Development of perceptual similarity and discriminability: the perception of Russian phonemes by Chinese learners

References

Aoyama, Katsura & James E. Flege. 2011. Effects of L2 experience on perception of English /r/ and /l/ by native Japanese speakers. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 15(3). 5–13.Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801686Search in Google Scholar

Barrios, Shannon, Nan Jiang & William J. Idsardi. 2016. Similarity in L2 phonology: Evidence from L1 Spanish late-learners’ perception and lexical representation of English vowel contrasts. Second Language Research 32(3). 367–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316630784.Search in Google Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Benjamin M. Bolker & Steven C. Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.Search in Google Scholar

Beddor, Patrice S. & Terry L. Gottfried. 1995. Methodological issues in cross-language speech perception research with adults. In Winifred Strange (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues in cross-language speech research, 207–232. Timonium, MD: York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Best, Catherine T. 1995. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Winifred Strange (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 171–204. Timonium, MD: York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Best, Catherine T., Louis M. Goldstein, Hosung Nam & Michael D. Tyler. 2016. Articulating what infants attune to in native speech. Ecological Psychology 28(4). 216–261.10.1080/10407413.2016.1230372Search in Google Scholar

Best, Catherine T. & Gerald W. McRoberts. 2003. Infant perception of non-native consonant contrasts that adults assimilate in different ways. Language and Speech 46(2–3). 183–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309030460020701.Search in Google Scholar

Best, Catherine T., Gerald W. McRoberts & Elizabeth Goodell. 2001. Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109(2). 775–794. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1332378.Search in Google Scholar

Best, Catherine T. & Michael D. Tyler. 2007. Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Ocke-Schwen Bohn & Murray Munro (eds.), Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production, 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.17.07besSearch in Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2021a. A Praat plugin with automated scripts for voice processing. http://www.praatvocaltoolkit.com/ (accessed January 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2021b. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.39). http://www.praat.org (accessed January 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Bohn, Ocke-Schwen & Catherine T. Best. 2012. Native-language phonetic and phonological influences on perception of American English approximants by Danish and German listeners. Journal of Phonetics 40(1). 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.08.002.Search in Google Scholar

Bohn, Ocke-Schwen & Anne A. Ellegaard. 2019. Perceptual assimilation and graded discrimination as predictors of identification accuracy for learners differing in l2 experience: The case of Danish listeners’perception of English initial fricatives. In International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (April), 2–6.Search in Google Scholar

Bondarko, Liya V. 2005. Phonetic and phonological aspects of the opposition of “soft” and “hard” consonants in the modern Russian language. Speech Communication 47(1–2). 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.03.012.Search in Google Scholar

Bundgaard-Nielsen, Rikke L., Catherine T. Best & Michael D. Tyler. 2011. Vocabulary size matters: The assimilation of second-language Australian English vowels to first-language Japanese vowel categories. Applied Psycholinguistics 32(1). 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716410000287.Search in Google Scholar

Cebrian, Juli. 2019. Perceptual assimilation of British English vowels to Spanish monophthongs and diphthongs. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145(1). EL52–EL58. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5087645.Search in Google Scholar

Cebrian, Juli, Celia Gorba & Núria Gavaldà. 2021. When the easy becomes difficult: Factors affecting the acquisition of the English /iː/-/ɪ/ contrast. Frontiers in Communication 6. 660917. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.660917.Search in Google Scholar

Crosby, Christiane F. 2013. L1 influence on L2 intonation in Russian speakers of English part of the adult and continuing education and teaching commons, and the bilingual, multilingual, and multicultural education commons. Portland, Oregon, MA: Portland State University.Search in Google Scholar

Croissant, Yves. 2012. Estimation of multinomial logit models in R: The mlogit packages. R package version 0.2-2. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mlogit/vignettes/mlogit.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Elvin, Jaydene, Daniel Williams, Jason A. Shaw, Catherine T. Best & Paola Escudero. 2021. The role of acoustic similarity and non-native categorization in predicting non-native discrimination: Brazilian Portuguese vowels by English vs. Spanish listeners. Languages 6(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6010044, In press.Search in Google Scholar

Escudero, Paola. 2005. Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization. In LOT Dissertation Series, 113. Utrecht: Utrecht University.Search in Google Scholar

Escudero, Paola. 2009. The linguistic perception of similar L2 sounds. In Paul Boersma & Silke Hamann (eds.), Phonology in perception, 151–190. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110219234.151Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Bronwen G. & Wafaa Alshangiti. 2018. The perception and production of British English vowels and consonants by Arabic learners of English. Journal of Phonetics 68. 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.01.002.Search in Google Scholar

Faris, Mona M., Catherine T. Best & Michael D. Tyler. 2016. An examination of the different ways that non-native phones may be perceptually assimilated as uncategorized. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 139(1). EL1–EL5. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4939608.Search in Google Scholar

Faris, Mona M., Catherine T. Best & Michael D. Tyler. 2018. Discrimination of uncategorized non-native vowel contrasts is modulated by perceived overlap with native phonological categories. Journal of Phonetics 70. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.05.003.Search in Google Scholar

Flege, James E. 1995. Second Language speech learning theory, findings, and problems. In Winifred Strange (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 233–277. Timonium, MD: York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Flege, James E. & Ocke-Schwen Bohn. 2021. The revised speech learning model. In Ratree Wayland (ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress, 3–83. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108886901.002Search in Google Scholar

Flege, James E., Naoyuki Takagi & Virginia Mann. 1995. Lexical familiarity and English‐language experience affect Japanese adults’ perception of /ɹ/ and /l/. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99(2). 1161–1173. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.414884.Search in Google Scholar

