Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Self-Denigration in 21st Century Chinese

  • Dániel Z. Kádár is Chair Professor and Director of the Centre for Pragmatic Research at the Dalian University of Foreign Languages. He is also Research Professor and Director of Research Centre at the Research Institute for Linguistics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

    EMAIL logo
    and

    Zhou Ling is Professor at the School of Foreign Languages, Northeast Normal University. Her main research area is intercultural pragmatics, with a special focus on face and (im)politeness.

Published/Copyright: July 8, 2020

Abstract

The present paper aims to explore the characteristics of the self-denigration phenomenon in present-day Chinese, hence revisiting a key Chinese linguacultural phenomenon from a contemporary angle. We investigate the following understudied phenomenon: Self-denigration has changed together with Chinese interpersonal language use and interactional technologies, and is currently being used in remarkably innovative ways, in particular in the domain of online interactions. While various historical self-denigrating forms have remained in use, significantly more newly invented ones have gained popularity. We argue that the cluster of self-denigrating forms used in present-day Chinese can fulfil a variety of sociopragmatic functions. Some of these functions - such as showing off - paradoxically contradict with the conventional understanding of self-denigration as a ceremonial form of deference behaviour expressing modesty. Our investigation is based on data drawn from computer-mediated communication (CMC), as well as semi-structured interviews.

About the authors

Dániel Z. Kádár

Dániel Z. Kádár is Chair Professor and Director of the Centre for Pragmatic Research at the Dalian University of Foreign Languages. He is also Research Professor and Director of Research Centre at the Research Institute for Linguistics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

Ling Zhou

Zhou Ling is Professor at the School of Foreign Languages, Northeast Normal University. Her main research area is intercultural pragmatics, with a special focus on face and (im)politeness.

Acknowledgements

The first author’s research time was supported by the grant (16BYY179) of the National Funds for Social Sciences, “A corpus-based semantics-pragmatics interface study of mianzi and lian in their conceptual representations”. The corresponding author’s involvement in the project has been sponsored by the Dalian University of Foreign Languages and the MTA Momentum (Lendület) Research Grant of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (LP2017-5).

References

Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Rong, & Chunmei Hu 2020 (in press). End-of-diner food offering: A three-way comparative/contrastive study. Contrastive Pragmatics 1(2).10.1163/26660393-BJA10009Search in Google Scholar

Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.10.4324/9781315760179Search in Google Scholar

Fukushima, Saeko & Michael Haugh. 2014. The role of emic understandings in theorizing im/politeness: the metapragmatics of attentiveness, empathy and anticipatory inference in Japanese and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics. 74. 165-179.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.004Search in Google Scholar

Gu, Yueguo. 1990. Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 14(2). 237-257.10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-OSearch in Google Scholar

Gu, Yueguo. 1992. Politeness, pragmatics and culture. Foreign Language Teaching and Research. 4.10-17.Search in Google Scholar

Herring, Susan. 1999. Interaction coherence in CMC. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. HICSS-32.Search in Google Scholar

House, Juliane, & Dániel Z. Kádár. Forthcoming. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108954587Search in Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko. 1989. Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, 8(2/3). 223-248.10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223Search in Google Scholar

Kádár, Dániel Z. 2007a. Forms of (Im)Politeness. Budapest: Eotvos Lorand University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kádár, Dániel Z. 2007b. On historical Chinese apology and its strategic application. Journal of Politeness Research, Language Behaviour Culture. 3(1). 125-150.10.1515/PR.2007.006Search in Google Scholar

Kádár, Dániel Z. 2013. In-group Ritual and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230393059Search in Google Scholar

Kádár, Dániel Z. 2017. Politeness in pragmatics, In: The Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Linguistics. https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-218. Accessed: 27 June 2020.10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.218Search in Google Scholar

Kádár, Dániel Z. & Jonathan Culpeper. 2010. Historical (im)politeness: an introduction. In: Jonathan Culpeper & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), Historical (Im)Politeness. 9-35. Berne: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0351-0025-9Search in Google Scholar

Kádár, Dániel Z. & Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139382717.006Search in Google Scholar

Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House. 2020. Ritual frame indicating forms across cultures. Pragmatics 30(1): 142-168.10.1075/prag.19018.kadSearch in Google Scholar

