Home Development and Preparation of Oral Suspensions for Paediatric Patients – a Challenge for Pharmacists
Article Publicly Available

Development and Preparation of Oral Suspensions for Paediatric Patients – a Challenge for Pharmacists

  • Cornelia Bruns

    Cornelia Bruns studied pharmacy at the Technical University Carolo-Wilhelmina in Brunswick, Germany. From 2005 she is the head of production in the pharmacy department of the clinical center Bremen-Mitte Gesundheit Nord gGmbH Klinikverbund Bremen, Germany. Intermittent from 2016 to 2017 she was responsible for the quality control at the hospital pharmacy. Her main interests focuse on extemporaneous preparations and physicochemical stability of dosage forms for paediatric patients as well as aseptic preparation of total parenteral nutrition.

    EMAIL logo
    and Michael Ober

    Michael Ober studied pharmacy between 2000 and 2004 at the University of Heidelberg. The research subject for his doctoral thesis in Clinical Pharmacy was about pharmacokinetic of antimicrobial drugs and was finished in 2009. Since 2006 he works as pharmacist in the pharmacy department of the Heidelberg University Hospital and is responsible for drug preparation. His special interests include different kinds of drug preparation, especially paediatric dosage forms.

Published/Copyright: April 27, 2018
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The preparation of liquid oral dosage forms for paediatric patients may pose a challenge on pharmacies. Marketed ready-to-use suspension vehicles do have advantages and disadvantages. In order to overcome the disadvantages a dedicated suspension vehicle, which can be prepared by every pharmacy, was cooperatively developed by pharmacist specialists on a national level in Germany. Marketed as well as pharmacy prepared suspension vehicles provide added value for pharmacy preparations for the special need of paediatric patients of different age groups.

Introduction

Licensed medicinal products manufactured by the pharmaceutical industry are often not appropriate for the safe use in paediatric patients. Since the Paediatric Regulation came into effect in 2007, applications for marketing-authorisation of new medicinal products have to come along with a paediatric investigation plan (PIP). Of note, this refers only to medicinal products containing new active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) and has been successfully performed in some cases. By contrast, the marketing-authorisation of PUMA (paediatric-use marketing authorisation) has not reached the expected level [1]. Therefore pharmacists have to fill the gap in order to ensure the supply of appropriate dosage forms for paediatric patients. Innovative dosage forms, like orodispersible mini-tablets or orodispersible films, provide fixed single doses. The fixed single doses are a major drawback of these dosage forms because the administered dose depends on the weight and age of the patients. Mini-tablets may improve the flexibility in dosing by multiplying the number of single doses [2]. Nevertheless, oral liquid dosage forms represent the gold standard for paediatric patients because they allow appropriate dosing by means of withdrawing the appropriate volume from a multiple dose container.

Discussion

Prior to the preparation the added value of the pharmacy preparations prepared for the specific need of the patients has to be determined. Pharmacy preparations have to be prepared according to the regulations and an appropriate quality assurance system. Efficacy, safety and quality are essential objectives of the specific dosage forms prepared in pharmacies. Two-phase systems like suspensions present one of the most challenging dosage forms.

Basic considerations

The challenge for pharmacists is to prepare stable suspensions of appropriate concentrations, which allow safe and easy administration of the prescribed dose in each paediatric patient of the different age groups [3, 4].

The aim should be the limitation of excipients, because they may cause adverse effects. Issues to be regarded are:

  1. Availability of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) fulfilling the specifications of the Pharmacopoeia or availability of solid dosage forms, such as tablets or capsules to be used as starting material

  2. Stability of the API in the suspension vehicle (e.g. low solubility to avoid crystal growth of suspended particles, concentration of API in the dissolved phase of suspensions)

  3. Compatibility of the excipients and stability of the formulation

  4. Appropriate particle size of the API

  5. Slow settling and, when shaken, readily dispersed

  6. Availability of toxicological data regarding the excipients and suitability for formulations for paediatric use

  7. Choice of preservatives

  8. Choice of thickening agents

  9. Choice of sweetener

  10. Avoidance of additional wetting agents, e.g. polysorbate or polyvidone

  11. Avoidance of flocculating agents, because the choice depends on the API and its concentration

  12. Avoidance of flavouring agents due to their individual acceptance and age-appropriate use. Furthermore the choice would depend on the taste of the API

