Home The Allegory of the Cave, the Ending of the Republic, and the Stages of Moral Enlightenment
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Allegory of the Cave, the Ending of the Republic, and the Stages of Moral Enlightenment

  • Paul Hosle EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 6, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This essay aims to shed new light on the stages of moral enlightenment in the Allegory of the Cave, of which there are three. I focus on the two stages within the cave, represented by eikasia and pistis, and provide a phenomenological description of these two mental states. The second part of the essay argues that there is a structural parallelism between the Allegory of the Cave and the ending of the Republic. The parallelism can be convincingly demonstrated by a purely formal analysis, but additionally it complements and reinforces the original interpretation of the Cave, insofar as the ending of the Republic also mirrors, on the level of content, the previously adduced stages of moral enlightenment.

Acknowledgements

This article was improved by the comments of Vittorio Hösle and anonymous reviewers, whom I would like to thank. I bear the sole responsibility for any remaining shortcomings.

Bibliography

Plato, Republic. Revision of G. M. A. Grube’s translation with Introduction and Notes by C. D. C. Reeve, Indianapolis 1992.Search in Google Scholar

PlatonisRespublica, rec. S. R. Slings, Oxford 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Search in Google Scholar

J. Annas, “On the ‘Intermediates’”, AGPh 57, 1975, 146‒66.10.1515/agph.1975.57.2.146Search in Google Scholar

J. Annas, “Plato’s Myth of Judgement”, Phronesis 27, 1982, 119‒43.10.1163/156852882X00096Search in Google Scholar

J. M. Cooper, “Plato’s Theory of Human Motivation”, HPhQ 1, 1984, 3‒21.Search in Google Scholar

G. F. Else, The Structure and Date of Book 10 of Plato’s Republic, Heidelberg 1972.Search in Google Scholar

A. S. Ferguson, “Plato’s Simile of Light Again”, CQ 28, 1934, 190‒210.10.1017/S0009838800020024Search in Google Scholar

G. R. F. Ferrari, “Glaucon’s Reward, Philosophy’s Debt: The Myth of Er”, in: C. Partenie (ed.), Plato’s Myths, Cambridge 2009, 116‒33.Search in Google Scholar

G. Fine, “Knowledge and Belief in Republic 5–7”, in: G. Fine (ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, Oxford 1999, 215‒46.Search in Google Scholar

F. Fischer, “La nature formelle du symbolisme dans la caverne (République VII)”, LThPh 59, 2003, 35‒67.10.7202/000788arSearch in Google Scholar

K. Gaiser, “Platons Zusammenschau der mathematischen Wissenschaften”, A&A 32, 1986, 89‒124.10.1515/9783110241440.89Search in Google Scholar

F. J. Gonzalez, “Propositions or Objects? A Critique of Gail Fine on Knowledge and Belief in Republic V”, Phronesis 41, 1996, 245‒75.10.1163/156852896321051620Search in Google Scholar

F. J. Gonzalez, “Combating Oblivion: The Myth of Er as Both Philosophy’s Challenge and Inspiration”, in: C. Collobert/P. Destrée/F. J. Gonzalez (eds.), Plato and Myth. Studies on the Use and Status of Platonic Myths, Leiden 2012, 259‒78.10.1163/9789004224360Search in Google Scholar

D. Hall, “Interpreting Plato’s Cave as an Allegory of the Human Condition”, Apeiron 14, 1980, 74‒86.10.1515/APEIRON.1980.14.2.74Search in Google Scholar

T. Irwin, Plato’s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues, Oxford 1977.Search in Google Scholar

R. R. Johnson, “Does Plato’s Myth of Er Contribute to the Argument of the Republic?”, Ph&Rh 32, 1999, 1‒13.Search in Google Scholar

V. Karasmanis, “Plato’s Republic: the Line and the Cave”, Apeiron 21, 1988, 147‒71.10.1515/APEIRON.1988.21.3.147Search in Google Scholar

M. A. Lizano-Ordovás, “‘Eikasia’ und ‘Pistis’ in Platons Höhlengleichnis”, ZPhF 49, 1995, 378‒97.Search in Google Scholar

J. Malcolm, “The Line and the Cave”, Phronesis 7, 1962, 38‒45.10.1163/156852862X00025Search in Google Scholar

J. Malcolm, “The Cave Revisited”, CQ 31, 1981, 60‒8.10.1017/S0009838800021078Search in Google Scholar

J. S. Morrison, “Two Unresolved Difficulties in the Line and the Cave”, Phronesis 7, 1977, 212‒31.10.1163/156852877X00092Search in Google Scholar

J. Mouracade, “Pleasure, Desire, and Akrasia in Plato’s Republic”, Méthexis 28, 2016, 33‒46.10.1163/24680974-02801003Search in Google Scholar

N. R. Murphy, The Interpretation of Plato’s Republic, Oxford 1951.Search in Google Scholar

J. E. Raven, Plato’s Thought in the Making, Cambridge 1965.Search in Google Scholar

D. Scott, Levels of Argument: A Comparative Study of Plato’s Republic and Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Oxford 2015.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249640.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

C. Shields, “Unified Agency and Akrasia in Plato’s Republic”, in: C. Bobonich/P. Destrée (eds.), Akrasia in Greek Philosophy: From Socrates to Plotinus, Leiden 2007, 61‒86.10.1163/ej.9789004156708.i-308.22Search in Google Scholar

C. Strang, “Plato’s Analogy of the Cave”, OSAPh 4, 1986, 19‒34.Search in Google Scholar

T. A. Szlezák, “Das Höhlengleichnis (Buch VII 514a–521b und 539d–541b)”, in: O. Höffe (ed.), Platon: Politeia, Berlin 2011, 155‒73.10.1524/9783050089935.155Search in Google Scholar

J. Wilberding, “Prisoners and Puppeteers in the Cave”, OSAPh 27, 2004, 117‒39.10.1093/oso/9780199277124.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

J. R. S. Wilson, “The Contents of the Cave”, CJPh Supplementary Volume 2, 1976, 117‒27.10.1017/S0229705100003827Search in Google Scholar

F. Woerther, “Music and the Education of the Soul in Plato and Aristotle: Homoeopathy and the Formation of Character”, CQ 58, 2008, 89‒103.10.1017/S0009838808000074Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-06-06
Published in Print: 2020-06-03

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phil-2020-0103/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button