Abstract
The field of rheumatic disease treatment has undergone a profound transformation, characterized by significant progress in research, precision medicine, and holistic patient care. Rheumatic diseases, a diverse group of conditions affecting the joints, muscles, bones, and connective tissues, have historically caused pain and disability for millions worldwide. Traditional treatment methods primarily centered on managing symptoms, relying heavily on medications like nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids. While these approaches provided some relief, they often carried side effects and had limited long-term effectiveness. However, recent years have witnessed remarkable breakthroughs in our understanding and management of rheumatic diseases. Pioneering research has unveiled the complex immunological mechanisms at the core of these disorders, leading to the development of targeted therapies that specifically inhibit key molecules and pathways responsible for inflammation. Biologic medications, such as tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and interleukin-6 inhibitors, have completely transformed treatment paradigms by not only alleviating symptoms but also potentially altering the course of diseases like rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Moreover, precision medicine has emerged as a central pillar of rheumatic disease management, creating personalized treatment strategies based on a patient’s unique genetic, molecular, and immunological profile. Genetic markers, such as the human leukocyte antigen gene, can identify individuals with a heightened risk of developing RA, allowing for proactive interventions that may prevent or mitigate the onset of the disease. Combination therapies, which combine different classes of medications, offer hope for patients who do not respond adequately to single-drug treatments. Beyond pharmaceutical interventions, holistic patient care encompasses lifestyle modifications, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and patient education, all aimed at improving overall well-being. Looking forward, ongoing research, innovation, and collaborative efforts among healthcare professionals, researchers, and patients are essential to sustain the trajectory of progress in rheumatic disease treatment. The future holds the potential for further breakthroughs, poised to reshape the lives and futures of individuals grappling with the complexities of these challenging health conditions, ushering in an era of renewed hope and an improved quality of life.
1 Introduction
Rheumatic diseases, which encompass a range of conditions affecting joints, muscles, bones, and connective tissues, have historically inflicted pain and disability on millions worldwide. However, recent years have seen remarkable progress in how these conditions are treated, providing renewed hope and improved outcomes for patients [1,2]. Traditionally, the management of rheumatic diseases primarily involved symptom relief and pain control, often relying on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids. While these treatments did offer some relief, they frequently came with side effects and limited long-term effectiveness. Nonetheless, the field of rheumatology has experienced a significant transformation in recent decades, driven by breakthrough research. Researchers have delved deeply into the intricate immunological mechanisms that underlie these conditions [2,3]. This enhanced understanding has paved the way for the development of targeted therapies designed to specifically inhibit key molecules and pathways responsible for inflammation. Biologic medications like tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitors have emerged as game-changers, not only easing symptoms but also altering the course of diseases like rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Moreover, the introduction of biosimilars has expanded the array of treatment options [3,4]. These drugs, closely resembling existing biologics, have introduced healthy competition into the market, potentially reducing treatment expenses and improving the overall sustainability of healthcare systems. Precision medicine has become a defining feature of modern rheumatic disease treatment. By customizing treatment plans based on individual patients’ genetic, molecular, and immunological profiles, precision medicine optimizes therapy while minimizing the occurrence of side effects. For instance, genetic markers like the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) gene can identify individuals at higher risk of developing RA. Armed with this genetic information, rheumatologists can initiate early interventions, potentially delaying or preventing the onset of the disease. Combination therapies represent another avenue of exploration. Researchers are investigating the effectiveness of combining different classes of medications, such as pairing biologics with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) [4,5,6]. This multifaceted approach offers hope for patients who may not respond adequately to a single medication alone. Beyond pharmaceutical interventions, there has been a broadening of focus toward holistic patient care. Lifestyle modifications, including dietary adjustments and exercise, are now recognized as integral components of managing rheumatic diseases. Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and patient education have seamlessly integrated into treatment plans to enhance overall well-being. In essence, the landscape of rheumatic disease treatment has undergone a profound transformation. Breakthrough research has illuminated the intricacies of these conditions, leading to the development of targeted therapies and the advent of precision medicine. Moreover, a holistic approach that encompasses lifestyle modifications and comprehensive patient care has taken center stage, offering a more comprehensive and patient-centric approach to managing these challenging conditions [7,8].
2 Methodology
The review article systematically searched databases like PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library using keywords such as “rheumatic disease treatment,” “biologic agents,” and “personalized medicine.” Grey literature, including conference abstracts and clinical trial registries, were also searched. Data extraction focused on the latest treatment modalities in RA. The article adhered to structured guidelines of ICMJE.
2.1 The landscape of rheumatic disease treatment
The conventional methods employed to address rheumatic diseases, a group of conditions impacting joints, muscles, bones, and connective tissues, have long centered on strategies for alleviating symptoms, managing pain, and enhancing the overall quality of life for individuals grappling with ailments like RA, osteoarthritis, lupus, and gout [9]. These conventional approaches have been the cornerstone of rheumatic disease management for numerous years and continue to hold a crucial role in patient care. One of the most frequently utilized treatments for rheumatic diseases involves the administration of NSAIDs. These medications, which encompass well-known drugs like ibuprofen, naproxen, and aspirin, operate by inhibiting enzymes known as cyclooxygenases (COX) [10]. This inhibition results in a reduction in the production of inflammatory molecules called prostaglandins. Consequently, pain relief and decreased inflammation occur in the affected joints and tissues. While NSAIDs provide valuable relief from symptoms, their extended usage may entail certain risks, including gastrointestinal issues and an increased likelihood of cardiovascular events. Corticosteroids, commonly referred to as steroids, constitute another potent class of medications employed in the treatment of rheumatic diseases [11,12]. In contrast to NSAIDs, corticosteroids function by suppressing the immune system’s inflammatory response. These drugs can be administered in various forms, including oral tablets, injections, or topical creams, depending on the specific condition and the patient’s requirements. Corticosteroids offer swift relief from pain and inflammation during flares or exacerbations of rheumatic diseases. Nevertheless, their prolonged use may lead to side effects such as weight gain, elevated blood pressure, bone loss (osteoporosis), and immune system suppression. Consequently, healthcare providers aim to strike a balance between symptom control and minimizing potential risks when employing corticosteroids. DMARDs represent a pivotal class of medications in the management of rheumatic diseases. DMARDs are meticulously designed to decelerate the progression of these conditions by addressing the underlying immune system abnormalities responsible for joint damage [13]. A prominent example of a DMARD is methotrexate, renowned for its efficacy. It functions by inhibiting the activity of immune cells that contribute to the inflammation and joint destruction observed in RA. Other DMARDs, such as sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and leflunomide, also serve as immune-modulating agents and may be utilized individually or in combination with other treatments. These drugs play a pivotal role in managing autoimmune rheumatic diseases, as they can potentially arrest or retard disease’s progression, thereby averting joint deformities and improving long-term outcomes. Nevertheless, it is important to note that DMARDs often require weeks to months before their full therapeutic effects become apparent. Pain management occupies a central role in the treatment of rheumatic diseases, as pain ranks among the most distressing symptoms encountered by patients [14]. In addition to NSAIDs and corticosteroids, healthcare providers employ a variety of strategies to help individuals manage pain effectively. Analgesics like acetaminophen (paracetamol) may be recommended for pain relief, especially when inflammation is less pronounced. Physical therapy is another crucial facet of pain management. Physical therapists collaborate with patients to create tailored exercise programs aimed at enhancing joint mobility, increasing muscle strength, and reducing pain. These programs encompass a range of exercises, including range-of-motion exercises, strength training, and joint stabilization exercises. Furthermore, hot and cold therapy, such as applying heat packs or cold packs, can alleviate pain and reduce muscle stiffness [15]. Assistive devices like canes, braces, splints, or orthopedic footwear may be recommended for some individuals to support joint function, alleviate stress on affected areas, and enhance overall comfort. Physical and occupational therapy are vital components of traditional rheumatic disease treatment, particularly for conditions affecting mobility and daily functioning. These therapies provide valuable support and education to individuals facing the challenges of these conditions. Physical therapists work closely with patients to design exercise regimens tailored to their specific joint and muscle issues [16,17]. The primary objectives include improving joint function, enhancing muscle strength, and reducing pain. These exercise programs may encompass range-of-motion exercises, strength training, and joint stabilization exercises, among others. Occupational therapists play an essential role in helping individuals adapt to their conditions and manage daily activities more effectively. They provide guidance on techniques and strategies for performing everyday tasks with greater ease and less discomfort. Occupational therapists may also recommend assistive devices or suggest modifications to the home environment to enhance independence and overall quality of life [18].