  13. Setting to the desired pH-value

  14. Palatability and acceptability

Preservatives

The most common preservatives used in liquid formulations are sodium benzoate, sorbic acid/potassium sorbate, methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate and propyl-4-hydroxybenzoate [5, 6, 7]. Clinical data about the toxicity of the compounds are rare. Some recommendations are made by the European Medicines Agency for the use of preservatives in children. Sodium benzoate and benzoic acid may displace bilirubin from albumin. Especially in newborns up to the age of eight weeks benzoic acid can accumulate and lead to clinical jaundice. Methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate and propyl-4-hydroxybenzoate may cause allergic reactions. The latter one binds to the oestrogen receptor and influence the maturation of the reproductive system. However, the hydroxybenzoates are widely used because they are effective in the pH interval of 1 to 8.5. Propylene glycol is sometimes used as preservative in oral formulations. Pharmacokinetic in neonates differs significantly from adult values leading to its accumulation following repeated administration and can cause alcohol-like symptoms. For children up to 5 years the maximum daily intake must be under 50 mg/kg/day and 1 mg/kg/day for pre-term and term neonates [8]. Comparing the risks and suitability of these preservatives (see Table 1), potassium sorbate shows the best risk-benefit-relationship but the effectiveness is limited to a pH-range of 3.5 to 5.5.

Table 1:

Characteristics of preservatives used in liquid oral dosage forms.

PreservativeConcentrationpH-rangeRiskRecommendation
Sodium benzoate0.01 – 0.2 %<5May increase the risk of jaundice in newborn babies.There are adequate data to establish an overall no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of 500 mg/kg bw/day. Therefore the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for benzoic acid and its salts has been established to 0–5 mg/kg bw/day. [5]
Potassium sorbate

(sorbic acid)
0,14 %

(0.1 %)
3.5–5.5There are no data showing any risk by using recommended concentrations.Recommended acceptable daily intake for sorbic acid and its salts are 3 mg/kg bw/day. [6]
Methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate (MHB)0.05 – 0.1 %1 – 8.5May cause allergic reactions (possibly delayed).The use of MHP in oral formulations up to 0.2 % of the product (as within the recommended effective concentrations as a preservative) is not a concern for humans including the paediatric population. [7]
Propyl-4-hydroxybenzoate (PHB)0.05 – 0.1 %1 – 8.5May cause allergic reactions (possibly delayed).

Propyl-4-hydroxybezoate binds to oestrogen receptors but with a much weaker affinity than the natural ligand [6]
A permitted daily exposure (PDE) value of 5 mg/kg/day can be calculated for the use of PHB in adults and children older than 2 years with mature metabolic capacity.

For children below 2 years a PDE for PHB cannot be determined because of uncertainty related to the maturation of the enzymes that metabolize PHB as well as the limitation of the available animal data corresponding to the youngest children. [6, 7]
Propylene glycol15–30 %1–14May cause alcohol-like symptoms. [8]In the absence of compelling data the maximum daily intake is 50 mg/kg/day in children less than 5 years old, and 1 mg/kg/day in pre-term and term neonates due to known immaturity of both metabolic and renal clearances of propylene glycol in these populations. [8]

Thickening agents

Oral liquids containing active substances with low aqueous solubility often result in two-phase systems (solid particles dispersed in the liquid). Thickening agents increase the viscosity of the aqueous solution and prevent fast sedimentation of suspended particles and caking. Some of these substances may also increase the stability of suspensions due to their surfactant activity. Well-known thickening agents are semi-synthetic polysaccharides, e.g. hydroxyethylcellulose or hypromellose, and natural polysaccharides such as tragacanth and xanthan gum (see Table 2). Unfortunately, xanthan gum is not marketed in small quantities appropriate for pharmacies and with certified pharmaceutical quality. Raw-material suppliers in small amounts deliver tragacanth, but the microbiological burden must be considered and eventually the suspension vehicle has to be sterilized. Hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) does not cover the bitterness of active substances such as tragacanth does. However, HEC is readily available on the market in assured quality, can be used in a wide pH-range, shows solubility in hot or cold water and exhibit the above-mentioned surfactant activity. These characteristics qualify HEC as advantageous thickening agent. One of the marketed suspension vehicles contains pregelatinised starch as thickening agent. This excipient is rather unknown and not available in certified pharmaceutical quality for pharmacy use [9, 10, 11].

Table 2:

Characteristics of thickening agents used in liquid oral dosage forms.

