Abstract
Today about 440 nuclear power plants, with total installed capacity of 390 GW(e) are in operation worldwide generating around 10% of global electricity which are largely fuelled by enriched uranium oxide [Nuclear Power in the World Today. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/nuclear-power-in-the-world-today.aspx]. Thorium is 3–4 times more abundant than uranium and needs to be exploited by countries with limited stock of uranium. Historically, there have been several attempts to develop Th based reactors, but none has reached commercial scale. In recent years, High Temperature Reactor based on thorium has gained prominence for production of hydrogen with long term goal of complete carbon neutrality. However, unlike natural uranium, which contains ∼0.7% fissile 235U isotope, natural thorium does not contain any ‘fissile’ material and is made up exclusively of the ‘fertile’ 232Th which can be converted to ‘fissile’ 233U, thereby enlarging the fissile material resources. However, there is a need to develop robust closed fuel cycle to address to the challenges of high gamma dose due to the presence of decay products of 232U. It is necessary to gain more experience with promising THOREX process to achieve the desired recovery and D.F. of 233U from the irradiated 232Th. There is also scope to have a close look at some of the alternative extractants and emerging separation techniques for the reprocessing of spent Th based fuels. In view of the distinct advantages of non aqueous reprocessing over aqueous reprocessing, there is need to intensify the efforts to develop the former on a commercial scale. Molten Salt Breeder Reactor (MSBR) is particularly promising in this context. There is a need to investigate Th as energy amplifier under Accelerator Driven Sub-critical System (ADSS) which has potential to burn long lived radio nuclides, considered as a threat to environment over million of years.
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Nuclear Power in the World Today. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/nuclear-power-in-the-world-today.aspx.Search in Google Scholar
2a. https://www.energymonitor.ai/sectors/power/weekly-data-chinas-nuclear-pipeline-as-big-as-the-rest-of-the-worlds-combined.Search in Google Scholar
2b. https://www.energy.gov/articles/doe-establishes-6-billion-program-preserve-americas-clean-nuclear-energy-infrastructure.Search in Google Scholar
2c. nuclear-power-plants/w.ans.org/news/article-3656/west-virginia-lifts-ban-on-nuclear-power-plants/Charleston)W.Va. (Chris Dorst/Charleston Gazette-Mail via AP).Search in Google Scholar
2d. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/02/boris-johnson-uk-will-build-one-new-nuclear-plant-a-year.html.Search in Google Scholar
2e. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/20/illinois-nuclear-power-subsidy-of-694-million-imperfect-compromise.html.Search in Google Scholar
2f. https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Finnish-EPR-starts-supplying-electricity.Search in Google Scholar
2g. https://www.southerncompany.com/innovation/vogtle-3-and-4.html.Search in Google Scholar
2h. https://www.capgemini.com/gb-en/resources/how-can-the-french-nuclear-industry-remain-at-the-cutting-edge-of-excellence/.Search in Google Scholar
3a. Nayak, A. K., Sehgal, B. R., Eds. Thorium-Energy for the Future; Publisher Springer Singapore Nature Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Singapore, 2019, Hardcover ISBN978-981-13-2657-8, eBook ISBN978-981-13-2658-5.Search in Google Scholar
3b. Sinha, R. K., Kushwaha, H. S., Agarwal, R. G., Saha, D., Dhawan, M. L., Vyas, H. P., Rupani, B. B. Proceedings of 11th Annual Conference of Indian Nuclear Society, Vol. 2, INSAC-2000/IT-4, Mumbai, June 1–2, 2000; p 81.Search in Google Scholar
4. Thorium Fuel Cycle — Potential Benefits and Challenges. IAEA-TECDOC-1450; IAEA: Vienna, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
5. Smith, J. R., Reeder, S. D., Fluharty, R. G. Measurement of value of eta for U-233, U- 235 and Pu- 239 using monochromatic neutrons. AEC Research and Development Report Physics. TID-4500; Philips Petroleum Company, IDO-17083, 1966.10.2172/4559783Search in Google Scholar
6. Nuclear Data Centre, JAEA, Modified on 2020/01/17; JENDL-4.0. wwwndc.jaea.go.jp.Search in Google Scholar