Lifestyle modifications are fundamental in managing rheumatic diseases effectively. These changes aim to improve overall well-being and may include:
Weight management: Maintaining a healthy weight is crucial, particularly for individuals with conditions like osteoarthritis and gout. Excess weight places added stress on joints, exacerbating symptoms and potentially accelerating joint damage [19].
Dietary modifications: For some rheumatic diseases, dietary adjustments can make a significant difference. For example, individuals with gout may benefit from reducing the consumption of purine-rich foods and moderating alcohol intake to prevent gout attacks [20].
Smoking cessation: Smoking is associated with an increased risk of certain rheumatic diseases, such as RA. Furthermore, it can exacerbate symptoms in some individuals. Quitting smoking can have a positive impact on disease management and overall health [21].
Adequate rest and quality sleep are essential components of traditional rheumatic disease treatment. Rest allows the body to recover and heal, while sleep promotes overall well-being and helps manage symptoms effectively. Achieving a balance between physical activity and periods of rest is crucial to prevent overexertion and fatigue, which can exacerbate symptoms in individuals with rheumatic diseases [22].
Traditional treatment approaches for rheumatic diseases encompass a multifaceted approach aimed at symptom management, pain relief, and enhancing the overall quality of life for affected individuals. These treatments, which include NSAIDs, corticosteroids, DMARDs, pain management strategies, physical and occupational therapy, lifestyle modifications, and prioritizing rest and sleep, have been pivotal in managing these conditions effectively. Nonetheless, it is important to recognize that the treatment approach may vary depending on the specific rheumatic disease, its severity, and individual patient factors. Healthcare providers work closely with patients to develop tailored treatment plans that address their unique needs and goals while minimizing potential risks and side effects associated with these treatments [23,24].
2.2 Breakthroughs in research
Advancements in research pertaining to rheumatic diseases have significantly expanded our comprehension of these intricate conditions and transformed their management. These breakthroughs encompass a wide array of facets within rheumatology, including genetics, treatment methodologies, and patient care approaches. One of the most pivotal breakthroughs has been the identification of crucial genetic factors associated with rheumatic diseases [25,26]. Researchers have pinpointed specific genetic markers such as variants in the HLA gene, which are correlated with an elevated susceptibility to conditions like RA. This genetic knowledge enables more precise risk assessment, early detection, and potentially targeted interventions, heralding the advent of personalized medicine within rheumatology. Another groundbreaking achievement in rheumatic disease research has been the development of biologic drugs and targeted therapies. Biologics, including medications like TNF inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, and therapies targeting B-cells, have brought about a transformation in the treatment landscape [27]. These drugs specifically target molecules and pathways involved in the inflammatory processes underlying conditions like RA, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis. They not only provide effective relief from symptoms but also hold the potential to modify the course of the diseases themselves, decelerating or halting joint damage and disability. Moreover, the introduction of biosimilars, highly similar versions of existing biologic drugs, has broadened treatment options and improved affordability. The availability of biosimilars introduces healthy competition into the market, potentially reducing healthcare costs and enhancing accessibility to these life-changing therapies [27,28]. The concept of precision medicine has emerged as a central theme in rheumatic disease research. This approach involves tailoring treatment plans to the individual patient’s genetic, molecular, and immunological profile. By optimizing therapy based on a patient’s unique characteristics, precision medicine minimizes adverse effects and maximizes treatment effectiveness, offering hope for improved outcomes and enhanced quality of life. Researchers have placed a strong emphasis on early intervention in rheumatic diseases.
Detecting and treating conditions like RA in their initial stages can lead to more favorable outcomes and, in some instances, prevent irreversible joint damage. The “window of opportunity” concept underscores the significance of promptly initiating treatment to control disease activity and forestall further harm. Combination therapies have also captured the attention of rheumatic disease researchers. Scientists are exploring the synergistic effects of combining different classes of medications, such as biologics with traditional DMARDs. This multifaceted approach aims to achieve superior disease control, particularly for patients who do not respond optimally to a single medication alone [28,29].
Lifestyle interventions have become increasingly integrated into rheumatic disease management. Diet, exercise, and weight management are recognized as influential factors, especially in conditions like osteoarthritis and gout. Physical therapy and occupational therapy play pivotal roles in helping patients improve mobility, muscle strength, and functional ability, ultimately enhancing their quality of life. Patient-centered care has become a hallmark of modern rheumatology. The incorporation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and shared decision- making between patients and healthcare providers ensures that treatment plans align with individual preferences and priorities [29,30]. By placing patients at the center of care, this approach seeks to enhance both treatment adherence and patient satisfaction. The COVID-19 pandemic has expedited the adoption of telemedicine and digital health tools in rheumatology. Remote consultations and digital monitoring platforms have improved access to care and allowed for ongoing assessment of disease activity, particularly when in-person visits were restricted. These technological advances are likely to continue reshaping the rheumatology landscape, offering patients greater convenience and flexibility in managing their conditions. Ongoing clinical trials and research studies persistently explore new treatments and therapeutic approaches for rheumatic diseases. These investigations span regenerative medicine, innovative medications, immunomodulatory treatments, and cutting-edge interventions. The overarching goal is to continually enhance patient outcomes and quality of life by staying at the forefront of scientific discovery [31,32].