Thickening agentConcentrationApplicable pH-rangeAdvantagesDisadvantages
Hydroxyethylcellulose [9, 10, 11]0.5 – 8 %2 – 12Wide pH-range, availability, solubility in cold and hot water, surfactant activitySometimes musty taste,

type dependent viscosity
Hypromellose [9, 10, 11]0.25 – 2,5 %3–11Wide pH-range, availability, surfactant activityUnsoluble in hot water, coagulation by heat
Tragacanth [9, 10, 11]0.6 – 2 %4–8Covers the taste of other excipientsNarrow pH-range, microbiological quality
Xanthan Gum [9, 10, 11]1 – 3 %3–11Wide pH-range, high viscosity, solubility in water, compatibility with high salt concentrationsLack of availability

Sweeteners

Sucrose is hydrolysed in the intestine to the monosaccharides glucose and fructose, which should avoided for paediatric patients suffering from fructose intolerance. Sorbitol and Sorbitol solution are also contraindicated to these patients and may cause osmotic diarrhoea, whereas an acceptable daily intake for artificial sweeteners like sodium saccharin, sodium cyclamate or aspartame must be appropriately taken into consideration. At high concentrations they may evolve a bitter aftertaste [12]. Therefore, glucose monohydrate seems to be the most suitable sweetener in spite of its caloric value and its risk to promote dental caries.

Stability

Undissolved substances are not subject to degradation and hydrolysis as if they are dissolved.

In suspensions, on the other hand, the particle size plays a significant aspect in physical stability. In order to influence the sedimentation rate the density and the viscosity of the medium should be adjusted to the particle size, as well as a narrow and small particle size distribution should be preferred.

Experimental stability testing is required to validate the preparation, distribution and the determination of the maximum shelf life and in-use stability after opening the container

Occasionally the lack of active pharmaceutical ingredients requires the use of tablets or capsules as starting material. In these cases the impact of the excipients contained in the solid oral dosage forms on the compatibility and stability of the resulting suspension must be considered. Furthermore the API content of the tablets and capsules used as starting material determines the content of the API in the extemporaneous preparation and has to be checked.

Marketed suspension vehicles

In Germany, a composition of a suspension vehicle, which can prepared in pharmacies, was published in 2001[13]. However, many pharmacies use industrially manufactured suspension vehicles [14], because they allow quick and easy preparation of oral formulations (see Table 3). The most important advantage of ready-to-use-vehicles is the proven stability of the products and provision of stability data for a huge number of APIs by the manufacturers of the suspension vehicles. This allows quick and easy preparation of oral liquid suspensions of many different APIs in every pharmacy. On the other hand marketed suspension vehicles can cause a relationship of dependence and may be subjected to product recalls and supply shortages. Such a recall and failure of deliver occurred in Germany at the end of 2017 for one of these products and caused a state of emergency especially in local pharmacies. Alternatives were not readily available and the company not able to predict the renewed availability.

Table 3:

Characteristics of suspension vehicles.

Suspension vehicleTypeCompositionAdvantagesDisadvantagesFormulations
Ora-Plus®MarketedWater, microcrystalline cellulose, carboxymethylcellulose sodium, xanthan gum, carrageen, calcium sulphate, trisodium phosphate, citric acid, sodium phosphate, dimethicone antfoam emulsion, methylparaben, potassium sorbateComposition meets USP monograph, can be combined with Ora-Sweet®, Ora-Sweet SF® or water, numerous formulations published, low osmolarityComplex composition makes stability tests difficult and increases API – excipient interactions,, incompatible with positively charged APIsStability data for many APIs published in different professional journals and books
Ora-Sweet®MarketedWater, sucrose, glycerin, sorbitol, citric acid, sodium phosphate, methylparaben, potassium sorbate, flavouringCan be combined with Ora-Plus® or water, numerous formulation publishedContains flavouring, complex composition makes stability tests difficult and increases API – excipient interactions, high osmolarityStability data for many APIs published in different professional journals and books
Ora-Sweet SF®MarketedWater, glycerin, sorbitol, sodium saccharin, xanthan gum, flavouring, citric acid, sodium citrate, methylparaben, potassium sorbate, propylparabenCan be combined with Ora-Plus® or water, numerous formulations publishedContains flavouring and propylparaben, complex composition makes stability tests difficult and increases API – excipient interactions, high osmolarityStability data for many APIs published in different professional journals and books
Ora-Blend®MarketedWater, sucrose, glycerin, sorbitol, flavouring, microcrystalline cellulose,, carboxymethylcellulose sodium, xanthan gum, carrageen, calcium sulphate, trisodium phosphate, citric acid, sodium phosphate, dimethicone antifoam emulsion, methylparaben, potassium sorbateNumerous formulations publishedContains flavouring, complex composition makes stability tests difficult and increases API – excipient interactions, incompatible with positively charged APIs, high osmolarityStability data for many APIs published in different professional journals and books
Ora-Blend SF®MarketedWater, sorbitol, glycerin, flavouring, microcrystalline cellulose, carboxymethylcellulose sodium, xanthan gum, car- rageenan, calcium sulfate, trisodium phosphate sodium saccharin, sodium phosphate, citric acid, sodium citrate, dimethicone antifoam emulsion, methylparaben, propylparaben, potassium sorbateNumerous formulations published, medium osmolarityContains flavouring and propylparaben, complex composition makes stability tests difficult and increases API – excipient interactions, incompatible with positively charged APIsStability data for many APIs published in different professional journals and books
In-Orpha®MarketedWater, glycerin, hydroxyethylcellulose, citric acid, sodium citrate, bitter blocker, toffee flavouring, sucralose, potassium sorbateHydroxyethylcellulose exhibit surfactant activity and inured to salts, preservative appropriate for paediatric patients, low osmolarityContains flavouring and bitter blockers, glycerin may cause adverse affectsStability data for only a few APIs
SyrSpend® SF PH4 liquidMarketedWater, preaggluginated starch, sodium citrate, citric acid, malic acid, sodium benzoate, sucralose, simethicone