7. Sood, D. D., Reddy, A. V. R., Ramamoorthy, N. Fundamentals of Radiochemistry, 3rd ed.; Indian Association of Nuclear Chemists and Allied Scientists: Mumbai, 2007; p 186.Search in Google Scholar
8a. Sjöstrand, N. G., Story, J. S. Cross Sections and Neutron Yields for U-233, U-235 and Pu-239 at 2200 m/sec. AE-11. Aktiebolaget Atomenergi Stockholm: Sweden, 1960; p 34.Search in Google Scholar
8b. Baybakov, D. F., Godovykh, A. V., Martynov, I. S., Nesterov, V. N. The dependence of the nuclide composition of the fuel core loading on multiplying and breeding properties of the KLT-40S nuclear facility. Nucl. Energy Technol. 2016, 20, 1–8; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.07.008.Search in Google Scholar
9. Status and Trends in Pyroprocessing of Spent Nuclear Fuels, IAEA-TECDOC-1967, Vienna, 2021.Search in Google Scholar
10. Gresky, A. T. Solvent extraction separation of U-233 and Th from fission products by means of tributyl phosphate. Proc. Int. Conf. 1955, 9, 505–510.Search in Google Scholar
11. Feiveson, H., Alexander, G., Marvin, M., Lawrence, S. Can Future Nuclear Power Be Made Proliferation Resistant? Center for International & Security Studies, U: Maryland, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
12. Schaffer, M. B. Abundant thorium as an alternative nuclear fuel: important waste disposal and weapon proliferation advantages. Energy Pol. 2013, 60, 4–12; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.062.Search in Google Scholar
13. Alhaj, M. Y., Nader, M. A. M., Alya, A. B. Towards proliferation-resistant thorium fuels. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2017, 101, 586–590; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.11.010.Search in Google Scholar
14. Thermophysical Properties of Materials for Nuclear Engineering: A Tutorial and Collection of Data. IAEA-THPH, ISBN 978-92-0-106508-7 © IAEA, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
15. Thermophysical Properties Database of Materials for Light Water Reactors and Heavy Water Reactors; IAEA-TECDOC-1496, Vienna, 2006.Search in Google Scholar
16. Bakker, K., Cordfunke, E. H. P., Konings, R. J. M., Schram, R. P. C. Critical evaluation of the thermal properties of ThO2 and Th1−yUy02 and a survey of the literature data on Th1−yPuy02. J. Nucl. Mater. 1997, 250, 1–12; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3115(97)00241-9.Search in Google Scholar
17. https://www.neimagazine.com/news/newschina-approves-launch-of-liquid-salt-thorium-reactor-9920912#:∼:text=It%20is%20variously%20referred%20to,totalled%20CNY3%20billion%20(%24450m).Search in Google Scholar
18. Meyer, H. R., Till, J. E., Bomar, E. S., Bond, W. D., Morse, L. E., Tennery, V. J., Yalcintas, M. G. Radiological impact of thorium mining and milling. Nucl. Saf. 1979, 20, 319–330.Search in Google Scholar
19. Meyer, H. R., Witherspoon, J. P., McBride, J. P., Frederick, E. J. Comparison of the Radiological Impacts of Thorium and Uranium Nuclear Fuel Cycles. NUREG/CR·2184 ORNL/TM·7868, 1982.10.2172/5536703Search in Google Scholar
20. Anantharaman, K., Shivakumar, V., Sinha, R. K. Design and fabrication of AHWR fuels. In International Conference on Characterization and Quality Control of Nuclear Fuels, (CQCNF2002), Hyderabad, India, December 10–12, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
21. Sinha, R. K., Kakodkar, A. Design and development of the AHWR—the Indian thorium fuelled innovative nuclear reactor. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2006, 236, 683–700; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.09.026.Search in Google Scholar
22. Mukerji, S., Krishnani, P. D., Srivenkatesan, R. Radiotoxicities of the minor actinides in the discharged PWR, PHWR and AHWR fuel in Nuclear fuel cycle technologies: closing the fuel cycle; Raj, B., Vasudeva Rao, P. R., Eds.; BRNS Publication: Mumbai, 2006, p. 395.Search in Google Scholar
23. Vijayan, P. K., Dulera, I. V., Rama Rao, A., Sinha, R. K. Molten Salt Reactors and Thorium Energy, 1st ed.; Dolan, T. J., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing, 2017, ISBN: 9780081011263, Imprint, pp. 655–681.Search in Google Scholar
24. Dulera, I. V., Sinha, R. K., Rama Rao, A., Patel, R. J. High temperature reactor technology development in India. J. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2017, 101, 82–99; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.04.020.Search in Google Scholar
