Abstract
Objectives
Early recurrence after surgical resection adversely affects long-term survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study aims to develop and validate a novel predictive model for early recurrence of HCC after curative resection.
Methods
A retrospective study included 132 HCC patients who underwent surgical resection at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between October 2018 and May 2021. Clinical and pathological features were evaluated to assess parameters independently linked with early recurrence. Associations between possible risk factors and early recurrence were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression models.
Results
Of the 132 individuals, 48 (36.36 %) had early recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified AFP level≥400 ng/mL (OR=2.603, 95 % CI: 1.056–6.587, p=0.039), portal hypertension (OR=3.556, 95 % CI: 1.195–11.049, p=0.024), tumor size>10 cm (OR=5.036, 95 % CI: 1.264–23.237, p=0.027), albumin<35 g/L (OR=0.127, 95 % CI: 0.041–0.353, p<0.001), and GGT≥50 U/L (OR=2.172, 95 % CI: 0.863–5.612, p=0.042) were independently predictive of early recurrence.
Conclusions
Early recurrence after HCC resection is associated with high AFP levels, presence of portal hypertension, larger tumor size, reduced serum albumin, and elevated GGT levels. Monitoring of these signs after surgery may help identify patients at a higher risk more quickly, allowing for earlier intervention and potentially better long-term outcomes.
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common primary liver cancer, stands as a major contributor to cancer-related deaths globally, particularly in populations burdened by chronic hepatic conditions, including hepatitis B or C, cirrhosis, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [1]. Despite advances in early detection and curative surgical procedures, including liver resection and transplantation, prognosis remains poor due to high postoperative recurrence rates [2]. Recurrence significantly affects long-term survival and its recurrence within two years after surgery is associated with much lower survival rates [3].
Early recurrence defined as tumor recurrence within two years after resection, remains a major challenge in HCC. Depending on patient characteristics, tumor features, and pre-existing liver conditions, the recurrence rate may vary significantly, ranging from 30–70 % [4]. Early recurrence is frequently associated with aggressive tumor biology, microvascular invasion, compromised liver function, and other clinical features [5]. Therefore, improving patient grouping, monitoring systems, and adjuvant treatment strategies depends on identifying reliable early recurrence risk markers, supporting clinical decision-making and potentially improving survival outcomes.
Although previous studies suggest that tumor size and number, lesion multiplicity, vascular involvement, and high alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels are potential markers of recurrence [6], 7]. However, the relative contributions of these factors continue to be a subject of debate, and the identification of a definitive set of independent risk factors suitable for routine clinical practice has not been fully established. The clinical relevance of these factors may vary depending on whether patients undergo partial liver resection or liver transplantation.
The study aims to identify the primary risk factors contributing to early recurrence in HCC cases following curative liver resection. It further seeks to identify independent prognostic markers that can guide post-surgical follow-up and care methods through a comprehensive evaluation of clinicopathological features as well as laboratory findings. Early diagnosis of high-risk patients depends on awareness of these factors, enabling timely clinical intervention to improve long-term putcomes after curative HCC therapy.
The study focuses on three objectives: (1) to identify clinicopathological characteristics linked with early recurrence following after HCC resection; (2) to asses the predictive value and relative contribution of each factor; and (3) to explore strategies to include these findings in routine clinical management to improve prognosis.
Materials and methods
Population selection
The Institutional Review Board of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University approved the protocol (YX2024-155). The requirement for informed consent was waived as the study was retrospective. The study obtained medical data from cases undergoing HCC resection at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between October 2018 and May 2021. This period was selected to provide an adequate length of postoperative follow-up. The study excluded patients with mixed HCC and cholangiocarcinoma as well as those who were treated preoperatively with transarterial chemoembolization, percutaneous ethanol injection, and radiofrequency ablation. Moreover, patients without follow-up data or with isolated extrahepatic recurrence were also excluded. Of the 141 patients in the original group, nine were excluded due to insufficient baseline data for continuous variables.
Collection of clinicopathologic and imaging data
The demographic information gathered from patients included their age and sex. All patients had traditional laboratory tests, including haematological evaluations, serum biochemistry tests, and tumor marker testing, before curative liver resection. Specific laboratory indicators evaluated in this investigation were AFP, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), bilirubin, albumin, gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, and indirect bilirubin.
