Home Exemplarity, Singularity and Generality. Remarks made between Law and Literature
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Exemplarity, Singularity and Generality. Remarks made between Law and Literature

  • Angela Condello

    Angela Condello is Temporary Lecturer at Roma Tre and Director of LabOnt Law at the University of Torino. She got a J.D. and a doctorate in legal philosophy at Roma Tre with a thesis on analogical thinking. She worked (2013) and currently cooperates with the Human Rights Committee of the Italian Senate. In 2014 she was Junior Fellow at the Käte Hamburger Center for Advanced Studies in the Humanities “Recht als Kultur.” In 2015 she was awarded a Fernand Braudel Fellowship to conduct research on exemplarity at the EHESS (Paris). From 2014 to 2016 she was a Guest Professor (Law and Humanities) at the Law School of the University of Ghent. She teaches Law and Humanities at Roma Tre. She is a member of the following boards: Law Text Culture, Law and Literature, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, Rivista di Estetica. She is Managing Editor of Brill Research Perspectives in Art and Law. In 2016 she was awarded a Jean Monnet Project.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 8, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this paper I argue (i) that the relationship between individual case and general norm shows interesting similarities between law and literature; (ii) that the emergence of one case as exemplary reflects the identity of the community in which the case emerged. (i) Paradigmatic cases are sources of normativity and they become normative by raising questions of precedent and repeatability: they perform the functions of a model and produce a split that involves singularity and law, accidental and necessary. (ii) There is a prescriptive force in exemplary cases and the passage from the case to the example is ethical from the start. The prescriptive force is performed in a context of which the exemplary case is the touchstone. The classification of a case as exemplary involves socio-identity-making processes of recognition that assimilate or differentiate human communities and fields of knowledge. Exemplarity thus shows how both law and literature can function as “identity-making” discourses.

About the author

Angela Condello

Angela Condello is Temporary Lecturer at Roma Tre and Director of LabOnt Law at the University of Torino. She got a J.D. and a doctorate in legal philosophy at Roma Tre with a thesis on analogical thinking. She worked (2013) and currently cooperates with the Human Rights Committee of the Italian Senate. In 2014 she was Junior Fellow at the Käte Hamburger Center for Advanced Studies in the Humanities “Recht als Kultur.” In 2015 she was awarded a Fernand Braudel Fellowship to conduct research on exemplarity at the EHESS (Paris). From 2014 to 2016 she was a Guest Professor (Law and Humanities) at the Law School of the University of Ghent. She teaches Law and Humanities at Roma Tre. She is a member of the following boards: Law Text Culture, Law and Literature, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, Rivista di Estetica. She is Managing Editor of Brill Research Perspectives in Art and Law. In 2016 she was awarded a Jean Monnet Project.

Published Online: 2017-8-8
Published in Print: 2017-8-28

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pol-2017-0027/html
Scroll to top button