Home Preparation and characteristics of sepiolite-waterborne polyurethane composites
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Preparation and characteristics of sepiolite-waterborne polyurethane composites

  • Tong Xu , Hong Xu EMAIL logo , Yi Zhong , Linping Zhang , Di Qian , Yelei Hu , Yuanzhao Zhu and Zhiping Mao EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 19, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A kind of organic/inorganic composite material composed of waterborne polyurethane and sepiolite was prepared in this work. Sepiolite was organically modified by three kinds of silane coupling agents, and then compounded with waterborne polyurethane through layer-by-layer method in order to prepare composite materials. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) show the crystal and chemistry structure of sepiolite samples, and confirmed the preparation of organic sepiolite. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) showed the surface microstructure and elemental content of sepiolite and organic sepiolite, and was consistent with the XRD results. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) examination of waterborne polyurethane composites surfaces showed that sepiolite particles were regularly dispersed in the waterborne polyurethane matrix. Thermal resistance of waterborne polyurethane composites was determined by thermogravimetry analyzer (TG) and derivative thermogravimetry analyzer (DTG), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), gas chromatography (GC), and mass chromatography (MS). Mechanical behavior was examined by tensile strength tester, showed higher break strength than that of the control waterborne polyurethane. Therefore, organically modified sepiolite was considered to be a kind of wonderful inorganic material that could be used to improve the thermal stability and mechanical property of polymer.


Corresponding authors: Hong Xu, Key Laboratory of Science & Technology of Eco-Textile, Ministry of Education, Donghua University, Shanghai, 201620, P. R. China, E-mail: ; and Zhiping Mao, Key Laboratory of Science & Technology of Eco-Textile, Ministry of Education, Donghua University, Shanghai, 201620, P. R. China; National Dyeing and Finishing Engineering Technology Research Center, Donghua University, No. 2999, North Renmin Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai 201620, P. R. China; and National Manufacturing Innovation Center of Advanced Dyeing and Finishing Technology, Taian, Shandong Province, 271000, P. R. China, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2018YFC1801500

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2232020G-04

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: The present work is supported financially by the Fundamental Research Funds for the National Key R & D Program of China (no. 2018YFC1801500) and the Central Universities (no. 2232020G-04).

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Chen, J., Wang, J., Chen, H., Ni, A., Ding, A. Synergistic effect of intumescent flame retardant and attapulgite on mechanical properties and flame retardancy of glass fibre reinforced polyethylene composites. Compos. Struct. 2020, 246, 112404–112410; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112404.Search in Google Scholar

2. Karaer Özmen, F., Üreyen, M. E., Koparal, A. S. Cleaner production of flame-retardant-glass reinforced epoxy resin composite for aviation and reducing smoke toxicity. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 124065–124085.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124065Search in Google Scholar

3. Han, G., Zhao, X., Feng, Y., Ma, J., Zhou, K., Shi, Y., Liu, C., Xie, X. Highly flame-retardant epoxy-based thermal conductive composites with functionalized boron nitride nanosheets exfoliated by one-step ball milling. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 407, 127099–127110; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127099.Search in Google Scholar

4. Jung, D., Bhattacharyya, D. Combined effect of silicate coating and phosphate loading on the performance improvement of a keratinous fiber-based flame retardant. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 424, 130484–130491; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.130484.Search in Google Scholar

5. Bokobza, L., Leroy, E., Lalanne, V. Effect of filling mixtures of sepiolite and a surface modified fumed silica on the mechanical and swelling behavior of a styrene–butadiene rubber. Eur. Poly. J. 2009, 45, 996–1001; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.12.028.Search in Google Scholar

6. Besli, N. S. O., Orakdogen, N. Sepiolite-embedded binary nanocomposites of (alkyl)methacrylate-based responsive polymers: role of silanol groups of fibrillar nanoclay on functional and thermomechanical properties. React. Funct. Polym. 2021, 161, 104844–104859; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.104844.Search in Google Scholar

7. Carignani, E., Cobani, E., Martini, F., Nardelli, F., Borsacchi, S., Calucci, L., Di Credico, B., Tadiello, L., Giannini, L., Geppi, M. Effect of sepiolite treatments on the oxidation of sepiolite/natural rubber nanocomposites prepared by latex compounding technique. Appl. Clay Sci. 2020, 189, 105528–105535; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2020.105528.Search in Google Scholar

8. Tagliaro, I., Di Credico, B., Moncho-Jorda, A. Electrostatic depletion effects on the stability of colloidal dispersions of sepiolite and natural rubber latex. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 560, 606–617; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.10.083.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Roy, N., Bhowmick, A. K. Novel in situ polydimethylsiloxane-sepiolite nanocomposites: structure-property relationship. Polymer 2010, 51, 5172–5185; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.08.064.Search in Google Scholar

10. Acosta, J. L., González, L., Ojeda, M. C., Del Río, C. Ionomer composites based on sepiolite/hydrogenated poly(styrene butadiene) block copolymer systems. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 86, 3512–3519; https://doi.org/10.1002/app.11113.Search in Google Scholar

11. Dall Agnol, L., Dias, F. T. G., Ornaghi, H. L., Sangermano, M., Bianchi, O. UV-curable waterborne polyurethane coatings: a state-of-the-art and recent advances review. Prog. Org. Coating 2021, 154, 106156–106175; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.106156.Search in Google Scholar

