Criterial V2: ModP as a Locus of Microvariation in Swiss Romansh Varieties

References

Abels, Klaus. 2017. Beyond phrase-phrase interactions in the Left Periphery. paper presented at WOLP. University of Oslo.Search in Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2004. The morphosyntax of complement-head sequences: Clause structure and word order patterns in Kwa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159905.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2007. Leftward focus versus rightward focus: The Kwa-Bantu conspiracy. SOAS Working Papers Linguistics 15. 81–104.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 2005. Aspects of the theory of clitics. [Oxford Studies in theoretical linguistics]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279906.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 2016. Romansh (Rumantsch). In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 169–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0012.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14(1). 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-005-4532-y.Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP [the cartography of syntactic structures], Vol. 2, 16–51. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195159486.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi. 2017. On the syntax and pragmatics of some clause-peripheral positions. In Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stephanie Durrleman & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds.), Formal models in the study of language, 33–48. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48832-5_3.Search in Google Scholar

Benincà, Paola. 1985/1986. Un’ipotesi sulla sintassi delle lingue romanze medievali. Quaderni Patavini di Linguistica 4. 3–19. (reprinted in: Paola Benincà (1994): La variazione sintattica. Studi di dialettologia romanza, 177-194. Bologna: Il Mulino).Search in Google Scholar

Benincà, Paola. 1995. Complement clitics in medieval romance. The Tobler-mussafia law. In Adrian Battaye & Ian Roberts (eds.), Clause structure and language change, 296–325. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195086324.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto. 2004. Topic, focus, and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP [the cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 2, 52–75. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195159486.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Berthelot, Frédérique. 2017. Movement of and out of subjects in French, PhD Dissertation. University of Geneva.Search in Google Scholar

den Besten, Hans. 1983. On the interaction of root Transformations and lexical deletive Rules. In Werner Abraham (ed.), On the formal syntax of West Germania, 77–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.3.03bes.Search in Google Scholar

Bianchi, Valentina, Giuliano Bocci & Silvio Cruschina. 2015. Focus fronting and its implicatures. In Enoch O. Aboh, Jeannette Schaeffer & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2013: Selected papers from ‘going Romance’ Amsterdam 2013 [Romance Languages and linguistic theory 8, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.8.01bia.Search in Google Scholar

Bianchi, Valentina & Mara Frascarelli. 2010. Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia 2. 43–88.Search in Google Scholar

Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts. 2015. Rethinking formal hierarchies: A proposed unification. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 7. 1–31.Search in Google Scholar

Bocci, Giuliano. 2013. The syntax–prosody interface a cartographic perspective with evidence from Italian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.204Search in Google Scholar

Bonan, Caterina. 2021a. ‘Pronounce φ’: ‘Number’ clitics in a non-redundant null-subject system. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 13. 1–34.Search in Google Scholar

Bonan, Caterina. 2021b. Romance interrogative syntax: Formal and typological dimensions of variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.266Search in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 1983. Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110808506Search in Google Scholar

Brody, Michael. 1990. Some remarks on the focus field in Hungarian. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2. 201–225.Search in Google Scholar

Caduff, Leonard. 1952. Essai sur la phonetique du pariér rhetoroman de la Vallée de Tavetsch (canton ´ des Grisons – Suisse) Francke, Bern.Search in Google Scholar

Caduff, Renzo, Uorschla N. Caprez & Georges Darms. 2008. Grammatica per l’instrucziun dal rumantsch grischun, Departament da linguatgs e litteraturas romanas, Linguatg e litteratura rumantscha. University of Fribourg.Search in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna. 2004. Toward a cartography of subject positions. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP [the cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 2, 115–165. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195159486.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Catasso, Nicholas. 2021. How large is the left periphery of present-day German? A unifying approach to multiply-filled-prefield configurations. Open Linguistics 7(1). 760–801. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0177.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist Inquirie”s. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Minimalist syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi. 2010. The cartography of syntactic structures. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0003.Search in Google Scholar

Cruschina, Silvio. 2021. The greater the contrast, the greater the potential: On the effects of focus in syntax. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 6(1). 3. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1100.Search in Google Scholar

Durrleman, Stephanie. 2008. The syntax of Jamaican Creole – A cartographic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.127Search in Google Scholar

Ebneter, Theodor. 1994. Syntax des gesprochenen Riitoromanischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110947540Search in Google Scholar

Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler S. (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form, 87–116. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.100.07fra.Search in Google Scholar

Freywald, Ulrike, Leonie Cornips, Natalia Ganuza, Ingvild Nistov & Toril Opsahl. 2013. Urban vernaculars in contemporary northern Europe: Innovative variants of V2 in Germany, Norway and Sweden. Working papers in Urban language and literacies 119. 1–21.Search in Google Scholar

Friedmann, Naama, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi. 2021. Growing trees: The acquisition of the left periphery. Glossa 6(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5877.Search in Google Scholar

Friedmann, Naama & Julia Reznick. 2021. Stages rather than ages in the acquisition of movement structures: Data from sentence repetition and 27696 spontaneous clauses. Glossa 39(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5716.Search in Google Scholar

