Home Literary Studies Supposing the Law: Nomos and Categorical Imperatives in Never Let Me Go
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Supposing the Law: Nomos and Categorical Imperatives in Never Let Me Go

  • Annalisa Volpone

    Annalisa Volpone is Associate Professor of English Literature at the University of Perugia and co-director of the CEMS (Centre for European Modernism Studies).

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 21, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of posthuman bodies in Kazuo Ishiguro’s novel Never Let Me Go against the background of organ transplants and prosthetic surgery. The novel posits a number of questions about what qualifies a human being and/or what distinguishes a human being from a clone, suggesting that art, perhaps, might be a discriminating factor. Further, it also raises questions about the kind of regulation should be applied to organs “donations,” especially when they are not voluntary, but part of a programmed response inscribed in someone’s DNA. Accordingly, the last section of the paper will investigate the social impact of the exploitation of the clones and the medico-legal issues pertaining to it.

About the author

Annalisa Volpone

Annalisa Volpone is Associate Professor of English Literature at the University of Perugia and co-director of the CEMS (Centre for European Modernism Studies).

Published Online: 2020-04-21
Published in Print: 2020-04-28

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 12.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pol-2020-2006/html
Scroll to top button