Abstract
Owing to the relevance of fluorescently labeled carbohydrates in the study of biological processes, we have investigated several routes for the preparation of saccharides covalently linked to borondipyrromethene (BODIPY) fluorophores. We have shown that BODIPY dyes can be used as aglycons through synthetic saccharide protocols. In particular, a per-alkylated 8-(2-hydroxy-methylphenyl)-4,4′-dicyano-BODIPY derivative, which withstands glycosylation and protection/deprotection reaction conditions without decomposition, has been used in the stepwise synthesis of two fluorescently labeled trisaccharides. These saccharides displayed high water solubility and a low tendency to (H-)aggregation, a phenomenon that causes loss of photophysical efficiency in BODIPYs. Two additional synthetic strategies toward glyco-BODIPYs have also been described. The first method relies on a Ferrier-type C-glycosylation of the BODIPY core, leading to linker-free carbohydrate–BODIPY hybrids. Secondly, the application of the Nicholas propargylation reaction to 1,3,5,7-tetramethyl BODIPYs provides access to 2,6-dipropargylated BODIPYs that readily undergo CuAAC reactions with azido-containing sugars. From a photophysical standpoint, the BODIPY-labeled saccharides could be used as stable and fluorescent water-soluble chromophores, thereby addressing one of the current challenges in molecular imaging.
Introduction
After several decades of investigations, the importance of carbohydrates in biological processes has become evident [1]. Some examples can be found in intercellular carbohydrate–receptor interactions that are crucial for physiological events, e.g., cell–cell adhesion and cell differentiation, and they are also very relevant in some pathological processes, e.g., cancer metastasis and bacterial infection [2, 3]. In this context, glycosylation continues to be a central and challenging reaction in carbohydrate chemistry since it allows access to saccharides. However, the synthesis of oligosaccharides is intrinsically complicated since the glycosylation of a donor, i.e., 1 (Scheme 1), with a carbohydrate acceptor, i.e., 2 (Scheme 1) entails, at least, diastereo- and regio-selectivity issues. Chemoselectivity might also be a concern in cases where activatable anomeric leaving groups (LVG) are present on both components. Classically, the question of regioselectivity has been solved by using hydroxyl-protecting groups so that only the desired OH group is exposed to the glycosyl donor.

Glycosyl coupling and the different selectivities involved.
n-Pentenyl 1,2-orthoesters in regioselective glycosylations
Some years ago, in collaboration with Prof. Fraser-Reid’s group, we addressed the issue of regioselectivity in the glycosyl coupling of monosaccharide polyols with n-pentenyl 1,2-orthoester glycosyl donors (NPOE), e.g., 4 (Fig. 1) [4], aiming at simplifying the synthetic protocols toward oligosaccharides by reducing the number of protection/deprotection steps. In this context, we found that NPOEs selectively glycosylated primary alcohols in the presence of secondary hydroxyl groups in several primary/secondary diol acceptors [5].

NPOE glycosyl donor 4 and methyl mannopyranoside triol acceptors 5, 6, and 7. The more reactive hydroxyl groups in the glycosylation reactions with NPOE 4 are indicated with an arrow.
We observed a similar selectivity trend in the glycosylation of three different mannopyranoside-triol acceptors, i.e., 5, 6, and 7 (Fig. 1) [6].
Thus, the reaction of 3,4,6-triols, e.g., 5, and 2,4,6-triols, e.g., 6 (Fig. 1), with NPOE 4, resulted in the selective glycosylation of their primary hydroxyl group. We also observed a remarkable selectivity in the glycosylation of 2,3,4 mannopyranoside triols, e.g., 7, containing three secondary hydroxyl groups, with glycosyl donor 4 (Fig. 1) [6].
Methyl 1,2-orthoesters as glycosyl donors
In line with our findings with NPOEs, we reinvestigated the use of 1,2-methyl orthoesters (MeOEs), e.g., 8 (Fig. 2), as glycosyl donors where the inexpensive methanol had replaced n-pentenyl alcohol, as the alcohol component of the 1,2-orthoesters [7]. These derivatives had previously been studied by Kochetkov’s group [8]. Nevertheless, we found that, under the agency of boron trifluoride etherate as the promotor, MeOEs were able to glycosylate mannose-derived diols and triols in good yields. The observed regioselectivities in these glycosylations were also excellent and similar to that previously observed with NPOEs [9].

