Honey and the Indecency of Epicurus’ aurea dicta (DRN 3.12)

Bibliography

Lucrèce, De la nature, ed. A. Ernout, 2 vols., Paris 1966.Search in Google Scholar

Lucreti De Rerum Natura, ed. H. Paratore/H. Pizzani, Rome 1960.Search in Google Scholar

Lucretius, De Rerum Natura, Edited with Prolegomena, Critical Apparatus, Translations and Commentary by C. Bailey, 3 vols., Oxford 1947.Search in Google Scholar

Lucretius, De Rerum Natura Book III, ed. E. J. Kenney, Cambridge ²2014.Search in Google Scholar

Lucretius, On the Nature of Things, English Translation by A. M. Esolen, Baltimore 1995.10.56021/9780801850547Search in Google Scholar

T. Lucretii Cari De rerum natura libri sex, ed. G. Wakefield, 4 vols., Glasgow 1813.Search in Google Scholar

The Epigrams of Rufinus, Edited with an Introduction and Commentary by D. Page, Cambridge 1978.Search in Google Scholar

The Greek Anthology: Hellenistic Epigrams, ed. A. S. F. Gow/D. L. Page, 2 vols., Cambridge 1965.Search in Google Scholar

Virgil, Eclogues, Georgics, Aeneid I-IV, English Translation by H. R. Fairclough/G. P. Goold, Cambridge, MA ^rev1999.Search in Google Scholar

J. N. Adams, The Latin Sexual Vocabulary, Baltimore 1982.10.56021/9780801829680Search in Google Scholar

Z. Adorjáni, “Ambrosia and Kingship: On Callimachus, Hymn 2.38–41”, CQ 70, 2020, 171–176.10.1017/S0009838820000439Search in Google Scholar

E. Asmis, “Epicurean Poetics”, in: D. Obbink (ed.), Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace, Oxford 1995, 15–34.10.1093/oso/9780195088151.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

H. C. Baldry, “Who Invented the Golden Age?”, CQ 2, 1952, 83–92.10.1017/S0009838800007667Search in Google Scholar

H. C. Baldry, “The Idler’s Paradise in Attic Comedy”, G&R 22, 1953, 49–60.10.1017/S0017383500011773Search in Google Scholar

C. Barton, “Being in the Eyes: Shame and Sight in Ancient Rome”, in: D. Fredrick (ed.), The Roman Gaze: Vision, Power, and the Body, Baltimore 2002, 216–235.Search in Google Scholar

D. R. Blickman, “Lucretius, Epicurus, and Prehistory”, HSPh 92, 1989, 157–191.10.2307/311357Search in Google Scholar

P. Boyancé, “Lucrèce et la poésie”, REA 49, 1947, 88–102.10.3406/rea.1947.3364Search in Google Scholar

W. Brockliss, Homeric Imagery and the Natural Environment, Washington 2019.Search in Google Scholar

R. D. Brown, Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura IV, 1030–1287 with Prolegomena, Text, and Translation, Leiden 1987.10.1163/9789004450868Search in Google Scholar

G. Campbell, Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura Book Five, Lines 772–1104, Oxford 2003.Search in Google Scholar

R. D. Carlson, The Honey Bee and Apian Imagery in Classical Literature, Diss. University of Washington 2015.Search in Google Scholar

D. Clay, Lucretius and Epicurus, Ithaca 1983.Search in Google Scholar

D. Clay, “Framing the Margins of Philodemus and Poetry”, in: D. Obbink (ed.), Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace, Oxford 1995, 3–14.10.1093/oso/9780195088151.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

F. O. Copley, Exclusus Amator: A Study in Latin Love Poetry, Chico 1956.Search in Google Scholar

A. S. Cox, “Lucretius and His Message: A Study in the Prologues of the De Rerum Natura”, G&R 18, 1971, 1–16.10.1017/S0017383500017605Search in Google Scholar

A. Dale, “A Feast Fit for a Eunuch: Hipponax Frs. 26, 26 a, and Martial 3.77”, Phoenix 71, 2017, 215–229.10.1353/phx.2017.0021Search in Google Scholar

R. De Smet, “The Erotic Adventure of Lucius and Photis in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses”, Latomus 46, 1987, 613–623.Search in Google Scholar