25. Brooksbank, R. E., McDuffee, W. T., Rainey, R. H. A Review of Thorium Fuel Reprocessing Experience; Oak Ridge, National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, 1978. CONF-780223-3.Search in Google Scholar
26. Walser, R. L., Jackson, R. R., Eds. Purex Process Operation and Performance; Thoria Campaign, Richland, Washington, ARH-1970, 2127.Search in Google Scholar
27. Orth, D. A. SRP thorium processing experience. In ANS Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, DPSPU-78-30-3, CONF-780622, 1978.Search in Google Scholar
28. Ramanujam, A. Purex and thorium processes (aqueous reprocessing). Encycl. Mater.: Sci. Technol. 2001, 7918–7924.10.1016/B0-08-043152-6/01426-1Search in Google Scholar
29. Dhami, P. S., Yadav, P. S., Gandhi, P. M. Indian experience on reprocessing of irradiated Thoria. In Thorium Energy Conference 2015 (ThEC15) October 12–15, 2015, Mumbai, India.Search in Google Scholar
30. Akabori, M., Shiratori, T. Dissolution of ThO2 based oxides in nitric acid solutions at elevated temperatures. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 1994, 31, 539–545; https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.1994.9735188.Search in Google Scholar
31. Pathak, P. N., Prabhu, D. R., Kanekar, A. S., Manchanda, V. K. Distribution studies on Th(IV), U(VI) and Pu(IV) using tri-n-butyl phosphate and N, N-dialkyl amides. Radiochim. Acta 2006, 94, 193–198; https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2006.94.4.193.Search in Google Scholar
32. Dhami, P. S., Jagasia, P., Panja, S., Naik, P. W., Achuthan, P. V., Tripathi, S. C. Validation of the flowsheet proposed for reprocessing of AHWR spent fuel. Desalination Water Treat. 2012, 38, 184–189; https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2012.2305.Search in Google Scholar
33. Kumari, N., Pathak, P. N., Prabhu, D. R., Manchanda, V. K. Development of solvent extraction scheme for reprocessing of advanced heavy water reactor spent fuel using N, N-Dihexyl octanamide as extractant. Desalination Water Treat. 2012, 38, 159–165; https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2012.2740.Search in Google Scholar
34. Benadict Rakesh, K., Suresh, A., Vasudeva Rao, P. R. Third phase formation in the extraction of Th(NO3)4 by tri-n-butyl phosphate and tri-iso-amyl phosphate in n-dodecane and n-tetradecane from nitric acid media. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2014, 32, 249–266; https://doi.org/10.1080/07366299.2013.838499.Search in Google Scholar
35. Benadict Rakesh, K., Suresh, A., Vasudeva Rao, P. R. Extraction and stripping behaviour of tri-iso-amyl phosphate and tri-n-butyl phosphate in n-dodecane with U(VI) in nitric acid media. Radiochim. Acta 2014, 102, 619–628; https://doi.org/10.1515/ract-2014-2175.Search in Google Scholar
36. Pathak, P. N., Veeraraghavan, R., Manchanda, V. K. Separation of uranium and thorium using tris(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate as extractant. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 1999, 240, 15–18; https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02349130.Search in Google Scholar
37. Suresh, A., Srinivasan, T. G., Vasudeva Rao, P. R. The effect of the structure of trialkyl phosphates on their physicochemical properties and extraction behavior. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2009, 27, 258–294; https://doi.org/10.1080/07366290802674481.Search in Google Scholar
38. Madigan, D. C., Cattral, R. W. The extraction of thorium from nitrate solution by dibutyl butyl phosphonate. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1961, 21, 334–338; https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(61)80313-8.Search in Google Scholar
39. Chandrasekar, A., Brahmmananda Rao, C. V. S., Mahesh, S., Ghanty Tapan, K., Nagarajan, S. Structure-modulated complexation of actinides with phosphonates: a combined experimental and quantum chemical investigation. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 11309–11315; https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201801841.Search in Google Scholar