Notably, researchers have embarked on investigating the role of the gut microbiome in rheumatic diseases. Emerging evidence suggests a potential link between gut bacteria and immune system dysregulation, particularly in conditions like RA and spondyloarthritis. This line of research opens new avenues for treatment and implies that modulating the gut microbiome may hold promise in managing these conditions. Breakthroughs in rheumatic disease research have ushered in a new era of understanding, treatment, and patient care. From genetics and biologics to precision medicine and patient-centered approaches, these advancements are transforming the landscape of rheumatology. With ongoing studies and continued innovation, the future promises even more effective treatments and improved quality of life for individuals living with rheumatic diseases [33,34].
2.3 Precision medicine in rheumatic disease
Precision medicine has emerged as a transformative paradigm within the realm of rheumatology, poised to fundamentally alter how we diagnose, treat, and manage rheumatic diseases. Departing from the conventional one-size-fits-all approach, precision medicine tailors medical care to the distinct genetic, molecular, and immunological characteristics of each individual patient [35,36]. A pivotal component of precision medicine in rheumatic diseases revolves around genetic analysis. Researchers have pinpointed specific genetic markers linked to various rheumatic conditions, including RA and systemic lupus erythematosus. These markers encompass variants within the HLA gene, among others. Through the scrutiny of a patient’s genetic composition, healthcare professionals can assess their susceptibility to specific rheumatic diseases. This early risk evaluation facilitates proactive monitoring and intervention, potentially averting the onset or progression of the condition. Furthermore, genetic profiling unveils a deeper understanding of disease mechanisms by spotlighting the genetic pathways and immune system components that deviate from the norm in rheumatic diseases. This knowledge not only enhances our comprehension of these intricate conditions but also pinpoints potential intervention targets [37,38].
The practical application of precision medicine in rheumatology is perhaps most conspicuous in treatment decisions. Physicians can leverage genetic and molecular insights to select the most suitable medications and therapies for individual patients. For instance, certain biologic drugs, such as TNF inhibitors or IL-6 inhibitors, may exhibit enhanced efficacy for patients with specific genetic profiles. This tailored approach mitigates the trial-and-error process often associated with rheumatic disease treatment, diminishing the risk of adverse effects while optimizing therapeutic outcomes [39]. Beyond genetic markers, precision medicine encompasses a wider spectrum of biomarkers encompassing proteins, immune system molecules, and indicators of inflammation or tissue damage. By continually monitoring these biomarkers, clinicians can gauge disease activity and calibrate treatment plans accordingly. Elevated levels of specific inflammatory markers, for instance, may indicate a RA flare, prompting modifications in medication dosages or therapies [40].
In addition, precision medicine underscores the importance of PROs and collaborative decision-making. Patient perspectives, preferences, and quality of life hold integral roles in shaping treatment strategies. This collaborative approach ensures active patient involvement in their care, with their distinct needs and priorities taken into account. The advent of telemedicine and digital health tools has facilitated the implementation of precision medicine in rheumatology. Remote consultations, coupled with digital monitoring platforms, enable the ongoing assessment of disease activity and treatment responses [41]. Patients can conveniently report their symptoms and well-being, while healthcare providers can remotely adjust treatment plans based on real-time data. However, precision medicine in rheumatology extends beyond genetics and biomarkers to encompass lifestyle factors. Diet, exercise, and weight management play pivotal roles in managing conditions like osteoarthritis and gout. By considering an individual’s dietary habits, physical activity level, and overall health, precision medicine can provide personalized lifestyle recommendations that complement medical treatments and improve outcomes [42]. Precision medicine has emerged as a groundbreaking approach in the care of rheumatic diseases. It harnesses the power of genetics, molecular biology, and patient engagement to provide personalized and optimized treatment strategies. This approach holds the promise of improved disease management, reduced treatment-related adverse effects, and an elevated quality of life for individuals living with rheumatic diseases. As research in this field continues to advance, the future of rheumatology becomes increasingly patient-centered and tailored to the unique needs of each individual [43].
2.4 Combination therapies
Combination therapies have surfaced as a promising tactic in the management of various rheumatic diseases, presenting a multifaceted approach to symptom control and the prevention of disease advancement. This innovative strategy involves the utilization of multiple medications, each with complementary mechanisms of action, to attain improved disease management. It is particularly beneficial for patients who do not respond satisfactorily to a single medication. In the context of rheumatic conditions such as RA and psoriatic arthritis, combination therapies often entail the integration of traditional DMARDs with biologic medications or targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) [3,43,44]. For instance, a common combination therapy for RA involves pairing methotrexate, a traditional DMARD with immune-modulating properties, with a biologic DMARD like a TNF inhibitor or an IL-6 inhibitor. This dual approach can provide enhanced disease control and potentially slow the progression of joint damage. It is especially advantageous for individuals with moderate to severe RA who do not achieve adequate relief from symptoms with methotrexate alone. The rationale behind employing combination therapies in rheumatic diseases is to concurrently target multiple pathways implicated in inflammation and immune dysregulation [45]. Traditional DMARDs like methotrexate work to suppress the immune response, while biologics or tsDMARDs focus on specific inflammatory molecules such as TNF or IL-6. This two-pronged strategy addresses the intricate nature of autoimmune rheumatic diseases, offering a more comprehensive means of controlling disease activity. Furthermore, combination therapies can help reduce the risk of developing drug resistance, a phenomenon where the body becomes less responsive to a single medication over time. By utilizing multiple medications with distinct mechanisms of action, healthcare providers can mitigate this risk and sustain treatment effectiveness over the long term [46].
Another advantage of combination therapies is the potential to reduce the dosage of individual medications. Lowering dosages can help minimize the risk of adverse effects associated with certain drugs, such as methotrexate, which can lead to side effects like liver toxicity or gastrointestinal disturbances. Through the combination of medications, clinicians may achieve the desired therapeutic effect with lower individual drug doses. While combination therapies offer significant promise, they demand careful monitoring and personalized treatment plans.
Regular evaluations of disease activity, side effects, and treatment responses are essential for optimizing the regimen for each patient [47]. Adjustments may be necessary to strike the right balance between controlling the disease and minimizing side effects. However, it is important to note that not all rheumatic disease patients require combination therapies. The treatment approach should be tailored to the individual’s specific disease, its severity, and their response to medications. Some individuals with milder forms of rheumatic diseases may achieve satisfactory symptom control with a single medication. Combination therapies have emerged as a valuable strategy in the management of rheumatic diseases, offering enhanced disease control and the potential to slow disease progression. By combining traditional DMARDs with biologics or tsDMARDs, clinicians can address the intricate immune dysregulation seen in these conditions [48]. While combination therapies hold great promise, they require vigilant monitoring and customization to meet each patient’s unique needs. The ultimate goal is to achieve optimal disease control while minimizing the risk of side effects, ultimately enhancing the quality of life for individuals living with rheumatic diseases [49].