Fuß, Eric. 2005. The rise of agreement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.81Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 1996. Verb Second, the split CP and null subjects in early Dutch finite clauses. GenGenP. 133–175.Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. Adverbial clauses, main clauses phenomena, and composition of the left periphery [the cartography of syntactic structures]. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199858774.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 2013. The syntax of registers. Diary subject omission and the privilege of the root. Lingua 130. 88–110.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.01.005.Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane & Ciro Greco. 2016. Frame setters and the microvariation of subject-initial V2. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003226 (December 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane & Raffaella Zanuttini. 1991. Negative heads and the neg criterion. The Linguistic Review 8. 233–251.https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1991.8.2-4.233.Search in Google Scholar

Hager, Clarisse. 2014. Structure de la phrase en Abidji, langue Kwa de Côte d’Ivoire, PhD Dissertation. University of Geneva.Search in Google Scholar

Haiman, John & Paola Benincà. 1992. The Rhaeto-Romance languages. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2006. Scrambling, remnant movement, and restructuring in West Germanic, [Oxford studies in comparative syntax]. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308211.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders. 2015. Verb second. In Syntax – Theory and analysis, Tibor Kiss and Artemis Alexiadou, 242–283. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Kaiser, Georg A. & Franziska M. Hack. 2010. Sujets et sujets nuls en romanch. In Heidi Siller (ed.), Actes du XXVe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes: Tome 7, Section 15: La place du romanche, du ladin dolomitique et du frioulan dans la Romania, Paul Danler, Maria Iliescu, 83–91. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110231922.7-83Search in Google Scholar

Kaiser, Georg A. & Franziska M. Hack. 2013. “Language change in comparison: The (special) case of Raeto-Romance. In Jürg Fleischer & Horst J. Simon (eds.), Sprachwandelvergleich – Comparing diachronies, 73–97. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110313468.73.Search in Google Scholar

Kaiser, Georg A. & Lenka. Scholze. 2009. Verbstellung im Sprachkontakt – das Obersorbische und Bündnerromanische im Kontakt mit dem Deutschen. In Lenka Sholze & Björn Wiemer (eds.), Von Zuständen, Dynamik und Veränderung bei Pygmäen und Giganten: Festschrift für Walter Breu zu seinem 60, 305–330. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Kiss, Katalin É. 1992. Logical structure in syntactic structure: The case of Hungarian. In C.T. James Huang & Robert May (eds.), Logical structure and linguistic structure: Crosslinguistic perspectives, 111–147. Dordrecht: Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3472-9_5.Search in Google Scholar

Lebrument, Hanspeter (ed.), 2006. Paraulas – Märchen. In Hanspeter Lebrument (ed.), Sursilvan, Sutsilvan, Surmiran, Putèr, Vallader und Deutsch. Chur/Glarus/Zürich: La Quotidiana Südostschweiz Buchverlag.Search in Google Scholar

Linder, Karl P. 1987. Grammatische Untersuchungen zur Charackteristik das Rätoromanischen in Graubünden. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2018. Principles, parameters, and schemata: A radically underspecified UG. Linguistic Analysis. 517–558.Search in Google Scholar

Merlo, Paola. 2015. Predicting word order universal. Journal of Language Modelling 3(2). 317–314.10.15398/jlm.v3i2.112Search in Google Scholar

Mohr, Sabine. 2009. V2 as a single-edge phenomenon. In Kleanthes K. Grohmann & Phoevos Panagiotidis (eds.), Selected papers from the 2006 syntaxfest, 141–159. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Nilsen, Øystein. 2003. Eliminating positions: Syntax and Semantics of sentential modifications, PhD Dissertation. University of Utrecht.Search in Google Scholar

Neto, Tescari Aquiles. 2012. On verb movement in Brazilian Portuguese: A cartographic study, PhD Dissertation. University of Venice.Search in Google Scholar

Oetzel, Annette. 1992. Markierte Wortstellung im Bündnerromanischen. Frankfurt: Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Oetzel, Annette. 1994. Die Nicht-Einhaltung der Inversion im Engadinischen und ihr Einfluss auf die Informationsstruktur. Annalas de la Societad Retorumanscha 107. 153–171.Search in Google Scholar

Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The higher functional field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195133561.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Poletto, Cecilia. 2002. The left-periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance dialects: A new view on V2 and V3, Syntactic Microvariation, Meertens Institute Electronic Publications in Linguistics, 214–242.Search in Google Scholar

Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 365–424.Search in Google Scholar

Puskás, Genoveva. 2000. Word order in Hungarian: The syntax of A’-positions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.33Search in Google Scholar

