Duelling contexts: how action misalignment leads to impoliteness in a courtroom

References

Aceron, Romel M. 2015. Conversational analysis: The judge and lawyers’ courtroom interactions. Part I Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 3(5). 120–127.Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Dawn. 2011. Cross-examining lawyers, facework and the adversarial courtroom. Journal of Pragmatics 43(13). 3216–3230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.007.Search in Google Scholar

Arminen, Ilkka. 1996. On the moral and interactional relevancy of self-repairs for life stories of members of Alcoholics Anonymous. Text 16. 449–480.10.1515/text.1.1996.16.4.449Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, Maxwell & Paul Drew. 1979. Order in Court. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.10.1007/978-1-349-04057-5Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2). 145–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X.Search in Google Scholar

Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in the struggle for power. In Miriam A. Locher (ed.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208344Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope. 2017. Politeness and impoliteness. In Yan, Huang (ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ch 20. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.16.Search in Google Scholar

Burns, Tom. 1953. Friends, enemies, and the polite fiction. American Sociological Review 18(6). 654. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088120.Search in Google Scholar

Christie, Chrisine. 2013. The relevance of taboo language: An analysis of the indexical values of swearwords. Journal of Pragmatics 58. 152–169.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.009Search in Google Scholar

Christie, Chris. 2018. The indexical scope of adios: A relevance theoretic analysis of discursive constructions of gender and institutions and their impact on utterance. Journal of Politeness Research 14(1). 97–119.10.1515/pr-2017-0050Search in Google Scholar

Clayman, Steven. 1992. Caveat orator: Audience disaffiliation in the 1988 presidential debates. The Quarterley journal of speech 78(1). 33–60.10.1080/00335639209383980Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. In Drew Paul, Marjorie H. Goodwin, John J. Gumpertz & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752Search in Google Scholar

Datchary, Caroline & Christian Licoppe. 2007. La multi-activité et ses appuis: l’exemple de la «présence obstinée» des messages dans l’environnement de travail. Activitéś (Vitry-Sur-Seine) 1(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.1370.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Bethan. 2018. Evaluating evaluations: What different types of metapragmatic behaviour can tell us about participants’ understandings of the moral order. Journal of Politeness Research 14(1). 121–151.10.1515/pr-2017-0037Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul. 1984. Speakers’ reportings in invitation sequences. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.010Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul & John Heritage. 1992. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eelen, Gino. 2001. A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, Rod. 2001. When listeners talk. In Andres H. Jucker (ed.), Pragmatics and beyond new series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.92Search in Google Scholar

Glenn, Phillip. 2003. Laughter in interaction. In Drew Paul, Marjorie H. Goodwin, John J. Gumpertz & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), Studies in interactional sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1979. Footing. Semiotica 25(1–2). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 1986. Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Text: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 6(3). 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1986.6.3.283.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie H. 2006. The hidden life of girls: games of stance, status, and exclusion. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.10.1002/9780470773567Search in Google Scholar

Grainger, Karen. 2018. “We’re not in a club now”: A neo-Brown and Levinson approach to analyzing courtroom data. Journal of Politeness Research 14(1). 19–38.10.1515/pr-2017-0039Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Sandra. 2011. The limits of politeness re-visited: Courtroom discourse as a case in point. In Linguistic Politeness Research Group (ed.), Discursive approaches to politeness. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110238679.85Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2013. Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order. Journal of Pragmatics 58. 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2015. Impoliteness and taking offence in initial interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 86. 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.018.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael & Melody Wei Li Chang 2015. Troubles talk, (dis)affiliation and the participation order in Taiwanese-Chinese online discussion boards. In Marta Dynel and Jan, Chovanec (eds.) Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.256.05hau.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2018. Afterword: Theorizing (im)politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 14(1). 153–65.10.1515/pr-2017-0058Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael & Valeria Sinkeviciute. 2018. Accusations and interpersonal conflict in televised multi-party interactions amongst speakers of (Argentinian and Peninsular) Spanish. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6(2). 248–270.10.1075/jlac.00012.hauSearch in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael & Melody Wei Lin Chang. 2015. Troubles talk, (dis)affiliation and the participation order in Taiwanese–Chinese online discussion boards. Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions. 99–133.10.1075/pbns.256.05hauSearch in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael & Valeria Sinkeviciute. 2019. Offence and conflict talk. In Matthew Evans, Lesley Jeffries & Jim O’Driscoll (eds.), The Routledge handbook of language in conflict, 196–214. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.10.4324/9780429058011-12Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & Steven Clayman. 2010. Interaction en Masse: Audiences and Speeches. In Talk in action, 263–279. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444318135.ch18Search in Google Scholar

