Home On the Raising of the Finite Main Verb in Angolan Portuguese and in Mozambican Portuguese: Cartographic Hierarchies, Microvariation and the Use of Adverbs as Diagnostics for Movement
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

On the Raising of the Finite Main Verb in Angolan Portuguese and in Mozambican Portuguese: Cartographic Hierarchies, Microvariation and the Use of Adverbs as Diagnostics for Movement

  • Aquiles Tescari Neto EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 2, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper revisits the issue of verb raising in two closely related languages, namely Angolan Portuguese (AP) and Mozambican Portuguese (MP). Cinque’s (cartographic) hierarchy of adverbs is used to examine microvariation in these two varieties of Portuguese. The empirical data, gathered through experiments on acceptability rating tasks (to detect the position of the V(erb) in relation to adverbs) and cloze tests (to diagnose the adverbial classes which can be recovered by the elliptical VP), have been collected among university students in Luanda and Maputo, the capitals of Angola and Mozambique, respectively. The cutting points within the functional hierarchy where the V goes, be it mandatorily or optionally, are different in the two languages. In AP, the verb must raise past the frustrative aspect adverb (em vão/à toa ‘in vain’), while in MP the verb must raise to the left of the singular completive adverb (tudo ‘everything’). The main verb cannot raise past the AspTerminative adverb (já não/não mais ‘no longer’) in MP. In AP, it can optionally raise over the highest projection in the inflectional domain. Such a difference may explain the recovery of high adverbs in VP-ellipsis structures, only possible in AP. The corollary of the inter-linguistic study developed for Comparative Syntax is the adequacy of the cartographic démarche when it comes to establishment of strict boundaries in the study of microvariation among closely related grammars.


Corresponding author: Aquiles Tescari Neto, Linguistics Department, Institute of Language Studies, IEL – University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil, E-mail:
LaCaSa – Cartographic Syntax Laboratory: Research and Teaching (https://is.gd/LaCaSaUnicamp).

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank The São Paulo Research Foundation, FAPESP for supporting this work, within the context of the research project entitled “Verb Raising and the Architecture of the Clause in Angolan and Mozambican Portuguese: a Cartographic Approach” (#2016/20853-6). I also acknowledge the CAPES-Print funding programme (# AUXPE 88881.311270/2018-01). Preliminary versions of this paper were presented at the universities of Venice and Geneva (January 2019), at the VIII Encuentro de Gramática Generativa (Buenos Aires, August 2018) and at the Eduardo Mondlane University (Maputo, Mozambique, September 2019). I thank the audiences for the questions raised. I would also like to thank the members of my research group, LaCaSa, at the University of Campinas (Unicamp), and Guglielmo Cinque for their insightful contributions to a first draft of this paper. I am indebted to the faculty at the Higher Institute of Educational Sciences – ISCED, Luanda, Angola, and at the Eduardo Mondlane University – UEM, Maputo, Mozambique, for all the institutional support and friendship provided to me on the three unforgettable occasions when I went to those places to gather the data presented here, especially professors José Tchindjendje and Teresa Camacha (ISCED), Francisco Vicente, Victor Justino and Óscar Fumo (UEM). I also owe gratitude to the undergraduate students from the Modern Languages and Linguistics courses at ISCED and at UEM who voluntarily took part in my study, giving their impressions on the data I have had the pleasure to share here. Last but not least, I must extend my thanks to the two anonymous reviewers for their significant questions, thought-provoking criticisms and insightful suggestions which have substantially helped me to improve the manuscript, and also the editors of this special issue on the Cartography of Romance languages, Giuseppe Samo and Luigi Rizzi, not only for the publication of this important collection of papers but also for their leadership in this notable research programme.