40. Vyas Chirag, K., Brahmmananda Rao, C. V. S., Jayalakshmi, S., Joshirao, P. M., Manchanda Vijay, K. Phosphonates as alternative to tributyl phosphate for the separation of actinides from fission products. Radiochim. Acta 2015, 103, 277–285; https://doi.org/10.1515/ract-2014-2319.Search in Google Scholar
41. Siddall, T. H.III. Applications of Amides as Extractants; USAEC Report, Savannah River Laboratory, Savannah River, DP-541, 1961.Search in Google Scholar
42. Condamines, N., Musikas, C. Extraction by N, N-dialkylamides. II. Extraction of actinide cations. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 1992, 10, 69–10; https://doi.org/10.1080/07366299208918093.Search in Google Scholar
43. Pathak, P. N., Veeraghavan, R., Prabhu, D. R., Mahajan, G. R., Manchanda, V. K. Separation studies of uranium and thorium using di(2-ethylhexyl)isobutyramide (D2EHIBA). Separ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 34, 2601; https://doi.org/10.1081/ss-100100793.Search in Google Scholar
44. Pathak, P. N., Veeraghavan, R., Ruikar, P. B., Manchanda, V. K. Solvent extraction studies on Th(IV), Pa(V) and U(VI) from nitric acid medium using di(2-ethylhexyl)isobutyramide (D2EHIBA). Radiochim. Acta 1999, 86, 129–134; https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.1999.86.34.129.Search in Google Scholar
45. Manchanda, V. K., Pathak, P. N. Amides and diamides as promising extractants in the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle: an overview. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2004, 35, 85–103; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2003.09.005.Search in Google Scholar
46. Pathak, P. N., Prabhu, D. R., Kanekar, A. S., Ruikar, P. B., Bhattacharyya, A., Mohapatra, P. K., Manchanda, V. K. Distribution behavior of U(VI), Th(IV) and fission products with di(2-ethylhexyl) isobutyramide under process conditions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 4369; https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0305566.Search in Google Scholar
47. Bhattacharyya, A., Mohapatra, P. K., Pathak, P. N., Manchanda, V. K. Cation-exchange separation of uranium from thorium in nitric acid medium. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2006, 268, 323–328; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-006-0168-8.Search in Google Scholar
48. Pathak, P. N., Prabhu, D. R., Ruikar, P. B., Manchanda, V. K. Evaluation of di(2-ethylhexyl)isobutyramide (D2EHIBA) as a process extractant for the recovery of U-233 from irradiated Th. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2002, 20, 293–311; https://doi.org/10.1081/sei-120004806.Search in Google Scholar
49. Pathak, P. N., Prabhu, D. R., Kanekar, A. S., Manchanda, V. K. Evaluation of N, N-dialkylamides as promising process extractants. Actinides 2009. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2010, 9, 012082; https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/9/1/012082.Search in Google Scholar
50. Parikh, K., Pathak, P. N., Misra, S. K., Tripathi, S. C., Dakshinamoorthy, A., Manchanda, V. K. Radiolytic degradation studies on N, N‐dihexyloctanamide (DHOA) under PUREX process conditions. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2009, 27, 244–257; https://doi.org/10.1080/07366290802672303.Search in Google Scholar
51. Ansari, S. A., Mohapatra, P. K. Hollow fibre supported liquid membranes for nuclear fuel cycle applications: a review. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2021, 4, 100138; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100138.Search in Google Scholar
52. Pathak, P. N., Ansari, S. A., Prabhu, D. R., Kanekar, A. S., Mohapatra, P. K., Manchanda, V. K. Selective recovery of uranium from THOREX feed by hollow fibre supported liquid mem brane technique containing di(2-ethylhexyl) isobutyramide (D2EHIBA) as the carrier. Radiochim. Acta 2010, 98, 259–266; https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2010.1720.Search in Google Scholar
53. Patil, C. B., Mohapatra, P., Manchanda, V. Transport of thorium from nitric acid solution by non-dispersive solvent extraction using a hollow fibre contactor. Desalination 2008, 232, 272–280; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.055.Search in Google Scholar
54. Kanekar, A. S., Pathak, P. N., Mohapatra, P. K., Manchanda, V. K. Comparative extraction efficiencies of tri-n-butyl phosphate and N, N-dihexyloctanamide for uranium recovery using supercritical CO2. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2010, 283, 789–796; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-009-0423-x.Search in Google Scholar
