Cu2+ Hg-SPCE 1,000 18.2 17.4 ± 0.08
Pb2+ Bi-SPCE 10 19.8 18.6 ± 0.08
Cd2+ Bi-SPCE 1 8.7 7.6 ± 0.06
Bi3+ Au-SPCE 100 0.09 ± 0.02
Tl3+ Au-SPCE 0.1
As3+ Au-SPCE 10 14.6 13.8 ± 1.02
Fe3+/Fe2+ Au-SPCE 300 28.6 25.7 ± 1.12
Cr6+ Au-SPCE 50 62.3 59.4 ± 2.08

Field measurements revealed elevated levels of lead, cadmium, chromium, and arsenic compared to acceptable limits, indicating the need for water purification [79], [80], [81].

Field measurements, on the one hand, provide faster data collection, and on the other hand, help prevent the effects of chemical changes occurring after sampling, such as the oxidation of arsenic (III) to arsenic (V). An analytical platform utilizing a flow-injection cell and modified screen-printed electrodes is virtually maintenance-free and can meet all field measurement requirements, including real-time and on-site analysis.

4 Conclusions

The study emphasizes the increasing demand for sensitive, selective, and rapid methods for detecting environmental pollutants, particularly heavy metal ions. Among the various detection techniques, electrochemical methods – especially those utilizing screen-printed electrodes (SPE) and microfluidic technologies – offer significant advantages, including high sensitivity, simplicity, and cost-effectiveness. A notable advancement in voltammetry has been achieved through the development of innovative technologies for modifying the surface of screen-printed electrodes with noble metal nanoparticles, their oxides, hexacyanoferrates, organic compounds, and carbon nanomaterials.

In this study, the electrochemical behavior of SPCEs modified with mercury, bismuth, and gold was investigated for the detection of several heavy metal ions in both model and real solutions. These measurements spanned a linear concentration range covering several orders of magnitude, with a detection limit as low as 5 μg per liter.

Furthermore, a novel and ergonomic design for a bath-injection cell compatible with standard SPCEs was developed and tested, enabling real-time voltammetric measurements at the sampling site.

A field trial of this cell with the modified SPCE was conducted to analyze pollution levels in the Zeravshan river, the primary freshwater source for the Samarkand region and surrounding areas. Contamination with lead, cadmium, chromium, and arsenic ions was detected, signaling the urgent need for intervention to improve the environmental conditions in the region.

Notably, the proposed devices enable the measurement of heavy metal ion concentrations under field and expeditionary conditions. These examples demonstrate the promising potential of these technologies to significantly enhance environmental monitoring efforts. Furthermore, they support rapid decision-making, especially in the event of natural or man-made disasters, thereby enabling timely and effective responses.


Corresponding author: Dmitry Aronbaev, Department of Inorganic Chemistry and Materials Science, Samarkand State University Named After Sh. Rashidov, Samarkand, Uzbekistan, E-mail:
All the authors contributed significantly to this manuscript, participated in reviewing/editing and approved the final draft for publication.

Acknowledgement

The authors express their gratitude to Turazhon Hashimov, Head of the Samarkand Regional Department of Ecology, Environmental Protection and Climate Change, for organizing expedition work on sampling water in the water sources of Samarkand and the Zeravshan river.

  1. Funding information: Authors state no funding involved.

  2. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  3. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

1. Richardson, SD, Kimura, SY. Water analysis: emerging contaminants and current issues. Anal Chem 2015;88:546–82. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04493.Search in Google Scholar

2. Schmitz, C. Real-time analysis is critical to quality chemical processing. 2015. Available from: https://www.chemicalprocessing.com/automation/analyzers/article/11332636/real-time-analysis-is-critical-to-quality-chemical-processing.Search in Google Scholar

3. Gałuszka, A, Migaszewski, ZM, Namieśnik, J. Moving your laboratories to the field – advantages and limitations of the use of field portable instruments in environmental sample analysis. Environ Res 2015;140:593–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.05.017.Search in Google Scholar

