Home Effects of fiber surface modification on the friction coefficient of luffa fiber/polyester composites under dry sliding condition
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effects of fiber surface modification on the friction coefficient of luffa fiber/polyester composites under dry sliding condition

  • G. Kalusuraman , I. Siva EMAIL logo , J.T. Winowlin Jappes and S. Anand Kumar
Published/Copyright: January 12, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this study, the fiber extracted from the fruit of a luffa plant was used as a reinforcement to an unsaturated polyester resin matrix under two different fiber conditions. The untreated and alkali-treated fibers were impregnated and pressed to produce laminates. Composites were made with an optimal compression pressure of 5 MPa for 12 h of curing at room temperature. Ejected samples were cut according to the dimensions specified by the ASTM test specifications. To investigate the effects of fiber surface treatment on the frictional behavior of the produced composites under dry sliding wear conditions, wear test was conducted in a pin-on-disc equipment as per ASTM G99 at varying sliding velocities. In addition, hardness and un-notched impact strengths were measured and discussed. Results showed that the change in fiber surface morphology significantly changed the coefficient of friction of the composites. Moreover, the sliding distance had a prominent influence in increasing the friction between the composite and the counter face.


Corresponding author: I. Siva, Centre for Composite Materials, Kalasalingam University, Anand Nagar, Srivilliputtur, TN 626126, India, e-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Centre for Composite Materials, Kalasalingam University, for its complete support of this work.

References

[1] Wang B, Tabil L, Panigrahi S. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2008, 15, 43–58.10.1515/SECM.2008.15.1.43Search in Google Scholar

[2] Karthikeyan A, Balamurugan K, Kalpana A. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2014, 21, 315–332.10.1515/secm-2013-0130Search in Google Scholar

[3] Demir H, Atikler U, Balkose D, Tihminlioglu F. Compos. Part A 2006, 37, 447–456.10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.036Search in Google Scholar

[4] Satyanarayana KG, Guimarães JL, Wypych, F. Compos. Part A 2007, 38, 1694–1709.10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.006Search in Google Scholar

[5] Gujjala R, Ojha S, Acharya SK, Pal SK. J. Compos. Mater. 2014, 48, 3445–3455.10.1177/0021998313501924Search in Google Scholar

[6] Tanobe Valcineide OA, Sydenstricker THD, Munaro M, Amico Sandro C. Polym. Test. 2005, 24, 474–482.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.12.004Search in Google Scholar

[7] Sydenstricker THD, Mochnaz S, Amico SC. Polym. Test 2003, 22, 375–380.10.1016/S0142-9418(02)00116-2Search in Google Scholar

[8] Li Y, Mai YW, Ye L. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2000, 60, 2037–2055.10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00101-9Search in Google Scholar

[9] Wambua P, Ivens J, Verpoes I. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 1259–1264.10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-4Search in Google Scholar

[10] Bledzki AK, Gassan J. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1999, 24, 221–274.10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5Search in Google Scholar

[11] Vazguez A, Riccieri J, Carvalho L. Polym. Compos. 1999, 20, 29–37.10.1002/pc.10332Search in Google Scholar

[12] Luo S, Netravali A. Polym. Compos. 1999, 367–378.10.1002/pc.10363Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ghali L, Msahli S, Zidi M, Sakli F. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63, 61–63.10.1016/j.matlet.2008.09.008Search in Google Scholar

[14] Boynard CA, Monteiro S, D’Almeida JRM. J. Appl. Polym.Sci. 2003, 87, 1927–1932.10.1002/app.11522Search in Google Scholar

[15] Nirmala U, Yousif BF, Rilling D, Brevern PV. Wear 2010, 268, 1354–1370.10.1016/j.wear.2010.02.004Search in Google Scholar

[16] Siva I, Winowlin Jappes JT, Suresha B. Polym. Compos. 2012, 33, 723–732.10.1002/pc.22197Search in Google Scholar

[17] El-Tayeb NSM. Wear 2008, 265, 223–235.10.1016/j.wear.2007.10.006Search in Google Scholar

[18] Gill NS, Yousif BF. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J: J. Eng. Tribol. 2009, 223, 183–194.10.1243/13506501JET516Search in Google Scholar

[19] Chin CW, Yousif BF. Wear 2009, 267, 1550–1557.10.1016/j.wear.2009.06.002Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hashmi SAR, Dwivedi UK, Chand N. Wear 2007, 262, 1426–1432.10.1016/j.wear.2007.01.014Search in Google Scholar

[21] Xin X, Xu CG, Qing LF. Wear 2007, 262, 736–741.10.1016/j.wear.2006.08.010Search in Google Scholar

[22] Basavarajappa S, Ellangovan S, Arun KV. Mater. Des. 2009, 30, 2670–2675.10.1016/j.matdes.2008.10.013Search in Google Scholar

[23] Dwivedi UK, Chand N. J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 2009, 209, 5371–5375.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.04.008Search in Google Scholar

[24] Mohanta N, Acharya SK. J. Polym. Eng. 2015, 35, 391–399.10.1515/polyeng-2014-0235Search in Google Scholar

[25] Kurschner K, Hoffer A. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1933, 92, 145–154.10.1007/BF01354736Search in Google Scholar

[26] Conrad CM. Ind. Eng. Chem. Anal. 1944, 16, 745–748.10.1021/i560136a007Search in Google Scholar

[27] Sreenivasasn VS, Soma Sundaram S, Ravindran D, Manikandan V, Narayanasamy R. Mater Des. 2011, 32, 453–461.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.06.004Search in Google Scholar

[28] Abdul Khalil HPS, Suraya NL, Atiqah N, Jawaid M, Hassan A. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 47, 3343–3350.10.1177/0021998312465026Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-7-16
Accepted: 2015-10-5
Published Online: 2016-1-12
Published in Print: 2016-10-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2015-0316/html
Scroll to top button