Abstract
This article represents an innovative perspective on the controversial issue of legitimacy of the “humanitarian military intervention” (HMI), by situating the normative debate into a quantitative perspective. It evaluates legitimacy of HMI by assessing a degree of “humanitarianism” behind the “motives and means” and the “outcomes” of military interventions from the post-WWII era. The “motives and means” of the interveners are evaluated based on the theoretical framework of the Just War Theory (JWT), more particularly based on the quantified “jus ad bellum” JWT criteria; and they are compared with the existence of “humanitarian outcomes” of these interventions in the light of consequentialist ethics. An overall goal is to generate a comprehensive picture of the dynamics and relationships within the HMI concept based on the empirical evidence.
References
Barbieri, K., Keshk, O., Pollins, B., (2008), Correlates of War Project Trade Data Set Codebook, Version 2.0.Search in Google Scholar
Bartholomew, D., Knott, M., Moustaki, I., (2011), Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis: A Unified Approach (3rd ed.), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, United Kingdom.10.1002/9781119970583Search in Google Scholar
Bates, R.H., Epstein, D.L., Goldstone, J.A., Gurr, T.R., Harff, B., Kahl, C.H., Knight, K., Levy, M.A., Lustik, M., Marshall, M.G., Parris, T.M., Ulfelder J., Woodward, M.R., (2003), Political Instability Task Force Report: Phase IV Findings, Science Applications International Corporation, McLean, VA.Search in Google Scholar
Bauhaug, H., (2005), Dangerous Dyads Revisited: Democracies May Not Be That Peaceful After All, Conflict Management and Peace Science, vol. 22, pp. 95–111.Search in Google Scholar
Beck, N., Katz, J.N., (1997), What To Do (and not to do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data and/or the Democratic Peace, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of The Political Methodology Group, Columbus, OH.Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, D.S., Stam, A., (2000), EUGene: A Conceptual Manual, International Interactions, vol. 26, pp. 179–204, available at: http://www.eugenesoftware.org.10.1080/03050620008434965Search in Google Scholar
Benoit, K., (1996), Democracies Really are more Pacific (in general): Reexamining Regime Type and War Involvement, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 646–657.Search in Google Scholar
Cederman, L.-E., Hug, S., Krebs, L.F., (2007), Democratization and Civil War: Empirical Evidence, Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Workshop Disaggregating the Study of Civil War and Transnational Violence at University of Essex, UK, November, pp. 24–25.Search in Google Scholar
Damrosch, L.F., (1993), Enforcing Restraint: Collection Intervention in Internal Conflicts (ed.), Council to Foreign Relations Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Elbadawi, A.I., Sambanis, N., (2000), External Interventions and the Duration of Civil Wars, World Bank Policy Research Paper 2433.10.1596/1813-9450-2433Search in Google Scholar
Fearon, D.J., (1991), Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science, World Politics, vol. 43, pp. 169–195.Search in Google Scholar
Finnemore, M., (2003), The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Flöter, A., Lujala, P., Rød, J.K., (2007), The Gemstone Dataset, Mimeo, Department of Geography. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.Search in Google Scholar
Gibler, M.D., Sarkees, M., (2004), Measuring Alliances: The Correlates of War Formal Interstate Alliance Data set, 1816-2000, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 211–222.Search in Google Scholar
Gilmore, E., Gleditsch, N.P., Lujala, P., Rød, J.K., (2005), Conflict Diamonds: A New Dataset, Conflict Management and Peace Science, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 257–292.Search in Google Scholar
Gleditsch, N.P.; Wallensteen, P., Eriksson, M., Sollenberg, M., Strand, H., (2002), Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 615–637.Search in Google Scholar
Goertz, G., Diehl, P.F., (1995), The Initiation and Termination of Enduring Rivalries: The Impact of Political Shocks, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 39, pp. 30–52.Search in Google Scholar
Hahn, J., Ham, J.C., Moon, H.R., (2011), The Hausman Test and Weak Instruments, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 289–299.Search in Google Scholar
Harcourt, W.V., (1863), Letters by Historicus on Some Questions of International Law, (Reprinted from The Times with considerable additions). Macmillan, London.Search in Google Scholar
Harhoff, F., (2001), Unauthorized Humanitarian Interventions – Armed Violence in the Name of Humanity? Nordic Journal of International Law, vol. 70, no. 1–2, pp. 65–119.Search in Google Scholar
Hehir, B.J. (1995), Expanding Military Intervention: Promise or Peril? Social Research, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 41–51.Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S., (1998), World Disorders: Troubled Peace in the Post–Cold War Era, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Md.Search in Google Scholar
Hubert, D., Weis, T.G., (2001), The Responsibility to Protect: Supplementary Volume to the Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, International Development Research Centre, Canada.Search in Google Scholar
Kisangani, F.E., Pickering, J., (2007), International Military Intervention, 1989-2005 [Computer file], Kansas State University [producer], Manhattan, KS.10.3886/ICPSR21282Search in Google Scholar
