Home Health in poultry- immunity and microbiome with regard to a concept of one health
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Health in poultry- immunity and microbiome with regard to a concept of one health

  • Aleksandra Dunislawska EMAIL logo , Elżbieta Pietrzak , Aleksandra Bełdowska and Maria Siwek
Published/Copyright: October 10, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Submit Manuscript Author Information
Physical Sciences Reviews
From the journal Physical Sciences Reviews Volume 9 Issue 1

Abstract

The overall concept of OneHealth focuses on health and infectious disease in the context of the relationship between humans, animals, and the environment. In poultry production, there are many opportunities to implement OneHealth by organizing work and introducing appropriate engineering solutions. It is recommended that future research directions include designing and testing solutions to improve air quality and the elimination of antibiotics in the poultry industry. For this to be possible, it is essential to understand the indigenous microbiota of poultry, which plays a crucial role in nutrients, but also restricts the growth of pathogenic organisms. In poultry production, the most important thing is disease control in the herd, high product quality, and product efficiency. Food safety is key for consumers, as some zoonoses are transmitted through the food chain. Moreover, antibiotic resistance of bacteria is becoming a growing threat. For this reason, it is essential to maintain the proper immune status in the herd. Virus disease control in poultry is based on vaccination programs and the maintenance of biosecurity. This chapter aims to present the current state of knowledge in the field of immunity and microbiome of poultry in the context of the OneHealth concept.

Keywords: chicken; immune status; microbiota
Corresponding author: Aleksandra Dunislawska, Department of Animal Biotechnology and Genetics, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, 85-084 Bydgoszcz, Poland, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Mackenzie, JS, Jeggo, M. The one health approach—why is it so important? Trop Med Infect Dis 2019;4:88. https://doi.org/10.3390/TROPICALMED4020088.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Destoumieux-Garzón, D, Mavingui, P, Boetsch, G, Boissier, J, Darriet, F, Duboz, P, et al.. The one health concept: 10 years old and a long road ahead. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Douphrate, DI. Animal agriculture and the one health approach. J Agromed 2021;26:85–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2021.1849136.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Sood, U, Gupta, V, Kumar, R, Lal, S, Fawcett, D, Rattan, S, et al.. Chicken gut microbiome and human health: past scenarios, current perspectives, and futuristic applications. Indian J Microbiol 2020;60:2. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12088-019-00785-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Berg, G, Rybakova, D, Fischer, D, Cernava, T, Vergès, MCC, Charles, T, et al.. Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome 2020;8:103. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40168-020-00875-0.Search in Google Scholar

6. Józefiak, A, Benzertiha, A, Kierończyk, B, Łukomska, A, Wesołowska, I, Rawski, M. Improvement of cecal commensal microbiome following the insect additive into chicken diet. Animals 2020;10:577. https://doi.org/10.3390/ANI10040577.Search in Google Scholar

7. Micciche, AC, Foley, SL, Pavlidis, HO, McIntyre, DR, Ricke, SC. A review of prebiotics against Salmonella in poultry: current and future potential for microbiome research applications. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:191. https://doi.org/10.3389/FVETS.2018.00191.Search in Google Scholar

8. Bucher, MG, Zwirzitz, B, Oladeinde, A, Cook, K, Plymel, C, Zock, G, et al.. Reused poultry litter microbiome with competitive exclusion potential against Salmonella Heidelberg. J Environ Qual 2020;49:869–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/JEQ2.20081.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Vieira, SL, Moran, ET. Effects of delayed placement and used litter on broiler yields. J Appl Poultry Res 1999;8:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/JAPR/8.1.75.Search in Google Scholar