Appendix: Apropos of the A–V–O Order Featuring the Three Lowest Low Adverbs

The mean ratings reported for the A–V–O order—see Table 1 (for AP) and Table 3 (for MP), Section 4.1—featuring the frequentativeII (com frequência ‘often’), repetitiveII (de novo ‘again’) and inceptiveII (do nada ‘out of nowhere’) classes of adverbs deserve an explanation. The mean ratings related to these adverbs in this order give rise to an unexpected “degree of acceptability”, since from cedo ‘early’ upwards in AP (see Table 1) and from bem ‘well’ (the category immediately c-commanding cedo) upwards in MP (Table 4) the A–V–O order gives rise to ill-formed results. So, considering the Head Movement Constraint (Travis 1984)—which can be subsumed under the more general locality condition, namely Relativised Minimality (Rizzi 1990, 2001, 2004)—, the A–V–O order would give rise to ill-formed results for those three adverbs c-commanded by cedo ‘early’, contrary to facts. Therefore, there are (conceptual) reasons to assume that our informants have probably considered the highest position of merger for those three adverbials—which is the position from where the adverb has scope over the event (or “TP”)—when rating the sentences presented in the task. Given the well formedness of the sentences rated, the only possible interpretation is that our informants considered the higher position of merger for these three adverbs. Were the lowest position taken into account, informants would have given low scores for the A–V–O order, inasmuch as locality would preclude their well formedness: on its raising upwards the V could not skip any intermediate position.

Methodology, Task and Stimuli

In order to make it precise whether the three lowest adverbs were the representatives of the lowest categories—i.e., the projections having scope over the vP—or the highest ones—having scope over the “TP”—, during the experiment described in Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2, volunteers were asked to rate sentences where the adverb com frequência ‘often’ co-occurs with raramente ‘rarely’ (see (16)). The sentence to be judged was presented as a separate section of the Google Form and counted on both written and audio stimuli.

The results of this co-occurrence test would allow one to argue that the acceptance of the A–V–O order featuring the lowest com frequência would be due to the fact that volunteers considered the highest representative of com frequência—and I believe that the same observation is also valid for the other (“ambiguous”) aspect-II adverbs (the repetitiveII adverb de novo ‘again’ and the inceptiveII adverb do nada ‘out of nowhere’).

(16)
A Maria raramente limpa a casa com frequência
The Maria rarely cleans the house often
‘Maria rarely cleans the house often’

Results and Discussion

The results of the acceptability rating task are presented below.

Table 21:

On the co-occurrence of two frequentative aspect adverbs in (16).

N Mean t-statistica p-value
Angola 24 3.67 −0.6990 0.244080
Mozambique 23 3.96
  1. a The statistic was obtained from a standard parametric t-test to compare two population means from independent populations. As the assumption of equal variances is not valid (according to the F-test for equality of two variances previously performed), unpooled variances were considered. It is important to note that the Welch test was used, that is, the t-test to compare population means with different variances. First, the F-test was used to evaluate the null hypothesis of equality of variances, rejected at 5% significance. Therefore, the test for the mean with distinct variances was conducted.

Of course, our Mozambican informants tend to consider these sentences virtually grammatical, as the mean rating is very close to 4 (of our Likert scale). Nonetheless, even among Angolans the result is closer to grammaticality than to ungrammaticality, as the mean rating is 3.67. As the p-value is higher than 0.05, which is a welcoming result, there would be no statistically significant difference among the speakers of these two communities, as expected, given the fact that the co-occurrence of these two classes of adverbs is indeed expected from the point of view of Cinque’s hierarchy, as they occupy different positions.

All in all, the conclusion on the mean ratings for the three lowest of the low adverbs in both varieties (see the text relative to Tables 1 and 3, Section 4.1) is that volunteers have probably taken the representatives of the highest positions when they judged the A–V–O order featuring the three lowest adverbs. That explains the relative well-formedness of the sentence featuring frequentemente ‘often’ in the A–V–O order. I conjecture that the same explanation can be extended to the repetitive and inceptive classes of adverbs, that each has two distinct merge positions in Cinque’s hierarchy.

