Home Penthemimeral Elision in Tragic Trimeters
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Penthemimeral Elision in Tragic Trimeters

  • James T. Clark EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 1, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper provides a statistical survey of the incidence of elision at the penthemimeral caesura in the iambic trimeters of Greek tragedy. It updates and builds on the work of Descroix (1931) by considering the rates of elision of different types of words: lexicals, nonlexical polysyllables, and nonlexical monosyllables. While all tragedians elide less at the caesura than throughout the line, in Aeschylus the rate of this reduction is far greater for lexicals and polysyllabic nonlexicals than it is for monosyllabic nonlexicals. On this evidence, and the evidence of interlinear elision, it is tentatively suggested that lexicals and nonlexical polysyllables should together be considered as the more constrained elisions. When the rates of constrained elision are examined, the difference between Aeschylus and later Euripides is revealed to be twice that obtained when bulk figures are used. This difference is attributed to a combination of Euripides’ adoption of more fluent phrasing towards the end of his career and the tragedians’ different approaches to compositional constraints.

Bibliography

Aeschyli Septem quae supersunt tragoediae, ed. D. L. Page, Oxford 1972.Search in Google Scholar

Aeschylus, ed. and transl. by H. W. Smyth, Cambridge, MA 1922–1926.Search in Google Scholar

Eschyle, Les Suppliantes, Les Perses, Les Sept contre Thèbes, Prométhée enchaîné, ed. P. Mazon, Paris 1920.Search in Google Scholar

Euripidis Fabulae, ed. G. Murray, Oxford 1902–1909.Search in Google Scholar

Euripidis Fabulae, ed. J. Diggle, Oxford 1981–1994.Search in Google Scholar

Iambi et elegi Graeci ante Alexandrum cantati, ed. M. L. West, Oxford 1989–1992.Search in Google Scholar

Sophocles, The Plays and Fragments, ed. and transl. by R. C. Jebb, Cambridge 1892–1900.Search in Google Scholar

Sophoclis Fabulae, ed. H. Lloyd-Jones/N. G. Wilson, Revised impression, Oxford 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, vol. I, ed. B. Snell, editio correctior by R. Kannicht, Göttingen 1986.Search in Google Scholar

N. Baechle, Metrical Constraint and the Interpretation of Style in the Tragic Trimeter, Lanham, MD 2007.Search in Google Scholar

D. J. Butterfield, “The Tragic Trimeter”, CR 58, 2008, 350–352.10.1111/j.1939-3881.2008.00030.xSearch in Google Scholar

M. Cropp/G. Fick, Resolutions and Chronology in Euripides: The Fragmentary Tragedies, Oxford 1985.Search in Google Scholar

J. Descroix, Le trimètre iambique des iambographers a la comédie nouvelle, Macon 1931.Search in Google Scholar

A. M. Devine/L. D. Stephens, “The Greek Appositives. Toward a Linguistically Adequate Definition of Caesura and Bridge”, CP 73, 1978, 314–328.10.1086/366451Search in Google Scholar

A. M. Devine/L. D. Stephens, “Rules for Resolution. The Zielinskian Canon”, TAPA 110, 1980, 63–79.10.2307/284211Search in Google Scholar

A. M. Devine/L. D. Stephens, “A New Aspect of the Evolution of the Trimeter in Euripides”, TAPA 111, 1981, 43–64.10.2307/284118Search in Google Scholar

A. M. Devine/L. D. Stephens, “Towards a New Theory of Greek Prosody. The Suprasylabic Rules”, GRBS 22, 1982, 305–321.Search in Google Scholar

A. M. Devine/L. D. Stephens, “Semantics, Syntax, and Phonological Organization in Greek”, CP 78, 1983, 1–25.10.1086/366742Search in Google Scholar

A. M. Devine/L. D. Stephens, Language and Metre. Resolution, Porson’s Bridge, and Their Prosodic Basis, Chico, CA 1984.Search in Google Scholar

A. M. Devine/L. D. Stephens, The Prosody of Greek Speech, Oxford 1994.10.1093/oso/9780195085464.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

J. G. De Gooijer/N. M. Laan, “Change-Point Analysis. Elision in Euripides’ Orestes”, Computers and the Humanities 35, 2001, 167–191.10.1023/A:1002485208039Search in Google Scholar

M. Fantuzzi, The Rhesus Attributed to Euripides, Cambridge 2020.10.1017/9781139199032Search in Google Scholar

M. Griffith, The Authenticity of Prometheus Bound, Cambridge 1977.Search in Google Scholar

B. Hedin, The Phonological and Syntactic Conditioning of Elision in Greek, PhD diss. Stanford 2000.Search in Google Scholar

I. Hilberg, Das Prinzip der Silbenwägung und die daraus entspringenden Gesetze der Endsilben in der griechischen Poesie. Wien, 1879.Search in Google Scholar

H. D. F. Kitto, “Sophocles, Statistics, and the Trachinae”, AJP 60, 1939, 178–193.10.2307/291198Search in Google Scholar

N. M. Laan, “Stylometry and Method. The Case of Euripides”, Literary and Linguistic Computing 10, 1995, 271–278.10.1093/llc/10.4.271Search in Google Scholar

V. Liapis, A Commentary on the Rhesus Attributed to Euripides, Oxford 2012.Search in Google Scholar

P. Maas, Greek Metre, transl. by H. Lloyd-Jones, Oxford 1962.Search in Google Scholar

N. Manousakis, Prometheus Bound. A Separate Authorial Trace in the Aeschylean Corpus, Berlin 2020.10.1515/9783110687675Search in Google Scholar

M. D. Olcott, Metrical Variations in the Iambic Trimeter as a Function of Dramatic Technique in Sophocles’ Philoctetes and Ajax, PhD diss. Stanford 1974.Search in Google Scholar

W. Ritchie, The Authenticity of the Rhesus of Euripides, Oxford 1964.Search in Google Scholar

M. Van Raalte, Rhythm and Metre. Towards a Systematic Description of Greek Stichic Verse, Assen 1986.Search in Google Scholar

A. Vatri/B. McGillivray. “The Diorisis Ancient Greek Corpus”, Research Data Journal for the Humanities and Social Sciences 3, 2018, 55–65.10.1163/24523666-01000013Search in Google Scholar

M. L. West, Greek Metre, Oxford 1982 a.Search in Google Scholar

M. L. West, “Three Topics in Greek Metre”, CQ 32, 1982 b, 281–297.10.1017/S0009838800026458Search in Google Scholar

T. Zielinski, Tragodoumenon Libri Tres, Krakow 1925.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-12-01
Published in Print: 2021-11-04

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phil-2021-0104/html
Scroll to top button