12. Qian, Y., Dong, F., Guo, L., Xu, X., Liu, H. Terpene derivative-containing silicone two-component waterborne polyurethane for coatings. Prog. Org. Coating 2021, 153, 106137–106145; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.106137.Search in Google Scholar

13. Zhang, Z., Peng, P., Wu, Q., Zhang, J., Wu, M., Liu, J., Yang, J. Preparation and antibacterial properties of poly(hexamethylene guanidine hydrochloride) modified ionic waterborne polyurethane. Prog. Org. Coating 2021, 156, 106246–106254; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.106246.Search in Google Scholar

14. Kim, B. K., Seo, J. W., Jeong, H. M. Morphology and properties of waterborne polyurethane/clay nanocomposites. Eur. Poly. J. 2003, 39, 85–91; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-3057(02)00173-8.Search in Google Scholar

15. Yeh, J. M., Yao, C. T., Hsieh, C. F., Lin, L. H., Chen, P. L., Wu, J. C., Yang, H. C., Wu, C. P. Preparation, characterization and electrochemical corrosion studies on environmentally friendly waterborne polyurethane/Na+-MMT clay nanocomposite coatings. Eur. Poly. J. 2008, 44, 3046–3056; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.05.037.Search in Google Scholar

16. Choi, H. Y., Bae, C. Y., Kim, B. K. Nanoclay reinforced UV curable waterborne polyurethane hybrids. Prog. Org. Coating 2010, 68, 356–362; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2010.03.015.Search in Google Scholar

17. Cho, M. S., Lee, S. C., Chae, H. J., Kwon, Y. M., Kim, H. J., Ryu, M. Y., Lee, J. B., Kim, J. C. Optimum design and characteristics of potassium-based sorbents using SiO2 for post-combustion CO2 capture. Renew. Energy 2019, 144, 107–115; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.057.Search in Google Scholar

18. García-López, D., Fernández, J. F., Merino, J. C., Santarén, J., Pastor, J. M. Effect of organic modification of sepiolite for PA 6 polymer/organoclay nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010, 70, 1429–1436.10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.05.020Search in Google Scholar

19. Fitaroni, L. B., Venancio, T., Tanaka, F. H., Gimenez, J. C. F., Costa, J. A. S., Cruz, S. A. Organically modified sepiolite: thermal treatment and chemical and morphological properties. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 179, 105149–105158; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2019.105149.Search in Google Scholar

20. Xiong, H., Qi, F., Zhao, N., Yuan, H., Wan, P., Liao, B., Ouyang, X. Effect of organically modified sepiolite as inorganic nanofiller on the anti-corrosion resistance of epoxy coating. Mater. Lett. 2020, 260, 126941–126944; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.126941.Search in Google Scholar

21. Haeri, S. Z., Ramezanzadeh, B., Asghari, M. A novel fabrication of a high performance SiO(2)-graphene oxide (GO) nanohybrids: characterization of thermal properties of epoxy nanocomposites filled with SiO(2)-GO nanohybrids. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 493, 111–122; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.01.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Sáenz-Pérez, M., Laza, J. M., García-Barrasa, J., Vilas, J. L., León, L. M. Influence of the soft segment nature on the thermomechanical behavior of shape memory polyurethanes. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2018, 58, 238–244.10.1002/pen.24567Search in Google Scholar

23. Cakić, S. M., Valcic, M. D., Ristić, I. S., Radusin, T., Cvetinov, M. J., Budinski-Simendić, J. Waterborne polyurethane-silica nanocomposite adhesives based on castor oil-recycled polyols: effects of (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (aptes) content on properties. Int. J. Adhesion Adhes. 2019, 90, 22–31.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.01.005Search in Google Scholar

24. Jiang, P., Zhang, S., Bourbigot, S., Chen, Z., Duquesne, S., Casetta, M. Surface grafting of sepiolite with a phosphaphenanthrene derivative and its flame-retardant mechanism on pla nanocomposites. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2019, 165, 68–79; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2019.04.012.Search in Google Scholar

25. Pan, Y., Liu, L., Cai, W., Hu, Y., Jiang, S., Zhao, H. Effect of layer-by-layer self-assembled sepiolite-based nanocoating on flame retardant and smoke suppressant properties of flexible polyurethane foam. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 168, 230–236; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2018.11.014.Search in Google Scholar

26. Zhan, Z., Xu, M., Li, B. Synergistic effects of sepiolite on the flame retardant properties and thermal degradation behaviors of polyamide 66/aluminum diethylphosphinate composites. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2015, 117, 66–74; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.03.018.Search in Google Scholar

27. Deng, C., Jiang, Y., Fan, Z., Zhao, S., Ouyang, D., Tan, J., Zhang, P., Ding, Y. Sepiolite-based separator for advanced li-ion batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 484, 446–452; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.141.Search in Google Scholar

28. Xu, Z., Liu, D., Yan, L., Xie, X. Synergistic effect of sepiolite and polyphosphate ester on the fire protection and smoke suppression properties of an amino transparent fire-retardant coating. Prog. Org. Coating 2020, 141, 105572–105584; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105572.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-06-11
Accepted: 2021-10-08
Published Online: 2021-11-19
Published in Print: 2022-01-27

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2021-0175/html
Scroll to top button