Riolfi, Alessandro. 2019. A history of the concept of parameter in Generative Grammar, PhD Dissertation. University of Verona.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110883718Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1991. Residual verb second and the Wh-Criterion. Technical Reports in Formal and Computational Linguistics 2.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic publisher. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. On the position “Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1163/9780585473949_016Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond [the Cartography of syntactic structures], Vol. 3, 223–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2006. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on, 97–133. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7197.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2013. Notes on cartography and further explanation. Probus 25. 197–226. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0010.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2014. On the elements of syntactic variation. In Carme Picallo (ed.), Linguistic variation, in the minimalist framework, 13–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702894.003.0002.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702894.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2015a. Cartography, criteria, and labeling. In Ur Shlonsky (ed.), Beyond functional sequence [the cartography of syntactic structures], Vol. 10, 314–338. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0017.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0017Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2015b. Notes on labeling and subject positions. In Elisa di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann & Simona Matteini (eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond – Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, 17–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.02riz.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2016. Monkey morpho-syntax and merge-based systems. Theoretical Linguistics 42(1–2). 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2016-0006.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2017. On the format and locus of parameters: The role of morphosyntactic features. Linguistic Analysis 41. 159–191.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi & Giuliano Bocci. 2017. The left periphery of the clause: Primarily illustrated for Italian. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 1–30. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom104.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi & Guglielmo Cinque. 2016. Functional categories and syntactic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics 2. 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040827.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi & Ian Roberts. 1989. Complex inversion in French. Probus 1. 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1989.1.1.1.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi & Ur Shlonsky. 2007. Strategies of subject extraction. In Uli Sauerland & Hans M. Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + Recursion = language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, 115–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207552-004Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 2004. The C-system in Brythonic celtic languages, V2, and the EPP. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP [the cartography of syntactic structures], Vol. 2, 297–328. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195159486.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 2019. Parameter Hierarchies and Universal grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198804635.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in Syntax, PhD Dissertation. MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Salvi, Giampaolo. 2021. V2. Un paio di malintesi. Verbum Analecta Neolatina XXI. 2020/1–2.Search in Google Scholar

Samo, Giuseppe. 2018. Towards a criterial V2: Some notes on subject-initial clauses. Generative Grammar in Geneva 11. 1–20.Search in Google Scholar

Samo, Giuseppe. 2019a. A Criterial approach to the cartography of V2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.257Search in Google Scholar

Samo, Giuseppe. 2019b. Cartography and microparametric variation: Criterial V2 in Swiss Romansh varieties. Revista Linguí∫tica. 141–160. v.15.3, ISSN 2238-975X/1808-835X https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rl/article/view/27546. https://doi.org/10.31513/linguistica.2019.v15n3a27546.Search in Google Scholar

Schweikert, Walter. 2005. The order of prepositional phrases in the structure of the clause. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.83Search in Google Scholar

Si, Fuzhen. 2011. Syntacticization of pragmatic information at sentential and noun phrase levels (语用信息在句子和名词短语层面的句法化). Journal of Yili Normal University (Social Science Edition) – 伊犁师范学院学报 (社会科学版)(2). 92–95.Search in Google Scholar

Sluckin, Benjamin L., Silvio Cruschina & Fabienne Martin. 2021. Locative inversion in Germanic and Romance: A conspiracy theory. In Sam Wolfe & Christine Mecklenborg (eds.), Continuity and variation in Germanic and Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198841166.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Stark, Elisabeth & Aurélia Robert-Tissot. 2017. Subject drop in Swiss French text messages. Linguistic Variation 17(2). 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.14020.sta.Search in Google Scholar

Stark, Elisabeth, Simone Ueberwasser & Bueni Ruef. 2009–2015. Swiss SMS corpus. University of Zurich. https://sms.linguistik.uzh.ch.Search in Google Scholar

Starke, Michal. 2001. Move dissolves into merge: A theory of locality, PhD Dissertation. University of Geneva.Search in Google Scholar

Stich, Dominique. 2007. Parlons Romanche: la quatrième langue official de la Suisse. Paris: L’harmattan.Search in Google Scholar

Thráhinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619441Search in Google Scholar

Tsiknakis, Antonios. 2020. Verb movement and topicalization in German. In Horst Lohnstein & Antonios Tsiknakis (eds.), Verb second. grammatical internal and grammar external interfaces, 413–444. Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501508141-013.Search in Google Scholar

Tsimpli, Ianthi M. 1995. Focusing in modern Greek. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Discourse configurational languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195088335.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Walther, Gérarldine & Sagot Benoît. 2017. Speeding up corpus development for linguistic research: Language documentation and acquisition in Romansh Tuatschin. In Proceedings of the joint SIGHUM workshop on computational linguistics for cultural heritage, social sciences, humanities and literature, 89–94. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-2212.Search in Google Scholar

Westergaard, Marit. 2009. The Acquisition of word order: Micro-cues, information structure, and economy. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.145Search in Google Scholar

Wolfe, Sam. 2015. Microvariation in medieval Romance syntax: A comparative study, PhD Dissertation. University of Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfe, Sam. 2019. Redefining the typology of V2 languages. The view from Medieval Romance and beyond. Linguistic Variation 19. 16–46. https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.15026.wol.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfe, Sam & Rebecca Woods. 2020. Rethinking verb second. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198844303.001.0001Search in Google Scholar