Binding as agree and index raising: The case of Polish accusative object experiencers

References

Béjar, S. and R. Milan. 2003. “Person licensing and the derivation of PCC effects”. In: Perez-Leroux, A. T. and Y. Roberge (eds.), Romance linguistics: Theory and acquisition Amsterdam: Benjamins. 49–62.10.1075/cilt.244.07bejSearch in Google Scholar

Belletti, A. and L. Rizzi. 1988. “Psych-verbs and theta theory”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 291–352.10.1007/BF00133902Search in Google Scholar

Bennis, H. 2004. “Unergartive adjectives and psych-verbs”. In: Coopmans, P., M. Everaert, and J. Grimshaw (eds.), Lexical specification and insertion Amsterdam: Benjamins. 27–68.Search in Google Scholar

Biały, A. 2005. Polish psychological verbs at the lexicon-syntax interface in crosslinguistic perspective Franfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, C., N. Hornstein and J. Nunes. 2008. “Copy-reflexive and copy-control constructions”. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 8. 61–100.10.1075/livy.8.03boeSearch in Google Scholar

Bondaruk, A. and B. Szymanek. 2007. “Polish nominativeless constructions with dative experiencers: Form, meaning and structure”. Studies in Polish Linguistics 4. 61–97.Search in Google Scholar

Bondaruk, A. and B. Rozwadowska. 2017. “Passivization of Polish experiencer verbs vs. the unaccusativity hypothesis (part 1)”. Studies in Polish Linguistics 12. 57–73.10.4467/23005920SPL.17.003.7021Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2005. “On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP”. Studia Linguistica 59(1). 1–45.10.1111/j.1467-9582.2005.00118.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2012. “Phases in NPs and DPs”. In: Gallego, A.J. (ed.), Phases: Developing the framework Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer. 343–383.10.1515/9783110264104.343Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2013. “Phases beyond clauses”. In: Schürcks, L., A. Giannakidou, and U. Etxeberria (eds.), The nominal structure in Slavic and beyond Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 75–128.10.1515/9781614512790.75Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2014. “More on the edge of the edge”. In: Chapman, C., O. Kit, and I. Kučerová (eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The McMaster Meeting 2013 (FASL 22) Michigan, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications. 44–66.Search in Google Scholar

Burzio, L. 1986. Italian syntax: A Government and Binding approach Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7Search in Google Scholar

Cetnarowska, B. 2002. “Unaccusativity mismatches and unaccusativity diagnostics from derivational morphology”. In: Boucher, P. (ed.), Many morphologies Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. 48–81.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1980. “On Binding”. Linguistic Inquiry 11(1). 1–46.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding Dordrech: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1993. “A minimalist program for linguistic theory.” In: Hale, K. and S.J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–52.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2001. “Derivation by phase”. In: Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 1–52.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2008. “On phases”. In: Freidin, R., C. P. Otero, and M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 133–166.Search in Google Scholar

Citko, B. 2014. Phase theory: An introduction Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139644037Search in Google Scholar

Citko, B., A. Germain, and J. Witkoś. 2018. “If you can’t agree, move on! On labels and non-nominative subjects”. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). 28.Search in Google Scholar

Despić, M. 2011. Syntax in the absence of Determiner Phrase. (PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.)Search in Google Scholar

Despić, M. 2013. “Binding and the structure of NP in Serbo-Croatian”. Linguistic Inquiry 44(2). 239–270.10.1162/LING_a_00126Search in Google Scholar

Despić, M. 2015. “Phases, reflexives and definiteness”. Syntax 18(3). 201–234.10.1111/synt.12031Search in Google Scholar

Dvořák, V. 2010. “On the syntax of ditransitive verbs in Czech”. In: Browne, W., A. Cooper, A. Fisher, E. Kesici, N. Predolac and D. Zec (eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 18: The Second Cornell Meeting 2009 Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. 161–177.Search in Google Scholar

Dziwirek, K. 1994. Polish subjects. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Franks, S. 2017. Syntax and Spell-Out in Slavic Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Franks, S. and T. King. 2000. A handbook of Slavic clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195135886.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Germain, A. 2015. “Nullifying null expletives: Accounting for EPP in Russian impersonal and nominative in situ constructions”. Proceeding s of formal approaches to Slavic linguistics 23. 418–438.Search in Google Scholar

Germain, A. 2017. Non-nominative subjects in Russian and Lithuanian: Case, argument structure, and anaphor binding. (PhD dissertation, University of Washington.)Search in Google Scholar

Gogłoza, A., P. Łęska, R. Meyer, and J. Witkoś. To appear. “Binding by objects in Polish double object constructions – experimental analysis of its acceptability and correlation with object order”. In: Proceedings of FASL 26 Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Gračanin-Yuksek, M. 2006. “Double object construction in Croatian: Arguments against Appl0”. In: Compton, R., M. Goledzinowska, and U. Savchenko (eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 15: The Toronto Meeting 2006 Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. 94–112.Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, J. 1991. Argument structure Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hale K. and S.J. Keyser. 1993. “On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations”. In: Hale K. and S.J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 53–109.Search in Google Scholar

Hestvik, A. 1992. “LF movement of pronouns and anti-subject orientation”. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 557–594.Search in Google Scholar

Hicks, G. 2009. The derivation of anaphoric relations Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.139Search in Google Scholar

Hornstein, N. 2001. Move! A minimalist theory of construal Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Jimenez-Fernandez, A. L. and B. Rozwadowska. 2016. “The information structure of Dative Experiencer psych-verbs”. In: Cetnarowska, B., M. Kuczok, and M. Zabawa (eds.), Various dimensions of contrastive studies Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskego. 100–121.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, R. 1985. “Principles of particle constructions”. In: Guéron, J., H.G. Obenauer, and J.Y. Pollock (eds.), Grammatical representation Dordrecht: Foris. 101–140.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, R. 1991. “Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO”. Linguistic Inquiry 22(4). 647–686.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, R. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Klimek D. and B. Rozwadowska. 2004. “From psych adjectives to psych verbs”. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 39. 59–72.Search in Google Scholar