Methyl 1,2-orthoesters 8a–c, and recent depiction of PI-88 as a mixture of compounds 9–12. n-Pentenyl glycoside 13, used as the reducing-end component.
Regioselective synthesis of PI-88 analogs
More recently, to validate MeOEs as useful glycosyl donors in oligosaccharide synthesis, we turned our attention to PI-88 (aka muparfostat) [10], the first heparanase inhibitor [11] to progress to the clinic [12]. Thus, PI-88 reached phase III clinical trials for post-resection hepatocellular carcinoma, however, it failed to be approved for use [13].
PI-88 consists of a complex mixture of monophosphorylated polysulfated mannose saccharides, recently depicted as 9 and 12 (Fig. 2), by Ferro and coworkers [14, 15]. Among them, the major components are the α-(1 → 3)/α-(1 → 2)-linked penta-10 (∼60 %) and tetrasaccharide 11 (30 %) derivatives (Fig. 2) [16, 17]. All α-(1 → 3) linked mannoses, i.e. 12 (Fig. 2), were also present although in minor amounts [14, 15].
We explored several synthetic routes to the penta- and tetrasaccharide analog components of PI-88 based on regioselective glycosylations with MeOEs 8 [18]. In all the routes investigated, we employed n-pentenyl glycoside (NPG) 13 [19] as the reducing-end component. In the ensuing derivatives, the terminal double bond in the anomeric pentenyl group could be used in additional conjugation events. [20] In addition, MeOEs could be selectively activated in the presence of NPG glycosides.
One of these routes is depicted in Scheme 2. Thus, chemoselective glycosylation of NPG 13 with MeOE 8a yielded a tri-O-benzoyl disaccharide intermediate (67 % yield), which after de-O-benzoylation and selective mono-silylation – at the primary hydroxyl group – furnished triol disaccharide 14. Chemo- and regioselective glycosylation of 14, at its 3′OH group, with MeOE disaccharide 15 allowed access to tetrasaccharide 16 (63 % yield). The latter was then de-O-benzoylated to heptaol tetramannoside 17, which could be regioselectively glycosylated at its 3′′′OH with MeOE 8b to yield n-pentenyl pentamannoside 18.

Synthetic route to tetra- and pentasaccharide PI-88 analogs 16 and 18, respectively, by regioselective glycosylations of mannose polyols with MeOEs 8.
Regioselective synthesis of BODIPY glycosides as PI-88 analogs
The use of small organic fluorescent molecules has significantly contributed to recent developments in chemical biology and biomedicine when used in combination with fluorescence spectroscopy, or microscopy, detection techniques [21, 22]. In this context, using BODIPY fluorophores in combination with carbohydrates has proven to be especially useful in bio-applications [23], [24], [25]. Along this line, we decided to evaluate the possibility of incorporating BODIPY aglycon 19a (Scheme 3a, rather than n-pentenyl alcohol) into the synthesis of PI-88 analogs. BODIPY 19a had been shown to display remarkable photophysical properties [26, 27]. Our synthetic route to 19a involved a one-pot transformation using phthalide and pyrrole as the starting materials, followed by in situ coordination with BF3.Et2O (Scheme 3a) [28]. A slight variation of the aforementioned protocol, replacing BF3.Et2O by B(Ph)3 in the coordination step allowed us access to B-Ph2 BODIPY 19b (Scheme 3b). Indeed, the chemical substitution of the fluorine atoms by phenyl groups at boron had been reported to increase the chemical stability of the ensuing BODIPYs [29], which proved to be useful in our synthesis of the PI-88-BODIPY analogs, vide infra.

Synthesis of BODIPYs 19a and 19b (a, b). Attempted glycosylation/deprotection of BODIPY 19a (c). Synthetic route to BODIPY containing tetrasaccharide PI-88 analog 24 from BODIPY 19b (d, e).