10. Siwek, M, Slawinska, A, Stadnicka, K, Bogucka, J, Dunislawska, A, Bednarczyk, M. Prebiotics and synbiotics – in ovo delivery for improved lifespan condition in chicken. BMC Vet Res 2018;14:402. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1738-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Cisek, AA, Binek, M. Chicken intestinal microbiota function with a special emphasis on the role of probiotic bacteria. Pol J Vet Sci 2014;17:385–94, https://doi.org/10.2478/pjvs-2014-0057.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Pan, D, Yu, Z. Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet. Gut Microb 2014;5:108–19. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.26945.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Aruwa, CE, Pillay, C, Nyaga, MM, Sabiu, S. Poultry gut health – microbiome functions, environmental impacts, microbiome engineering and advancements in characterization technologies. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2021;12:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40104-021-00640-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Lu, J, Idris, U, Harmon, B, Hofacre, C, Maurer, JJ, Lee, MD. Diversity and succession of the intestinal bacterial community of the maturing broiler chicken. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003;69:6816–24. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.11.6816-6824.2003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Oakley, BB, Kogut, MH. Spatial and temporal changes in the broiler chicken cecal and fecal microbiomes and correlations of bacterial taxa with cytokine gene expression. Front Vet Sci 2016;3:11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Wilkinson, TJ, Cowan, AA, Vallin, HE, Onime, LA, Oyama, LB, Cameron, SJ, et al.. Characterization of the microbiome along the gastrointestinal tract of growing Turkeys. Front Microbiol 2017;8:1089. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01089.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Qin, SM, Bai, WQ, Zhang, KY, Ding, XM, Bai, SP, Wang, JP, et al.. Different microbiomes are found in healthy breeder ducks and those with foot pad dermatitis. Poultry Sci 2019;98:6340. https://doi.org/10.3382/PS/PEZ456.Search in Google Scholar

18. Feye, KM, Baxter, MFA, Tellez-Isaias, G, Kogut, MH, Ricke, SC. Influential factors on the composition of the conventionally raised broiler gastrointestinal microbiomes. Poultry Sci 2020;99:653–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSJ.2019.12.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Lee, MD, Ipharraguerre, IR, Arsenault, RJ, Lyte, M, Lyte, JM, Humphrey, B, et al.. Informal nutrition symposium: leveraging the microbiome (and the metabolome) for poultry production. Poultry Sci 2022;101:101588. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSJ.2021.101588.Search in Google Scholar

20. Mellata, M. Human and avian extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli: infections, zoonotic risks, and antibiotic resistance trends. Foodb Pathog Dis 2013;10:916. https://doi.org/10.1089/FPD.2013.1533.Search in Google Scholar

21. Dai, SJ, Zhang, KY, Ding, XM, Bai, SP, Luo, YH, Wang, JP, et al.. Effect of dietary non-phytate phosphorus levels on the diversity and structure of cecal microbiota in meat duck from 1 to 21 d of age. Poultry Sci 2018;97:2441–50. https://doi.org/10.3382/PS/PEY090.Search in Google Scholar

22. Ngunjiri, JM, Taylor, KJM, Abundo, MC, Jang, H, Elaish, M, Mahesh, KC, et al.. Farm stage, bird age, and body site dominantly affect the quantity, taxonomic composition, and dynamics of respiratory and gut microbiota of commercial layer chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 2019;85:e03137–18. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03137-18.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Kers, JG, Velkers, FC, Fischer, EAJ, Hermes, GDA, Stegeman, JA, Smidt, H. Host and environmental factors affecting the intestinal microbiota in chickens. Front Microbiol 2018;9:235. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMICB.2018.00235.Search in Google Scholar

24. Thames, HT, Sukumaran, AT. A review of Salmonella and Campylobacter in broiler meat: emerging challenges and food safety measures. Foods 2020;9:776. https://doi.org/10.3390/FOODS9060776.Search in Google Scholar

25. De Jong, MCM, Bouma, A. Herd immunity after vaccination: how to quantify it and how to use it to halt disease. Vaccine 2001;19:2722–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(00)00509-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Song, B, Tang, D, Yan, S, Fan, H, Li, G, Shahid, MS, et al.. Effects of age on immune function in broiler chickens. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2021;12:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00559-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Ryan, JR. Chapter 8 – Biological threat to agriculture. In: Biosecurity and bioterrorism, 2nd ed. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2016:185–216 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802029-6.00008-6.Search in Google Scholar