4. Santos, B, Henn, RL, Rohwedder, JJR, Giuffrida, A, Materazzi, S, Risoluti, R. Portable near-infrared spectroscopy: towards greener analytical chemistry. Front Chem 2023;11:1214825. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2023.1214825.Search in Google Scholar

5. Liu, X, Huang, Q, Deng, J, Liu, X, Hu, B. Portable mass spectrometry for on-site detection of hazardous volatile organic compounds via robotic extractive sampling. Anal Chem 2024;96:9325–31. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01555.Search in Google Scholar

6. Laschi, S, Sfragano, PS, Tadini-Buoninsegni, F, Palchetti, I. Development of a flow system for decentralized electrochemical analysis of heavy metals using screen-printed electrodes: the importance of sensor stability. The Analyst 2024;149:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4AN00616J.Search in Google Scholar

7. Tiihonen, TE, Nissinen, TJ, Turhanen, PA, Vepsäläinen, JJ, Riikonen, J, Lehto, VP. Real-time on-site multielement analysis of environmental waters with a portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) system. Anal Chem 2022;94:11739–44. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c01490.Search in Google Scholar

8. Alam, AU, Clyne, D, Jin, H, Hu, NX, Deen, MJ. Fully integrated, simple, and low-cost electrochemical sensor array for in situ water quality monitoring. ACS Sens 2020;5:412–22. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b02095.Search in Google Scholar

9. Bao, Q, Li, G, Yang, Z, Pan, P, Liu, J, Li, R, et al.. In situ detection of heavy-metal ions in sewage with screen-printed electrode-based portable electrochemical sensor. The Analyst 2021;146:5610–18. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1AN01012C.Search in Google Scholar

10. Ferrari, AGM, Neale, SR, Banks, CE. Nanoporous screen-printed electrodes: transitioning the laboratory into the field. Talanta Open 2021;3:100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talo.2021.100032.Search in Google Scholar

11. Barton, J, González García, MB, Santos, DH, Fanjul-Bolado, P, Ribotti, A, McCaul, M, et al.. Screen-printed electrodes for environmental monitoring of heavy metal ions: a review. Microchim Acta 2016;183:503–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-015-1651-0.Search in Google Scholar

12. Choudhari, U, Jagtap, S, Ramgir, N, Debnath, AK, Muthe, KP. Screen-printed electrochemical sensors for environmental monitoring of heavy metal ions: a review. Rev Chem Eng 2022;39:1227–68. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2022-0002.Search in Google Scholar

13. Singh, S, Wang, J, Stefano Cinti, S. Review – an overview on recent progress in screen-printed electroanalytical (bio) sensors. ECS Sens Plus 2022;1:023401. https://doi.org/10.1149/2754-2726/ac70e2.Search in Google Scholar

14. Dossi, C, Monticelli, D, Pozzi, A, Recchia, S. From batch to flow stripping analysis with screen-printed electrodes: a possible way to decentralize trace inorganic analysis. Chemosensors 2018;6:37. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors6030037.Search in Google Scholar

15. Crapnell, R, Banks, CE. Electroanalytical overview: screen-printed electrochemical sensing platforms. Chemelectrochem 2024;11:e202400370. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202400370.Search in Google Scholar

16. Costa-Rama, EC, Abedul, MTF. Paper-based screen-printed electrodes: a new generation of low-cost analytical devices. Biosensors 2021;11:51. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11020051.Search in Google Scholar

17. Shitanda, I, Irisako, T, Itagaki, M. Three-electrode type micro-electrochemical cell fabricated by screen-printing. Sensor Actuator B Chem 2011;160:1606–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2011.10.018.Search in Google Scholar

18. Paimard, G, Ghasali, E, Baeza, M. Screen-printed electrodes: fabrication, modification, and biosensing applications. Chemosensors 2023;11:113. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11020113.Search in Google Scholar

19. Suresh, RR, Lakshmanakumar, M, Jayalatha, AJ, Rajan, KS, Sethuraman, S, Krishnan, UM, et al.. Fabrication of screen-printed electrodes: opportunities and challenges. J Mater Sci 2021;56:8951–9006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05499-1.Search in Google Scholar