Two experienced pathologists independently evaluated all pathological specimens. The tissue sample was processed according to the standard recommendations for handling hepatic surgical specimens [8], including specific locations, distances from the tumor edge, and tissue volume to ensure diagnostic accuracy. Histopathological features assessed included tumor size and number, degree of cellular differentiation, capsular invasion, and status of the surgical margin.
Follow-up
Tumor recurrence within two years after liver resection was defined as early HCC recurrence. Following tumor resection, all patients underwent systematic follow-up in accordance with clinical guidelines [9]. Follow-up was performed every three months using imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography [CT], and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) and laboratory analyses (such as AFP level and tests for liver function). Two or more diagnostic techniques, such as hepatic artery angiography, contrast-enhanced CT, ultrasound, or MRI, supported by elevated AFP levels when present, were required to diagnose HCC recurrence. For those patients who remained recurrence-free, the follow-up concluded on December 31, 2023.
Statistical analysis
In this study, the overall rate of missing data was low (<5 % for all variables) and was addressed separately for each variable before model development. Missing values in continuous variables were imputed using the median of non-missing observations, while those in categorical variables were imputed using the mode. Continuous variables were dichotomized or categorized using pre-specified cut-offs derived from clinical guidelines, established literature, or conventional reference ranges. When multiple potential thresholds existed, we prioritized those most widely cited in hepatocellular carcinoma research to enhance interpretability and clinical utility. Chi-squared tests were applied for comparison of categorical data. p-values <0.05 represented statistical significance in risk factor identification. Univariable logistic regression was performed to identify potential predictors of early recurrence. To account for multiple testing in the univariable screening process, we applied the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to control the false discovery rate (FDR). Variables with an FDR-adjusted p<0.05 were considered statistically significant and were included in the subsequent multivariable analysis. Analysis outputs included odds ratios, 95 % confidence intervals (CI), and p-values. Moreover, a predictive model for early HCC recurrence was created by randomly dividing the data into training and validation cohorts in a 6:4 ratio while employing stratified sampling. The development of the model was carried out using the “rms” package in R (version 3.6.1), based on statistically significant predictors from the multivariate regression. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the model’s discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Model performance was then evaluated in the validation cohort.
Results
Participant characteristics
Between October 2018 and May 2021, 132 patients who underwent curative HCC resection at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were enrolled. Of these, 109 (82.58 %) were males and 23 (17.42 %) were females. Regarding the etiology of HCC, 101 (76.52 %) cases were associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV). Portal hypertension was found in 24 (18.18 %) patients, while cirrhosis was present in 104 (78.79 %). Splenomegaly and ascites were observed in 38 (28.79 %) and 23 (17.42 %) patients, respectively. Laboratory findings showed that 50 (37.88 %) patients had AFP levels above 400 ng/mL, 37 (28.03 %) had albumin levels below 35 g/L, and 72 (54.55 %) had higher GGT levels equal to or exceeding 50 U/L. Furthermore, 13 (9.85 %) were classified as Child-Pugh class B, while 119 (90.15 %) were categorized as Child-Pugh class A.
Factors linked to early HCC recurrence following after resection
The cases were divided into two groups based on postoperative tumor recurrence status: those exhibiting early recurrence (within 2 years post-surgery) and those without early recurrence (no recurrence or metastasis observed over at least a 2-year follow-up period). A range of variables were analyzed, including demographics (sex, age, and body mass index [BMI]), clinical parameters (albumin-bilirubin [ALBI] grade, surgical approach, margin status, operative time, hepatic inflow occlusion, intraoperative transfusion), laboratory findings (AFP, hepatitis B status, presence of portal hypertension, cirrhosis, splenomegaly, ascites), surgical specifics (extent of resection, anatomical liver resection), pathological characteristics (maximum tumor diameter, tumor count, intravascular tumor thrombus, satellite nodules, TNM classification, Child-Pugh score), and biochemical markers (total protein, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, albumin, GGT, ALT, AST, and AST/ALT ratio). Table S1 presents the distribution and statistical significance (p-values) of these variables between the two groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed significant associations between early recurrence and AFP≥400 ng/mL (p=0.004), portal hypertension (p=0.005), tumor size>10 cm (p=0.002), albumin<35 g/L (p<0.001), AST≥40 U/L (p=0.010), and GGT levels≥50 U/L (p=0.002), representing potential risk factors (Table 1). Multivariate logistic regression was then performed to identify independent predictors while adjusting for confounding effects. AFP≥400 ng/mL (OR=2.603, 95 % CI: 1.056–6.587), portal hypertension (OR=3.556, 95 % CI: 1.195–11.049), tumor size>10 cm (OR=5.036, 95 % CI: 1.264–23.237), albumin<35 g/L (OR=0.127, 95 % CI: 0.041–0.353), and GGT≥50 U/L (OR=2.172, 95 % CI: 0.863–5.612) were identified as independent predictors of early recurrence. Comprehensive statistical details are provided in Table 2.