2.5 Common treatments for rheumatic diseases
Type of treatment | Description | References |
---|---|---|
Medications | NSAIDs | [5,6] |
Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) | [14,15,16,17] | |
Biologic response modifiers | [22] | |
Corticosteroids | [25] | |
Physical therapy | Exercises to improve joint flexibility, strength, and range of motion | [55] |
Heat and cold therapy to reduce pain and inflammation | [56] | |
Occupational therapy to help with daily tasks and joint protection | [55] | |
Assistive devices such as braces, splints, or canes for support and mobility | [55] | |
Lifestyle changes | Weight management to reduce stress on joints | [32] |
Regular exercise to maintain joint function and overall health | [32,33] | |
Stress management techniques to cope with the emotional impact of chronic illness | [33] | |
Surgery | Joint replacement surgery for severely damaged joints | [49,50,51,52] |
Synovectomy to remove inflamed synovium | [54] | |
Tendon repair or reconstruction for damaged tendons | [55] | |
Arthroscopic surgery to remove damaged tissue or debris from the joint space | [54,56] | |
Complementary therapy | Acupuncture to help reduce pain and improve joint function | [34] |
Massage therapy to relax muscles and improve circulation | [35] | |
Dietary supplements such as omega-3 fatty acids, glucosamine, and chondroitin sulfate | [37] |
2.6 Beyond medication: Holistic care
In addition to pharmaceutical treatments, holistic care has gained recognition as a valuable and complementary approach in the management of rheumatic diseases. This holistic perspective encompasses not only the medical aspects of the condition but also considers the patient’s overall well-being, including their physical, emotional, and lifestyle factors [50]. In this context, we will explore how holistic care can have a significant impact on improving the quality of life for individuals living with rheumatic diseases.
2.6.1 Diet and nutrition
Holistic care starts by taking dietary factors into account. In conditions like gout, modifications to one’s diet can have a substantial influence on disease management. For example, reducing the intake of foods rich in purines, such as red meat and seafood, can be effective in preventing gout attacks. Similarly, individuals with rheumatic diseases may find benefits in adopting an anti-inflammatory diet that includes a variety of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and healthy fats. Nutritional counseling plays a crucial role in guiding patients toward dietary choices that complement their treatment plans [51,52].
2.6.2 Physical activity and exercise
Physical activity forms a fundamental component of holistic care. Regular exercise can help enhance joint flexibility, alleviate stiffness, and strengthen muscles, all of which are essential for managing conditions like osteoarthritis. Physical therapists design tailored exercise programs that ensure safety and effectiveness for each patient. In addition, activities such as yoga and tai chi can promote relaxation, reduce stress, and contribute to overall well-being [53].
2.6.3 Weight management
Maintaining a healthy weight is particularly important for individuals with rheumatic diseases because excess weight places additional stress on the joints. Holistic care places a strong emphasis on weight management through a combination of dietary adjustments and regular physical activity. Achieving and sustaining a healthy weight can alleviate pain and reduce the risk of joint damage [17].
2.6.4 Pain management
Holistic pain management strategies extend beyond medication and encompass various techniques, including physical therapy, hot and cold therapy, and mindfulness-based practices. These approaches are aimed at reducing pain, improving joint function, and enhancing overall comfort. For example, the application of heat packs or cold packs can provide pain relief and reduce muscle stiffness [54].
2.6.5 Mind–body practices
Stress management is a significant component of holistic care. Chronic stress can exacerbate the symptoms of rheumatic diseases and impact overall health. Mind–body practices such as meditation, deep breathing exercises, and progressive muscle relaxation offer effective ways for individuals to cope with stress and enhance their emotional well-being [55].
2.6.6 Sleep hygiene
Quality sleep is crucial for healing and symptom management. Holistic care promotes good sleep hygiene practices, including maintaining a consistent sleep schedule, creating a comfortable sleep environment, and avoiding stimulants before bedtime. Sufficient sleep supports the body’s natural healing processes and helps reduce fatigue [56].
2.6.7 Patient education and support
Holistic care places a strong emphasis on patient education. Having a comprehensive understanding of the nature of the disease, potential complications, and self-care strategies empowers patients to take an active role in their treatment. Support groups and online communities provide valuable emotional support and opportunities for individuals to connect with others facing similar challenges [57,58].
2.6.8 Complementary therapies
Holistic care may incorporate complementary therapies such as acupuncture, massage therapy, and herbal supplements. While these therapies should be used with caution and under the guidance of healthcare professionals, some individuals find them beneficial in managing pain and improving their overall sense of well-being [59].
2.6.9 Occupational therapy
Occupational therapists play a vital role in helping individuals adapt to their conditions and optimize their daily functioning. They provide guidance on strategies and the use of assistive devices that can make daily tasks more manageable. Occupational therapy aims to enhance independence and improve the quality of life for patients [60].
2.6.10 Spiritual and psychological support
Holistic care recognizes the importance of addressing the psychological and spiritual aspects of living with a chronic condition. Spiritual support and counseling can provide individuals with a sense of purpose and emotional resilience, helping them cope with the challenges posed by rheumatic diseases [61].
Holistic care goes beyond the use of medications to address the comprehensive well-being of individuals living with rheumatic diseases. By taking into account dietary factors, physical activity, weight management, pain relief strategies, stress management, sleep hygiene, patient education, complementary therapies, occupational therapy, and psychological support, holistic care aims to enhance the overall quality of life for patients. This patient-centered approach acknowledges that the management of rheumatic diseases involves not only treating the symptoms but also promoting physical and emotional well-being, fostering independence, and improving the overall quality of life [62,63].
3 Discussion
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by persistent inflammation of the joints. It significantly affects the quality of life due to its progressive nature and the potential for severe joint damage and disability. The pathogenesis of RA involves complex cellular and molecular mechanisms, influenced by genetic and environmental factors. RA is divided into two major subtypes based on the presence or absence of anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs). Citrullination, catalyzed by peptidyl-arginine deiminase (PAD), converts a positively charged arginine into a neutral citrulline. ACPAs, detectable in approximately 67% of RA patients, are crucial for early diagnosis and predicting disease progression [64,65]. The ACPA-positive subset exhibits a more aggressive clinical phenotype compared to the ACPA-negative subset, with distinct genetic associations and immune responses to citrullinated antigens. ACPA-negative RA patients show less effective treatment responses to methotrexate (MTX) and rituximab, highlighting the need for further study on the pathophysiological differences between these subsets. In the triggering stage of RA, ACPA production is influenced by genetic and environmental factors. The presence of specific HLA-DR genes, particularly HLA-DR1 and HLA-DR4, is the strongest genetic risk factor. These genes, known as “shared epitopes” (SEs), promote ACPA production and influence RA outcomes [64,66]. In addition, polymorphisms in the protein tyrosine phosphatase nonreceptor type 22 (PTPN22) gene are associated with ACPA-positive RA across various ethnicities. Environmental factors, such as smoking, silica dust, and infections, can also trigger ACPA production. For instance, the periodontal pathogen Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans can induce neutrophil hypercitrullination, leading to ACPA production. Similarly, the respiratory pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis can enhance ACPA production through its PAD enzyme. During the maturation stage, ACPA levels gradually increase, reflecting a breakdown of immunological tolerance. This stage, which can last several years before joint symptoms appear, involves epitope spreading where immune responses expand to target multiple citrullinated proteins. ACPA can induce pain, bone loss, and inflammation by activating MHC class II-dependent T cells, which in turn help B cells produce more ACPA [64,67]. Notably, the presence of RA-specific autoantigens, such as N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfatase and filamin A, suggests a link between microbial immunity and autoimmune responses in the joints. The targeting stage of RA manifests in the joints with characteristic symmetrical synovitis. This stage involves the infiltration of leukocytes into the synovial compartment and the accumulation of pro-inflammatory mediators in the synovial fluid. Both the innate and adaptive immune systems are involved in these interactions. Monocytes and macrophages play central roles, with ACPA enhancing NF-κB activity and TNF-α production in these cells. In addition, α-enolase on monocyte surfaces induces pro-inflammatory mediator production. The imbalance between pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages and anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages contributes to osteoclastogenesis in ACPA-positive RA [64,68]. Moreover, mast cells, dendritic cells, and other immune cells are involved in the inflammatory cascade, with specific subsets of T and B cells sustaining chronic synovitis and supporting autoantibody production. In the fulminant stage, hyperplastic synovium, cartilage damage, bone erosion, and systemic consequences become apparent. The hyperplastic synovium results from the abnormal proliferation of fibroblast-like synoviocytes, which produce inflammatory cytokines and proteinases that perpetuate joint destruction [64,69]. Cartilage damage is mediated by matrix metalloproteinases and other enzymes that degrade the collagenous cartilage matrix. Bone erosion, a hallmark of RA, results from the induction of osteoclasts and the suppression of osteoblasts. Inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-17 promote osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption, while ACPA binding to osteoclast precursors further induces osteoclastogenesis. Systemic consequences of RA include an elevated risk of cardiovascular events, cognitive dysfunction, inflammatory lung disease, secondary Sjogren’s syndrome, sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and an increased risk of certain cancers. These systemic effects are driven by chronic inflammation and abnormal immune responses, highlighting the need for comprehensive management of RA to address both joint and systemic manifestations [64,70].