Landau, I. 2000. Elements of Control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-3943-4Search in Google Scholar

Landau, I. 2010. “Saturated adjectives, reified properties”. In: Rappaport-Hovav, M., E. Doron, and I. Sichel (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure Oxford: Oxford University Press. 204–225.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Larson, R. 1988. “On the double object construction”. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 335–391.10.4324/9780203429204-7Search in Google Scholar

Larson, R. 1990. “Double objects revisited: Reply to Jackendoff”. Linguistic Inquiry 21. 589–632.10.4324/9780203429204-8Search in Google Scholar

Larson, R. 2014. On shell structure London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203429204Search in Google Scholar

Manzini, R. and K. Wexler. 1987. “Parameters, binding theory and learnability”. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 413–444.Search in Google Scholar

Marvin, T. and A. Stegovec. 2012. “On the syntax of ditransitive sentences in Slovenian”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 59. 177–203.10.1556/ALing.59.2012.1-2.8Search in Google Scholar

Matushansky, O. 2006. “Head movement in linguistic theory”. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 69–109.10.1162/002438906775321184Search in Google Scholar

May, R. 1985. Logical form: Its structure and derivation Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

McGinnis, M. 2000. “Event heads and the distribution of psych-roots”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 6(3). 107–144.Search in Google Scholar

Migdalski, K. To appear. “The auxiliary ‘be’ as a bundle of phi-features”. In: Proceedings of FASL 26 Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Nikolaeva, L. 2014. The secret life of pronouns. (PhD dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.)Search in Google Scholar

Ouali, H. 2006. Unifying agreement relations: A minimalist analysis of Berber Pro-Quest Dissertations Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, D. 1995. Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pica, P. 1987. “On the nature of the reflexivization cycle”. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 17(2). 483–500.Search in Google Scholar

Pica, P. 1991. “On the interaction between Antecedent-Government and Binding: The case of long-distance reflexivization”. In: Koster, J. and E. Reuland (eds.), Long distance anaphora Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 119–135.10.1017/CBO9780511627835.006Search in Google Scholar

Progovac, L. 1992. Long-distance reflexives without movement. Linguistic Inquiry 23(4): 671–680.Search in Google Scholar

Progovac, L. 1993. “Long-distance reflexives: Movement to Infl versus Relativized SUBJECT”. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4). 755–772.Search in Google Scholar

Przepiórkowski, A. 1999. Case Assignment and the complement-adjunct dichotomy: A non-configurational constraint-based approach. (PhD dissertation, Universität Tübingen.)Search in Google Scholar

Rappaport, G. 1986. “On anaphor binding in Russian”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 4. 97–120.10.1007/BF00136266Search in Google Scholar

Reinders-Machowska, E. 1991. “Binding in Polish”. In: Koster, J. and E.J. Reuland (eds.), Long-distance Anaphora Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 137–150.10.1017/CBO9780511627835.007Search in Google Scholar

Reuland, Eric. 2011. Anaphora and language design Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0050Search in Google Scholar

Richards, M. 2007. “On feature inheritance: An argument from the Phase Impenetrability Condition”. Linguistic Inquir 38(3). 563–572.10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.563Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 1990. Relativized minimality Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, I. 1992. “A formal account of grammaticalisation in the history of Romance futures”. Folia Linguistica Historica 13(1/2). 219–258.10.1515/flih.1992.13.1-2.219Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, I. 1993. Verbs and diachronic syntax Dordrecht: Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, I. 2009. Agreement and head movement Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Safir, K. 2004. The syntax of anaphora Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195166132.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Safir, K. 2014. “One true anaphor”. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1). 91–124.10.1162/LING_a_00149Search in Google Scholar

Sportiche, D. 1996. “Clitic constructions”. In: Rooryck, J. and L. Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon. Netherlands: Springer. 213–276.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_9Search in Google Scholar

Tajsner, P. 2008. Aspects of the grammar of focus: A minimalist view Franfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Vikner, S. 1985. “Parameters of binder and of binding category in Danish”. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 23. 1–61.Search in Google Scholar

Wiland, B. 2016. “Le charme discret of remnant movement: Crossing and nesting in Polish OVS sentences”. Studies in Polish Linguistics 11(3). 133–165.Search in Google Scholar

Willim, E. 1986/1989. On word-order: A government-binding study of English and Polish Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Search in Google Scholar

Witkoś, J. 2003. Movement and reconstruction: Questions and Principle C effects in English and Polish Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Witkoś, J. 2007. “Polish and A-type scrambling”. In: Kosta, P. and L. Schuercks (eds.), Linguistic investigations into formal description of Slavic languages Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 165–180.Search in Google Scholar

Witkoś, J. 2008. “On the correlation between A-type scrambling and Weak Crossover Effects”. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 44. 297–328.Search in Google Scholar

Witkoś, J. and D. Dziubała-Szrejbrowska. 2015. “A note on the Genitive of Quantification in Polish and derivational phases”. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 51(3). 433–462.10.1515/psicl-2015-0017Search in Google Scholar

Woolford, E. 1999. “More on the Anaphor Agreement Effect”. Linguistic Inquiry 30(2). 257–287.10.1162/002438999554057Search in Google Scholar

Woolford, E. 2006. “Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure”. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1). 111–130.10.1162/002438906775321175Search in Google Scholar

Żychliński, S. 2013. On some aspects of the syntax of Object Experiencers in Polish and English. (PhD dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.)Search in Google Scholar