Thus, even though glycosylation of 19a with MeOE 8a yielded the sought BODIPY glycoside 20, its saponification under different reaction conditions failed to yield the desired 2-OH mannopyranoside. Instead, depending on the reaction conditions employed, compounds 21a or 21b, where the fluorine atoms at boron have been replaced by methoxy groups, were obtained (Scheme 3c) [30]. Fortunately, glycosylation of BODIPY 19b with MeOE 8a followed by de-O-benzoylation, led to the desired 2-OH mannopyranoside 22 that underwent a subsequent glycosylation reaction with MeOE 8a to furnish BODIPY disaccharide 23a in moderate yield (Scheme 3d).
Protecting group manipulations in disaccharide 23a, involving saponification and monosilylation of the primary hydroxyl group, paved the way to 2′,3′,4′-triol 23c. The latter was regioselectively glycosylated at O-3′ with MeOE disaccharide 15, leading to PI-88 BODIPY-tetrasaccharide analog 24 in a fair 53 % yield (Scheme 3e).
BODIPYs as chemically stable aglycons in saccharide synthesis
In light of the aforementioned work, we turned our attention to the development of BODIPY aglycons able to withstand the reaction conditions commonly employed in the chemical synthesis of saccharides. Such BODIPYs, if used at the reducing end during the oligosaccharide synthesis, would allow the stepwise preparation of fluorescently labeled carbohydrates by involving easy-to-detect fluorescent saccharide intermediates. In general, the designed BODIPY aglycon should tolerate glycosylation and protecting-group manipulation steps without decomposition.
In our view, the interest in these carbohydrate/BODIPY assemblies would arise from two different areas: the fluorescent labeling of glycans [31], [32], [33], and/or the incorporation of biologically relevant carbohydrates to BODIPY fluorophores [34]. In the latter category, the glycosyl moiety could play a significant role as a targeting [35] and internalizing [36] agent for the probe, sometimes providing less cytotoxic entities [37].
After consideration of some BODIPY candidates, we selected BODIPY 25 (Fig. 3), as the ideal compound to fulfill the aforementioned stability requirements, while maintaining a remarkable fluorescence quantum yield (ϕ = 0.87, compared to ϕ = 0.22 for BODIPY 19b) [38]. In terms of stability, the per-alkylation in BODIPY 25 was designed to shield all the dipyrromethene positions toward electrophilic reagents [39], which are commonly used as promotors in glycosylation reactions. Additionally, computational modeling reported by Vicente’s group [40, 41], had demonstrated that dicyano substitution at boron in BODIPYs increases the aromaticity of the system, leading to derivatives of higher stability while maintaining elevated fluorescence quantum yields.

Per-alkylated B(Ph)2 BODIPY 19b and B-(CN)2 BODIPY 25, highlighting their fluorescence quantum yield (ϕ).
Thus, regarding the compatibility of 25 toward glycosyl donors, we validated its stability in glycosylation reactions with NPOEs (NIS/BF3.Et2O, −30 °C), MeOEs (BF3.Et2O, −30 °C), glycosyl trichloroacetimidates (BF3.Et2O, −78 °C), armed and disarmed thioglycosides (NIS/BF3.Et2O, −30 °C, and NIS/Yb(OTf)3, −30 °C, respectively), glycals (InCl3, 0 °C), and glycosyl bromides (AgOTf, −30 °C) [38]. On the other hand, concerning protecting group manipulations, we examined the stability of 25 in protection/deprotection events with benzoyl, silyl, and benzyl protecting groups [42, 43]. The latter is a representative example of permanent, rather than temporary, protecting groups in saccharide synthesis [44].
BODIPY as aglycons in saccharide synthesis: proof of concept
To demonstrate the usefulness of BODIPY 25 as a fluorescent aglycon in the synthesis of saccharides, we tackled the preparation of branched and linear trisaccharides 29 and 31, respectively (Scheme 4a and b).

Synthesis of branched BODIPY-containing trisaccharide 29 (a), and linear BODIPY-containing trisaccharide 31 (b), by sequential glycosylation of BODIPY 25 with several glycosyl donors.
Accordingly, access to trisaccharide 29 was carried out by glycosylation of 25 with mannopyranosyl trichloroacetimidate 26, followed by de-O-benzoylation of the ensuing tetrabenzoyl mannopyranoside to a tetraol intermediate, which was regioselectively glycosylated (at O-6) with phenyl thioglycoside 27, and with NPOE 28 (at O-3) (Scheme 4a). Final saponification of the benzoyl protecting groups yielded trisaccharide 29 in fairly good yield (26 % yield, five steps).