Univariate analyses of risk factors associated with early recurrence.
| Characteristic | Number | OR | 95 % CI | p-Value | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 109 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| Female | 23 | 0.726 | 0.275–1.912 | 0.517 | 0.759 |
| Age, years | |||||
| ≤60 | 83 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| ≤70 | 35 | 0.942 | 0.417–2.129 | 0.885 | 0.899 |
| >70 | 14 | 0.435 | 0.113–1.678 | 0.227 | 0.582 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | |||||
| ≤23.9 | 77 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| ≤27.9 | 43 | 0.679 | 0.306–1.505 | 0.340 | 0.649 |
| >27.9 | 12 | 1.119 | 0.325–3.850 | 0.858 | 0.899 |
| ALBI | |||||
| ≤−2.60 | 47 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| >−2.60 | 85 | 1.571 | 0.734–3.363 | 0.244 | 0.582 |
| Surgical method | |||||
| Open surgery | 84 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| Laparoscopic surgery | 48 | 0.938 | 0.448–1.963 | 0.864 | 0.899 |
| Circumcision | |||||
| No | 126 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| Yes | 6 | 1.800 | 0.349–9.291 | 0.483 | 0.759 |
| Surgical time, min | |||||
| ≤180 | 45 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| >180 | 87 | 1.055 | 0.498–2.232 | 0.890 | 0.899 |
| Portal blockage | |||||
| No | 35 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| Yes | 97 | 0.810 | 0.366–1.792 | 0.602 | 0.79 |
| Intraoperative blood transfusion | |||||
| No | 120 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| Yes | 12 | 1.279 | 0.383–4.276 | 0.689 | 0.852 |
| AFP, ng/mL | |||||
| <400 | 82 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| ≥400 | 50 | 2.955 | 1.411–6.188 | 0.004 | 0.0391 |
| Hepatitis B | |||||
| No | 31 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| Yes | 101 | 1.885 | 0.768–4.626 | 0.163 | 0.728 |
| Portal hypertension | |||||
| No | 108 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| Yes | 24 | 3.788 | 1.506–9.526 | 0.005 | 0.039 |
| Cirrhosis | |||||
| No | 28 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| Yes | 104 | 1.562 | 0.629–3.882 | 0.337 | 0.649 |
| Splenomegaly | |||||
| No | 94 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| Yes | 38 | 1.920 | 0.889–4.149 | 0.097 | 0.37 |
| Ascites | |||||
| No | 109 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| Yes | 23 | 2.212 | 0.890–5.497 | 0.087 | 0.367 |
| Range of excision | |||||
| Local resection | 32 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| Single-segmental hepatic resection | 26 | 0.500 | 0.157–1.594 | 0.241 | 0.582 |
| Combined segmental or lobar resection | 49 | 0.885 | 0.351–2.236 | 0.797 | 0.899 |
| Semi-hepatic resection | 25 | 1.806 | 0.624–5.222 | 0.275 | 0.609 |
| Anatomical liver resection | |||||
| No | 32 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| Yes | 100 | 0.938 | 0.411–2.137 | 0.878 | 0.899 |
| Pathology | |||||
| I | 7 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| II | 55 | 1.118 | 0.197–6.351 | 0.899 | 0.899 |
| III | 70 | 1.768 | 0.321–9.751 | 0.513 | 0.759 |
| Tumor maximum diameter, cm | |||||
| ≤5 | 71 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| ≤10 | 46 | 1.759 | 0.797–3.883 | 0.162 | 0.486 |
| >10 | 15 | 7.526 | 2.137–26.513 | 0.002 | 0.024 |
| Tumor number | |||||
| 1 | 122 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| ≥2 | 10 | 0.733 | 0.181–2.979 | 0.664 | 0.846 |
