Abstract
The immediate aftermath of an armed conflict is a key window of opportunity to build sustainable peace and security. Whether and how violence arises during that time has profound effects on a country’s political and economic development. Yet, conceptualizing post-conflict violence has remained elusive. Much of this difficulty arises because post-conflict violence is a liminal phenomenon with a dual nature: it emerges during transitions from war to peace and is a combination of new strategic incentives and wartime organizational legacies. This paper contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of post-conflict violence with a theory-grounded typology, based on two axes: strategic aims (predatory, constructive) and degrees of cooperation (directed, coordinated, spontaneous). The premise of this categorizing effort is that with a more solid grasp of the mechanisms driving post-conflict violence and its variation we can design more suitable policies to lower its incidence.
- 1
I agree with Suhrke (Suhrke and Berdal 2012) that “post-conflict violence” is an oxymoron and therefore the term “postwar violence” is more appropriate. I follow the established convention in academia and practice, however, and use the two expressions interchangeably.
- 2
Extended versions of this idea are in Grandi, 2012 and Grandi, 2013.
- 3
As a result, post-conflict violence lies at the margin of existing datasets. The COW Project and the UCDP/PRIO do not account for violence happening outside an “armed conflict.” The UCDP One-sided Violence Dataset, the UCDP Geo-referenced Event Dataset, the CIRI Human Rights Dataset, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Homicide Statistics, and the World Bank Death Rate Dataset are closer to capture the phenomenon of post-conflict violence, but alone cannot provide the full picture as they cover only killings, by specific armed groups, and their timeframes are not always limited to the aftermath of a war. The first and the second datasets measure “the use of armed force by a state’s government or by a formally organized group against civilians” (Sundberg, 2009). The third looks at “killings by government officials without due process of law.” The fourth covers the “unlawful death purposefully inflicted on a person by another person.” The fifth collects crude death rates, or “the number of deaths per year, per 1000 people.”
- 4
Defining the immediate aftermath of a conflict may be difficult to operationalize from an empirical lens and using any threshold (e.g., 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, etc.) to capture this may seem arbitrary. However, a 2-year cut-off point seems reasonable as this coincides with the scope conditions of the theoretical framework suggested in this paper. I follow the UCDP definition, according to which a conflict is terminated “each time [it] fails to reach the level of inclusion in one calendar year,” i.e., the 25 battle-related deaths criteria. This can occur “by any of the following events: 1) victory; 2) peace agreement; 3) ceasefire agreement; 4) low activity; 5) no activity; or 6) other (see: www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/definitions; emphasis added).
- 5
Similarly, Tilly (2003, 13–15) juxtaposes leaders of centralized organizations guiding followers and drunken sailors scuffling with military police to distinguish different types of “interpersonal violence” by “the extent of coordination among violence actors.” In other words, there is a qualitative difference between private and public violence. As Boyle (in Suhrke, 2012, 98–99) puts it, “revenge” and “reprisal” violence differ because the latter has “communicative aims” geared toward a public audience.
- 6
My use of the term “revolution” is less demanding than Skocpol’s (1979) “both a change in state institutions and a change in social structures.”
- 7
Instead, in post-Dayton Yugoslavia, the ethnic, territorial, and political partition of Bosnia Herzegovina was not challenged through violent means (Berdal, in: Suhkre and Berdal 2012: 76).
I thank Corinna Jentzsch, Stathis Kalyvas, Omar Wasow, and Elisabeth Wood for useful comments and editor Tobias Böhmelt for thorough guidance.