References

Abels, Klaus. 2016. The fundamental left-right asymmetry in the Germanic verb cluster. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 19(3). 179–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-016-9082-9.Search in Google Scholar

Ambar, Manuela. 1988. Para uma sintaxe da inversão sujeito verbo em português. Lisbon: University of Lisbon dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Ambar, Manuela. 1989. Sobre a posição do sujeito, movimento do verbo e estrutura da frase, 369–399. Actas do V ENAPL. https://apl.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/1989-26.pdf (accessed 29 April 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Ambar, Manuela, Manuela Gonzaga & Esmeralda Vailati Negrão. 2004. Tense, quantification and Clause structure in EP and BP: Evidence from a comparative study on Sempre. In Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2002, 1–16. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.256.01ambSearch in Google Scholar

Ambar, Manuela, Esmeralda Vailati Negrão, Rita Veloso & Luís Graça. 2009. Tense Domains in BP and EP – vP, CP and phases. In Enoch Oladé Aboh, Elisabeth van der Linden, Josep Quer & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 1, 1–24. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/rllt.1.01ambSearch in Google Scholar

Angola (Ministério do Urbanismo e Habitação da República de Angola). 2014. 7o. Fórum Urbano Mundial. Medelín. 5–11 abril de 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana. 1990. Generalized verb movement. Turim: Rosenberg & Sellier.Search in Google Scholar

Brito, Ana Maria. 2001. Clause structure, subject positions and verb movement: About the position of Sempre in European Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese. In Yves D’hulst, Johan Rooryck & Jan Schroten (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 1999, 63–85. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.221.03briSearch in Google Scholar

Bross, Fabian. 2019. Acceptability ratings in linguistics: A practical guide to grammaticality judgments, data collection, and statistical analysis. http://www.fabianbross.de/acceptabilityratings.pdf (accessed 27 December 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Chalucuane, Beatriz Damaciano Paulo. 2017. As influências das línguas Bantu no Português falado em Moçambique: Um estudo descritivo do Cindau. São Carlos: Universidade Federal de São Carlos MA thesis. https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/9369 (accessed 5 January 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Chimbutane, Feliciano. 2009. The purpose and value of Bilingual Education: A critical, linguistic ethnographic study of two rural primary schools in Mozambique. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UK: University of Birmingham https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/667/1/Chimbutane09PhD.pdf (accessed 3 August 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale. A Life in Language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam, Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott. 2019. Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 2019(special issue). 229–261. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.288.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1996. The ‘antisymmetric’ programme: Theoretical and typological implications. Journal of Linguistics 32(2). 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700015966.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua 114(6). 683–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00048-2.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3). 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396917.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006. Restructuring and functional heads (The cartography of syntactic structures 4). New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195179545.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2009. The fundamental left-right asymmetry of natural languages. In Sergio Scalise, Elisabetta Magni & Antonietta Bisetto (eds.), Universals of language today (Studies in natural language and linguistic theory 76), 165–184. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-8825-4_9Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2013a. Typological studies: Word order and relative clauses. New York & London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315776699Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2013b. Word order typology: A change of perspective. In Theresa Biberauer & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Theoretical approaches to disharmonic word order, 47–73. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684359.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo & Richard S. Kayne (eds.). 2005. The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi. 2010. The cartography of syntactic structures.. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 51–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0003Search in Google Scholar

Costa, João. 1998. Word order variation: A constraint-baised approach. Leiden: Leiden University dissertation. https://www.lotpublications.nl/Documents/014_fulltext.pdf (accessed 29 April 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Costa, João. 2004a. Subject positions and interface: The case of European Portuguese (Studies in generative grammar 73). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197396Search in Google Scholar

Costa, João. 2004b. A multifactorial approach to adverb placement: Assumptions, facts, and problems. Lingua 114(6). 711–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3841(03)00049-4.Search in Google Scholar

Costa, João & Charlotte Galves. 2002. External Subjects in two varieties of Portuguese: Evidence for a non-unified analysis. In Claire Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Drijkoningen Frank & Paola Monachesi (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2000, 109–125. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.232.08cosSearch in Google Scholar

Costa, João & Maria Cristina F. Silva. 2006. Notas sobre a concordância verbal e nominal em português. Estudos Linguisticos XXXV. 95–109.Search in Google Scholar