Alternatively (Scheme 4b), BODIPY 25 was glycosylated with phenyl thioglycoside 30, followed by de-O-silylation of the ensuing monosaccharide to unveil the primary hydroxyl group. Iteration of the process (glycosylation with 30, de-O-silylation) allowed the preparation of a disaccharide intermediate that was finally glycosylated with phenyl thioglycoside 27 to yield a trisaccharide intermediate that upon saponification produced linear saccharide 31 (Scheme 4b).
Trisaccharides 29 and 31, displayed high water solubility and remarkable fluorescence efficiency in water, reaching quantum yield values up to 81 % [38]. In contrast to their excellent luminescence in organic solvents, many BODIPYs become weakly or non-emissive in aqueous media owing to their tendency to associate forming H-type aggregates, by assembly of the dyes in a head-to-tail manner. H-aggregates are characterized by hypsochromic shifted absorption bands and no or weak fluorescence emission. In this context, branched derivative 29, which was soluble in water at concentrations as high as 2 mM, displayed a slight trend toward molecular (H-)aggregation upon increasing the dye concentration in water. This phenomenon was observed at concentrations higher than 0.1 mM, as revealed by the increased absorbance observed at the short-wavelength vibronic shoulder (Fig. 4). Nevertheless, it is important to mention that – highly fluorescent – BODIPYs at concentrations up to 0.1 mM in water, already fulfilled the requirements normally demanded in biological microscopy studies.

Normalized absorption spectra of trisaccharide 29 at different concentrations in H2O. The growing absorption corresponding to the H-aggregate is highlighted.
Synthesis of carbohydrate–BODIPY hybrids or glyco-BODIPYs
The aforementioned strategy allows the stepwise entry to BODIPY containing saccharides [45]. The interest in these type of compounds [46], recently termed “glyco-BODIPYs” is increasing in the last years, and two recent studies serve to further illustrate the internalizing properties conferred to the fluorescent BODIPY–carbohydrate ensemble by the glycan moiety [47, 48].
In this context, we have become interested in the development of novel synthetic strategies for the chemical assembly of BODIPY and sugar derivatives. Two such methods are described below.
Access to linker-free glyco-BODIPYs by Ferrier-type C-glycosylation
Among the existing synthetic methods to access carbohydrate–BODIPY hybrids, scarce literature examples are dealing with glycosylation reactions. During our studies on the glycosylation of BODIPYs containing hydroxyl groups (e.g., Scheme 3a and b), we had not observed the formation of any compound arising from the competing C-glycosylation reaction of the dipyrromethene moiety. Indeed, attempted C-glycosylation of BODIPY 32a (Scheme 5) with some mannopyranosyl trichloroacetimidate donors failed to give any coupling product. Conversely, the reaction 32a with tri-O-acetyl D-glucal 33 as the donor, under Ferrier rearrangement [49, 50] conditions, successfully led to bis-β-BODIPY-C-glycoside 34a as the sole regio- and stereoisomer in 68 % yield (Scheme 5) [51]. Likewise, Ferrier-type glycosylation of azidomethyl BODIPY 32b with 33 produced bis-monosaccharidic BODIPY 34b in 70 % yield, also in a completely stereocontrolled manner (Scheme 5). On the other hand, the reaction of hydroxymethyl BODIPY 32c with D-glucal 33 produced BODIPY 35a containing three sugar units, again as the sole isomer. Saponification of 35a (Et3N/MeOH 1:4) led to hydrophilic BODIPY 35b. The latter was soluble in water up to the millimolar range, retaining a remarkable fluorescence efficiency (77 %, H2O). Noticeably, this derivative showed no tendency to intermolecular aggregation in water, a well-known deactivation pathway in BODIPYs, and the increment of dye concentration in water altered neither the absorption nor the fluorescence profiles.

Synthesis of linker-free bis-monosaccharidic BODIPYs 34a, b by Ferrier-type C-glycosylation of BODIPYs 32a, b with commercially available tri-O-acetyl D-glucal 33. Access to BODIPY 35a, containing three sugar units, by Ferrier-type glycosylation of 32c with D-glucal 33.