Insights into the pathogenesis of arthrofibrosis, a condition often seen in chronic inflammatory diseases like RA, reveal that fibrosis results from a dysregulation of the immune system. The process starts with injury-induced oxidative stress and inflammation, leading to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and TGF-β, which increase mast cells, macrophages, and lymphocytes that promote fibroblast proliferation and reduced vascularization. A lack of apoptosis and autophagy in fibrotic tissues contributes to this condition. Reduced autophagy results in defective mitochondria and oxidative stress, while immune cell signaling increases reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, causing further immune dysregulation [71,72]. Fibrosis severity often does not correlate with inflammation levels, as low-level, persistent inflammation can also cause fibrosis. Pro-fibrotic cytokines create an imbalance between ECM production and degradation, leading to excessive matrix protein deposition, primarily collagen type I, which impairs tissue flexibility. Fibrotic ECM has extensive cross-linking, making it hard to degrade. Hydroxyallysine cross-linking particularly leads to irreversible collagen accumulation and affects cell signaling and ECM synthesis. Major cell types and cytokines involved in fibrosis include myofibroblasts, macrophages, mast cells, T cells, and inflammasomes [71,73]. Myofibroblasts are key effector cells in fibrosis, derived from fibroblasts and other cells in response to inflammatory cytokines like TGF-β, IL-1β, and IL-6. Macrophages, activated by TGF-β, secrete pro-fibrotic mediators and play crucial roles in initiating, maintaining, and resolving fibrosis. Mast cells maintain inflammation and contribute to fibrosis by producing cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-17, and TGF-β. Th2 cells promote fibrosis by increasing ECM production, whereas Th1 cells typically suppress it. Th17 cells secrete IL-17, which activates immune cells to produce inflammatory cytokines, contributing to fibrosis. Inflammasomes, intracellular protein complexes that activate inflammatory cytokines like IL-1β and IL-18, play a central role in organ fibrosis by upregulating α-SMA and collagen type I [71,74]. Key cytokines in fibrosis include TGF-β, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17. TGF-β activates myofibroblasts, inhibits collagen degradation, and increases ECM synthesis. IL-1β influences cell migration, adhesion, and immune-modulatory gene expression. IL-6 is associated with lung injury and fibrosis initiation, increasing TGF-β receptor expression. TNF-α upregulates TGF-β production and receptor expression, promoting fibroblast growth and collagen expression. IL-17 promotes TGF-β and inflammatory cytokine production, disrupting ECM homeostasis. Additional pro- and anti-fibrogenic mediators include NF-κB, the AMPK pathway, specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators (SPMs), NSAIDs, and hypoxia. NF-κB regulates genes involved in inflammation and fibrosis [71,75]. The AMPK pathway inhibits fibrosis by regulating macrophages and limiting ROS production. SPMs actively resolve inflammation and fibrosis, reducing inflammatory cytokines and neutrophil migration. NSAIDs inhibit COX-2 and SPM production, potentially prolonging inflammation and promoting fibrosis. Hypoxia contributes to fibrosis by promoting a pro-fibrotic environment. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms of RA and fibrosis is crucial for developing targeted therapies that can effectively manage and potentially halt the progression of these debilitating conditions [71,76,77,78,79].
4 Conclusion
The field of rheumatic disease treatment has undergone a remarkable transformation, with significant advancements in research, precision medicine, and holistic patient care. This journey has expanded the options available to individuals dealing with rheumatic diseases, offering them a wider range of personalized and effective treatments that ultimately enhance their quality of life. However, it is important to recognize that this field continues to evolve, emphasizing the ongoing need for dedicated research, innovative strategies, and collaborative efforts involving healthcare professionals, researchers, and patients themselves. This continuous progress instills hope in the lives of those grappling with the intricacies of these complex conditions. Looking ahead, the landscape of rheumatic disease treatment holds the promise of further breakthroughs that have the potential to profoundly impact the lives and futures of individuals managing the challenges posed by these formidable health conditions.
Acknowledgments
The authors are sincerely grateful to the authors whose unwavering review articles and invaluable contributions played a pivotal role in successfully completing this review article.
-
Funding information: Authors state no funding involved.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and consented to its submission to the journal, reviewed all the results and approved the final version of the manuscript. SUR provided conceptualization and methodology, VSC helped in formal analysis and project administration, MAD provided data curation, MM contributed in proof reading and meticulous review, ZQ contributed in final editing, overall supervision, and final submission, and AQ contributed in validation and technical support.