Cyrino, Sonia Maria L. 1999. A categoria ‘INFL’ no português brasileiro. Estudos Linguisticos XXVIII. 449–454.Search in Google Scholar

Cyrino, Sonia Maria L. 2013. On richness of tense and verb movement in Brazilian Portuguese. In Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-González & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds.), Information structure and agreement, 297–318. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.197.11cyrSearch in Google Scholar

Cyrino, Sonia Maria L. & Gabriela Matos. 2002. VP ellipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese: A comparative analysis. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1(2). 177–195. https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.41.Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas Boyden. 2002. The Syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Firmino, Gregório. 1995. O caso do português e das línguas indígenas de Moçambique. Revista Internacional de Língua Portuguesa 13. 33–43.Search in Google Scholar

Friedmann, Naama, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi. 2021. Growing trees: The acquisition of the left periphery. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 6(1). 1–38. https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5877.Search in Google Scholar

Forero, Francisco de Paula Pataquiva. 2019. Valência verbal e tempo verbal no espanhol colombiano: uma análise cartográfica da subida do verbo. Caderno De Squibs: Temas Em Estudos Formais Da Linguagem 5(2). 28–38.Search in Google Scholar

Galves, Charlotte. 1993. O Enfraquecimento da Concordância no Português Brasileiro. In Ian G. Roberts & Mary A. Kato (eds.), Português Brasileiro: Uma Viagem diacrônica, 387–408. Campinas: Editora da UNICAMP.Search in Google Scholar

Galves, Charlotte. 1994. V-movement, levels of representation and the Structure of S. Letras de Hoje 96. 35–58.Search in Google Scholar

Galves, Charlotte. 2001. Ensaios sobre gramáticas do português. Campinas: Editora da UNICAMP.Search in Google Scholar

Garzonio, Jacopo & Cecilia Poletto. 2013. Sulla posizione degli avverbi nella struttura frasale in alcune varietà delle Marche. Quaderni di lavoro 23–43. http://asit.maldura.unipd.it/documenti/ql15/ASIt15_garzonio_poletto.pdf (accessed 29 April 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Giorgi, Alessandra. 2016. Epistemic adverbs, the prosody-syntax interface, and the theory of phases. In Christina Tortora, Marcel den Dikken, Ignacio L. Montoya & Teresa O’Neill (eds.), Romance linguistics 2013, 99–118. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/rllt.9.06gioSearch in Google Scholar

Gonçalves, Perpétua. 2004. Towards a unified vision of classes of language acquisition and change: Arguments from the genesis of Mozambican African Portuguese. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 19(2). 225–259. https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.19.2.01gon.Search in Google Scholar

Gonçalves, Perpétua. 2010. A génese do português de Moçambique. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda.Search in Google Scholar

Gonçalves, Perpétua. 20152015. Lusofonia em Moçambique: Com ou sem glotofagia? Universidade Eduardo Mondlane Ms. https://www.catedraportugues.uem.mz/storage/app/media/bibliografia/Goncalves_Ataliba2012.pdf (accessed 28 December 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl G. & Paul Oppenheim. 1948. Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science XV(2). 135–175. https://doi.org/10.1086/286983.Search in Google Scholar

Inverno, Liliana. 2008. Transição de Angola para o português vernáculo: uma história sociolinguística. In Luís Reis Torgal (ed.), Comunidades Imaginadas, 169–182. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262874958_Transicao_de_Angola_para_o_portugues_uma_historia_sociolinguistica (accessed 3 August 2021).10.14195/978-989-26-0339-1_9Search in Google Scholar

Inverno, Liliana. 2018. Angolan Portuguese: Its historical development and current sociolinguistic setting. In Laura Álvarez López, Perpétua Gonçalves & Juanito Avelar (eds.), The Portuguese Language Continuum in Africa and Brazil, 111–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ihll.20.06invSearch in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1996. Microparametric syntax: Some introductory remarks. In James R. Black & Virginia Motapanyane (eds.), Microparametric syntax and dialect variation, ix–xvii. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.139.01kaySearch in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1998. Overt vs. covert movements. Syntax 1. 128–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00006.Search in Google Scholar