Access to glyco-BODIPYs by CuAAC reaction of bis-propargyl BODIPYs with azido-sugars
In an unrelated approach to carbohydrate–BODIPY hybrids, we recently described the synthesis and click copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) reactions [52, 53], of 2,6-dipropargyl BODIPY derivatives, e.g., 37 (Scheme 6), with azido-containing carbohydrates to yield bis-triazolyl derivatives 38 [54].

Synthesis of 2,6-di-propargyl BODIPYs 37, and their CuAAC reactions with azido-sugars to gain access to carbohydrate–BODIPY hybrids 38.
The reported method involved the initial preparation of bis-propargyl BODIPYs 37, by a Nicholas propargylation/decobaltation protocol [55], of a series of 8-substituted 1,3,5,7-tetramethyl BODIPYs (36), followed by CuAAC click-type reaction with azido-containing sugars.
Accordingly, the CuAAC reaction of BODIPY 39 with the carbohydrate derivatives 40, and 41, and cholesteryl derivative 42, gave rise to glyco-BODIPYs 43a,b, and 44 (Fig. 5). Thus, protected or unprotected sugar derivatives, e.g., 40 and 41, respectively, could be used (CuSO4, sodium ascorbate, 3.0 equiv azido compound, THF/H2O, pressure tube, 65 °C) to access either hydroxyl-protected or hydroxyl-free glyco-BODIPYs, e.g., 43a or 43b, respectively. Furthermore, using limited amounts of the first azido component, the CuAAC reaction could be performed sequentially with two azido-containing molecules to obtain differently substituted BODIPYs. For instance, the CuAAC reaction of 39 with cholesteryl azide 42 (0.9 equiv) allowed the synthesis of a monosubstituted BODIPY-cholesteryl derivative intermediate (40 % yield) that could undergo a second CuAAC reaction with 40 to furnish compound 44 (78 % yield), where installation of one carbohydrate and one cholesteryl derivative at the BODIPY core had taken place (Fig. 5).

Bis-triazolyl BODIPY–carbohydrate hybrids 43a, b and 44, obtained by CuAAC reaction of BODIPY 39 with azido-derivatives 40–42.
Conclusions
In summary, we have shown that borondipyrromethene (BODIPY) fluorophores can be efficiently incorporated at the reducing end of the saccharide in synthetic oligosaccharide sequences. We first illustrated this approach synthesizing a BODIPY labeled PI-88 tetrasaccharide analog. Furthermore, to generalize this strategy, we selected one BODIPY derivative containing a boron-dicyano group – rather than the usual borondifluoride moiety – and alkyl substitution at all borondipyrromethene positions, which could withstand the reaction conditions commonly used in oligosaccharide synthesis, i.e., glycosylation and protection/deprotection steps. Proof of concept was provided by the synthesis of two different BODIPY-labeled trisaccharide derivatives. The photophysical properties of the resulting BODIPY-saccharides retained the excellent photophysical characteristics of the BODIPY derivatives even in water. Alternatively, the direct C-glycosylation reaction of the borondipyrromethene core, using the Ferrier rearrangement of commercially available tri-O-acetyl D-glucal, has been used to gain stereoselective access to linker-free BODIPY–carbohydrate moieties. These derivatives also displayed remarkable photophysical properties and a low tendency to aggregate in water, a phenomenon that usually causes a loss of photophysical efficiency in BODIPYs. Finally, we have shown that hitherto unreported bis-alkynyl BODIPYs, efficiently undergo CuAAC reactions with azido-containing sugars to generate a novel type of carbohydrate–BODIPY hybrids.
This paper was presented (AMG) at the 30th International Carbohydrate Symposium, Florianopolis, Brazil, July 2022.
Funding source: Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion/Agencia Estatal de Investigación (MCIN/AEI) 10.13039/501100011033
Award Identifier / Grant number: PID2021-122504NB-I00
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MCIN)/Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) Grant: PID2021-122504NB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by “ERDF A way of making Europe, for financial support. We also would like to thank our students, as well as to the members of the various research groups involved in the investigations reported in this Conference Paper for their contribution. Special thanks are given to Profs. Inmaculada Garcia-Moreno (IQFR-CSIC, Spain) and Jorge Bañuelos (Universidad del Pais Vasco, Spain) for fruitful discussions. We thank Marina Rodriguez, Jennifer Barato and Diego Pozas for their skillful technical assistance.