28. Tian, H, Zhou, S, Dong, L, Van Boeckel, TP, Cui, Y, Wu, Y, et al.. Avian influenza H5N1 viral and bird migration networks in Asia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015;112:172–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1405216112.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Dal Bosco, A, Mattioli, S, Cartoni Mancinelli, A, Cotozzolo, E, Castellini, C. Extensive rearing systems in poultry production: the right chicken for the right farming system. A review of twenty years of scientific research in Perugia University, Italy. Animals 2021;11:1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051281.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Van Der Most, PJ, De Jong, B, Parmentier, HK, Verhulst, S. Trade-off between growth and immune function: a meta-analysis of selection experiments. Funct Ecol 2011;25:74–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01800.x.Search in Google Scholar

31. Zerjal, T, Härtle, S, Gourichon, D, Guillory, V, Bruneau, N, Laloë, D, et al.. Assessment of trade-offs between feed efficiency, growth-related traits, and immune activity in experimental lines of layer chickens. Genet Sel Evol 2021;53:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-021-00636-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Van Limbergen, T, Sarrazin, S, Chantziaras, I, Dewulf, J, Ducatelle, R, Kyriazakis, I, et al.. Risk factors for poor health and performance in European broiler production systems. BMC Vet Res 2020;16:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02484-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Borsoi, A, Quinteiro-Filho, WM, Calefi, AS, Piantino Ferreira, AJ, Astolfi-Ferreira, CS, Florio, JC, et al.. Effects of cold stress and Salmonella Heidelberg infection on bacterial load and immunity of chickens. Avian Pathol 2015;44:490–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2015.1086976/SUPPL_FILE/CAVP_A_1086976_SM5888.ZIP.Search in Google Scholar

34. Abdo, SE, El-Kassas, S, El-Nahas, AF, Mahmoud, S. Modulatory effect of monochromatic blue light on heat stress response in commercial broilers. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2017;2017:1351945. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1351945.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Pietrzak, E, Dunislawska, A, Siwek, M, Zampiga, M, Sirri, F, Meluzzi, A, et al.. Splenic gene expression signatures in slow-growing chickens stimulated in ovo with galactooligosaccharides and challenged with heat. Animals 2020;10:474. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030474.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Li, X, Chen, D, Li, J, Bao, J. Effects of furnished cage type on behavior and welfare of laying hens. AJAS (Asian-Australas J Anim Sci) 2016;29:887. https://doi.org/10.5713/AJAS.15.0576.Search in Google Scholar

37. Larsen, H, Cronin, G, Smith, CL, Hemsworth, P, Rault, JL. Behaviour of free-range laying hens in distinct outdoor environments. Anim Welf 2017;26:255–64. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.26.3.255.Search in Google Scholar

38. Bhanja, SK, Bhadauria, P. Behaviour and welfare concepts in laying hens and their association with housing systems. Indian J Poultry Sci 2018;53:1. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8180.2018.00009.0.Search in Google Scholar

39. Matur, E, Akyazi, I, Eraslan, E, Ergul Ekiz, E, Eseceli, H, Keten, M, et al.. The effects of environmental enrichment and transport stress on the weights of lymphoid organs, cell-mediated immune response, heterophil functions and antibody production in laying hens. Anim Sci J 2016;87:284–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/ASJ.12411.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Korver, DR. Implications of changing immune function through nutrition in poultry. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2012;173:54–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANIFEEDSCI.2011.12.019.Search in Google Scholar

41. Ma, S, Qiao, X, Xu, Y, Wang, L, Zhou, H, Jiang, Y, et al.. Screening and identification of a chicken dendritic cell binding peptide by using a phage display library. Front Immunol 2019;10:1853. https://doi.org/10.3389/FIMMU.2019.01853.Search in Google Scholar