20. Beitollahi, H, Mohammadi, SZ, Safaeia, M, Tajik, S. Applications of electrochemical sensors and biosensors based on modified screen-printed electrodes: a review. Anal Methods 2020;12:1547–60. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9AY02598G.Search in Google Scholar

21. Celesti, C, Giofrè, SV, Espro, C, Legnani, L, Neri, G, Iannazzo, D. Modified goldscreen-printed electrodes for the determination of heavy metals. Sensors 2024;24:4935. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24154935.Search in Google Scholar

22. Silva, RF, Silva, AD, Camargo, JR, Castro, BS, Meireles, LM, Silva, PS, et al.. Carbon nanomaterials-based screen-printed electrodes for sensing applications. Biosensors 2023;13:453. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13040453.Search in Google Scholar

23. Aragay, G, Pons, J, Merkoçi, A. Enhanced electrochemical detection of heavy metals at heated graphite nanoparticle-based screen-printed electrodes. J Mater Chem 2011;21:4326–31. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0JM03751F.Search in Google Scholar

24. Tiwari, M, Kadu, A. Thiol-based chemically modified carbon screen-printed electrode for simultaneous quantification of trace level Pb(II) and Cd(II). Anal Sci 2024;40:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44211-024-00581-z.Search in Google Scholar

25. Torres-Rivero, K, Florido, A, Bastos-Arrieta, J. Recent trends in the improvement of the electrochemical response of screen-printed electrodes by their modification with shaped metal nanoparticles. Sensors 2021;21:2596. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21082596.Search in Google Scholar

26. Yamanaka, K, Vestergaard, MC, Tamiya, E. Printable electrochemical biosensors: a focus on screen-printed electrodes and their application. Sensors 2016;6:1761. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16101761.Search in Google Scholar

27. Aronbaev, SD, Aronbaev, DM, Ismailov, EH, Islomov, LB, Raimkulova, CA, Zhuraeva, SB. Screen-printed electrodes for stripping voltamperometric definition of heavy metals. Universum: Chem Biol Electron Sci J 2020;5:22–34. Available from: http://7universum.com/ru/nature/archive/item/9278.Search in Google Scholar

28. Liang, G, He, Z, Zhen, J, Tian, H, Ai, L, Pan, L, et al.. Development of the screen-printed electrodes: a mini review on the application for pesticide detection. Environ Technol Innovation 2022;28:102922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102922.Search in Google Scholar

29. Tyszczuk-Rotko, K, Kozak, J, Czech, B. Screen-printed voltammetric sensors – tools for environmental water monitoring of painkillers. Sensors 2022;22:2437. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072437.Search in Google Scholar

30. DropSens product catalog. http://dropsens.spb.ru/production.html.[Accessed 13 Jul 2024].Search in Google Scholar

31. Rusens LLC product catalog. http://www.rusens.com/micro.html.[Accessed 13 Jul 2024].Search in Google Scholar

32. Adkins, J, Boehle, K, Henry, C. Electrochemical paper-based microfluidic devices. Electrophoresis 2015;36:1811–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201500084.Search in Google Scholar

33. Kumar, S, Kaushal, JB, Lee, HP. Sustainable sensing with paper microfluidics: applications in health, environment and food safety. Biosensors 2024;14:300. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14060300.Search in Google Scholar

34. Squissato, AL, Munoz, RAA, Banks, CE, Richter, EM. An overview of recent electroanalytical applications utilizing screen‐printed electrodes within flow systems. Chemelectrochem 2020;7:2211–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202000175.Search in Google Scholar

35. Li, M, Li, D-W, Xiu, G, Long, Y-T. Applications of screen-printed electrodes in current environmental analysis. Curr Opin Electrochem 2017;3:137–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2017.08.016.Search in Google Scholar

36. Rubino, A, Queirós, R. Electrochemical determination of heavy metal ions applying screen-printed electrodes based sensors. A review on water and environmental samples analysis. Talanta Open 2023;7:100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talo.2023.100203.Search in Google Scholar

