Home 4-(2′-Phenylethynylphenyl)phenyl glycosides as glycosylation donors
Article Publicly Available

4-(2′-Phenylethynylphenyl)phenyl glycosides as glycosylation donors

  • Wei Liu , Ziqiang Wang , Tayyab Gulzar , Xiaodong Zhang , Guoping Ding , Peng Xu ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Biao Yu ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 6, 2023

Abstract

We have disclosed that 3,5-dimethyl-4-(2′-phenylethynylphenyl)phenyl (EPP) glycosides could be employed as glycosylation donors via an unprecedented activation mechanism. Here we report that the EPP glycosides without the 3,5-dimethyl groups, which were previously installed to prevent the plausible Friedel-Crafts-type side reactions, can also undergo glycosylation effectively. Employing such an EPP 2-azidoglucoside as donor, the construction of the challenging α-GlcN-(1→4)-GlcA linkage is realized, leading to a heparin trisaccharides precursor.

Introduction

In 2019, we disclosed an effective and versatile glycosylation protocol, which employed 3,5-dimethyl-4-(2′-phenylethynylphenyl)phenyl (EPP) glycosides as donors and NIS/TMSOTf as promoter (Fig. 1) [1]. The EPP aglycone could proceed a dearomative cyclization initiated by activation of the triple bond with I+, leading to the glycosyl oxocarbenium species, which underwent glycosylation, and the spiroindene (A1) as a side-product. A plausible competing reaction would be an intramolecular Friedel-Crafts-type addition, converting the EPP glycoside to a phenanthrene glycoside (e.g., B). To avoid this competing pathway, methyl groups were installed at the 3,5-positions involving in the Friedel-Crafts-type addition. Here, we report the glycosylation reactions of EPP glycosides without the 3,5-dimethyl groups, which are easier to prepare than the previous 4-(2′-phenylethynylphenyl)phenyl glycosides.

Fig. 1: 
Glycosylation reaction with 4-(2′-ethynylphenyl)phenyl (EPP) glycosides as donors.
Fig. 1:

Glycosylation reaction with 4-(2′-ethynylphenyl)phenyl (EPP) glycosides as donors.

Results and discussion

An effective procedure was developed for the convenient synthesis of the new EPP glycosides (Scheme 1). Taking l-rhamnopyranoside 4 and d-glucopyranoside 7 as examples, the preparation involved: (1) Lewis acid-promoted glycosylation of the peracyl glycosides 1/5 with p-bromophenol to give the corresponding p-bromophenyl glycosides 2 (92 %, α only) and 6 (92 %, β/α = 3/1); (2) installation of the 2′-phenylethynylphenyl moiety onto the aglycone of 2 and via a Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction with pinacol boronic ester 3 [2]. The resultant EPP glycosides 4 and 7 were crystalline compounds, which could stay inert on shelf for at least six months.

Scheme 1: 
Preparation of 4-(2′-phenylethynylphenyl)phenyl glycosides 4 and 7.
Scheme 1:

Preparation of 4-(2′-phenylethynylphenyl)phenyl glycosides 4 and 7.

The glycosylation capability of the new EPP glycosides 4 and 7 was then examined (Scheme 2). Under the promotion of NIS (3.0 eq.) and triflic acid (0.4 eq.) in CH2Cl2 at 0 °C to RT, the reaction of EPP rhamnoside 4 with diacetone-d-galactose acceptor 8 proceeded smoothly, providing the coupled disaccharide 13 in a good yield (68 %). The side-product derived from the aglycone, i.e., spiro[4.5]-cyclohexadienone 14 [3], was isolated in 81 % yield, while the phenanthrene glycoside 15 derived from the intramolecular Friedel-Crafts-type addition was isolated in a low 5 % yield [4].

Scheme 2: 
Glycosylation reactions of EPP glycosides 4 and 7 with a panel of complex alcohols (8–12).
Scheme 2:

Glycosylation reactions of EPP glycosides 4 and 7 with a panel of complex alcohols (812).