M. Deufert, Kritischer Kommentar zu Lukrezens De rerum natura, Berlin 2018.10.1515/9783110479034Search in Google Scholar

H. Donohue, The Song of the Swan: Lucretius and the Influence of Callimachus, Lanham 1993.Search in Google Scholar

L. Fulkerson, “Lucretius and Sapphic voluptas”, in: T. S. Thorsen/S. Harrison (eds.), Roman Receptions of Sappho, Oxford 2019.10.1093/oso/9780198829430.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

M. Gale, Myth and Poetry in Lucretius, Cambridge 1994 a.Search in Google Scholar

M. Gale, “Lucretius 4.1–25 and the Proems of the De Rerum Natura”, PCPhS 40, 1994 b, 1–17.10.1017/S0068673500001796Search in Google Scholar

M. Gale, “Piety, Labour, and Justice in Lucretius and Hesiod”, in: D. Lehoux/A. D. Morrison/A. Sharrock (eds.), Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science, Oxford 2013, 25–50.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199605408.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

T. H. M. Gellar-Goad, Laughing Atoms, Laughing Matter: Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura and Satire, Ann Arbor 2020.10.3998/mpub.11378464Search in Google Scholar

P. Gordon, The Invention and Gendering of Epicurus, Ann Arbor 2012.10.3998/mpub.1826277Search in Google Scholar

G. M. Gruber, Medium and Message in Lucretius “Honey” Analogy, Diss. University of Iowa 2009.Search in Google Scholar

J. Henderson, The Maculate Muse: Obscene Language in Attic Comedy, Oxford ²1991.Search in Google Scholar

S. Holm, Honeyed Cups: Latent Didacticism in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura, Diss. Boston University 2013.Search in Google Scholar

P. A. Johnston, Vergil’s Agricultural Golden Age: A Study of the Georgics, Leiden 1980.10.1163/9789004327788Search in Google Scholar

P. Keyser, “Horace Odes 1.13.3–8, 14–16: Humoural and Aetherial Love”, Philologus 133, 1989, 75–81.10.1524/phil.1989.133.12.75Search in Google Scholar

H. A. Khan, “Catullus 99 and the Other Kiss-Poems”, Latomus 26, 1967, 609–618.Search in Google Scholar

D. Konstan, “Lucretius on Poetry: III.1–13”, ColbyQ 24, 1988, 65–70.10.1080/08893675.2011.549690Search in Google Scholar

D. Konstan, “A Pig Convicts Itself of Unreason: The Implicit Argument of Plutarch’s Gryllus”, Hyperboreus 16/17, 2010/2011, 371–385.Search in Google Scholar

D. Konstan, “Epicurean Happiness: A Pig’s Life?”, Journal of Ancient Philosophy 6, 2012, 1–24.10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v6i1p1-22Search in Google Scholar

D. Konstan/M. Dillon, “The Ideology of Aristophanes’ Wealth”, AJPh 102, 1981, 371–394.10.2307/294325Search in Google Scholar

L. Landolfi, “Patologia dell’eros e metaforesi in Lucrezio De rer. Nat. 4, 1058–1090”, PP 46, 2006, 87–109.Search in Google Scholar

L. B. Lawler, “Bee Dances and the “Sacred Bees””, Classical Weekly 47, 1954, 103–106.10.2307/4343554Search in Google Scholar

R. S. Liebert, “Apian Imagery and the Critique of Poetic Sweetness in Plato’s Republic”, TAPhA 140, 2010, 97–115.10.1353/apa.0.0042Search in Google Scholar

R. S. Liebert, Tragic Pleasure from Homer to Plato, Cambridge 2017.10.1017/9781316877036Search in Google Scholar

J. W. MacKail, Virgil’s Works, New York 1934.Search in Google Scholar

D. Marković, The Rhetoric of Explanation in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura, Leiden 2008.10.1163/ej.9789004167964.i-178Search in Google Scholar

M. McCosker, “Poetics”, in: P. Mitsis (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epicurus and Epicureanism, Oxford 2020, 347–376.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199744213.013.16Search in Google Scholar

P. Mitsis, “Committing Philosophy on the Reader: Didactic Coercion and Reader Autonomy in De Rerum Natura”, MD 31, 1993, 111–128.10.2307/40231041Search in Google Scholar

A. D. Morrison, “Arguing over Text(s): Master-Texts vs. Intertexts in the Criticism of Lucretius”, in: D. O’Rourke (ed.), Approaches to Lucretius: Traditions and Innovations in Reading the De Rerum Natura, Cambridge 2020, 157–176.10.1017/9781108379854.010Search in Google Scholar