Kitagawa, Yoshihisa & Janet D. Fodor. Prosodic influence on syntactic judgements. In Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Fery, Ralf Vogel & Matthias Schlesewsky (eds.), Gradience in grammar: Generative perspectives, 336–358. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0017Search in Google Scholar

Konietschke, Frank, Ludwig A. Hothorn & Edgar Brunner. 2012. Rank-based multiple test procedures and simultaneous confidence intervals. Electronic Journal of Statistics 6. 738–759. https://doi.org/10.1214/12-EJS691.Search in Google Scholar

Koopman, Hilda & Anna Szabolcsi. 2000. Verbal complexes. Cambridge: MIT Press MA.10.7551/mitpress/7090.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig. 2016. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 19 edn. Dallas: SIL International.Search in Google Scholar

Laenzlinger, Christopher. 2002. A Feature-based Theory of Adverb Syntax. GG@G (GenerativeGrammar in Geneva) 3. 67–105.10.1075/la.70.08laeSearch in Google Scholar

Laenzlinger, Christopher. 2011. Elements of comparative generative grammar: A cartographic approach. Padova: Unipress.Search in Google Scholar

Laenzlinger, Christopher & Gabriela Soare. 2005. A cartographic approach to the Romance mittelfeld. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 30. 17–69.Search in Google Scholar

Ledgeway, Adam & Alessandra Lombardi. 2005. Verb movement, adverbs and clitic positions in romance. Probus 17(1). 79–113. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2005.17.1.79.Search in Google Scholar

Lunguinho, Marcus Vinicius. 2014. On the acquisition of root and epistemic modals in Brazilian Portuguese. ReVEL Special issue(8). 131–159.Search in Google Scholar

Marcilese, Mercedes & Erica dos Santos Rodrigues. 2015. Notes on speakers’ intuitions and judgments in linguistic theory and psycholinguistics: The case of Q-expressions in BrP. ReVEL Special issue(9). 93–119.Search in Google Scholar

Matos, Gabriela & Sonia Maria L. Cyrino. 2001. Elipse de VP no Português Europeu e no Português Brasileiro. Boletim da Abralin 26(special issue). 386–390.Search in Google Scholar

Myers, James. 2009. Syntactic judgment experiments. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 406–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00113.x.Search in Google Scholar

Myers, James. 2017. Acceptability judgments. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.333Search in Google Scholar

Modesto, Marcello. 2000. On the Identification of null arguments. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation. http://linguistica.fflch.usp.br/sites/linguistica.fflch.usp.br/files/inline-files/08_1.pdf (accessed 29 April 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Pires, Acrisio. 2005. Verb movement and clitics: Variation and change in Portuguese. In Montserrat Batllori, Maria-Lluïsa Hernanz, Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca (eds.), Grammaticalization and parametric variation, 48–59. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272129.003.0003.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272129.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3). 365–424.Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2018. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1996. Residual verb second and the Wh-criterion. In Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Parameters and functional heads: Essays in comparative syntax. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.4324/9780203461785-15Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. Relativized minimality effects. In Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 89–110. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756416.ch4Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond (The cartography of syntactic structures 3), 223–251. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2018. The cartography of the left periphery: The role of grammatical and interface principles. In Paper presented at the 3EISSI, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil, 27 June. https://negufsc.files.wordpress.com/2019/06/rizzi-florianopolis-2018-talk.pdf (accessed 20 April 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi & Ian G. Roberts. 1989. Complex inversion in French. Probus 1(1). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1989.1.1.1.Search in Google Scholar

Samo, Giuseppe. 2019a. A criterial approach to the cartography of V2. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.257Search in Google Scholar

Samo, Giuseppe. 2019b. Cartography and microparametric variation: Criterial V2 in Swiss Romansh varieties. Revista Linguíʃtica 15(3). 141–160. https://doi.org/10.31513/linguistica.2019.v15n3a27546.Search in Google Scholar