| Intravascular tumor thrombus | |||||
| No | 61 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| Yes | 71 | 1.526 | 0.743–3.134 | 0.249 | 0.582 |
| Satellite nodules | |||||
| No | 100 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| Yes | 32 | 0.892 | 0.387–2.055 | 0.788 | 0.899 |
| TNM stage | |||||
| I | 52 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| II | 47 | 1.278 | 0.560–2.918 | 0.560 | 0.759 |
| III | 33 | 1.338 | 0.540–3.316 | 0.529 | 0.759 |
| Child Pugh | |||||
| A | 119 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| B | 13 | 1.571 | 0.496–4.980 | 0.442 | 0.759 |
| Total protein, g/L | |||||
| <60 | 11 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| ≥60 | 121 | 1.579 | 0.398–6.258 | 0.516 | 0.759 |
| Albumin, g/L | |||||
| <35 | 37 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| ≥35 | 95 | 0.153 | 0.067–0.353 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| ALT, U/L | |||||
| <40 | 84 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| ≥40 | 48 | 1.429 | 0.687–2.969 | 0.339 | 0.649 |
| AST, U/L | |||||
| <40 | 85 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| ≥40 | 47 | 2.652 | 1.263–5.568 | 0.010 | 0.0497 |
| ALT/AST | |||||
| <1 | 51 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| <2 | 70 | 1.982 | 0.912–4.307 | 0.084 | 0.367 |
| ≥2 | 11 | 1.510 | 0.382–5.966 | 0.556 | 0.759 |
| GGT, U/L | |||||
| <50 | 60 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| ≥50 | 72 | 3.420 | 1.586–7.376 | 0.002 | 0.024 |
| Total bilirubin, sμmol/L | |||||
| <17.1 | 78 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| ≥17.1 | 54 | 1.800 | 0.876–3.700 | 0.110 | 0.385 |
| Direct bilirubin, μmol/L | |||||
| <7 | 108 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| ≥7 | 24 | 2.000 | 0.818–4.893 | 0.129 | 0.416 |
| Indirect bilirubin, μmol/L | |||||
| <13.7 | 79 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – |
| ≥13.7 | 53 | 1.897 | 0.921–3.907 | 0.083 | 0.367 |
-
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; FDR, false discovery rate; BMI, body mass index; ALBI, albumin-bilirubin; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase.
Multivariate logistic regression analyses to predict early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.
| Characteristic | Regression coefficient | Standard error | OR | 95 % CI | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFP, ng/mL | |||||
| <400 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – | – |
| ≥400 | 0.957 | 0.463 | 2.603 | 1.056–6.587 | 0.039 |
| Portal hypertension | |||||
| No | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – | – |
| Yes | 1.269 | 0.562 | 3.556 | 1.195–11.049 | 0.024 |
| Tumor maximum diameter, cm | |||||
| ≤5 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – | – |
| ≤10 | 0.599 | 0.500 | 1.819 | 0.680–4.921 | 0.232 |
| >10 | 1.617 | 0.731 | 5.036 | 1.264–23.237 | 0.027 |
| Albumin, g/L | |||||
| <35 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – | – |
| ≥35 | −2.062 | 0.544 | 0.127 | 0.041–0.353 | < 0.001 |
| AST, U/L | |||||
| <40 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – | – |
| ≥40 | 1.249 | 0.882 | 3.488 | 0.663–22.468 | 0.157 |
| GGT, U/L | |||||
| <50 | 1.00 (Reference) | – | – | – | – |
| ≥50 | 0.775 | 0.473 | 2.172 | 0.863–5.612 | 0.042 |
-
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase.