Amnesty International, (2011), Detention Abuses Staining the New Libya, Report, London.Search in Google Scholar
Annan, J., Blattman, C., Mazurana, D., Carlson, K., (2011), Civil War, Reintegration, and Gender in Northern Uganda, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 55, no.6, pp. 877–908.Search in Google Scholar
Archer, D., Gartner, R., (1984), Violence and Crime in Cross-national Perspective, Yale University Press, New Haven.Search in Google Scholar
Arthur, P., (2011), Identities in Transition: Challenges for Transitional Justice in Divided Societies, Cambridge University Press, New York.10.1017/CBO9780511976858Search in Google Scholar
Autesserre, S., (2010), The Trouble with the Congo: Local Violence and the Failure of International Peacebuilding, Cambridge University Press, New York.10.1017/CBO9780511761034Search in Google Scholar
Berdal, M., (2009), Building Peace after War, The International Institute for Strategic Studies, Routledge, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Berdal, M., Ucko, D., (eds.) (2009), Reintegrating Armed Groups After Conflict: Politics, Violence and Transition, Routledge, New York.10.4324/9780203876497Search in Google Scholar
Boyle, M.J., (2009), Explaining Strategic Violence after Wars, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, vol. 32, no.3, pp. 209–236.Search in Google Scholar
Boyle, M.J., (2010), Revenge and Reprisal Violence in Kosovo, Conflict, Security and Development, vol. 10, no.2, pp. 189–216.Search in Google Scholar
Brancati, D., Snyder, J.L., (2011), Rushing to the Polls: The Causes of Premature Postconflict Elections, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 55, no.3, pp. 469–492.Search in Google Scholar
Call, C., (2007), Constructing Justice and Security after War, US Institute of Peace Press, Washington, DC.Search in Google Scholar
Chetail, V., (2009), Post-conflict Peacebuilding, Oxford Uniniversity Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Darby, J., Mac Ginty, R., (eds.) (2008), Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Peace Processes and Post-war Reconstruction, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Dodge, T., (2012), Enemy Images. Coercive Socio-Engineering and Civil War in Iraq, International Peacekeeping, vol. 19, no.4, pp. 461–477.Search in Google Scholar
Doyle, M.W., Sambanis, N., (2006), Making War and Building Peace United Nations Peace Operations, Princeton University Press, Princeton.10.1515/9781400837694Search in Google Scholar
Doyle, M.W., Johnstone, I., Orr, R.C., (1997), Keeping the Peace Multidimensional UN Operations in Cambodia and El Salvador, Cambridge University Press, New York.10.1017/CBO9780511558986Search in Google Scholar
Duclos, N., (ed.) (2012), War veterans in postwar situations: Chechnya, Serbia, Turkey, Peru, and Cote d’Ivoire, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.10.1057/9781137109743Search in Google Scholar
Dunnage, J., (ed.) (1999), After the War: Violence, Justice, Continuity and Renewal in Italian Society, Papers Given at the Contemporary History Conference, “After the War was Over”, University of Sussex, July 1996, Troubador Publishing, Market Harborough.Search in Google Scholar
Dunning, T., (2011), Fighting and Voting: Violent Conflict and Electoral Politics, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 55, no.3, pp. 327–339.Search in Google Scholar
Einsiedel, S., Malone, D., Pradhan, S., (eds.) (2012), Nepal in Transition. From People’s War to Fragile Peace, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139021869Search in Google Scholar
Fortna, V.P., (2004), Peace Time Cease-fire Agreements and the Durability of Peace, Princeton University Press, Princeton.10.1515/9780691187952Search in Google Scholar
Grandi, F., (2012), What Can Italy Teach us about Post-conflict Violence?, Italian Politics and Society, no.70, pp. 55–67.Search in Google Scholar
Grandi, F., (2013), Why do the Victors Kill the Vanquished? Explaining Political Violence in Post-World War II Italy, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 50, no.5, pp. 577–593.Search in Google Scholar
Herreros, F., (2011), Peace of Cemeteries: Civil War Dynamics in Postwar States’ Repression, Politics and Society, vol. 39, no.2, pp. 175–202.Search in Google Scholar
Ikenberry, J., (2001), After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, Princeton University Press, Princeton.10.1515/9781400823963Search in Google Scholar
International Rescue Committee, (2012), Let Me Not Die Before My Time. Domestic Violence in West Africa, Report, New York/Washington, DC.Search in Google Scholar
Krause, K., (2005), Peace, Security and Development in Post-Conflict Environments. Security Dialogue, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 447–462.10.1177/0967010605060449Search in Google Scholar
Kritz, N., (ed.) (1995), Transitional Justice, US Institute of Peace Press, Washington, DC.Search in Google Scholar
Lawrence, A., (2010), Triggering Nationalist Violence: Competition and Conflict in Uprisings against Colonial Rule, International Security, vol. 35, no.2, pp. 88–122.Search in Google Scholar
Lyons, T., (2005), Demilitarizing Politics: Elections on the Uncertain Road to Peace, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder.10.1515/9781588269676Search in Google Scholar
Mobekk, E., (2006), Transitional Justice and Security Sector Reform: Enabling Sustainable Peace, Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, Geneva.Search in Google Scholar
Muggah, R., (2005), No Magic Bullet: A Critical Perspective on Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration and Weapons Reduction in Post-conflict Contexts, The Round Table, vol. 94, no.379, pp. 239–252.Search in Google Scholar
Muggah, R., (ed.) (2009), Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction. Dealing with Fighters in the Aftermath of War, Routledge, New York.10.4324/9780203886915.ch1Search in Google Scholar
Özerdem, A., (2009), Post-war Recovery: Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, I. B. Tauris, London.10.5040/9780755620302Search in Google Scholar
Paris, R., (2004), At War’s End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict, Cambridge University Press, New York.10.1017/CBO9780511790836Search in Google Scholar
