Maximizing advantages and minimizing misinterpretation risks when using analogies in the presentation of chemistry concepts: a design challenge
-
Liliana Mammino
Abstract
Analogies are frequently used in chemistry education (and science education in general), above all when introducing a new concept or when a concept is perceived as too abstract by the teacher or by the learners. On the one hand, analogies can offer functioning opportunities for clarifications; on the other hand, they may risk engendering misinterpretations or misconceptions, because the terms of a given analogy may be perceived differently by the teacher and by the student, or may be too farfetched to have a clarifying role. In order to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks, the design of analogies needs to entail careful attention both to the nature of the analogy and to its ‘matching’ to the nature of the concept to which it refers. This involves vigilant analysis of all the details and of their implications, and the parallel design of a viable way to guide the student through the terms of the analogy; such guidance is actually meant to become an explanation component. The paper considers concrete examples from the author’s direct experience with general chemistry and physical chemistry courses, and analyses both the design of the details of the selected analogies and the corresponding guidance pathways. It also discusses related issues like the importance of limiting the resort to analogies to the cases where they can actually have a significant impact on students’ understanding, and the opportunity of replacing them with molecular models whenever feasible, as a model’s nature is closer to the mental images that it is desirable to promote through students’ perceptions. Comparisons of the types of guidance needed for analogies, for general-type visualization, and for visualization through models are also included. The take-home message reiterates the considerations on the nature of analogies as something to be designed, on the teacher’s active role in the design, and on the possibility of including students in the design process, when the concepts and corresponding analogies are suitable for such inclusion.
-
Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Naseriazar, A, Özmen, H, Badrian, A. Effectiveness of analogies on students’ understanding of chemical equilibrium, Western Anatolia. In: Special Issue: Selected papers presented at WCNTSE. Izmir, Turkey: WAJES; 2011:491–8 pp.Search in Google Scholar
2. Lauriola, R. Su alcune similitudini in Omero: interpretazioni a confronto. Available from: https://mediaclassica.loescher.it/news/su-alcune-similitudini-in-omero-interpretazioni-a-confronto-6974 [Accessed 13 Nov 2022].Search in Google Scholar
3. Lucretius, TC. La natura delle cose. Milano: A. Mondadori; 2009.Search in Google Scholar
4. Galilei, G.: Accademia dei Lincei; 1623.Search in Google Scholar
5. Gentner, D. Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognit Sci 1983;7:155–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3.Search in Google Scholar
6. Orgill, MK, Bodner, G. The role of analogies in chemistry teaching. In: Cooper, M, Pienta, N, Greenbowe, T, editors. How students learn chemistry. Hoboken, New Jersey, US: Prentice-Hall; 2004. chapter 9.Search in Google Scholar
7. Treagust, DF, Thiele, RB, Harrison, AG, Venville, GJ, Stocklmayer, SM. Teaching and learning science with Analogies. Paper presented at the AARE Annual Conference, Fremantle; 1993.Search in Google Scholar
8. Gabel, DL, Sherwood, RD. Effect of using analogies on chemistry achievement according to Piagetian level. Sci Educ 1980;64:709–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730640516.Search in Google Scholar
9. Gabel, DL, Sherwood, RD. Analyzing difficulties with mole-concept tasks by using familiar analog tasks. J Res Sci Teach 1984;21:843–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660210808.Search in Google Scholar
10. Love, A, Mammino, L. Using the analysis of errors to improve students’ expression in the sciences. Zimbabwe J Educ Res 1997;9:1–17.Search in Google Scholar
11. Mammino, L. Electrons and orbitals: challenges at first year level and beyond. In: Mogari, D, Mji, A, Ogbonnaya, UI, editors. ISTE international conference proceedings, Pretoria: UNISA Press; 2013:133–47 pp.Search in Google Scholar
12. Ngoh Khang, G, Lian Sai, C. The use of analogies in teaching and learning chemistry. Teach Learn 1985;6:39–43.Search in Google Scholar
13. Siddiqui, U. Teaching chemistry with analogies: are multiple analogies better than one-size-fits-all analogies? Eur Acad Res 2016;III:10791–804.Search in Google Scholar
14. Duit, R. On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Sci Educ 1991;75:649–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750606.Search in Google Scholar
15. Cardinale, LA. Facilitating science by learning by embedded explication. Instr Sci 1993;21:501–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00118560.Search in Google Scholar