37. Marzouk, SA, Alyammahi, AR, Bolado, PF. Development and characterization of novel flow injection, thin-layer, and batch cells for electroanalytical applications using screen-printed electrodes. Anal Chem 2021;93:16690–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c04337.Search in Google Scholar

38. Squissato, AL, Munoz, RAA, Banks, CE, Richter, EM. An overview of recent electroanalytical applications of utilizing screen-printed electrodes within flow systems. Chemelectrochem 2020;7:2211–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202000175.Search in Google Scholar

39. Haššo, M, Švorc, L. Batch injection analysis in tandem with electrochemical detection: the recent trends and an overview of the latest applications (2015–2020). Monatshefte für Chem – Chem Monthly 2022;153:985–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-022-02898-9.Search in Google Scholar

40. Haššo, M, Sarakhman, O, Djurdjic, S, Švorc, L, Švorc, Ľ. Advanced electrochemical platform for simple and rapid quantification of tannic acid in beverages using batch injection analysis with amperometric detection. J Electroanal Chem 2023;942:117578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2023.117578.Search in Google Scholar

41. Ferreira, DSME, Canhete de Moraes, N, Ferreira, V. A novel 3D-printed batch injection analysis (BIA) cell coupled to paper-based electrochemical devices: a cheap and reliable analytical system for fast on-site analysis. Microchem J 2022;179:107663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2022.107663.Search in Google Scholar

42. Rocha, DP, Cardoso, RM, Tormin, TF, de Araujo, WR, Munoz, RAA, Richter, EM, et al.. Batch‐injection analysis better than ever: new materials for improved electrochemical detection and on‐site. Electroanalysis 2018;30:1386–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201800042.Search in Google Scholar

43. Richter, EM, Tormin, TF, Cunha, RR, Silva, WP, Pérez‐Junquera, A, Fanjul‐Bolado, P, et al.. A compact batch injection analysis cell for screen printed electrodes: a portable electrochemical system for on‐site analysis. Electroanalysis 2016;28:1856–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201600008.Search in Google Scholar

44. de Oliveira, FM, Ferreira, PA, Neves, CG, Rosa, TM, dos Santos, WTP, de Melo, EI, et al.. Fast screening and determination of tadalafil in pharmaceutics by batch injection analysis (BIA) with amperometric detection. Electroanalysis 2020;32:2253–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.202060106.Search in Google Scholar

45. Haššo, M, Matúšková, I, Easy, ŠL. Rapid and high-throughput analytical sensing platform for theobromine quantification in chocolate and cocoa products based on batch injection analysis with amperometric detection. J Food Compos Anal 2022;115:105035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2022.105035.Search in Google Scholar

46. Haroon, N, Stine, KJ. Surface modification of screen-printed carbon electrodes. Coatings 2025;15:1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15101182.Search in Google Scholar

47. Ferrari, AGM, Olaya Amor-Gutiérrez, O, Rama, EC, Fernández-Abedul, MT. Batch injection electroanalysis with stainless-steel pins as electrodes in single and multiplexed configurations. Sensor Actuator B Chem 2017;253:1207–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.07.148.Search in Google Scholar

48. Trojanowicz, M, Pyszynska, M. Flow-injection methods in water analysis – recent trends. Molecules 2022;27:1410. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041410.Search in Google Scholar

49. Cardoso, ER, de Menezes, AS, dos Santos, CC, Luz, RC, Damos, F. Light-assisted batch injection analysis of glucose exploiting a p-n-Homojunction based on Cu2O. J Braz Chem Soc 2022;33:723–32. https://doi.org/10.21577/0103-5053.20210121.Search in Google Scholar

50. Russian Federation patent RU2753352C1. A method for the recovery of gold from a solution containing impurities of platinum and base metals. Pavlova EI, Sirotina DYu, Cherenko AV. Application: 2021103766, 15 Feb 2021; Published: 13 Aug 2021.Search in Google Scholar