Paris, R., Sisk, T., (2009), The Dilemmas of Statebuilding: Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations, Routledge, New York.10.4324/9780203884836Search in Google Scholar
Petersen, R.D., (2002), Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred, and Resentment in Twentieth-century Eastern Europe, Cambridge University Press, New York.10.1017/CBO9780511840661Search in Google Scholar
Porto, J.G., Alden, C., Parsons, I., (2007), From Soldiers to Citizens. Demilitarization of Conflict and Society, Ashgate Publishing, Farmham.Search in Google Scholar
Quinn, J.R., (2009), Reconciliation(s): Transitional Justice in Postconflict Societies, McGill-Queen’s Press, Montreal.Search in Google Scholar
Rice, A., (2009), The Teeth May Smile but the Heart does not Forget. Murder and Memory in Uganda, Metropolitan Books, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, N., Mariezcurrena, J., (eds.) (2006), Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth Versus Justice, Cambridge University Press, New York.10.1017/CBO9780511617911Search in Google Scholar
Sisk, T.D., (2008), Elections in Fragile States: Between Voice and Violence, Paper Prepared for The International Studies Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, California, March 24–28, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
Skocpol, T., (1979), States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China, Cambridge University Press, New York.10.1017/CBO9780511815805Search in Google Scholar
Smith, T., Offit, T., (2010), Confronting Violence in Postwar Guatemala: An Introduction, The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, vol. 15, no.1, 1–15.Search in Google Scholar
Suhrke, A., Berdal, M.R., (2012), The Peace in between: Post-war Violence and Peacebuilding, Routledge, New York.10.4324/9780203808924Search in Google Scholar
Sundberg, R., (2009), Revisiting One-sided Violence. A Global and Regional Analysis, Uppsala Conflict Data Program, Paper no.3.Search in Google Scholar
Teitel, R., (2000), Transitional Justice, Oxford University Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Themner, A., (2011), Violence in Post-conflict Societies. Remarginalization, Remobilizers, and Relationships, Routledge, New York.10.4324/9780203814598Search in Google Scholar
Tilly, C., (2003), The Politics of Collective Violence, Cambridge University Press, New York.10.1017/CBO9780511819131Search in Google Scholar
United Nations Secretary-General, (2004), The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-conflict Societies. Report to the Security Council.Search in Google Scholar
Wallander, C., (2000), Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO after the Cold War, International Organization, vol. 54, no.4, pp. 705–735.Search in Google Scholar
Weitekamp, E.G.M., Kerner, H.-J., (2002), Restorative Justice: Theoretical Foundations, Willan Publishing, Cullompton.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, M., Nagy, R., Elster, J., (eds.) (2012), Transitional Justice, New York University Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Wood, E.J., (2003), Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador, Cambridge University Press, New York.10.1017/CBO9780511808685Search in Google Scholar
Wood, E.J., (2006), Variation in Sexual Violence during War, Politics Society, vol. 34, no.3, pp. 307–341.Search in Google Scholar
Zinecker, H., (2006), Violence in Peace: Forms and Causes of Postwar Violence in Guatemala, Peace Research Institute, Frankfurt.Search in Google Scholar
Datasets
CIRI: http://www.humanrightsdata.org/index.asp;
UCDP: www.ucdp.uu.se/;
PRIO: http://www.prio.no/Data/Armed-Conflict/
UNODC: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/homicide.html
WB: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.CDRT.IN?page=5
©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Masthead
- Introduction
- International Relations
- Major Power Status (In)Consistency and Political Relevance in International Relations Studies
- New Incentives and Old Organizations: The Production of Violence After War
- When the Weak Roar: Understanding Protracted Intrastate Conflict
- Determinants of Extremism
- You Shall Not Overkill: Substitution Between Means of Group Removal
- Does Higher Education Decrease Support for Terrorism?
- The Curvilinear Effects of Economic Development on Domestic Terrorism
- Regional Dimensions of Somali Piracy and Militant Islamism: Anthropological and Econometric Evidence
- Institutions Factors and Violence
- Climate Change and the Risk of Mass Violence: Africa in the 21st Century
- Constitutional Design and Conflict Management in Africa
- An Overview of the Influence of Domestic Constraints on Crisis Initiation and Termination
- Consequences of War and Militarization
- Macroeconomic Consequences of War and Terrorism in Lebanon
- A Note on War and Fiscal Capacity in Developing Countries
- On Defence Expenditure Reduction: Balancing Between Austerity and Security in Greece
- North Korea as a Military Dictatorship
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Masthead
- Introduction
- International Relations
- Major Power Status (In)Consistency and Political Relevance in International Relations Studies
- New Incentives and Old Organizations: The Production of Violence After War
- When the Weak Roar: Understanding Protracted Intrastate Conflict
- Determinants of Extremism
- You Shall Not Overkill: Substitution Between Means of Group Removal
- Does Higher Education Decrease Support for Terrorism?
- The Curvilinear Effects of Economic Development on Domestic Terrorism
- Regional Dimensions of Somali Piracy and Militant Islamism: Anthropological and Econometric Evidence
- Institutions Factors and Violence
- Climate Change and the Risk of Mass Violence: Africa in the 21st Century
- Constitutional Design and Conflict Management in Africa
- An Overview of the Influence of Domestic Constraints on Crisis Initiation and Termination
- Consequences of War and Militarization
- Macroeconomic Consequences of War and Terrorism in Lebanon
- A Note on War and Fiscal Capacity in Developing Countries
- On Defence Expenditure Reduction: Balancing Between Austerity and Security in Greece
- North Korea as a Military Dictatorship