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 1997. A multilevel approach in the study of talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics. 7(1). 1-20.10.1075/prag.7.1.01kerSearch in Google Scholar

Linguistic Politeness Research Group (ed.) 2011. Discursive Approached to Politeness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110238679Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam & Sebastian Hoffmann. 2006. Constructing the identity of an advice-giver in an American internet advice column. Bulletin of JSME. 26(4). 1719-1726.10.1515/TEXT.2006.004Search in Google Scholar

Marsden, Liz & Dániel. Z. Kádár. 2017. The pragmatics of mimesis: a case study of intercultural email communication, Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice. 4(1). 1-29.10.7577/fleks.2434Search in Google Scholar

Meiners, Jocelly G. 2017. Cross-cultural and interlanguage perspectives on the emotional and pragmatic expression of sympathy in Spanish and English. In: Vahid Parvaresh & Alessandro Capone (eds.) The Pragmeme of Accommodation: The Case of Interaction around the Event of Death. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 13. 319-348. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-55759-5_17Search in Google Scholar

Niu, Li & Yaohua Luo. 2015. 机构性礼貌话语积极语用功能探究——以电视综艺节目为例 [The positive pragmatic functions of institutional impoliteness-a case study of TV Variety Show]. 语言教学与研究Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies. 4. 104-112.Search in Google Scholar

Pan, Yuling & Dániel. Z. Kádár. 2011. Historical vs. contemporary Chinese linguistic politeness. Journal of Pragmatics. 43(6). 1525-1539.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.018Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen. (2008). Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking. Culture, communication and politeness theory. 11-47. London: Continuum.10.5040/9781350934085.ch-002Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Shansheng. 2003.褒扬恭维与讽利言语行为构成分析 [An analysis of positive complimentary and ironic speech acts]. 修辞学习Rhetoric Learning. 4. 15-17.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Qin. 2007. 对称赞语的跨文化研究 [A cross-cultural study of compliments]. 外语教学Foreign Language Education. 4. 44-46.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Ying. 2003. 外语课堂教师礼貌情况调查分析 [An investigation on teachers’ politeness in foreign language teaching class]. 外语教学与研究Foreign Language Teaching and Research. 1. 62-68.Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Changrong. 2013. Two interactional functions of self-mockery in everyday English conversations: a multimodal analysis. Journal of Pragmatics. 50(1). 1-22.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.006Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Ming Chung. 2003. On the universality of face: evidence from Chinese compliment response behavior. Journal of Pragmatics. 35(10). 1679-1710.10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00074-2Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Ming Chung. 2005. Sociolinguistic competence in the complimenting act of native Chinese and American English speakers: a mirror of cultural value. Language & Speech. 48(1). 91-119.10.1177/00238309050480010501Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, Tingdong. 2007. 古人称谓 [Ancients’ Addressee Form]. Shandong: Shandong Pictorial Publisher.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Meng, Jijia Zhang & Zhanling Cui. 2009. 反语语用的心理学研究 [A psychological study of pragmatic irony]. 兰州学刊Lanzhou Academic Journal. 1. 185-187.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Wei. 2017. 基于语料库英汉的概念隐喻 [A comparative study of metaphorical form ‘dog’ between English and Chinese based on corpus]. 西安外国语大学学报Journal of Xi’an International Studies University. 2. 11-14.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Yanhong & Guodong Yu. 2016. 汉语恭维回应语对比恭维模式的会话分析 [A conversational analysis of “contrast compliment” in compliment responses in Mandarin]. 现代外语Modern Foreign Languages. 5. 605-615.Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, Hua & Xiaohui Han. 2013. 中式礼貌语境中的缓和语语用研究 [A pragmatic. study of mitigation in Chinese politeness]. 外语学刊 Foreign Language Research. 2. 58-63.Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, Ling & Shaojie Zhang. 2018. Reconstructing the politeness principle in Chinese: A response to Gu’s approach, 2018. Intercultural Pragmatics. 15(5). 693-721.10.1515/ip-2018-0024Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, Weifang. 1998. 书信语篇礼貌现象调查 [An investigation of politeness in letter discourse]. 外语教学与研究 Foreign Language Teaching and Research. 1. 5-10.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-09-21
Accepted: 2019-04-12
Published Online: 2020-07-08
Published in Print: 2021-07-27

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pr-2018-0043/html
Scroll to top button