The construction of aryltetralin 4-O-glycosidic linkage is a challenging task, due to the acid and base sensitivity of the podophyllotoxin skeleton [5]. Indeed, the glycosylation of podophyllotoxin 9 with EPP rhamnoside 4 led to the desired rhamnoside 16 in a moderate 35 % yield. A small amounts of 15 was isolated, testifying that the Friedel-Crafts-type addition was not the major side-reaction. With 2-aminoglucoside 4-OH 10 as acceptor, the glycosylation of EPP rhamnoside 4 afforded the coupled disaccharide 17 in a satisfactory 69 % yield. Taking tetraacetylglucoside 7 as donor, the coupling with diacetone-d-galactose acceptor 8 under the action of NIS and TMSOTf proceeded smoothly to deliver disaccharide 18 in 78 % yield. With benzyl ursolate 9 as acceptor, the glycosylation led to the coupled glycoside 19 in a low 33 % yield. In this case, migration of acetyl groups in the donor to the acceptor became a major reaction [6], leading to 20 in 52 % yield. EPP glucoside donor 7 could couple with azidoglucoside 4-OH acceptor 12 to provide disaccharide 21 in 71 % yield.

In line with our efforts on the synthesis of heparin oligosaccharides [7, 8], we examined the construction of the challenging α-GlcN-(1→4)-GlcA linkage with an EPP glycoside donor. Thus, the requisite EPP 2-azidoglucoside 27 was prepared (Scheme 3). Treatment of 2-azido-d-glucose tetraacetate 22 with p-bromophenol in the presence of stoichiometric amounts of TfOH led to the desired p-bromophenyl glycoside 23 (86 %, α/β = 5.2/1). Subjection of 23 to deacylation, selective protection of the resulting 4,6-di-OH with a benzylidene group, and subsequent benzylation of the remaining 3-OH delivered 24 (61 % over 3 steps). Regioselective opening of the 4,6-O-benzylidene acetal in 24 with BH3·THF and Bu2B·OTf provided 6-ol 25 (90 %) [9]. The primary hydroxyl group in 25 was then subjected to silylation with TBDPSCl in the presence of triethylamine and DMAP to afford 26 in 74 % yield. Finally, installation of the 2′-phenylethynylphenyl moiety on the aglycone via Suzuki-Miyaura coupling with pinacol boronic ester 3 furnished the desired EPP glycoside 27 in excellent yield (84 %).

Scheme 3: 
Synthesis of EPP glycoside 27.
Scheme 3:

Synthesis of EPP glycoside 27.

To our delight, the coupling of EPP glycoside 27 with disaccharide 28 [8b, 10] proceeded smoothly under the promotion of NIS and triflic acid, giving trisaccharide 29 in a satisfactory 57 % yield and excellent stereoselectivity (α only) (Scheme 4). It was worth noting that the exclusive α selectivity was partially benefited from the steric effect of the hindered 6-O-TBDPS group [11]. Subsequently, the 6-O-TBDPS group in trisaccharide 29 was selectively removed with HF-pyridine at 50 °C to provide 30 (88 %). The benzyl esters were removed completely with KOH in THF/MeOH, furnishing trisaccharide 31 in 95 % yield [8]. Trisaccharide 31 had been readily converted into heparin trisaccharides bearing a variety of N-sulfonate/acetate and O-sulfonate substituents.

Scheme 4: 
Synthesis of heparin trisaccharides precursor 31.
Scheme 4:

Synthesis of heparin trisaccharides precursor 31.

Given the consistent presence of spiro[4.5]-cyclohexadienone 14 and the minor phenanthrene glycoside (e.g., 15), the present EPP glycosides proceed glycosylation via the expected mechanism (Scheme 5). The activation with NIS/TfOH resulted in the formation of iodonium species, which coordinated and activated the alkyne C–C triple bond (II/III), resulting in the generation of dearomatic intermediate IV or the competitive Friedel-Crafts-type glycoside V (e.g., 15). The ready cleavage of the anomeric C-O bond in IV generated oxocarbenium ion VI and spiro[4.5]-cyclohexadienone 14. Subsequently, the oxocarbenium VI accepted the approach of nucleophiles to afford glycoside VII and H+, which could participate in the next catalytic cycle.

Scheme 5: 
The plausible mechanism of the glycosylation of 4-(2′-phenylethynylphenyl)phenyl glycosides.
Scheme 5:

The plausible mechanism of the glycosylation of 4-(2′-phenylethynylphenyl)phenyl glycosides.

Conclusion

Here we studied 4-(2′-phenylethynylphenyl)phenyl (EPP) glycosides (i.e., 4, 7, 27) which could undergo glycosylation effectively via the dearomative activation mechanism. Employing EPP 2-azidoglucoside 27 as donor, the construction of the challenging α-GlcN-(1→4)-GlcA linkage has been realized to furnish a heparin trisaccharides precursor (i.e., 31). Compared to the previous 3,5-dimethyl-4-(2′-phenylethynylphenyl)phenyl (EPP) glycosides, the absence of the 3,5-dimethyl groups in the present EPP donors could result in a competitive intramolecular Friedel-Crafts-type addition, leading to the phenanthrene glycoside (i.e., 15) as side products.