-
Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
[1] Littlejohn EA, Monrad SU. Early diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Prim Care. 2018;45:237–55. 10.1016/j.pop.2018.02.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[2] Cush JJ. Rheumatoid arthritis: early diagnosis and treatment. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2022;48:537–47. 10.1016/j.rdc.2022.02.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] Galvez-Sánchez CM, de la Coba P, Colmenero JM, Reyes Del Paso GA, Duschek S. Attentional function in fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0246128. 10.1371/journal.pone.0246128.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[4] Rose J. Autoimmune connective tissue diseases: systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2022;40:179–91. 10.1016/j.emc.2021.09.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[5] Coates LC, FitzGerald O, Helliwell PS, Paul C. Psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis: is all inflammation the same? Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;46:291–304. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.05.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Carmona L, Wolfe F, Vos T, et al. The global burden of rheumatoid arthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:1316–22. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204627.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] Roodenrijs NMT, van der Goes MC, Welsing P, Tekstra J, Lafeber F, Jacobs J, et al. Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: contributing factors and burden of disease. Rheumatology. 2021;60:3778–88. 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa860.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] Kvien TK. Epidemiology and burden of illness of rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22:1–12. 10.2165/00019053-200422001- 00002.Search in Google Scholar
[9] Kobelt G, Jönsson B. The burden of rheumatoid arthritis and access to treatment: outcome and cost-utility of treatments. Eur J Health Econ. 2008;8:95–106. 10.1007/s10198-007-0091-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Kitas GD, Gabriel SE. Cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis: state of the art and future perspectives. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:8–14. 10.1136/ard.2010.142133.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Sokka T, Kautiainen H, Pincus T, Verstappen SM, Aggarwal A, Alten R, et al. Work disability remains a major problem in rheumatoid arthritis in the 2000s: data from 32 countries in the QUEST-RA study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:R42. 10.1186/ar2951.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[12] Hu H, Luan L, Yang K, Li SC. Burden of rheumatoid arthritis from a societal perspective: a prevalence-based study on cost of this illness for patients in China. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018;21:1572–80. 10.1111/1756-185X.13028.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] Galloway J, Capron JP, De Leonardis F, Fakhouri W, Rose A, Kouris I, et al. The impact of disease severity and duration on cost, early retirement and ability to work in rheumatoid arthritis in Europe: an economic modelling study. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2020;4:rkaa041. 10.1093/rap/rkaa041.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[14] Xavier RM, Zerbini C, Pollak DF, Morales-Torres J, Chalem P, Restrepo J, et al. Burden of rheumatoid arthritis on patients’ work productivity and quality of life. Adv Rheumatol. 2019;59:47. 10.1186/s42358-019-0090-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] Langley PC, Mu R, Wu M, Dong P, Tang B. The impact of rheumatoid arthritis on the burden of disease in urban China. J Med Econ. 2011;14:709–19. 10.3111/13696998.2011.611201.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[16] Zhang W, Anis AH. The economic burden of rheumatoid arthritis: beyond health care costs. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30:S25–32. 10.1007/s10067-010-1637-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[17] Gregersen PK, Silver J, Winchester RJ. The shared epitope hypothesis. An approach to understanding the molecular genetics of susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1987;30:1205–13. 10.1002/art.1780301102.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[18] Wysocki T, Olesińska M, Paradowska-Gorycka A. Current understanding of an emerging role of HLA-DRB1 gene in rheumatoid arthritis-from research to clinical practice. Cells. 2020;9:1127. 10.3390/cells9051127.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[19] Abbasifard M, Imani D, Bagheri-Hosseinabadi Z. PTPN22 gene polymorphism and susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis (RA): Updated systematic review and meta- analysis. J Gene Med. 2020;22:e3204. 10.1002/jgm.3204.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] Perdigones N, Vigo AG, Lamas JR, Martínez A, Balsa A, Pascual-Salcedo D, et al. Evidence of epistasis between TNFRSF14 and TNFRSF6B polymorphisms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:705–10. 10.1002/art.27292.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] Raychaudhuri S, Sandor C, Stahl EA, Freudenberg J, Lee HS, Jia X, et al. Five amino acids in three HLA proteins explain most of the association between MHC and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Genet. 2012;44:291–6. 10.1038/ng.1076.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[22] Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. Association of MHC and rheumatoid arthritis. HLA polymorphisms in phenotypic variants of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. 2000;2:212–6. 10.1186/ar90.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[23] Kerlan-Candon S, Combe B, Vincent R, Clot J, Pinet V, Eliaou JF. HLA-DRB1 gene transcripts in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2001;124:142–9. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2001.01498.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[24] Kapitány A, Zilahi E, Szántó S, Szücs G, Szabó Z, Végvári A, et al. Association of rheumatoid arthritis with HLA-DR1 and HLA-DR4 in hungary. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1051:263–70. 10.1196/annals.1361.067.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[25] Becart S, Whittington KB, Prislovsky A, Rao NL, Rosloniec EF. The role of posttranslational modifications in generating neo-epitopes that bind to rheumatoid arthritis-associated HLA-DR alleles and promote autoimmune T cell responses. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0245541. 10.1371/journal.pone.0245541.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[26] Auger I, Roudier J. HLA-DR and the development of rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmunity. 1997;26:123–8. 10.3109/08916939709003856.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[27] van der Helm‐van Mil AH, Huizinga TW, Schreuder GM, Breedveld FC, de Vries RR, Toes RE. An independent role of protective HLA class II alleles in rheumatoid arthritis severity and susceptibility. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:2637–44. 10.1002/art.21272.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[28] Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. HLA polymorphisms and T cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Int Rev Immunol. 1999;18:37–59. 10.3109/08830189909043018.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[29] McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2205–19. 10.1056/NEJMra1004965.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[30] Klein K, Gay S. Epigenetics in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015;27:76–82. 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000128.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[31] Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Barton A, Burmester GR, Emery P, Firestein GS, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2018;4:18001. 10.1038/nrdp.2018.1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[32] Turesson C, O'Fallon WM, Crowson CS, Gabriel SE, Matteson EL. Extra-articular disease manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis: incidence trends and risk factors over 46 years. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:722–7. 10.1136/ard.62.8.722.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[33] Conforti A, Di Cola I, Pavlych V, Ruscitti P, Berardicurti O, Ursini F, et al. Beyond the joints, the extra-articular manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2021;20:102735. 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102735.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[34] Grassi W, De Angelis R, Lamanna G, Cervini C. The clinical features of rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27:S18–24. 10.1016/S0720-048X(98)00038-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[35] Sharif K, Sharif A, Jumah F, Oskouian R, Tubbs RS. Rheumatoid arthritis in review: Clinical, anatomical, cellular and molecular points of view. Clin Anat. 2018;31:216–23. 10.1002/ca.22980.