-
Research funding: This work was financially supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion/Agencia Estatal de Investigación (MCIN/AEI) (PID2021-122504NB-I00).
References
[1] A. Varki. Glycobiology 3, 97 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/3.2.97.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[2] D. M. Ratner, E. W. Adams, M. D. Disney, P. H. Seeberger. Chembiochem 5, 1375 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200400106.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] G. W. Hart, R. J. Copeland. Cell 143, 672 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[4] J. G. Allen, B. Fraser-Reid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 468 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9832358.Search in Google Scholar
[5] C. Uriel, A. Agocs, A. M. Gomez, J. C. Lopez, B. Fraser-Reid. Org. Lett. 7, 4899 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/ol0518232.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] J. C. Lopez, A. Agocs, C. Uriel, A. M. Gomez, B. Fraser-Reid. Chem. Commun. 5088 (2005).10.1039/b507468aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] C. Uriel, J. Ventura, A. M. Gomez, J. C. Lopez, B. Fraser-Reid. J. Org. Chem. 77, 795 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/jo202335n.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] N. K. Kochetkov, A. J. Khorlin, A. F. Bochkov. Tetrahedron 23, 693 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-4020(67)85014-2.Search in Google Scholar
[9] C. Uriel, J. Ventura, A. M. Gomez, J. C. Lopez, B. Fraser-Reid. Eur. J. Org. Chem., 3122 (2012).10.1002/ejoc.201200089Search in Google Scholar
[10] M. Chhabra, V. Ferro. PI-88 and related heparan sulfate mimetics. In Heparanase: From Basic Research to Clinical Applications, I. Vlodavsky, R. D. Sanderson, N. Ilan (Eds.), pp. 473–492, Springer-Nature, Cham, Switzerland, 1st ed. (2020), (Chapter 19).10.1007/978-3-030-34521-1_19Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] M. Chhabra, G. D. Doherty, N. W. See, N. S. Gandhi, V. Ferro. Chem. Rec. 21, 1 (2021).10.1002/tcr.202100125Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[12] R. Kudchadkar, R. Gonzalez, K. D. Lewis. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 17, 1769 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1517/13543784.17.11.1769.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] P. J. Chen, P. H. Lee, K. H. Han, J. Fan, T. T. Cheung, R. H. Hu, S. W. Paik, W. C. Lee, G. Y. Chau, L. B. Jeng, H. J. Wang, J. Y. Choi, C. L. Chen, M. Cho, M. C. Ho, C. C. Wu, K. S. Lee, Y. Mao, F. C. Hu, K. L. Lai. Ann. Oncol. 28, 213 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx369.008.Search in Google Scholar
[14] P. N. Handley, A. Carroll, V. Ferro. Carbohydr. Res. 446–447, 68 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2017.05.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] S. Elli, E. Stancanelli, P. N. Handley, A. Carroll, E. Urso, M. Guerrini, V. Ferro. Glycobiology 28, 731 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwy068.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[16] V. Ferro, K. Fewings, M. C. Palermo, C. Li. Carbohydr. Res. 332, 189 (2001).10.1016/S0008-6215(01)00061-1Search in Google Scholar
[17] G. Yu, N. S. Gunay, R. J. Linhardt, T. Toida, J. Fareed, D. A. Hoppensteadt, H. Shadid, V. Ferro, C. Li, K. Fewings, M. C. Palermo, D. Podger. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 37, 783 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0223-5234(02)01347-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[18] J. Ventura, C. Uriel, A. M. Gomez, J. C. Lopez. Carbohydr. Res. 516, 108557 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2022.108557.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[19] B. Fraser-Reid, U. E. Udodong, Z. Wu, H. Ottoson, J. R. Merritt, C. S. Rao, C. Roberts, R. Madsen. Synlett, 927 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-1992-21543.Search in Google Scholar