Sant’anna, Mathew Gabriel. 2018. On the placement of the main verb in Canadian English and the cartography of syntactic structures. Scientific Report. Campinas: UNICAMP, PIBIC/CNPq.10.20396/revpibic2720192976Search in Google Scholar

Schifano, Norma. 2018. Verb movement in romance: A comparative study. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198804642.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sedarous, Yourdanis & Savithry Namboodiripad. 2020. Using audio stimuli in acceptability judgment experiments. Language and Linguistics Compass 14. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12377.Search in Google Scholar

Shlonsky, Ur & Gabriela Soare. 2011. Where’s ‘Why’? Linguistic Inquiry 42(4). 651–669. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00064.Search in Google Scholar

Silva, Maria Cristina F. 1996. A posição sujeito no português brasileiro: Frases finitas e infinitivas. Campinas: Editora da UNICAMP.Search in Google Scholar

Silva, Gláucia V. 2001. Word order in Brazilian Portuguese. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110869552Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon. 2018. Acceptability judgments and grammaticality, prospects and challenges. In Norbert Hornstein, Lasnik Howard, Pritty Patel-Grosz & Charles Yang (eds.), Syntactic structures after 60 years: The impact of the Chomskyan revolution in linguistics, 195–224. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501506925-199Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon & Diogo Almeida. 2012. Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger’s Core Syntax. Journal of Linguistics 48(3). 609–652. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226712000011.Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon, Carson Schütze & Diogo Almeida. 2013. A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua 134. 219–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002.Search in Google Scholar

Tavares da Silva, Claudia. 2009. Morfologia flexional e movimento do verbo em português: Por uma análise unificada a partir da proposta vickneriana. Revista do GELNE 11(2). 1–18.Search in Google Scholar

Tescari Neto, Aquiles. 2013. On verb movement in Brazilian Portuguese. Venice: Ca’Foscari University of Venice dissertation. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/3078 (accessed 29 April 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Tescari Neto, Aquiles. 2015. Por que advérbios altos não são diagnósticos para o movimento do verbo? Linguistica 31(2). 27–46.Search in Google Scholar

Tescari Neto, Aquiles. 2016. Verb raising, impoverishment of the verbal paradigm and weakening of tense in Brazilian Portuguese. Revista do GEL 13(3). 75–106. https://doi.org/10.21165/gel.v13i3.395.Search in Google Scholar

Tescari Neto, Aquiles. 2019. Da posição do verbo temático em cinco variedades ibéricas. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem 27(2). 737–770. https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.27.2.737-770.Search in Google Scholar

Tescari Neto, Aquiles. 2020. Diagnosing verb raising: The view from cartography. In Roberta Pires de Oliveira, Ina Emmel & Sandra Quarezemin (eds.), Brazilian Portuguese, syntax and semantics, 168–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.260.07tesSearch in Google Scholar

Tescari Neto, Aquiles. 2021a. Sentence adverbs don’t exist! Manuscript, University of Campinas, UNICAMP. (To appear in Olivier Duplâtre and Pierre-Yves Modicom (eds.), Adverbs and adverbials: Categorial issues. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2022).10.1515/9783110767971-006Search in Google Scholar

Tescari Neto, Aquiles. 2021b. Sintaxe Gerativa: uma introdução à Cartografia Sintática. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Search in Google Scholar

Tescari Neto. 2022. Aquiles. “Adverbs and functional heads” twenty years later: cartographic methodology, verb raising and macro/micro-variation. The Linguistic Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2022-2088.10.1515/tlr-2022-2088Search in Google Scholar

Tescari Neto, Aquiles & Francisco de Paula Forero. 2020. Do movimento do verbo finito e infinitivo em português brasileiro e espanhol colombiano: Microvariação e cartografias. Cuadernos de la Alfal 12(2). 491–511.Search in Google Scholar

Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/dm/theses/travis84.pdf (accessed 29 April 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-06-02
Published in Print: 2022-05-25

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/probus-2022-0008/html
Scroll to top button