(flavoured or unflavoured)
Low osmolarityContains sodium benzoate, lack of information relating to sucralose for the use in paediatricsStability data for many APIs
SyrSpend® SF PH4 powderMarketedPreaggluginated starch, sodium citrate, citric acid, sucralosePreservative-free, low osmolarityMicrobiological risk, lack of information regarding to the use of sucralose in paediatricsStability data for many APIs
SyrSpend® SF Alka powderMarketedPreaggluginated starch, calcium carbonate, sucralosePreservative-free, low osmolarityMicrobiological risk, lack of information regarding to the use of sucralose in paediatricsStability data for relevant APIs
Basissuspensionsmedium [13]CompoundedWater, glucose monohydrate, sodium chloride, citric acid, tragacanth (potassium sorbate is added to final suspension, the preservative-free vehicle is sterilized)Tragacanth can cover poor taste of APIs and may act as wetting agent, excipients in small amounts available, preservative appropriate for paediatric patientsMicrobiological quality of tragacanth, high osmolarityStability data for only a few APIs:

Hydrochlorothiazide Suspension 2 mg/ml - shelf life 3 month, after opening 2 weeks Spironolactone Suspension 5 mg/ml - shelf life 6 month, after opening 3 month Naproxen Suspension 50 mg/ml - shelf life 6 month, after opening 3 month
Grundlage für Suspensionen zum Einnehmen DAC/NRF®

(utility model No. 20 2018 000 323)
Compounded and marketedWater, glucose monohydrate, citric acid, potassium sorbate, hydroxyethylcelluloseExcipients in small amounts available, hydroxyethylcellulose exhibit surfactant activity and inured to salts, preservative appropriate for paediatric patients, medium osmolarityStability studies are currently performed

Another disadvantage of the marketed suspension vehicles are the different and sometimes non-suitable ingredients for patients of special age groups. Some preservatives used in these products are not appropriate for the use in new-born or premature infants. Of note, vehicles without preservatives are problematic because of the microbiological instability of the multiple dosage form.

Development of an alternative compounded suspension vehicle

In order to overcome these disadvantages a dedicated suspension vehicle, which can be prepared by every pharmacy or ordered as ready-to-use vehicle from a pharmaceutical manufacturer, was developed in a joint project of Deutscher Arzneimittel-Codex/Neues Rezeptur-Formularium (DAC/NRF) and other groups, e.g. hospital pharmacists. Currently stability studies of this particular suspension vehicle are performed with the 10 most often used APIs in paediatric patients [15].

Conclusion

In spite of new regulations and the development of promising new dosage forms, the preparation of suspensions for the special needs of paediatric patients remains an important assignment in pharmacies. Whenever a marketed suspension vehicle is not available or not suitable, e.g. for newborn, pharmacies should be able to prepare a preparation for the particular needs. Due to the different components contained in suspensions stability testing and validation is commonly performed by validated high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Therefore sharing of information and cooperation in the development and analytics of suitable formulas are essential both on the national and international level of the professional bodies.