Corresponding authors: Peng Xu and Biao Yu, School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, 100 Haike Road, Shanghai 201210, China and State Key Laboratory of Bioorganic and Natural Products Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 345 Lingling Road, Shanghai 200032, China, e-mail: ,

Article note: A collection of invited papers based on presentations at 30th International Carbohydrate Symposium (ICS-30), held in Brazil, 10–15 July, 2022.


Funding source: Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of CAS

Award Identifier / Grant number: ZDBS-LY-SLH030

Funding source: Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2020258

Funding source: Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project

Award Identifier / Grant number: 22177125 & 22031011

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22177125 & 22031011), Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of CAS (ZDBS-LY-SLH030), Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (2020258), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (23ZR1476400) and Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project are acknowledged.

References

[1] Z. Hu, Y. Tang, B. Yu. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 4806 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b00210.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] N. Miyaura, T. Yanagi, A. Suzuki. Synth. Commun. 513 (1981).10.1080/00397918108063618Search in Google Scholar

[3] C.-W. Li, C.-I. Wang, H.-Y. Liao, R. Chaudhuri, R.-S. Liu. J. Org. Chem. 72, 9203 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1021/jo701504m.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Y. Okuda, M. Fujimoto, H. Akashi, A. Orita. J. Org. Chem. 86, 17651 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.1c01897.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] H. Liu, J.-X. Liao, Y. Hu, Y.-H. Tu, J.-S. Sun. Org. Lett. 18, 1294 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.6b00216.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6(a)] S. Deng, B. Yu, J. Xie, Y. Hui. J. Org. Chem. 64, 7265 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1021/jo990603x.Search in Google Scholar

(b) P. Xu, B. Yu. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biol. 79, 1 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.accb.2021.11.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7(a)] Y. Zhou, F. Lin, J. Chen, B. Yu. Carbohydr. Res. 341, 1619 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2006.02.020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

(b) J. Chen, Y. Zhou, C. Chen, W. Xu, B. Yu. Carbohydr. Res. 343, 2853 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2008.06.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

(c) C. Chen, B. Yu. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19, 3875 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.03.155.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

(d) J. Li, Y. Dai, W. Li, S. Laval, P. Xu, B. Yu. Asian J. Org. Chem. 4, 756 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1002/ajoc.201500113.Search in Google Scholar

(e) P. Xu, S. Laval, Z. Guo, B. Yu. Org. Chem. Front. 3, 103 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1039/c5qo00320b.Search in Google Scholar

[8(a)] P. Xu, W. Xu, Y. Dai, Y. Yang, B. Yu. Org. Chem. Front. 1, 405 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1039/c4qo00039k.Search in Google Scholar

(b) W. Xu, W. Liu, X. Li, P. Xu, B. Yu. Hua Hsueh Hsueh Pao 78, 767 (2020), https://doi.org/10.6023/a20060201.Search in Google Scholar

(c) Y. Dai, W. Liu, P. Xu, B. Yu, K. Chu, J. S. Zachary. Sci. Sin. Chim. 52, 1636 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1360/SSC-2022-0177.Search in Google Scholar

[9] L. Jiang, T. Chan. Tetrahedron Lett. 39, 355 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-4039(97)10599-8.Search in Google Scholar

[10] For details, see Supporting Information.Search in Google Scholar

[11(a)] R.-H. Fan, J. Achkar, J. M. Hernández-Torres, A. Wei. Org. Lett. 7, 5095 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1021/ol052130o.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

(b) Y.-P. Hu, S.-Y. Lin, C.-Y. Huang, M. M. L. Zulueta, J.-Y. Liu, W. Chang, S.-C. Hung. Nat. Chem. 3, 557 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1073.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

(c) M. M. L. Zulueta, S.-Y. Lin, Y.-T. Lin, C.-J. Huang, C.-C. Wang, C.-C. Ku, Z. Shi, C.-L. Chyan, D. Irene, L.-H. Lim, T.-I. Tsai, Y.-P. Hu, S. D. Arco, C.-H. Wong, S.-C. Hung. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 8988 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1021/ja302640p.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

(d) L.-T. Chiu, N. M. Sabbavarapu, W.-C. Lin, C.-Y. Fan, C.-C. Wu, T.-J. R. Cheng, C.-H. Wong, S.-C. Hung. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 5282 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c00005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2022-1114).


Published Online: 2023-04-06
Published in Print: 2023-09-26

© 2023 IUPAC & De Gruyter

Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2022-1114/html
Scroll to top button