42. Rumińska, E, Koncicki, A, Stenzel, T. Structure and function of the avian immune system in birds. Med Weter 2008;64:265–8.Search in Google Scholar

43. Chen, CH, Göbel, TW, Kubota, T, Cooper, MD. T cell development in the chicken. Poultry Sci 1994;73:1012–8. https://doi.org/10.3382/PS.0731012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Seto, F. Early development of the avian immune system. Poultry Sci 1981;60:1981–95. https://doi.org/10.3382/PS.0601981.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Paramithiotis, E, Ratcliffe, MJ. Survivors of bursal B cell production and emigration. Poultry Sci 1994;73:991–7. https://doi.org/10.3382/PS.0730991.Search in Google Scholar

46. Kim, I-J, You, SK, Kim, H, Yeh, H-Y, Sharma, JM. Characteristics of bursal T lymphocytes induced by infectious bursal disease virus. J Virol 2000;74:8884–92. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.74.19.8884-8892.2000.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Tizard, I. The avian antibody response. Seminars Avian Exot Pet Med 2002;11:2–14. https://doi.org/10.1053/SAEP.2002.28216.Search in Google Scholar

48. Brambell, FWR. The transmission of passive immunity from mother to young. North Holl Res Monogr Front Biol 1970;18.Search in Google Scholar

49. Hamal, KR, Burgess, SC, Pevzner, IY, Erf, GF. Maternal antibody transfer from dams to their egg yolks, egg whites, and chicks in meat lines of chickens. Poultry Sci 2006;85:1364–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/PS/85.8.1364.Search in Google Scholar

50. Crhanova, M, Hradecka, H, Faldynova, M, Matulova, M, Havlickova, H, Sisak, F, et al.. Immune response of chicken gut to natural colonization by gut microflora and to Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis infection. Infect Immun 2011;79:2755–63. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01375-10.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

51. Dar, MA, Urwat, U, Ahmad, SM, Ahmad, R, Kashoo, ZA, Dar, TA, et al.. Gene expression and antibody response in chicken against Salmonella Typhimurium challenge. Poultry Sci 2019;98:2008–13. https://doi.org/10.3382/PS/PEY560.Search in Google Scholar

52. Brisbin, JT, Gong, J, Parvizi, P, Sharif, S. Effects of lactobacilli on cytokine expression by chicken spleen and cecal tonsil cells. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2010;17:1337–43. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00143-10.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

53. Shang, Y, Regassa, A, Kim, JH, Kim, WK. The effect of dietary fructooligosaccharide supplementation on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and immune responses in broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis lipopolysaccharides. Poultry Sci 2015;94:2887–97. https://doi.org/10.3382/PS/PEV275.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

54. Dunislawska, A, Herosimczyk, A, Lepczynski, A, Slama, P, Slawinska, A, Bednarczyk, M, et al.. Molecular response in intestinal and immune tissues to in ovo administration of inulin and the combination of inulin and Lactobacillus lactis Subsp. cremoris. Front Vet Sci 2021;7:632476. https://doi.org/10.3389/FVETS.2020.632476.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

55. Attia, YA, Al-Khalaifah, H, Abd El-Hamid, HS, Al-Harthi, MA, El-shafey, AA. Effect of different levels of multienzymes on immune response, blood hematology and biochemistry, antioxidants status and organs histology of broiler chicks fed standard and low-density diets. Front Vet Sci 2020;6:510. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00510.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

56. Chomel, BB. Zoonoses. In: Schaechter, M, editor. Encyclopedia of microbiology, 3rd ed. Oxford: Academic Press; 2009:820–9 pp.10.1016/B978-012373944-5.00213-3Search in Google Scholar

57. Kozdruń, W, Czekaj, H, Stys, N. Avian zoonoses – a review. J Vet Res 2015;59:171–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/BVIP-2015-0026.Search in Google Scholar