51. Güell, R, Fontas, C, Aragay, G. A portable flow injection system for the determination of trace metals using screen-printed electrodes modified with mercury film. Int J Environ Anal Chem 2012;93:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2012.684049.Search in Google Scholar

52. Sanchez-Moreno, RA, Gismera, MJ, Teresa Sevilla, M, Procopio, JR. Screen-printed sensor for batch and flow injection potentiometric chromium(VI) monitoring. Anal Bioanal Chem 2010;397:331–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3437-x.Search in Google Scholar

53. Chernyavina, VV, Berezhnaya, AG, Panchenko, AV. Nanoparticles of nickel hexacyanoferrate derivatives as the components of electrode materials for electrochemical capacitors. Russ J Electrochem 2022;58:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1134/S102319352112003X.Search in Google Scholar

54. Ruiz-Vega, G, Garcia-Berrocoso, T, Montaner, J, Baldrich, E. Paper microfluidics on screen-printed electrodes for simple electrochemical magneto-immunosensor performance. Sensor Actuator B Chem 2019;298:126897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.126897.Search in Google Scholar

55. McCormick, WJ, McLoughlina, E, McCrudden, D. Non-enzymatic glucose sensing using a nickel hydroxide/chitosan modified screen-printed electrode incorporated into a flow injection analysis system. Anal Methods 2023;15:5071–7. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3AY01145C.Search in Google Scholar

56. Švancara, I, Prior, C, Hočevar, SB, Wang, J. A decade with bismuth-based electrodes in electroanalysis. Electroanalysis 2010;22:1405–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.200970017.Search in Google Scholar

57. Chemistry and toxicology. Lethal doses of substances. http://chemister.ru [Accessed 9 Apr 2024].Search in Google Scholar

58. Busev, AI. Analytical chemistry of bismuth. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 1953:381 p.10.1021/ac60075a001Search in Google Scholar

59. Wang, J. Stripping analysis at bismuth electrodes: a review. Electroanalysis 2005;17:1341–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.200403270.Search in Google Scholar

60. Zhou, H, Hou, H, Dai, L, Li, Y, Zhu, J, Wang, L. Preparation of dendritic bismuth film electrodes and their application for detection of trace Pb(Ⅱ) and Cd(Ⅱ). Chin J Chem Eng 2016;24:410–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2015.08.012.Search in Google Scholar

61. Serrano, N, Alberich, A, Díaz-Cruz, JM, Ariño, C, Esteban, M. Coating methods, modifiers and applications of bismuth screen-printed electrodes. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem 2013;46:15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2013.01.012.Search in Google Scholar

62. Niu, P, Sánchez, CF, Gich, M, Hernández, CN, Bolado, PB, Roig, R. Screen-printed electrodes made of a bismuth nanoparticle porous carbon nanocomposite applied to the determination of heavy metal ions. Microchim Acta 2016;183:617–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-015-1684-4.Search in Google Scholar

63. Palisoc, S, Sowa, V, Natividad, M. Fabrication of a bismuth nanoparticle/nafion modified screen-printed graphene electrode for in situ environmental monitoring. Anal Methods 2019;11:1591–603. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9AY00221A.Search in Google Scholar

64. Hormigos, RM, Gismera, J, Procopio, JR, Sevilla, T. Disposable screen-printed electrode modified with bismuth–PSS composites as high sensitive sensor for cadmium and lead determination. J Electroanal Chem 2016;767:114–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.02.025.Search in Google Scholar

65. Li, Y, Wang, Z, Chen, X. In situ deposition of bismuth on pre-anodized screen-printed electrode for cadmium detection. Res Square 2024;14:1–20. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4600103/v1.Search in Google Scholar

66. Claux, B, Vittori, O. Bismuth film electrode as an alternative for mercury electrodes: determination of azo dyes and application for detection in foodstuffs. Electroanalysis 2007;19:2243–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.200703978.Search in Google Scholar

67. Ademe, M, Kitte, SA, Sisay, G, Diro, A. Bismuth film modified glassy carbon electrode for determination of tannic acid. Bioanal Chem Res 2020;7:497–508. https://doi.org/10.22036/abcr.2020.218658.1455.Search in Google Scholar