Establishment of the predictive nomogram
To verify the correlation between these factors and early postoperative HCC recurrence, a model for the prediction of early recurrence was established. Table S2 presents the distribution of the relevant variables among HCC patients comparing groups with and without early recurrence in both the training and validation datasets. Five predictors identified in the multivariate regression were incorporated into a nomogram to estimate the risk of early recurrence in HCC cases after resection. Figure 1 illustrates this nomogram, with the top bar indicating the score for each variable, and the bottom bar showing the early HCC recurrence rates following resection.

Novel nomogram for predicting the risk of early recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The early recurrence after resection of HCC patients’ nomogram was developed in the cohort, with the use of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), portal hypertension, albumin, tumor maximum diameter. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001.
Assessment of nomogram performance
To determine how the nomogram performed in terms of calibration and discriminatory ability, calibration and ROC curves were used. The calibration curve indicated good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes (Figure 2A) in the training cohort. Compared to the other factors, the nomogram’s AUC was higher at 0.844 (95 % CI: 0.774–0.913) for identifying early HCC recurrence following resection (Figure 2B). The comparative AUV values of individual variables were as follows: AFP (0.628), portal hypertension (0.603), maximum tumor size (0.641), albumin (0.689), and GGT (0.664). Furthermore, the clinical applicability of the nomogram was analyzed through DCA (Figure 2C).

Apparent performance of the predictive nomogram in the cohort. (A, D) Calibration curves of the early recurrence nomogram prediction in (A) the training cohort and (D) the validation cohort: The x-axis represents the predicted early recurrence after resection of HCC patients. The y-axis represents the actual early recurrence after resection of HCC patients. (B, E) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the nomogram in (B) the training cohort and (E) the validation cohort: The ROC curve is displayed in a solid line, and the reference is displayed in a dotted line. The ROCs of the predictive nomogram in the training and validation cohorts with the AUC of 0.882 and 0.923, respectively. (C, F) Decision curve analysis (DCA) of the nomogram in (C) the training cohort and (F) the validation cohort. Using this predictive nomogram to predict early recurrence after resection of HCC patients adds more benefit than the intervention-all-patients scheme or the intervention-none scheme.
To confirm the robustness of the nomogram, its calibration, discriminative, and clinical utility were evaluated in the validation cohort. The calibration curve (Figure 2D), AUC analysis (Figure 2E), and DCA (Figure 2F) yielded results in close alignment with those of the training cohort. The AUC of the nomogram was 0.874 (95 % CI: 0.794–0.954), exceeding the predictive accuracy of other independent variables that contribute to early HCC recurrence. The AUC for individual predictors were lower than the nomogram: 0.658 for AFP, 0.574 for portal hypertension, 0.717 for tumor maximum diameter, 0.687 for albumin, and 0.663 for GGT. This indicates that the nomogram offers a consistent and enhanced predictive capacity for early HCC recurrence following resection.
Discussion
This study aimed to develop and validate a model to predict the early recurrence of HCC in patients who underwent curative liver resection. High AFP levels, portal hypertension, larger tumor size, low serum albumin, and increased GGT were shown by this study to be independently related to an increased risk of early recurrence following surgery.
AFP levels that are persistently elevated in HCC have been related to an increase in tumor burden and aggressive biological behaviour [10]. High AFP levels before surgery may indicate active tumor growth, which suggests intrahepatic dissemination or microscopic vascular invasion, two conditions known to increase the risk of early recurrence [11], 12]. Similarly, increased GGT, a biochemical marker of oxidative stress and liver inflammation, has also been associated with poor cellular differentiation and tumor invasiveness [13]. Furthermore, GGT may also represent impaired liver function and a tumor-promoting microenvironment, which would support tumor recurrence [14], 15].
Portal hypertension reflects significant disease progression and reduced hepatic functional reserve, both of which elevate the likelihood of tumor recurrence and adversely affect prognosis [16]. It also limit the extent of liver resection, increasing the risk of leaving microscopic residual disease [17]. Furthermore, low serum albumin, a marker of decreased hepatic synthetic capacity, may also signify underlying inflammation and ongoing tumor activity, making it a useful predictor of poor prognosis [18], 19].
The size of the tumor is documented as a significant predictor of early postoperative recurrence. Larger tumors are typically more aggressive and are often associated with vascular invasion and intrahepatic spread at the time of surgical intervention [20], 21]. This study supports existing evidence by highlighting the predictive power of tumor size in assessing recurrence risk.
