Abstract
The main aim of this study was to improve the mechanical properties of the recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6-naphthalate) (r-PET/PEN) blends by enhancing the miscibility between PET and PEN with the usage of chain extenders. This idea was novel for the recycled PET-based r-PET/PEN blends, as investigation of the effects of the chain extender usage on the properties of r-PET/PEN blends has not been studied in the literature, according to our knowledge. 1,4-Phenylene-bis-oxazoline (PBO), 1,4-phenylene-di-isocyanate (PDI), and triphenyl phosphite (TPP) were selected as chain extenders. The maximum tensile strength value was observed for the 1.0PDI sample. Moreover, PDI-based blends exhibited better Izod impact strength when compared with all other samples. The miscibility and degree of crystallinity values of all blends were discussed by means of thermal analysis. 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) analysis was carried out to determine transesterification reaction levels. According to 1H-NMR results, the increase in the level of transesterification was around 40% with the usage of PDI. The optimum loading level for selected chain extenders was determined as 1 wt.%, and PDI-based blends exhibited better properties when compared with those of the blends based on PBO and TPP at this loading level.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a grant from the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (project no. 112M254).
References
[1] Welle F. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 55, 865–875.10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.04.009Search in Google Scholar
[2] Srithep Y, Javadi A, Pilla S, Turng LS, Gong S, Clemons C, Peng J. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2011, 51, 1023–1032.10.1002/pen.21916Search in Google Scholar
[3] Torres N, Robin JJ, Boutevin B. Eur. Polym. J. 2000, 36, 2075–2080.10.1016/S0014-3057(99)00301-8Search in Google Scholar
[4] Ida SI, Ito M. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 110, 1814–1821.10.1002/app.28582Search in Google Scholar
[5] Karayannidis GP, Papachristos N, Bikiaris DN, Papageorgiou GZ. Polymer 2003, 44, 7801–7808.10.1016/j.polymer.2003.10.037Search in Google Scholar
[6] Krutphun P, Supaphol P. Eur. Polym. J. 2005, 41, 1561–1568.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.01.023Search in Google Scholar
[7] Schoukens G, Clerck KD. Polymer 2005, 46, 845–857.10.1016/j.polymer.2004.11.106Search in Google Scholar
[8] Dias ML, Silva APF. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2000, 40, 1777–1782.10.1002/pen.11309Search in Google Scholar
[9] Bedia EL, Murakami S, Kitade T, Kohjiya S. Polymer 2001, 42, 7299–7305.10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00236-1Search in Google Scholar
[10] Ito M, Takahashi M, Kanamoto T. Polymer 2002, 43, 3675–3681.10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00194-5Search in Google Scholar
[11] Gunes K, Isayev AI, Li X, Wesdemiotis C. Polymer 2010, 51, 1071–1081.10.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.013Search in Google Scholar
[12] Yang H, Ma J, Li W, Liang B, Yu Y. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2002, 42, 1629–1641.10.1002/pen.11058Search in Google Scholar
[13] Yang H, He J, Liang B. J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Phys. 2001, 39, 2607–2614.10.1002/polb.10021Search in Google Scholar
[14] Ludueña LN, Vazquez A, Alvarez VA. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 109, 3148–3156.10.1002/app.28266Search in Google Scholar
[15] Liangbin L, Rui H, Ling Z, Shiming H. Polymer 2001, 42, 2085–2089.10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00387-6Search in Google Scholar
[16] Raffa P, Coltelli MB, Savi S, Bianchi S, Castelvetro V. React. Funct. Polym. 2012, 72, 50–60.10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2011.10.007Search in Google Scholar
[17] Torres N, Robin JJ, Boutevin B. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 79, 1816–1824.10.1002/1097-4628(20010307)79:10<1816::AID-APP100>3.0.CO;2-RSearch in Google Scholar
[18] Zhang Y, Guo W, Zhang H, Wu C. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2009, 94, 1135–1141.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.03.010Search in Google Scholar
[19] Loontjens T, Pauwels K, Derks F, Neilen M, Sham CK, Serné M. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997, 65, 1813–1819.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970829)65:9<1813::AID-APP18>3.0.CO;2-NSearch in Google Scholar
[20] Nascimento CR, Azuma C, Bretas R, Farah M, Dias ML. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 115, 3177–3188.10.1002/app.31400Search in Google Scholar
[21] Jacques B, Devaux J, Legras R. Polymer 1996, 37, 1189–1200.10.1016/0032-3861(96)80846-9Search in Google Scholar
[22] Cavalcanti FN, Teófilo ET, Rabello MS, Silva SML. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2007, 47, 2155–2163.10.1002/pen.20912Search in Google Scholar
[23] Cheung MF, Carduner KR, Golovoy A and Van Oene H. J. AppL Polym Sci. 1990, 40, 977.10.1002/app.1990.070400530Search in Google Scholar
[24] Aoki Y, Li L, Amari T, Nishimura K, Arashiro Y. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 1923–1929.10.1021/ma981657wSearch in Google Scholar
[25] Karsli G, Aytac A. KGK – Kaut Gummi Kunst 2011, 15, 255–258.Search in Google Scholar
©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review
- IMKS and IMMS: two methods for the production of plastic parts featuring metallic areas
- Original articles
- Application of a multilayer injection molding process for thick-walled optical components
- Mesoscale simulation of the solidification process in injection moulded parts
- Improved molding of micro structures using PVD-coated mold inserts
- In-mould graining of 3D-shaped parts with micro-structured surfaces
- Mold technology for mass production of continuous fiber-reinforced sandwich parts
- The effect of pressure and temperature on microthermoforming thermoplastic films integrated in the injection moulding process
- Effect of filler type and composition on the mechanical, thermal, and dynamic mechanical properties of PS/SBR vulcanizate
- Improving the properties of recycled PET/PEN blends by using different chain extenders
- Effect of ABS/PMMA/EMA ternary blending sequence on mechanical properties and surface glossiness
- Fabrication of a superhydrophobic LLDPE film by thermal lamination and peeling
- Heat distortion temperature and mechanical properties of agricultural wastes-reinforced phenolic composites
- Nondestructive evaluation of graphene-based strain sensor using Raman analysis and Raman mapping
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review
- IMKS and IMMS: two methods for the production of plastic parts featuring metallic areas
- Original articles
- Application of a multilayer injection molding process for thick-walled optical components
- Mesoscale simulation of the solidification process in injection moulded parts
- Improved molding of micro structures using PVD-coated mold inserts
- In-mould graining of 3D-shaped parts with micro-structured surfaces
- Mold technology for mass production of continuous fiber-reinforced sandwich parts
- The effect of pressure and temperature on microthermoforming thermoplastic films integrated in the injection moulding process
- Effect of filler type and composition on the mechanical, thermal, and dynamic mechanical properties of PS/SBR vulcanizate
- Improving the properties of recycled PET/PEN blends by using different chain extenders
- Effect of ABS/PMMA/EMA ternary blending sequence on mechanical properties and surface glossiness
- Fabrication of a superhydrophobic LLDPE film by thermal lamination and peeling
- Heat distortion temperature and mechanical properties of agricultural wastes-reinforced phenolic composites
- Nondestructive evaluation of graphene-based strain sensor using Raman analysis and Raman mapping