Home Literary Studies Aristotle’s Pharmacy
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Aristotle’s Pharmacy

  • Nick Piška

    Nick Piška is a Lecturer in Law at the University of Kent, UK. His research pursues a critical engagement with private law, particularly in the area of equity and trusts. He is currently writing a book on the fate of equity in modern law and society. He is the founding member with Rob Herian of the Equity & Trusts Research Network (https://www.kent.ac.uk/law/research/centres-and-groups/equity.html) as well as a member of the advisory board of the University of Kent’s transfaculty Centre for Critical Thought (https://www.kent.ac.uk/cct). He has previously been a researcher at the Law Commission for England and Wales.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 4, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This essay draws on the works of Jacques Derrida and Bernard Stiegler, particularly the concept of the pharmakon, to outline a pharmacological critique of the concept of equity in Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics and Rhetoric and the Equitable remedies of the former Court of Chancery which make up the architecture of financial capitalism.

About the author

Nick Piška

Nick Piška is a Lecturer in Law at the University of Kent, UK. His research pursues a critical engagement with private law, particularly in the area of equity and trusts. He is currently writing a book on the fate of equity in modern law and society. He is the founding member with Rob Herian of the Equity & Trusts Research Network (https://www.kent.ac.uk/law/research/centres-and-groups/equity.html) as well as a member of the advisory board of the University of Kent’s transfaculty Centre for Critical Thought (https://www.kent.ac.uk/cct). He has previously been a researcher at the Law Commission for England and Wales.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Daniela Carpi and Sidia Fiorato for their support of the Equity & Trusts Research Network, in their participation in the network’s events, in publishing this two-part Focus, and for their patience and encouragement in the production of this essay.

Published Online: 2017-4-4
Published in Print: 2017-4-1

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pol-2017-0002/pdf
Scroll to top button