Hutchby, Ian. 1996. Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries, and power on talk radio. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1979. A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In George, Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Alison & Ruth Clifford. 2011. Polite incivility in defensive attack: Strategic politeness and impoliteness in cross-examination in the David Irving vs. Penguin Books Ltd and Deborah Lipstadt trial. Journal of Politeness Research 7(1). 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2011.003.Search in Google Scholar

Kochman, Thomas. 1983. The boundary between play and nonplay in Black verbal dueling. Language in Society 12(3). 329–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500009970.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen. 2012. Action formation and action ascription. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 101–130. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001. ch 6.Search in Google Scholar

Licoppe, Christian. 2015. Video communication and “camera actions”. The production of wide video shots in courtrooms with remote defendants. Journal of Pragmatics 76. 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.008.Search in Google Scholar

Manzo, John F. 1996. Taking turns and taking sides: Opening scenes from two jury deliberations. Social Psychology Quarterly 59(2). 107. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787046.Search in Google Scholar

Maynard, Douglas W. 1983. Social order and plea bargaining in the courtroom. Sociological Quarterly 24(2). 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1983.tb00700.x.Search in Google Scholar

Maynard, Douglas W & Don, H. Zimmerman. 1984. Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly 47(4). 301–316.10.2307/3033633Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, Nathaniel. 2015. Goading as a social action. In Marina Terkourafi (ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on im/politeness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/aals.14.07mitSearch in Google Scholar

Mitchell, Nathaniel. 2016. Accountability, agency and orientations to the participation order in the interactional achievement of evaluations of impoliteness (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Brisbane, Australia: Griffith University.Search in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2012. Talking and driving: Multiactivity in the car. Semiotica 2012(191). 223–256. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-0062.Search in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2013. Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: Participatory democracy debates. Journal of Pragmatics 46(1). 39–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010.Search in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2018. Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51(1). 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878.Search in Google Scholar

O’Driscoll, Jim. 2018. Dances with footings: a Goffmanian perspective on the Soto case. Journal of Politeness Research 14(1). 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0038.Search in Google Scholar

Petitjean, Cécile & Etienne Morel. 2017. “Hahaha”: Laughter as a resource to manage WhatsApp conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 110. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, Anita & J. Maxwell Atkinson. 1984. Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and the study of courtroom interaction. In Antony J. Chapman, Dave J. Müller & Derek E. Blackman (eds.), Psychology and law: Topics from an international conference, 283–294. Chichester, England: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Price, Hazel & Jack Wilson. 2018. Applying politeness research: An introduction to the soto data. Journal of politeness research 14(1). 1–17.10.1515/pr-2017-0057Search in Google Scholar

Reynolds, Edward. 2015. How participants in arguments challenge the normative position of an opponent. Discourse Studies 17(3). 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615571198.Search in Google Scholar

Romaniuk, Tanya & Susan Ehrlich. 2013. On the interactional import of self-repair in the courtroom. In Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond & Jack Sidnell (eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding, 172–197. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511757464.006Search in Google Scholar

Rossano, Federico. 2013. Gaze in conversation. In Tanya Stivers & Jack Sidnell (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118325001.ch15Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4). 696–735.10.1353/lan.1974.0010Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Search in Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack. 2014. The architecture of intersubjectivity revisited. In N. J. Enfield, Kockelman Paul & Jack Sidnell (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology, Cambridge handbooks in language and linguistics, 364–399. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139342872.018Search in Google Scholar

Van Der Houwen, Fleur. 2013. Reported writing in court: Putting evidence “on record. Text and Talk 33(6). 747–769. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0032.Search in Google Scholar

Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding pragmatics. London/New York: Edward Arnold/Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Jack & Hazel Price. 2018. Courtroom data and politeness research: A case for neo-Peircean semiotics in interpersonal pragmatics. Journal of Politeness Research 14(1). 63–95.10.1515/pr-2017-0056Search in Google Scholar