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[36] Jevtic V, Lingg G. Differential diagnosis of rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis at an early stage in the small hand and foot joints using magnetic resonance imaging. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2012;44:163–70. 10.1055/s-0032-1321760.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[37] Meng XH, Wang Z, Zhang XN, Xu J, Hu YC. Rheumatoid arthritis of knee joints: MRI-pathological correlation. Orthop Surg. 2018;10:247–54. 10.1111/os.12389.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[38] Imagama T, Tokushige A, Seki K, Taguchi T. Weight bearing joints destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2017;13:37–42. 10.2174/1573397112666160331142548.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[39] Chen AL, Joseph TN, Zuckerman JD. Rheumatoid arthritis of the shoulder. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11:12–24. 10.5435/00124635-200301000-00004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[40] Mok CC. Morning stiffness in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis: what is known about the effect of biological and targeted agents. Drugs Aging. 2018;35:477–83. 10.1007/s40266-018-0548-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[41] Boeth H, Biesen R, Hollnagel J, Herrmann S, Ehrig RM, Pelli L, et al. Quantification of morning stiffness to assess disease activity and treatment effects in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2021;60:5282–91. 10.1093/rheumatology/keab323.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[42] Orange DE, Blachere NE, DiCarlo EF, Mirza S, Pannellini T, Jiang CS, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis morning stiffness is associated with synovial fibrin and neutrophils. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72:557–64. 10.1002/art.41141.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[43] Jain S, Mishra D, Dhir V. Determinants of morning stiffness in rheumatoid arthritis: comment on the Article by Orange et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73:174–5. 10.1002/art.41459.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[44] Suresh E. Diagnosis of early rheumatoid arthritis: what the non-specialist needs to know. J R Soc Med. 2004;97:421–4. 10.1177/014107680409700903.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[45] Schaible HG. Nociceptive neurons detect cytokines in arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16:470. 10.1186/s13075-014-0470-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[46] Dave MH, Mason LW, Hariharan K. Forefoot deformity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of shod and unshod populations. Foot Ankle Spec. 2015;8:378–83. 10.1177/1938640015583513.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[47] Smith GC, Amirfeyz R. The flexible swan neck deformity in rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:1405–7. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.01.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[48] Louwerens JW, Schrier JC. Rheumatoid forefoot deformity: pathophysiology, evaluation and operative treatment options. Int Orthop. 2013;37:1719–29. 10.1007/s00264-013-2014-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[49] Adami G, Fassio A, Rossini M, Caimmi C, Giollo A, Orsolini G, et al. Osteoporosis in rheumatic diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:5867. 10.3390/ijms20235867.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[50] Wysham KD, Baker JF, Shoback DM. Osteoporosis and fractures in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2021;33:270–6. 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000789.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[51] Liao KP. Cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2017;27:136–40. 10.1016/j.tcm.2016.07.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[52] England BR, Thiele GM, Anderson DR, Mikuls TR. Increased cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanisms and implications. BMJ. 2018;361:k1036. 10.1136/bmj.k1036.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[53] Meyer PW, Anderson R, Ker JA, Ally MT. Rheumatoid arthritis and risk of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2018;29:317–21. 10.5830/CVJA-2018-018.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[54] Kapoor T, Bathon J. Renal manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2018;44:571–84. 10.1016/j.rdc.2018.06.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[55] Tilstra JS, Lienesch DW. Rheumatoid nodules. Dermatol Clin. 2015;33:361–71. 10.1016/j.det.2015.03.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[56] Böcher W, Galle PR, Märker-Hermann E. Skin nodules and ulcers of the limbs in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2002;127:735–8. 10.1055/s-2002-24401.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[57] Kadura S, Raghu G. Rheumatoid arthritis-interstitial lung disease: manifestations and current concepts in pathogenesis and management. Eur Respir Rev. 2021;30:210011. 10.1183/16000617.0011-2021.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[58] Dai Y, Wang W, Yu Y, Hu S. Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: an overview of epidemiology, pathogenesis and management. Clin Rheumatol. 2021;40:1211–20. 10.1007/s10067-020-05320-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[59] Reynisdottir G, Olsen H, Joshua V, Engström M, Forsslund H, Karimi R, et al. Signs of immune activation and local inflammation are present in the bronchial tissue of patients with untreated early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:1722–7. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208216.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[60] Nielen MM, van Schaardenburg D, Reesink HW, van de Stadt RJ, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, de Koning MH, et al. Specific autoantibodies precede the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis: a study of serial measurements in blood donors. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:380–6. 10.1002/art.20018.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[61] Petrovská N, Prajzlerová K, Vencovský J, Šenolt L, Filková M. The pre-clinical phase of rheumatoid arthritis: from risk factors to prevention of arthritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2021;20:102797. 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102797.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[62] Molendijk M, Hazes JM, Lubberts E. From patients with arthralgia, pre-RA and recently diagnosed RA: what is the current status of understanding RA pathogenesis? RMD Open. 2018;4:e000256. 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000256.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[63] Paul BJ, Kandy HI, Krishnan V. Pre-rheumatoid arthritis and its prevention. Eur J Rheumatol. 2017;4:161–5. 10.5152/eurjrheum.2017.16006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[64] Guo Q, Wang Y, Xu D, Nossent J, Pavlos NJ, Xu J. Rheumatoid arthritis: pathological mechanisms and modern pharmacologic therapies. Bone Res. 2018 Apr;6:15. 10.1038/s41413-018-0016-9. PMID: 29736302; PMCID: PMC5920070.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[65] McCallion A, Sisnett DJ, Zutautas KB, Hayati D, Spiess KG, Aleksieva S, et al. Endometriosis through an immunological lens: a pathophysiology based in immune dysregulation. Exploration Immunology. 2022 Jul;2(4):454–83.10.37349/ei.2022.00062Search in Google Scholar
[66] Orsini F, Crotti C, Cincinelli G, Di Taranto R, Amati A, Ferrito M, et al. Bone involvement in rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloartritis: an updated review. Biology. 2023 Oct;12(10):1320.10.3390/biology12101320Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[67] Reddy V, Dahal LN, Cragg MS, Leandro M. Optimising B-cell depletion in autoimmune disease: is obinutuzumab the answer? Drug discovery Today. 2016 Aug;21(8):1330–8.10.1016/j.drudis.2016.06.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[68] Kondo N, Kuroda T, Kobayashi D. Cytokine networks in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Oct;22(20):10922.10.3390/ijms222010922Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[69] Jang S, Kwon EJ, Lee JJ. Rheumatoid arthritis: pathogenic roles of diverse immune cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jan;23(2):905.10.3390/ijms23020905Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[70] Kelmenson LB, Wagner BD, McNair BK, Frazer-Abel A, Demoruelle MK, Bergstedt DT, et al. Timing of elevations of autoantibody isotypes prior to diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72:251–61.10.1002/art.41091Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[71] Usher KM, Zhu S, Mavropalias G, Carrino JA, Zhao J, Xu J. Pathological mechanisms and therapeutic outlooks for arthrofibrosis. Bone Res. 2019 Mar;7:9. 10.1038/s41413-019-0047-x. PMID: 30937213; PMCID: PMC6433953.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[72] Hafkenscheid L, de Moel E, Smolik I, Tanner S, Meng X, Jansen BC, et al. N-linked glycans in the variable domain of IgG anti–citrullinated protein antibodies predict the development of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:1626–33.10.1002/art.40920Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[73] Grellner W, Georg T, Wilske J. Quantitative analysis of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) in human skin wounds. Forensic Sci Int. 2000;113:251–64.10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00218-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[74] Liu RM, Gaston Pravia KA. Oxidative stress and glutathione in TGF-betamediated fibrogenesis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;48:1–15.10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.09.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[75] Chaudhary K, Madaio MP. Amino acid limitation stress response in inflammation. Transl Cancer Res. 2016;5:220–2.10.21037/tcr.2016.06.27Search in Google Scholar