68. Du, D, Ye, X, Zhang, J, Liu, D. Cathodic electrochemical analysis of methyl parathion at bismuth-film-modified glassy carbon electrode. Electrochim Acta 2008;53:4478–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2008.01.023.Search in Google Scholar

69. Nigović, B, Šimunić, B, Hočevar, S. Voltammetric measurements of aminosalicylate drugs using bismuth film electrode. Electrochim Acta 2009;54:5678–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2009.05.006.Search in Google Scholar

70. Squissato, AL, Almeida, ES, Silva, SG, Richter, EM, Batista, AD, Munoz, RA. Screen-printed electrodes for quality control of liquid (Bio)fuels. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem 2018;108:210–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.08.024.Search in Google Scholar

71. Aronbaev, SD, Narmayeva, GZ, Aronbaev, DM. Investigation of the behavior of a carbon graphite electrode modified with a bismuth film in the voltammetric determination of vitamin B2. Universum: Chem Biol Electron Sci J 2019;3. Available from: http://7universum.com/ru/nature/archive/item/6974.Search in Google Scholar

72. Bobrowski, A, Królicka, A, Zarebski, J. Morphology and electrochemical properties of the bismuth film electrode ex situ electrochemically plated from perchloric acid. Electroanalysis 2010;22:1421–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.200900543.Search in Google Scholar

73. KhZ, B, Galperin, LG, Piankova, LA, Nyu, S, Myrzakaev, AM, Timoshenkova, OR. Bismuth nanoparticles electrooxidation: theory and experiment. J Solid State Electrochem 2011;15:2469–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-011-1455-z.Search in Google Scholar

74. Svitková, V, Labuda, J, Vyskočil, V. Batch injection analysis with amperometric detection for DNA biosensing applications. Electroanalysis 2019;31:2001–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201900279.Search in Google Scholar

75. Usmanov, IA, Khodzhayeva, GA, Musayeva, AK. The question of improving monitoring of water bodies in Uzbekistan. Ekologiya i Stroitelstvo 2017;3:4–9. https://doi.org/10.24411/2413-8452-2017-00010.Search in Google Scholar

76. Usmanov, IA, Khasanova, MI. The protection of water bodies and drinking water supply in Uzbekistan. Ekologiya i Stroitelstvo 2018;1:9–13. https://doi.org/10.24411/2413-8452-2018-00002.Search in Google Scholar

77. Rasulova, NF, Mukhamedova, NS, Maksudova, NA. On the issue of hygienic forecasting of water quality in reservoirs in Uzbekistan. Probl Sci 2017;2:89–93. Available from: https://scienceproblems.ru/images/PDF/2017/15/pn-2-15.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

78. Iskandarova, ST, Usmanov, IA. The forecast of the change of water quality of the zeravshan river under the conditions of Uzbekistan. Ekologiya i Stroitelstvo 2018;1:4–10. https://doi.org/10.24411/2413-8452-2018-10009.Search in Google Scholar

79. Maximum permissible concentrations (MPC) of chemicals in the water of water bodies of economic and drinking and cultural and household water use, Hygienic standards GN 2.1.5.1315–03, 15 Jun 2003.Search in Google Scholar

80. Reimov, PR. National report on environmental services and financing of protection and sustainable use of water-related ecosystems in the Republic of Uzbekistan, Workshop on Environmental Services and Financing for the Protection and Sustainable Use of Ecosystems, Geneva, 2005 Oct 10–11. https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/water/meetings/payment_ecosystems/Reports/Uzbekistan_Reimov.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

81. Usmanov, IA. The improvement of ecological monitoring for water bodies of the middle course of syrdarya river. Ekologiya i Stroitelstvo 2017;1:10–14. https://doi.org/10.35688/2413-8452-2017-01-002.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-05-07
Accepted: 2025-12-02
Published Online: 2026-01-19

© 2026 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 31.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/revac-2025-0096/html
Scroll to top button