[20] T. Buskas, E. Söderberg, P. Konradsson, B. Fraser-Reid. J. Org. Chem. 65, 958 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1021/jo9909554.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] N. Soh. Sensors 8, 1004 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3390/s8021004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[22] M. H. Lee, J. S. Kim, J. L. Sessler. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 4185 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00280f.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[23] X.-P. He, Y. Zhang, T. D. James, J. Li, G.-R. Chen, J. Xie. Chem. Commun. 53, 82 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cc06875h.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] A. Baratucci, C. M. A. Gangemi, A. Santoro, S. Campagna, F. Puntoriero, P. Bonaccorsi. Org. Biomol. Chem. 20, 2742 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ob02459k.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[25] B. Thomas, K.-C. Yan, X.-L. Hu, M. Donnier-Marechal, G.-R. Chen, X.-P. He, S. Vidal. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 593 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00118a.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[26] R. I. Roacho, A. J. Metta-Magaña, E. Peña-Cabrera, K. H. Pannell. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 26, 345 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.3095.Search in Google Scholar
[27] E. Peña-Cabrera, A. Aguilar-Aguilar, M. Gonzalez-Dominguez, E. Lager, R. Zamudio-Vazquez, J. Godoy-Vargas, F. Villanueva-Garcia. Org. Lett. 9, 4163 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/ol701628z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[28] M. del Rio, F. Lobo, J. C. Lopez, A. Oliden, J. Bañuelos, I. Lopez-Arbeloa, I. Garcia-Moreno, A. M. Gomez. J. Org. Chem. 82, 1240 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.6b02426.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[29] L. Yang, R. Simionescu, A. Lough, H. Yan. Dyes Pigments 91, 264 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.03.027.Search in Google Scholar
[30] E. Bodio, C. Goze. Dyes Pigments 160, 700 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.08.062.Search in Google Scholar
[31] Y. Mechref, M. V. Novotny. Chem. Rev. 102, 321 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0103017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[32] R. B. Keithley, A. S. Rosenthal, D. C. Essaka, H. Tanaka, Y. Yoshimura, M. M. Palcic, O. Hindsgaul, N. J. Dovichi. Analyst 138, 164 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c2an36286d.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[33] I. M. Ivanova, S. A. Nepogodiev, G. Saalbach, E. C. O’Neill, M. D. Urbaniak, M. A. J. Ferguson, S. S. Gurcha, G. S. Besra, R. A. Field. Carbohydr. Res. 438, 26 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2016.11.017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[34] C. R. Bertozzi, L. L. Kiessling. Science 291, 2357 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059820.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[35] N. E. M. Kaufman, Q. Meng, K. E. Griffin, S. S. Singh, A. Dahal, Z. Zhou, F. R. Fronczek, J. M. Mathis, S. D. Jois, M. G. H. Vicente. J. Med. Chem. 62, 3323 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01746.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[36] A. L. Nguyen, K. E. Griffin, Z. Zhou, F. R. Fronczek, K. M. Smith, M. G. H. Vicente. New J. Chem. 42, 8241 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nj00041g.Search in Google Scholar
[37] L. Dong, Y. Zang, D. Zhou, X.-P. He, G.-R. Chen, T. D. James, J. Li. Chem. Commun. 51, 11852 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cc04357c.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[38] C. Uriel, C. Permingeat, J. Ventura, E. Avellanal-Zaballa, J. Bañuelos, I. Garcia-Moreno, A. M. Gomez, J. C. Lopez. Chem. Eur J. 26, 5388 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201905780.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[39] N. Boens, B. Verbelen, M. J. Ortiz, L. Jiao, W. Dehaen. Coord. Chem. Rev. 399, 213024 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213024.Search in Google Scholar
[40] M. Wang, M. G. H. Vicente, D. Mason, P. Bobadova-Parvanova. ACS Omega 3, 5502 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b00404.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[41] A. L. Nguyen, M. Wang, P. Bobadova-Parvanova, Q. Do, Z. Zhou, F. R. Fronczek, K. M. Smith, M. G. H. Vicente. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 20, 1409 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1142/s108842461650125x.Search in Google Scholar
[42] S. Oscarson. Protective Group Strategies in Protective Group Strategies in the Organic Chemistry of Sugars, D. E. Levy, P. Fugedi (Eds.), Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton (2006), Chapter 3.10.1201/9781420027952.ch3Search in Google Scholar