J. S. Nethercut, “Provisional Argumentation and Lucretius’ Honeyed Cup”, CQ 68, 2019, 523–533.10.1017/S000983881800054XSearch in Google Scholar

S. G. Nugent, “Mater Matters: The Female in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura”, ColbyQ 30, 1994, 179–205.Search in Google Scholar

M. C. Nussbaum, “Erōs and Ethical Norms: Philosophers Respond to a Cultural Dilemma”, in: M. C. Nussbaum/J. Sihvola (eds.), Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome, Chicago 2002, 55–94.10.7208/chicago/9780226923314.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

D. Obbink (ed.), Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace, Oxford 1995.10.1093/oso/9780195088151.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

L. O’Hearn, “Juventius and the Summer of Youth in Catullus 48”, Mnemosyne 74, 2021, 111–123.10.1163/1568525X-12342780Search in Google Scholar

T. O’Keefe, “Lucretius and the Use of Literary Persuasion”, in: D. O’Rourke (ed.), Approaches to Lucretius: Traditions and Innovations in Reading the De Rerum Natura, Cambridge 2020, 177–194.10.1017/9781108379854.011Search in Google Scholar

H. N. Parker, “The Teratogenic Grid”, in: J. P. Hallett/M. B. Skinner (eds.), Roman Sexualities, Princeton 1997, 47–65.10.1515/9780691219547-004Search in Google Scholar

M. Pope, “Ocular Penetration, Grammatical Objectivity, and an Indecent Proposal in De Rerum Natura”, CPh 113, 2018 a, 206–212.10.1086/696823Search in Google Scholar

M. Pope, “Seminal Verse: Atomic Orality and Aurality in De Rerum Natura”, Eugesta 8, 2018 b, 108–130.10.54563/eugesta.442Search in Google Scholar

H. M. Roisman, “Nestor the Good Counsellor”, CQ 55, 2005, 17–38.10.1093/cq/bmi002Search in Google Scholar

R. Scodel, “The Story-Teller and his Audience”, in: R. Fowler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer, Cambridge 2004, 45–55.10.1017/CCOL0521813026.004Search in Google Scholar

C. Segal, Lucretius on Death and Anxiety: Poetry and Philosophy in De Rerum Natura, Princeton 1990.10.1515/9781400861293Search in Google Scholar

C. Segal, “Jupiter in Ovid’s Metamorphoses”, Arion 9, 2001, 78–99.Search in Google Scholar

D. Sider, “Epicurean Poetics: Response and Dialogue”, in: D. Obbink (ed.), Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace, Oxford 1995, 35–41.10.1093/oso/9780195088151.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

E. Sistakou, “Mock Epic in the Greek Anthology”, in: B. Acosta-Hugues/C. Cusset/Y. Durbec/D. Pralon (eds.), Homère revisité. Parodie et humour dans les réécritures homériques. Actes du colloque international, Aix-en-Provence 30–31 octobre 2008, Besançon 2011, 193–210.Search in Google Scholar

M. F. Smith, “Notes on Lucretius”, Sileno 11, 1985, 219–225.10.1002/jcp.1041240208Search in Google Scholar

M. C. Stokes, “A Lucretian Paragraph: III. 1–30”, in: G. M. Kirkwood (ed.), Poetry and Poetics from Ancient Greece to the Renaissance: Studies in Honor of James Hutton, Ithaca 1975, 91–104.Search in Google Scholar

M. Symons, Meals Matter: A Radical Economics through Gastronomy, New York 2020.10.7312/symo19602Search in Google Scholar

E. M. Thury, “Lucretius’ Poem as a Simulacrum of the Rerum Natura”, AJPh 108, 1987, 270–294.10.2307/294817Search in Google Scholar

M. E. Toomey, The Poet and the Bee in Classical Literature, Diss. Johns Hopkins University 2021.Search in Google Scholar

H. Usener, “Milch und Honig”, RhM 57, 1902, 177–195.Search in Google Scholar

K. Volk, The Poetics of Latin Didactic: Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius, Oxford 2002.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245505.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

C. Ware, Claudian and the Roman Epic Tradition, Cambridge 2012.10.1017/CBO9781139004152Search in Google Scholar

J. H. Waszink, Lucretius and Poetry, Amsterdam 1954.Search in Google Scholar

C. A. Williams, Roman Homosexuality, Oxford ²2010.Search in Google Scholar

G. Wöhrle, “Essen und Sexualität in der frühgriechischen, besonders iambischen Dichtung”, RhM 143, 2000, 113–118.Search in Google Scholar