16. Gick, ML, Holyoak, KJ. Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognit Psychol 1983;15:1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6.Search in Google Scholar
17. Newby, TJ, Stepich, DA. Learning abstract concepts: the use of analogies as a mediational strategy. J Instruct Developm 1987;10:20–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02905788.Search in Google Scholar
18. Rahayu, R, Sutrisno, H. The effect of chemistry learning based on analogy on higher order thinking skills of senior high school students in equilibrium concept. Europ J Educ Studies 2019;5:255–67.Search in Google Scholar
19. Harrison, AG, Coll, RK. Using analogies in middle and secondary science classrooms. California: Corwin Press; 2008.Search in Google Scholar
20. Kawedhar, MCS, Mulyani, S, Indriyant, NY. Analogies and visual aids provided by chemistry teachers’ in chemistry learning: a case study of pre-service chemistry teacher. AIP Conf Proc 2019;2194:020048. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139780.Search in Google Scholar
21. Dilber, R, Duzgun, B. Effectiveness of analogy on students’ success and elimination of misconceptions. Lat Am J Phys Educ 2008;2.Search in Google Scholar
22. Rebollos, DS. The systematic use of analogies in teaching abstract concepts in chemistry: Effects on achievement and retention; 1997. Available from: https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/777.Search in Google Scholar
23. Orgill, MK, Thomas, M. Analogies and the 5E model. Sci Teach 2007;74:40–5.Search in Google Scholar
24. Brown, A. Analogical learning and transfer: what develops? In: Vosniadou, S, Ortony, A, editors. Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1989:369–412 pp.10.1017/CBO9780511529863.019Search in Google Scholar
25. Dagher, ZR. Review of studies on the effectiveness of instructional analogies in science education. Sci Educ 1995;79:295–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790305.Search in Google Scholar
26. Spiro, RJ, Feltovich, PJ, Coulson, RL, Anderson, DK. Multiple analogies for complex concepts: antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition. In: Vosniadou, S, Ortony, A, editors. Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1989:498–531 pp.10.1017/CBO9780511529863.023Search in Google Scholar
27. Aubusson, P, Treagust, D, Harrison, A. Learning and teaching science with analogies and metaphors. In: Ritchie, SM, editor. The world of science education: handbook of research in Australasia. Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers; 2009:99–216 pp.10.1163/9789087909291_014Search in Google Scholar
28. Duit, R, Roth, M, Komorek, M, Wilbers, J. Fostering conceptual change by analogies –between Scylla and Charybdis. Learn Struct 2001;11:283–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(00)00034-7.Search in Google Scholar
29. Samara, JNAH. Effectiveness of analogy instructional strategy on undergraduate student’s acquisition of organic chemistry concepts in Mutah University. J Educ Pract 2016;7:70–4.Search in Google Scholar
30. Orgill, MK, Bodner, G. What research tells us about using analogies to teach chemistry. Chem Educ Res Pract 2004;5:15–32. https://doi.org/10.1039/b3rp90028b.Search in Google Scholar
31. Brown, S, Salter, S. Analogies in science and science teaching. Adv Physiol Educ 2010;34:167–9. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00022.2010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
32. Clerk, D, Rutherford, M. Language as a confounding variable in the diagnosis of misconceptions. Int J Sci Educ 2000;22:703–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044053.Search in Google Scholar
33. Morrison, JA, Lederman, NG. Science teachers’ diagnosis and understanding of students’ preconceptions. Sci Educ 2003;87:849–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10092.Search in Google Scholar
34. Feltovich, PJ, Coulson, RL, Spiro, RJ, Adami, JF. Conceptual understanding and stability, and knowledge shields for fending off conceptual change. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois Univ. School of Medicine; 1994.Search in Google Scholar
35. Posner, GJ, Strike, KA, Hewson, PW, Gertzog, WA. Accomodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Sci Educ 1982;66:211–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207.Search in Google Scholar
36. Simanek, DE. The dangers of Analogies. Available from: http://www.lhup.edu/_dsimanek/scenario/analogy.htm [Accessed 29 Sep 2010].Search in Google Scholar
37. Glynn, SM. Explaining science concepts: a teaching-with analogies model. In: Glynn, S, Yeany, R, Britton, B, editors. The psychology of learning science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1991:219–40 pp.Search in Google Scholar
38. Treagust, DF. The evolution of an approach for using analogies in teaching and learning science. Res Sci Educ 1993;23:293–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02357073.Search in Google Scholar