These variables emphasize that HCC recurrence is influenced by a combination of tumor characteristics and viral infection markers. Integrating these factors into a comprehensive predictive model enhances the ability to stratify patients by risk and informs personalized postoperative monitoring and decisions regarding adjuvant therapy. While previous models have established the prognostic value of individual factors such as AFP and tumor size, our nomogram integrates these established markers with novel prognostic indicators to achieve higher predictive accuracy. The model’s AUC of 0.844 represents a significant improvement over single-factor predictions (AUC 0.603–0.689) and existing clinical scores. This suggests potential utility for tailoring postoperative surveillance intensity and selecting candidates for adjuvant therapy trials. Future prospective validation should focus on implementing this tool in clinical decision pathways to evaluate its impact on postoperative survival and recurrence.
However, this study has some limitations. In particular, tumor multiplicity and liver function status, as assessed by the Child-Pugh score, showed no statistically significant association with early postoperative recurrence of HCC. This observation differs from various previous studies that have identified both variables as being significantly associated with postoperative outcomes [22], 23]. A potential reason for this inconsistency could be the limited sample size in the present study. Moreover, this was a retrospective analysis with a relatively modest sample size (n=132) from a single center, which may have affected statistical power and generalizability due to the limited population diversity and institution-specific practices. Although internally validated, the model requires further external validation in prospective, multi-center cohorts to confirm its robustness and broad clinical applicability for predicting early HCC recurrence.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the presence of elevated AFP and GGT levels, portal hypertension, large tumor size, and reduced albumin concentration were identified as key factors contributing to early HCC recurrence following surgical resection. The predictive model developed using these indicators exhibited strong performance and has the potential to facilitate personalized strategies for postoperative monitoring and intervention.
Funding source: The Open Research Fund of the Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (2022)
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2022APKLGUD06
-
Research ethics: Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (YX2024-155).
-
Informed consent: The need for informed consent was waived as the study was retrospective.
-
Author contributions: Hui Hou, Fubao Liu, Xiaoping Geng: conception and design; Song Zhang, Zicheng Guo, Chunli Wu: collection and assembly of data; Song Zhang, Xiao Cui, Jinhua Wei, Hong Xue, Debao Fang: data analysis and interpretation; Song Zhang: manuscript writing.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: All the authors state they have no conflicts of interest.
-
Research funding: The Open Research Fund of the Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (2022) (2022APKLGUD06).
-
Data availability: The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
1. Lima, HA, Alaimo, L, Brown, ZJ, Endo, Y, Moazzam, Z, Tsilimigras, DI, et al.. Application of hazard functions to investigate recurrence after curative-intent resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB 2023;25:260–8.10.1016/j.hpb.2022.11.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Tabrizian, P, Jibara, G, Shrager, B, Schwartz, M, Roayaie, S. Recurrence of hepatocellular cancer after resection: patterns, treatments, and prognosis. Ann Surg 2015;261:947–55.10.1097/SLA.0000000000000710Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Liu, YW, Moi, SH, Li, WF, Lin, CC, Yong, CC, Wang, CC, et al.. A preoperative model for predicting early recurrence in patients undergoing resection for single hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023;49:1444–9.10.1016/j.ejso.2023.03.211Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Maithel, SK, Wang, R, Harton, J, Yopp, A, Shah, SA, Rocha, FG, et al.. Prognostic significance of recurrence and timing of recurrence on survival among patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in U.S. clinical practice. Ann Surg Oncol 2025;32:1054–62.10.1245/s10434-024-16476-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Roayaie, S, Obeidat, K, Sposito, C, Mariani, L, Bhoori, S, Pellegrinelli, A, et al.. Resection of hepatocellular cancer ≤2 cm: results from two Western centers. Hepatology 2013;57:1426–35.10.1002/hep.25832Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. Liu, L, Qin, S, Lin, K, Xu, Q, Yang, Y, Cai, J, et al.. Development and comprehensive validation of a predictive prognosis model for very early HCC recurrence within one year after curative resection: a multicenter cohort study. Int J Surg 2024;110:3401–11.10.1097/JS9.0000000000001467Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