55. Vyas Chirag, K., Joshirao Pranav, M., Shukla Rakesh, B., Tyagi Avesh, K., Manchanda Vijay, K. A novel approach for preferential recovery of Sr from (Sr, Th) O2. J. Hazard Mater. 2012, 241–242, 340–347; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.09.047.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
56. Kumari, N., Pathak, P. N., Prabhu, D. R., Manchanda, V. K. Solvent extraction studies of protactinium for its recovery from short-cooled spent fuel and high-level waste solutions in thorium fuel cycle using diisobutyl carbinol (DIBC) as extractant. Desalination Water Treat. 2012, 38, 46–51; https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2012.2292.Search in Google Scholar
57. Goff, K. M., Benedict, R. W., Howden, K. L., Teske, G. M., Johnson, T. A., Pyrochemical treatment of spent nuclear fuel. In Proc. of Global 2005, Tsukuba, Japan, Oct. 9–13, Paper No 364, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
58. Li, S., Johnson, T., Westphal, B., Goff, K., Benedict, R. Electrorefining experience for pyrochemical reprocessing of spent EBR-II driver fuel. In Proc. of Global 2005, Tsukuba, Japan, Oct. 9–13, Paper No 487, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
59. Kasten, P. R., Bettis, E. S., Bauman, H. F., Carter, W. L. Summary of molten salt breeder reactor design studies. ORNL-TM-1467, 1966.Search in Google Scholar
60. Abderrahim, H. A., D’Hondt, P. MYRRHA: a European experimental ADS for R&D applications status at mid-2005 and prospective towards implementation. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2007, 44, 491–498; https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2007.9711313.Search in Google Scholar
61. Mishra, R. K., Mishra, R., Kaushik, C. P., Tyagi, A. K., Das, D., Raj, K. Effect of ThO2 on ionic transport behaviour of barium borosilicate. J. Nucl. Mater. 2009, 392, 1–5; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.001.Search in Google Scholar
62. Farges, F. Structural Environment around Th 4+ in silicate glasses, Implications for the geochemistry of M4+ elements. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 1991, 55, 3303–3309; https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(91)90490-v.Search in Google Scholar
63. Mishra, R. K., Sudarshan, V., Tyagi, A. K., Kaushik, C. P., Raj, K., Kulshreshtha, S. K. J. Structural studies of ThO2 containing barium borosilicate glasses. Non-Cryst. Solids 2006, 352, 2952–2957; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.04.008.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review
- Thorium as an abundant source of nuclear energy and challenges in separation science
- Original Papers
- Recovery of no-carrier-added 41Ca, 44Ti, and 26Al from high-energy proton-irradiated vanadium targets
- Development of purification of no-carrier-added 47Sc of theranostic interest: selective separation study from the natTi(n,p) process
- Determination of scandium in ash and slag wastes and products of their processing by instrumental neutron activation analysis
- Evaluation of Re/99mTc-labeled somatostatin receptor-targeting peptide complexes synthesized via direct metal cyclization
- Effects of UV stress on Shewanella azerbaijanica bioremediation response
- Short nylon tire cord and gamma irradiation impact on SBR/ultrasonic and mechanochemical devulcanized rubber blends
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review
- Thorium as an abundant source of nuclear energy and challenges in separation science
- Original Papers
- Recovery of no-carrier-added 41Ca, 44Ti, and 26Al from high-energy proton-irradiated vanadium targets
- Development of purification of no-carrier-added 47Sc of theranostic interest: selective separation study from the natTi(n,p) process
- Determination of scandium in ash and slag wastes and products of their processing by instrumental neutron activation analysis
- Evaluation of Re/99mTc-labeled somatostatin receptor-targeting peptide complexes synthesized via direct metal cyclization
- Effects of UV stress on Shewanella azerbaijanica bioremediation response
- Short nylon tire cord and gamma irradiation impact on SBR/ultrasonic and mechanochemical devulcanized rubber blends