About the authors

Cornelia Bruns

Cornelia Bruns studied pharmacy at the Technical University Carolo-Wilhelmina in Brunswick, Germany. From 2005 she is the head of production in the pharmacy department of the clinical center Bremen-Mitte Gesundheit Nord gGmbH Klinikverbund Bremen, Germany. Intermittent from 2016 to 2017 she was responsible for the quality control at the hospital pharmacy. Her main interests focuse on extemporaneous preparations and physicochemical stability of dosage forms for paediatric patients as well as aseptic preparation of total parenteral nutrition.

Michael Ober

Michael Ober studied pharmacy between 2000 and 2004 at the University of Heidelberg. The research subject for his doctoral thesis in Clinical Pharmacy was about pharmacokinetic of antimicrobial drugs and was finished in 2009. Since 2006 he works as pharmacist in the pharmacy department of the Heidelberg University Hospital and is responsible for drug preparation. His special interests include different kinds of drug preparation, especially paediatric dosage forms.

Acknowledements

We are grateful to Prof. Dr. Irene Krämer head of the Special Interest Group Pharmacy preparation and quality control of the German Society of Hospital Pharmacists ADKA e.V. for taking the initiative and fruitful discussions.

  1. Conflicts of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest. The authors have read the journal’s Publication ethics and publication malpractice statement available at the journal’s website and hereby confirm that they comply with all its parts applicable to the present scientific work.

References

1. European medicines agency state of paediatric medicines in the EU Report from the commission to the European parlament and the council COM (2017) 626. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/files/paediatrics/docs/2017_childrensmedicines_report_en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

2. European medicines agency committee on medicinal products for human Use (CHMP) & paediatric commitee (PDCO). Guideline on the pharmaceutical development of medicines for paediatric use. 2013. Available at http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2013/07/WC500147002.pdf. Accessed 27 April 2016.Search in Google Scholar

3. Albrecht S, Scherließ R, Baehr M, Goerke A, Langebrake C. Umstellung häufig verordneter Kapselrezepturen in der Pädiatrie und Neonatologie auf flüssige Oralia im Krankenhaus. Krankenhauspharmazie 2017;38:459–68.Search in Google Scholar

4. Heeb RM, Weis M. Propafenonhydrochlorid-Lösung zur oralen Gabe in der Pädiatrie. Krankenhauspharmazie 2017;38:385–90.Search in Google Scholar

5. European medicines agency committee for human medicinal products (CHMP) questions and answers on benzoic acid and benzoates in the context of the revision of the guideline on ‘excipients in the label and package leaflet of medicinal products for human use’ (CPMP/463/00). Available at http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2014/02/WC500162031.pdf. Accessed 23 January 2014. Access date 28 March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

6. Re-evaluation of sorbic acid, potassium sorbate and calcium sorbate (E 200, 202, 203); EFSA Journal. Scientific Opinion. 30 June 2015; Available at http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/4144 Access date 28 March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

7. European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Reflection paper on the use of methyl- and propylparaben as excipients in human medicinal products for oral use. Available at http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2013/05/WC500143139.pdf. Accessed 25 April 2013. Access date 28 March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

8. European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Questions & answers on propylene glycol and esters in the context of the revision of the guideline on ‘Excipients in the label and package leaflet of medicinal products for 7 human use’ (Draft) http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2014/12/WC500177945.pdf. Accessed 28 February 2015. Access date 28 March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

9. Schmidt PC. Pharmazeutische Hilfsstoffe. Eschborn: Pharmazeutischer Verlag GmbH; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

10. Europäisches Arzneibuch 8.0–8.4. Amtliche deutsche Ausgabe. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 2015.Search in Google Scholar

11. Bouwman Y, Fenton-May V, Le Brun P. Practical Pharmaceutics. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland; 2015.10.1007/978-3-319-15814-3Search in Google Scholar

12. European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Reflection paper: formulations of choice for the paediatric population. Available at http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003782.pdf. Accessed 21 September 2006. Access date 26 March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

13. Bruns C, Lemcke I. Herstellung und Analytik von oralen liquida für die Pädiatrie. Krankenhauspharmazie 2001;2:76–80.Search in Google Scholar

14. Erdmann JH, Ober M, Ackermann B. Moderne Herstellung kindgerechter Arzneimittel. Pharm Ztg 2015;160:2986 –92.Search in Google Scholar

15. Manuel W. Status quo in deutschen Krankenhausapotheken. Krankenhauspharmazie 2017;3:131–35.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-2-17
Revised: 2018-4-5
Accepted: 2018-4-6
Published Online: 2018-4-27
Published in Print: 2018-6-1

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pthp-2018-0008/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOoq4Mow1QhTdZH3dIkV5RaJ4u7OcKuXgSbFdxTJyqS2izZeoIBw1
Scroll to top button