58. Maki, JJ, Klima, CL, Sylte, MJ, Looft, T. The microbial pecking order: utilization of intestinal microbiota for poultry health. Microorganisms 2019;7:376. https://doi.org/10.3390/MICROORGANISMS7100376.Search in Google Scholar

59. Khan, S, Moore, RJ, Stanley, D, Chousalkar, KK. The gut microbiota of laying hens and its manipulation with prebiotics and probiotics to enhance gut health and food safety. Appl Environ Microbiol 2020;86. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00600-20.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

60. Best, AA, Porter, AL, Fraley, SM, Fraley, GS. Characterization of gut microbiome dynamics in developing pekin ducks and impact of management system. Front Microbiol 2017;7:2125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02125.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

61. Wang, S, Chen, L, He, M, Shen, J, Li, G, Tao, Z, et al.. Different rearing conditions alter gut microbiota composition and host physiology in Shaoxing ducks. Sci Rep 2018;8:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25760-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

62. Yang, H, Lyu, W, Lu, L, Shi, X, Li, N, Wang, W, et al.. Biogeography of microbiome and short-chain fatty acids in the gastrointestinal tract of duck. Poultry Sci 2020;99:4016–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSJ.2020.03.040.Search in Google Scholar

63. Yang, Y, Deng, Y, Cao, L. Characterising the interspecific variations and convergence of gut microbiota in Anseriformes herbivores at wintering areas. Sci Rep 2016;6:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32655.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

64. Wilkinson, N, Hughes, RJ, Aspden, WJ, Chapman, J, Moore, RJ, Stanley, D. The gastrointestinal tract microbiota of the Japanese quail, Coturnix japonica. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2016;100:4201–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00253-015-7280-Z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

65. Johnson, TA, Sylte, MJ, Looft, T. In-feed bacitracin methylene disalicylate modulates the Turkey microbiota and metabolome in a dose-dependent manner. Sci Rep 2019;9:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44338-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

66. Knittler, MR, Sachse, K. Chlamydia psittaci: update on an underestimated zoonotic agent. Pathog Dis 2015;73. https://doi.org/10.1093/FEMSPD/FTU007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

67. Chlebicz, A, Śliżewska, K. Campylobacteriosis, salmonellosis, yersiniosis, and listeriosis as zoonotic foodborne diseases: a review. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2018;15:863. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH15050863.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

68. Sarowska, J, Futoma-Koloch, B, Jama-Kmiecik, A, Frej-Madrzak, M, Ksiazczyk, M, Bugla-Ploskonska, G, et al.. Virulence factors, prevalence and potential transmission of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from different sources: recent reports. Gut Pathog 2019;11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13099-019-0290-0.Search in Google Scholar
Received: 2022-07-22
Accepted: 2022-07-26
Published Online: 2022-10-10