Fox, John & Sanford Weisberg. 2019. An R companion to applied regression, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Available at: https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/.Search in Google Scholar

Gerrits, Ellen & Martin E.H. Schouten. 2004. Categorical perception depends on the discrimination task. Perception and Psychophysics 66(3). 363–376. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194885.Search in Google Scholar

Goldstein, Louis & Carol A. Fowler. 2011. Articulatory phonology: A phonology for public language use. In Niels O. Schiller & Antje S. Meyer (eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities, 159–207. Meyer Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110895094.159Search in Google Scholar

Gong, Jian, Martin Cooke & Maria L. G. Lecumberri. 2015. A quantitative model of first language influence in second language consonant learning. Speech Communication 69. 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2015.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

Gong, Jian & Weijing Zhou. 2015. Effect of experience on Chinese assimilation and identification of English consonants. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, UK.Search in Google Scholar

Guion, Susan G., James E. Flege, Reiko Akahane-Yamada & Jesica C. Pruitt. 2000. An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107(5). 2711–2724. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428657.Search in Google Scholar

Ingram, John C.L. & See-Gyoon Park. 1997. Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics 25(3). 343–370. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0048.Search in Google Scholar

Isshiki, Nobuhiko & Robert Ringel. 1964. Air flow during the production of selected consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 7(3). 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.0703.233.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Daniel & Dennis Ward. 1969. The phonetics of Russian. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Kitikanan, Patchanok. 2017. The effects of L2 experience and vowel context on the perceptual assimilation of English fricatives by L2 Thai learners. English Language Teaching 10(12). 72–82. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n12p72.Search in Google Scholar

Knyazev, Sergey. 2016. Affricated dental plosives in Russian: Phonological status and perceptual cues as a trigger of sound changes. Linguistica Lettica 24. 138–146.Search in Google Scholar

Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen. 2017. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13). 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.Search in Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter. 1963. Some physiological parameters in speech. Language and Speech 6(3). 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096300600301.Search in Google Scholar

Lenth, Russell, Henrik Singmann, Jonathon Love, Paul Buerkner & Maxime Herve. 2020. Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (accessed January 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Leussen, Jan-Willem van & Paola Escudero. 2015. Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: The L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology 6. 1–12.10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01000Search in Google Scholar

Levy, Erika S. 2009a. Language experience and consonantal context effects on perceptual assimilation of French vowels by American-English learners of French. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125(2). 1138–1152. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3050256.Search in Google Scholar

Levy, Erika S. 2009b. On the assimilation-discrimination relationship in American English adults’ French vowel learning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126(5). 2670–2682. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3224715.Search in Google Scholar

Macmillan, Neil A. & C. Douglas Creelman. 2005. Detection theory: A user’s guide, 2nd edn. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2020. The R project for statistical computing. Version 4.1.2. https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed January 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Rallo Fabra, Lucrecia & Joaquín Romero. 2012. Native Catalan learners’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics 40(3). 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

So, Connie K. & Catherine T. Best. 2014. Phonetic influences on English and French listeners’ assimilation of Mandarin tones to native prosodic categories. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36(2). 195–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263114000047.Search in Google Scholar

Strange, Winifred, Miwako Hisagi, Reiko Akahane-Yamada & Rieko Kubo. 2011. Cross-language perceptual similarity predicts categorial discrimination of American vowels by naïve Japanese listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130(4). EL226–EL231. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3630221.Search in Google Scholar

Strange, Winifred, Erika S. Levy & Franzo F. Law. 2009. Cross-language categorization of French and German vowels by naïve American listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126(3). 1461–1476. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3179666.Search in Google Scholar

Styler, Will. 2015. Praat script: Duration matcher [software]. https://github.com/stylerw/styler_praat_scripts/blob/master/normalize_duration.praat (accessed January 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Tyler, Michael D., Catherine T. Best, Louis M. Goldstein & Mark Antoniou. 2014a. Investigating the role of articulatory organs and perceptual assimilation of native and non-native fricative place contrasts. Developmental Psychobiology 56(2). 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21195.Search in Google Scholar

Tyler, Michael, Saya Kawase & Mark Antoniou. 2014b. Does immersion experience reduce /r/-/l/ category overlap for Japanese learners of English? In Proceedings of the 15th Australasian International Speech Science and Technology Conference, 54–57.Search in Google Scholar

Werker, Janet F. & John S. Logan. 1985. Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics 37(1). 35–44. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03207136.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Xianghua, Murray J. Munro & Yue Wang. 2014. Tone assimilation by Mandarin and Thai listeners with and without L2 experience. Journal of Phonetics 46. 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.06.005.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Yuxiao & Xiaoxiang Chen. 2019. Within-organ contrast in second language perception: The perception of Russian initial /r-l/ contrast by Chinese learners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 146(2). EL117–EL123.10.1121/1.5120549Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Yuxiao, Xiaoxiang Chen & Qi Xiao. 2022. Cross-linguistic similarity in L2 speech learning: Evidence from the acquisition of Russian stop contrasts by Mandarin speakers. Second Language Research 38(1). 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319900919.Search in Google Scholar

Yanushevskaya, Irena & Daniel Bunčić. 2015. Russian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 45(2). 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025100314000395.Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, Min, Xiaoxiang Chen & Yuxiao Yang. 2021. The effects of native prosodic system and segmental context on Cantonese tone perception by Mandarin and Japanese listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149(6). 4214–4227. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0005274.Search in Google Scholar