Lacina, B. Gleditsch, N.P., (2005), Monitoring Trends in Global Combat: A New Dataset of Battle Deaths, European Journal of Population, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 145–166.Search in Google Scholar
Lebow, R.N., (2000), What’s So Different About a Counterfactual? World Politics, vol. 52, pp. 580–581.Search in Google Scholar
Lujala, P., Rød, J.K., Thieme, N., (2007), Fighting over Oil: Introducing A New Dataset, Conflict Management and Peace Science, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 239–256.Search in Google Scholar
Marshall, G.M., (1999), Third World War: System, Process, and Conflict Dynamics, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD.Search in Google Scholar
Minorities at Risk Project, (2005), Minorities at Risk Dataset, Center for International Development and Conflict Management, College Park, MD.Search in Google Scholar
Parekh, B., (1997), Rethinking Humanitarian Intervention, International Political Science Review, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 55–74.Search in Google Scholar
Pearson, S.F., Baumann, R.A., (1992), International Military Intervention, 1946-1988 [Computer file], University of Missouri-St. Louis, Center for International Studies [producer], St. Louis, MO.Search in Google Scholar
Rantner, S.R., (1995), The New UN Peacekeeping: Building Peace in Lands of Conflict after the Civil War, St. Martin’s Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Regan, M.P., (2000), Civil Wars and Foreign Powers: Interventions and Intrastate Conflict, University of Michigan Press, Michigan.10.3998/mpub.16706Search in Google Scholar
Regan, M.P., (2002), Third-party Interventions and the Duration of Intrastate Conflicts, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 55–73.Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, L., Hofmann, C.-A., (2004), Assessing the Impact of Humanitarian Assistance in the Health Sector, Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–9.Search in Google Scholar
Rummel, R.J., (1970), Applied Factor Analysis, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.Search in Google Scholar
Ryter, M.-A., (2003), Motives for Humanitarian Intervention and the International Community, Research Report No. 2(23). National Defense College, Helsinki.Search in Google Scholar
Seybolt, B.T., (2007), Humanitarian Military Interventions: The Conditions for Success and Failure, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Singer, J.D., Bremer, S., Stuckey, J., (1972), Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820-1965, in Russett, B., (ed.), Peace, War, and Numbers, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 19–48.Search in Google Scholar
Teorell, J., Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., (2007), The Quality of Government Dataset, version 1 July07, The Quality of Government Institute, Göteborg University.Search in Google Scholar
Tesón, F., (2005), Humanitarian Intervention: An Inquiry into Law and Morality (2nd+3rd ed.), Transnational Publishers, Irvington, New York.10.1163/9789004479791Search in Google Scholar
UN Population Division, (2006), UN World Population Prospects (2006 Revision), available at: http://www.un.org/esa/population/unpop.htm.Search in Google Scholar
UN Secretary General, (2009), Report on the Implementation of the Responsibility to Protect (A/63/677).Search in Google Scholar
UN World Summit, (2005), World Summit Outcome (A/RES/60/1), paragraphs 138 and 139.Search in Google Scholar
Voon, T., (2002), Closing the Gap between Legitimacy and Legality of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from East Timor and Kosovo, UCLA Journal of International Law & Foreign Affairs, vol. 7, pp. 31–98.Search in Google Scholar
Walzer, M., (1997), Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (2nd and 3rd ed.), Harper Collins, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Wheeler, N.J., (2000), Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Wheeler, N.J. (2001), The Legality of NATO’s Intervention in Kosovo, in Booth, K., (ed.), The Kosovo Tragedy: The Human Rights Dimensions, Frank Cass, London.Search in Google Scholar
Wimmer, A., Cederman, L.-E., Min, B., (2009), Ethnic Politics and Armed Conflict. A Configurational Analysis of A New Global Dataset, American Sociological Review, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 316–337. Downloaded from: ‘Replication data and publications’, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/13825UNF:5:SmiRXYaARiznnVH0DtoDoQ==V1[Version].10.1177/000312240907400208Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- A New Look at Weak State Conditions and Genocide Risk
- Piqueteros: An Experimental Analysis of Direct vs. Indirect Reciprocity
- Increasing Natural Resource Rents from Farmland: A Curse or a Blessing for the Rural Poor?
- Governments, Rebels, and the Use of Child Soldiers in Internal Armed Conflicts: A Global Analysis, 1987–2007
- Legitimacy of the “Humanitarian Military Intervention”: An Empirical Assessment
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- A New Look at Weak State Conditions and Genocide Risk
- Piqueteros: An Experimental Analysis of Direct vs. Indirect Reciprocity
- Increasing Natural Resource Rents from Farmland: A Curse or a Blessing for the Rural Poor?
- Governments, Rebels, and the Use of Child Soldiers in Internal Armed Conflicts: A Global Analysis, 1987–2007
- Legitimacy of the “Humanitarian Military Intervention”: An Empirical Assessment