39. Zeitoun, HH. Teaching scientific analogies: a proposed model. Res Sci Technol Educ 1984;2:107–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514840020203.Search in Google Scholar
40. Ayas, A, Sözbilir, M, Öğretimi, K, Eğitimcileri, Ö. Öğretmenler ve Öğretmen Adayları için İyi Uygulama Örnekleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi; 2015.Search in Google Scholar
41. Kurt, S. An analogy activity for teaching chemical reaction and collision theory from perspectives of pre-service science teachers. Int J Environ Sci Educ 2019;14:521–34.Search in Google Scholar
42. Harrison, GA, Treagust, FD. Teaching with analogies: a case study in grade-10 optics. J Res Sci Teach 1993;30:1291–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660301010.Search in Google Scholar
43. Curtis, RV, Reigeluth, CM. The use of analogies in written text. Instr Sci 1984;13:99–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00052380.Search in Google Scholar
44. Mammino, L. Chimica aperta. Florence: G. D’Anna; 2003.Search in Google Scholar
45. Mammino, L. The spontaneity of chemical reactions: challenges with handling the concept and its implications. Phys Sci Rev 2023;8:4099–123. https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2021-0144.Search in Google Scholar
46. Friedel, AW, Gabel, DL, Samuel, J. Using analogs for chemistry solving: does it increase understanding? Sch Sci Math 1990;90:674–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12046.x.Search in Google Scholar
47. Atkins, PW. Physical chemistry, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994. (or subsequent editions).Search in Google Scholar
48. Mammino, L. Chimica viva. Firenze: G. D’Anna; 1993.Search in Google Scholar
49. Mammino, L. Computational chemistry: studying the properties and behaviours of molecules. In: Mammino, L, editor. Green chemistry and computational chemistry: shared lessons in sustainability: Elsevier; 2021:1–39 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-819879-7.00040-4Search in Google Scholar
50. Mammino, L. Correlation effects in trimeric acylphloroglucinols. Computation 2021;9:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation9110121.Search in Google Scholar
51. Sarantopoulos, P, Tsaparlis, G. Analogies in chemistry teaching as a means of attainment of cognitive and affective objectives: a longitudinal study in a naturalistic setting, using analogies with a strong social content. Chem Educ Res Pract 2004;5:33–50. https://doi.org/10.1039/b3rp90029k.Search in Google Scholar
52. Mammino, L. Visualisation as a tool for classroom interactions. presented at 18th international conference on chemical education, Istanbul (Turkey); 2004.Search in Google Scholar
53. Mammino, L. Terminology in science and technology – an overview through history and options. Thohoyandou, South Africa: Ditlou Publishers; 2006.Search in Google Scholar
54. Russo, L. Segmenti e bastoncini: dove sta andando la scuola? Milan: Feltrinelli; 1998.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Reviews
- Biopolymeric composite materials for environmental applications
- Evaluation of phytochemicals and amino acid profiles of four vegetables grown on a glyphosate contaminated soil in Southwestern Nigeria
- Synthesis, characterization and in vitro activity study of some organotin(IV) carboxylates against leukemia cancer cell, L-1210
- Maximizing advantages and minimizing misinterpretation risks when using analogies in the presentation of chemistry concepts: a design challenge
- Computational chemistry in the undergraduate inorganic curriculum
- Phytochemical components and GC–MS analysis of Petiveria alliaceae L. fractions and volatile oils
- Sugar palm (Arenga p innata) thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
- Photoprotection strategies with antioxidant extracts: a new vision
- Light-driven bioprocesses
- A systematic DFT study of arsenic doped iron cluster AsFe n (n = 1–4)
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Reviews
- Biopolymeric composite materials for environmental applications
- Evaluation of phytochemicals and amino acid profiles of four vegetables grown on a glyphosate contaminated soil in Southwestern Nigeria
- Synthesis, characterization and in vitro activity study of some organotin(IV) carboxylates against leukemia cancer cell, L-1210
- Maximizing advantages and minimizing misinterpretation risks when using analogies in the presentation of chemistry concepts: a design challenge
- Computational chemistry in the undergraduate inorganic curriculum
- Phytochemical components and GC–MS analysis of Petiveria alliaceae L. fractions and volatile oils
- Sugar palm (Arenga p innata) thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
- Photoprotection strategies with antioxidant extracts: a new vision
- Light-driven bioprocesses
- A systematic DFT study of arsenic doped iron cluster AsFe n (n = 1–4)