7. Yen, YH, Liu, YW, Li, WF, Yong, CC, Wang, CC, Lin, CY. A simple model to predict early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024;409:261.10.1007/s00423-024-03449-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Cong, WM, Bu, H, Chen, J, Dong, H, Zhu, YY, Feng, LH, et al.. Practice guidelines for the pathological diagnosis of primary liver cancer: 2015 update. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:9279–87.10.3748/wjg.v22.i42.9279Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
9. Benson, AB3rd, D’Angelica, MI, Abrams, TA, Are, C, Bloomston, PM, Chang, DT, et al.. Hepatobiliary cancers, version 2.2014. J Natl Compr Cancer Network 2014;12:1152–82.10.6004/jnccn.2014.0112Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Chen, T, Dai, X, Dai, J, Ding, C, Zhang, Z, Lin, Z, et al.. AFP promotes HCC progression by suppressing the HuR-mediated Fas/FADD apoptotic pathway. Cell Death Dis 2020;11:822.10.1038/s41419-020-03030-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
11. Wang, Q, Qiao, W, Zhang, H, Liu, B, Li, J, Zang, C, et al.. Nomogram established on account of Lasso-Cox regression for predicting recurrence in patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Immunol 2022;13:1019638.10.3389/fimmu.2022.1019638Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
12. Samban, SS, Hari, A, Nair, B, Kumar, AR, Meyer, BS, Valsan, A, et al.. An insight into the role of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in the development and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Biotechnol 2024;66:2697–709.10.1007/s12033-023-00890-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Yu, X, Yang, R, He, Z, Li, K, Zeng, P. Construction and validation of a nomogram for hepatocellular carcinoma patients based on HCC-GRIm score. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023;149:12013–24.10.1007/s00432-023-05037-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
14. Caponigro, V, Tornesello, AL, Merciai, F, La Gioia, D, Salviati, E, Basilicata, MG, et al.. Integrated plasma metabolomics and lipidomics profiling highlights distinctive signature of hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV patients. J Transl Med 2023;21:918.10.1186/s12967-023-04801-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
15. Yang, Z, Ye, P, Xu, Q, Lu, Y, Tang, B, Wang, Q, et al.. Elevation of serum GGT and LDH levels, together with higher BCLC staging are associated with poor overall survival from hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective analysis. Discovery Med 2015;19:409–18.Search in Google Scholar
16. Aliseda, D, Zozaya, G, Martí-Cruchaga, P, Herrero, I, Iñarrairaegui, M, Argemí, J, et al.. The impact of portal hypertension assessment method on the outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma resection: a meta-analysis of matched cohort and prospective studies. Ann Surg 2024;280:46–55.10.1097/SLA.0000000000006185Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Chen, ZH, Zhang, XP, Feng, JK, Li, LQ, Zhang, F, Hu, YR, et al.. Patterns, treatments, and prognosis of tumor recurrence after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion: a multicenter study from China. HPB 2022;24:1063–73.10.1016/j.hpb.2021.11.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Wang, L, Li, Q, Zhang, J, Lu, J. A novel prognostic scoring model based on albumin and glutamyltransferase for hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis. Cancer Manage Res 2019;11:10685–94.10.2147/CMAR.S232073Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
19. Liu, KJ, Lv, YX, Niu, YM, Bu, Y. Prognostic value of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase to albumin ratio combined with aspartate aminotransferase to lymphocyte ratio in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. Medicine 2020;99:e23339.10.1097/MD.0000000000023339Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
20. Shehta, A, Elsabbagh, AM, Medhat, M, Farouk, A, Monier, A, Said, R, et al.. Impact of tumor size on the outcomes of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study. BMC Surg 2024;24:7.10.1186/s12893-023-02296-wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
21. Dai, CY, Lin, CY, Tsai, PC, Lin, PY, Yeh, ML, Huang, CF, et al.. Impact of tumor size on the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients who underwent liver resection. J Chin Med Assoc 2018;81:155–63.10.1016/j.jcma.2017.06.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Zhao, S, Wang, M, Yang, Z, Tan, K, Zheng, D, Du, X, et al.. Comparison between Child-Pugh score and albumin-bilirubin grade in the prognosis of patients with HCC after liver resection using time-dependent ROC. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:539.10.21037/atm.2020.02.85Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
23. Wang, YY, Zhong, JH, Su, ZY, Huang, JF, Lu, SD, Xiang, BD, et al.. Albumin-bilirubin versus Child-Pugh score as a predictor of outcome after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 2016;103:725–34.10.1002/bjs.10095Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/oncologie-2025-0303).
© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter on behalf of Tech Science Press (TSP)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review Articles
- Liquid biopsy – a promising and effective method for surveying non-small cell lung cancer minimal residual diseases and anti-cancer drug response after treatment
- Current application status of proton beam therapy for gastrointestinal tumors
- Research progress on the regulation of cuproptosis-related genes by non-coding RNAs in tumors
- Deep learning in hepatic oncology imaging: a narrative review of computed tomography applications
- Synergistic approaches: a narrative mini-review of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer
- Research Articles
- Intravesical prostatic protrusion as a predictor of acute urinary retention following stereotactic body radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer: a retrospective study
- The differential effect of glutamine supplementation on the orthotopic and subcutaneous growth of two syngeneic murine models of glioma
- Intermittent afatinib treatment suppresses the growth of resistant T790M-H1975 cells in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) co-culture
- Prognostic stratification of colorectal cancer by immune profiling reveals SPP1 as a key indicator for tumor immune status
- The activity of base excision repair is positively correlated with the infiltration of CD4+ T cells in melanoma
- Integrated analysis of immunity and ferroptosis related tumor microenvironment in a novel risk score model for lung adenocarcinoma prognosis
- Retrospective analysis of risk factors for early recurrence after hepatocellular carcinoma resection
- The ENST00000539930 transcript predicts sensitivity to PARP inhibitors and clinical prognosis in cancers
- VTA1 and breast cancer: a potential indicator for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation
- USP24 stabilizes VDAC2 via deubiquitination to promote apoptosis and ferroptosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)
- Clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, and therapeutic implications in breast cancer with pathologically confirmed bone marrow metastases: an observational retrospective study
- Short Commentaries
- Cancer cell mitochondria: the missing puzzle in predicting response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors
- From mitochondrial cristae pathobiology to metabolic reprogramming in cancer: the α and ω of Malignancies?
- Article Commentary
- Stopping SOAT1 sparks an immune attack on liver cancer: a metabolic-immune axis in hepatocellular carcinoma
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review Articles
- Liquid biopsy – a promising and effective method for surveying non-small cell lung cancer minimal residual diseases and anti-cancer drug response after treatment
- Current application status of proton beam therapy for gastrointestinal tumors
- Research progress on the regulation of cuproptosis-related genes by non-coding RNAs in tumors
- Deep learning in hepatic oncology imaging: a narrative review of computed tomography applications
- Synergistic approaches: a narrative mini-review of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer
- Research Articles
- Intravesical prostatic protrusion as a predictor of acute urinary retention following stereotactic body radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer: a retrospective study
- The differential effect of glutamine supplementation on the orthotopic and subcutaneous growth of two syngeneic murine models of glioma
- Intermittent afatinib treatment suppresses the growth of resistant T790M-H1975 cells in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) co-culture
- Prognostic stratification of colorectal cancer by immune profiling reveals SPP1 as a key indicator for tumor immune status
- The activity of base excision repair is positively correlated with the infiltration of CD4+ T cells in melanoma
- Integrated analysis of immunity and ferroptosis related tumor microenvironment in a novel risk score model for lung adenocarcinoma prognosis
- Retrospective analysis of risk factors for early recurrence after hepatocellular carcinoma resection
- The ENST00000539930 transcript predicts sensitivity to PARP inhibitors and clinical prognosis in cancers
- VTA1 and breast cancer: a potential indicator for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation
- USP24 stabilizes VDAC2 via deubiquitination to promote apoptosis and ferroptosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)
- Clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, and therapeutic implications in breast cancer with pathologically confirmed bone marrow metastases: an observational retrospective study
- Short Commentaries
- Cancer cell mitochondria: the missing puzzle in predicting response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors
- From mitochondrial cristae pathobiology to metabolic reprogramming in cancer: the α and ω of Malignancies?
- Article Commentary
- Stopping SOAT1 sparks an immune attack on liver cancer: a metabolic-immune axis in hepatocellular carcinoma