[76] Kendall RT, Feghali-Bostwick CA. Fibroblasts in fibrosis: novel roles and mediators. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:1–13.10.3389/fphar.2014.00123Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[77] Ricard-Blum S, Baffet G, Theret N. Molecular and tissue alterations of collagens in fibrosis. Matrix Biol. 2018;68–69:122–49.10.1016/j.matbio.2018.02.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[78] van der Slot AJ, Zuurmond AM, van den Bogaerdt AJ, Ulrich MM, Middelkoop E, Boers W, et al. Increased formation of pyridinoline cross-links due to higher telopeptide lysyl hydroxylase levels is a general fibrotic phenomenon. Matrix Biol. 2004;23:251–7.10.1016/j.matbio.2004.06.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[79] Wu J, Chitapanarux T, Chen Y, Soon Jr RK, Yee Jr HF. Intestinal myofibroblasts produce nitric oxide in response to combinatorial cytokine stimulation. J Cell Physiol. 2013;228:572–80.10.1002/jcp.24164Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Research Articles
- Predictors of diagnosed cardiovascular diseases and their spatial heterogeneity in Lagos State, Nigeria
- Discourses of risk in public health advertising about underage alcohol consumption
- Utilization of health service and associated factors among women in childbearing age in selected internally displaced persons camps, Hargeisa – Somaliland
- Healthcare workers’ attitudes toward children getting Covid-19 vaccinations in Gaza Strip
- Regional prevalence and spatial modeling of hypertension in South Africa
- Immediate effect of mud pack on resting cardiovascular parameters in hypertensive individuals – A single-arm pilot study
- An analysis of medical scheme-related pregnancy terminations in South Africa in 2022
- Immediate effect of Kaki Mudra on pupillary light reflex among healthy individuals – A study protocol of a Randomized control trial
- Healthy lifestyle perceptions and practices among college students at Yanbu University College for Women in Saudi Arabia
- Food service management perspectives on reducing sodium content in foods served: Opportunities and challenges
- Effects of sanitation on child growth in Serbian Roma communities
- College students’ resilience-promoting behaviors and psychological well-being: A latent class analysis
- Comparative analysis of household deprivation among Jewish and other religious groups in England and Wales
- A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial on the effect of Surya Nadi Pranayama practice on cognitive abilities in school children
- Determinants of health insurance adoption among residents of Lagos, Nigeria: A cross-sectional survey
- Enhancing geographical access to cardiovascular disease healthcare services in Lagos State, Nigeria
- Mortality trends from all causes and diabetes mellitus according to sex between 1998 and 2021
- Developing syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion in Guillain-Barre syndrome
- Health professionals’ continuing education attitudes and experiences in food and nutrition sustainability
- Nutrition literacy among women participating in a community kitchen program in Antioquia, Colombia: A cross-sectional study
- Review Articles
- Unraveling PCOS: Exploring its causes and diagnostic challenges
- Smart healthcare: Integration of AI and brain cells for advanced healthcare applications
- Disrupting the melody: The interplay of obesity and metabolic dysfunction
- Comparing global trends in gastric cancer and the need for national screening programs: An in-depth literature review
- Social media – Boon or Bane?
- Advancing rheumatic disease treatment: A journey towards better lives
- Antimicrobial resistance: A significant public health issue of both human and veterinary concern
- Psychological flexibility and celiac disease in adolescents: Understanding adherence and well-being for enhanced care. A rapid narrative review
- Harnessing real-world evidence in pharmacoeconomics: A comprehensive review
- Commentary
- Mixed messages, broken trust, avoidable deaths: A critical appraisal of the UK government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic
- The psychological profile of Iraq: A nation haunted by decades of suffering
- Metabolic mysteries of the mind: Investigating type 3 diabetes
- Ready to bleed when touched – Moral Injury in the Special Operations Forces military population
- Towards robust pharmacovigilance surveillance systems
- Short Communications
- From click to calories: Navigating the impact of food delivery apps on obesity
- Long-term economic outlook for Japan, as impacted by COVID-19
- Special Issue on Public Health Resilience - Part II
- Reframing the response to the opioid crisis: The critical role of resilience in public health
Articles in the same Issue
- Research Articles
- Predictors of diagnosed cardiovascular diseases and their spatial heterogeneity in Lagos State, Nigeria
- Discourses of risk in public health advertising about underage alcohol consumption
- Utilization of health service and associated factors among women in childbearing age in selected internally displaced persons camps, Hargeisa – Somaliland
- Healthcare workers’ attitudes toward children getting Covid-19 vaccinations in Gaza Strip
- Regional prevalence and spatial modeling of hypertension in South Africa
- Immediate effect of mud pack on resting cardiovascular parameters in hypertensive individuals – A single-arm pilot study
- An analysis of medical scheme-related pregnancy terminations in South Africa in 2022
- Immediate effect of Kaki Mudra on pupillary light reflex among healthy individuals – A study protocol of a Randomized control trial
- Healthy lifestyle perceptions and practices among college students at Yanbu University College for Women in Saudi Arabia
- Food service management perspectives on reducing sodium content in foods served: Opportunities and challenges
- Effects of sanitation on child growth in Serbian Roma communities
- College students’ resilience-promoting behaviors and psychological well-being: A latent class analysis
- Comparative analysis of household deprivation among Jewish and other religious groups in England and Wales
- A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial on the effect of Surya Nadi Pranayama practice on cognitive abilities in school children
- Determinants of health insurance adoption among residents of Lagos, Nigeria: A cross-sectional survey
- Enhancing geographical access to cardiovascular disease healthcare services in Lagos State, Nigeria
- Mortality trends from all causes and diabetes mellitus according to sex between 1998 and 2021
- Developing syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion in Guillain-Barre syndrome
- Health professionals’ continuing education attitudes and experiences in food and nutrition sustainability
- Nutrition literacy among women participating in a community kitchen program in Antioquia, Colombia: A cross-sectional study
- Review Articles
- Unraveling PCOS: Exploring its causes and diagnostic challenges
- Smart healthcare: Integration of AI and brain cells for advanced healthcare applications
- Disrupting the melody: The interplay of obesity and metabolic dysfunction
- Comparing global trends in gastric cancer and the need for national screening programs: An in-depth literature review
- Social media – Boon or Bane?
- Advancing rheumatic disease treatment: A journey towards better lives
- Antimicrobial resistance: A significant public health issue of both human and veterinary concern
- Psychological flexibility and celiac disease in adolescents: Understanding adherence and well-being for enhanced care. A rapid narrative review
- Harnessing real-world evidence in pharmacoeconomics: A comprehensive review
- Commentary
- Mixed messages, broken trust, avoidable deaths: A critical appraisal of the UK government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic
- The psychological profile of Iraq: A nation haunted by decades of suffering
- Metabolic mysteries of the mind: Investigating type 3 diabetes
- Ready to bleed when touched – Moral Injury in the Special Operations Forces military population
- Towards robust pharmacovigilance surveillance systems
- Short Communications
- From click to calories: Navigating the impact of food delivery apps on obesity
- Long-term economic outlook for Japan, as impacted by COVID-19
- Special Issue on Public Health Resilience - Part II
- Reframing the response to the opioid crisis: The critical role of resilience in public health