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Effect of sugarcane bagasse on thermal and mechanical properties of thermoplastic cassava starch/beeswax composites
  4. Investigation on impact properties of different type of fibre form: hybrid hemp/glass and kenaf/glass composites
  5. Material selection and conceptual design in natural fibre composites
  6. Fundamental study of commercial polylactic acid and coconut fiber/polylactic acid filaments for 3D printing
  7. Amine compounds post-treatment on formaldehyde emission and properties of urea formaldehyde bonded particleboard
  8. Properties of plybamboo manufactured from two Malaysian bamboo species—
  9. Mechanical performance and failure characteristics of cross laminated timber (CLT) manufactured from tropical hardwoods species
  10. Effect of stacking sequence on tensile properties of glass, hemp and kenaf hybrid composites
  11. Flexural analysis of hemp, kenaf and glass fibre-reinforced polyester resin
  12. Manufacturing defects of woven natural fibre thermoset composites
  13. Fumaric acid: fermentative production, applications and future perspectives
  14. Modeling, simulation and mixing time calculation of stirred tank for nanofluids using partially-averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS) k u  − ϵ u turbulence model
  15. Malic acid: fermentative production and applications
  16. Biotic farming using organic fertilizer for sustainable agriculture
  17. An overview about the approaches used in the production of alpha-ketoglutaric acid with their applications
  18. Conscientiousness of environmental concepts in sustainable development and ecological conservation
  19. Biochar: its characteristics application and utilization of on environment
  20. Biofuel as an alternative energy source for environmental sustainability
  21. Evaluation of the crystal structures of metal(II) 2-fluorobenzoate complexes
  22. Role of science in environmental conservation leading to sustainable development
  23. The phytotherapeutic potential of commercial South African medicinal plants: current knowledge and future prospects
  24. Pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in East African water resources: progress, challenges, and future
  25. Embedding systems thinking in tertiary chemistry for sustainability
  26. Clean technology for sustainable development by geopolymer materials
  27. Role of semiconductor photo catalysts on mask pollution management
  28. An overview of mechanical and corrosion properties of aluminium matrix composites reinforced with plant based natural fibres
  29. Physical and mechanical properties of Acacia mangium plywood after sanding treatment
  30. Simple naturally occurring β-carboline alkaloids – role in sustainable theranostics
  31. A SWOT analysis of artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging in the developing world: making a case for a paradigm shift
  32. Health in poultry- immunity and microbiome with regard to a concept of one health
https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2021-0124
Keywords for this article
chicken; immune status; microbiota

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Effect of sugarcane bagasse on thermal and mechanical properties of thermoplastic cassava starch/beeswax composites
  4. Investigation on impact properties of different type of fibre form: hybrid hemp/glass and kenaf/glass composites
  5. Material selection and conceptual design in natural fibre composites
  6. Fundamental study of commercial polylactic acid and coconut fiber/polylactic acid filaments for 3D printing
  7. Amine compounds post-treatment on formaldehyde emission and properties of urea formaldehyde bonded particleboard
  8. Properties of plybamboo manufactured from two Malaysian bamboo species—
  9. Mechanical performance and failure characteristics of cross laminated timber (CLT) manufactured from tropical hardwoods species
  10. Effect of stacking sequence on tensile properties of glass, hemp and kenaf hybrid composites
  11. Flexural analysis of hemp, kenaf and glass fibre-reinforced polyester resin
  12. Manufacturing defects of woven natural fibre thermoset composites
  13. Fumaric acid: fermentative production, applications and future perspectives
  14. Modeling, simulation and mixing time calculation of stirred tank for nanofluids using partially-averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS) k u  − ϵ u turbulence model
  15. Malic acid: fermentative production and applications
  16. Biotic farming using organic fertilizer for sustainable agriculture
  17. An overview about the approaches used in the production of alpha-ketoglutaric acid with their applications
  18. Conscientiousness of environmental concepts in sustainable development and ecological conservation
  19. Biochar: its characteristics application and utilization of on environment
  20. Biofuel as an alternative energy source for environmental sustainability
  21. Evaluation of the crystal structures of metal(II) 2-fluorobenzoate complexes
  22. Role of science in environmental conservation leading to sustainable development
  23. The phytotherapeutic potential of commercial South African medicinal plants: current knowledge and future prospects
  24. Pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in East African water resources: progress, challenges, and future
  25. Embedding systems thinking in tertiary chemistry for sustainability
  26. Clean technology for sustainable development by geopolymer materials
  27. Role of semiconductor photo catalysts on mask pollution management
  28. An overview of mechanical and corrosion properties of aluminium matrix composites reinforced with plant based natural fibres
  29. Physical and mechanical properties of Acacia mangium plywood after sanding treatment
  30. Simple naturally occurring β-carboline alkaloids – role in sustainable theranostics
  31. A SWOT analysis of artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging in the developing world: making a case for a paradigm shift
  32. Health in poultry- immunity and microbiome with regard to a concept of one health
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2021-0124/pdf
Scroll to top button