[43] A. M. Gomez. Reactions at Oxygen Atoms in Glycoscience, p. 103, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2008).10.1007/978-3-540-30429-6_3Search in Google Scholar
[44] Protecting Groups. Strategies and Applications in Carbohydrate Chemistry, S. Vidal (Ed.). Wiley VCH, Weinheim (2019).Search in Google Scholar
[45] A. M. Gomez, J. C. Lopez. Chem. Rec. 21, 3112 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.202100190.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[46] A. Baratucci, S. Campagna, T. Papalia, M. Galletta, A. Santoro, F. Puntoriero, P. Bonaccorsi. ChemPhotoChem 4, 647 (2020).10.1002/cptc.202000073Search in Google Scholar
[47] G. Biagotti, W. Puric, I. Urbancic, A. Kriselj, M. Weiss, J. Mravljak, C. Gellini, L. Lay, F. Chiodo, M. Anderluh, S. Cicchi, B. Richichi. Bioorg. Chem. 109, 104730 (2021).10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.104730Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[48] L. J. Patalaj, S. Ahadi, O. Lashchuk, P. G. Jones, S. Ebbinghaus, D. B. Werz. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 8766 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202016764.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[49] R. J. Ferrier, O. A. Zubkov. Org. React. 62, 569 (2003).10.1039/9781847553126-00062Search in Google Scholar
[50] A. M. Gomez, F. Lobo, C. Uriel, J. C. Lopez. Eur. J. Org. Chem., 7221 (2013).10.1002/ejoc.201300798Search in Google Scholar
[51] A. M. Gomez, C. Uriel, A. Oliden-Sanchez, J. Bañuelos, I. Garcia-Moreno, J. C. Lopez. J. Org. Chem. 86, 9181 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.1c00413.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[52] H. C. Kolb, M. G. Finn, K. B. Sharpless. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40, 2004 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20010601)40:11<2004:aid-anie2004>3.0.co;2-5.10.1002/1521-3773(20010601)40:11<2004::AID-ANIE2004>3.0.CO;2-5Search in Google Scholar
[53] M. Meldal, C. W. Tornoe. Chem. Rev. 108, 2952 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0783479.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[54] C. Uriel, A. M. Gomez, E. Garcia Martinez de la Hidalga, J. Bañuelos, I. Garcia-Moreno, J. C. Lopez. Org. Lett. 23, 6801 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.1c02380.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[55] K. M. Nicholas. J. Org. Chem. 80, 6943 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.5b00982.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this issue
- Editorial
- Preface to 30th International Carbohydrate Symposium ICS-30, Brazil 2022
- Conference papers
- Synthesis of carbohydrate–BODIPY hybrids
- Synthesis and structural analysis of d-fructofuranosylated compounds for the analysis of GH172 difructose dianhydride I synthase/hydrolase
- 4-(2′-Phenylethynylphenyl)phenyl glycosides as glycosylation donors
- Dynamic assembly and interaction of glycosphingolipids in cholesterol-containing model membranes
- Lipidated brartemicin adjuvant p-C18Brar is a promising α,α′-trehalose 6,6′-dilipid for use in ovine pneumonia vaccines
- pH dependence of glyphosate adsorption from aqueous solution using a cationic cellulose microfibers (cCMF) biosorbent
- Gradation control in the hydrodynamic diameters of mixed glycan-aglycan glycovesicles
- From metabolism to disease: the biological roles of glutamine:fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase (GFAT)
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this issue
- Editorial
- Preface to 30th International Carbohydrate Symposium ICS-30, Brazil 2022
- Conference papers
- Synthesis of carbohydrate–BODIPY hybrids
- Synthesis and structural analysis of d-fructofuranosylated compounds for the analysis of GH172 difructose dianhydride I synthase/hydrolase
- 4-(2′-Phenylethynylphenyl)phenyl glycosides as glycosylation donors
- Dynamic assembly and interaction of glycosphingolipids in cholesterol-containing model membranes
- Lipidated brartemicin adjuvant p-C18Brar is a promising α,α′-trehalose 6,6′-dilipid for use in ovine pneumonia vaccines
- pH dependence of glyphosate adsorption from aqueous solution using a cationic cellulose microfibers (cCMF) biosorbent
- Gradation control in the hydrodynamic diameters of mixed glycan-aglycan glycovesicles
- From metabolism to disease: the biological roles of glutamine:fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase (GFAT)